These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

how about we make it an act of aggression to actively scan a ship?

First post
Author
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#121 - 2013-10-02 13:28:59 UTC
Mole Guy wrote:
"pop, pop, pop, pop"
From: xxx x xx
Sent: 2013.10.02 13:00
To: Mole Guy,

do freighters and haulers if they carry too much.

Its ok this way, gankers already loose their ships. No more safety for high sec, **** off stupid moron.

keep it on the forums.


See that kind of message really annoys me and I'd report it for harassment. Forums is forums and should stay that way but the maturity of some can seriously be questioned with that kind of message.

It's a shame because I've had some awesome discussions with the likes of Lucas Kell, Nago and Nikk Narrel to name but a few (and they've got heated, oh have they) but they never went so far as to harrass my inbox.

Keep it on the forums folks and keep it civil Smile
Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#122 - 2013-10-02 13:35:10 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Mole Guy wrote:
"pop, pop, pop, pop"
From: xxx x xx
Sent: 2013.10.02 13:00
To: Mole Guy,

do freighters and haulers if they carry too much.

Its ok this way, gankers already loose their ships. No more safety for high sec, **** off stupid moron.

keep it on the forums.


See that kind of message really annoys me and I'd report it for harassment. Forums is forums and should stay that way but the maturity of some can seriously be questioned with that kind of message.

It's a shame because I've had some awesome discussions with the likes of Lucas Kell, Nago and Nikk Narrel to name but a few (and they've got heated, oh have they) but they never went so far as to harrass my inbox.

Keep it on the forums folks and keep it civil Smile

well, they couldnt have a heated debate...they would be coming unarmed.
i love a good debate. you bring up good points, bring out your argument, i will do the same. let me see where you stand.
lets come to an agreement thats beneficial to all. but throwing names or posting without being informed or only seeing one small side is lame.

i have apologized several times on these forums for being uninformed or making assumptions.
nikk does have some weird ideas at times, but bad azz ideas other times. but i respect folks who bring it here, put up a good debate/argument and keep it here reguardless the out come.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#123 - 2013-10-02 15:00:14 UTC
Mole Guy wrote:
nikk does have some weird ideas at times, but bad azz ideas other times.


Especially the one with Marauders replenishing ammo...I really thought he was smoking some good shizz that night but it wasn't that crazy lol.

Any way, back on topic, there's some strong feeling on this I see and it's certainly getting some good constructive comments going both for and against. Let's hope it keeps going that way and the trolling to a minimum eh.
Krissada
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#124 - 2013-10-02 15:33:29 UTC
Roime wrote:


Well suggesting ship scanning to be made an aggression is not really as much carebearing as wanting to keep it safe.

Ship scanning has only offensive purpose in the game, so yes, it should cause a suspect timer.



WOW is that way --->
Remember to biomass your characters as well.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#125 - 2013-10-02 15:38:17 UTC
Krissada wrote:
Roime wrote:


Well suggesting ship scanning to be made an aggression is not really as much carebearing as wanting to keep it safe.

Ship scanning has only offensive purpose in the game, so yes, it should cause a suspect timer.



WOW is that way --->
Remember to biomass your characters as well.


5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
Madlof Chev
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#126 - 2013-10-02 15:38:30 UTC
god damn why is this thread seven pages

people like you are literally what's killing this game
Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#127 - 2013-10-02 15:52:30 UTC
Madlof Chev wrote:
god damn why is this thread seven pages

people like you are literally what's killing this game

why, because i want to be able to engage you for being a low life, high sec ganker?
again, im not asking for concord to intervene, just allow me to shoot u for scanning me.

dig through my truck, you will meet st peter or whom ever you believe in.

look through my ship, and i wanna know so i can put u in the grave.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#128 - 2013-10-02 16:22:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Can we please keep the name calling and derisory comments on other peoples play style out if this. You can justify your ideas without such things.

Also it still remains against the rules to post personal mail here. You're not helping your stance by doing any of these things.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#129 - 2013-10-02 18:28:43 UTC
Time to revisit the OP. The theme was active scanning of ships (including both ship modules and cargos). The original proposal was to trigger a suspect offence, but as has been suggested (and I concur) - a more balanced approach would be to trigger a limited engagement with the offending vessel. I don't think this is an unreasonable change to the game, and it's not ultimately going to change gameplay significantly.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#130 - 2013-10-02 18:33:01 UTC
what im looking for is not just a limited engagement between the 2 parties, i want it to anyone can shoot. what good is having a limited engagement between a hauler and a scanning ship?

i think anyone should be able to engage, but no concord interference.

i will setup a corp or fleet around every main gate on a trade route or outside every main station.

you go flashy from scanning ANYONE, i will pop ya.

not just between the 2 people.

what ever you wanna call it, thats the desired effect i seek.
i will build a corp around hunting these people down. will make it more costly to leave folks alone.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#131 - 2013-10-02 19:01:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Arthur Aihaken
Mole Guy wrote:
what im looking for is not just a limited engagement between the 2 parties, i want it to anyone can shoot. what good is having a limited engagement between a hauler and a scanning ship?

i think anyone should be able to engage, but no concord interference.

i will setup a corp or fleet around every main gate on a trade route or outside every main station.

you go flashy from scanning ANYONE, i will pop ya.

not just between the 2 people.

what ever you wanna call it, thats the desired effect i seek.
i will build a corp around hunting these people down. will make it more costly to leave folks alone.

Respectfully, I think suspect status would be overkill. When you steal something, said action is (at least in theory) viewable or detectable by others. The act of targeting and scanning is a little different. How would anyone else know, for instance? In fact, if they use a passive targeting system I don't think there's any way you'd even be alerted.

I appreciate your viewpoint, but for any type of valuable cargo there are alternate ways of securely transporting it - from wrapping it inside of a container to using an insta-dock/undock to moving it in a tanked combat vessel. I got gate-ganked once in a rather expensive Tengu fit (though not obscenely ridiculous), because I'd been passively scanned at a previous jump gate and wasn't aware of the danger lurking just around the next jump. Such is life, but it taught me a lot of invaluable lessons - and I've never been ganked since.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Ciaphas Cyne
Moira.
#132 - 2013-10-02 19:33:37 UTC
Anomaly One wrote:
This doesn't make ganking harder it just gives more opportunities for ship explosions! which is what we all want right? well, except the gankers complaining here.. how does this make highsec any safer you're still gonna destroy the freighter if it has nice loot you just can't go around doing it the easiest way now.

I don't think people are getting the idea here especially the gankers, it's not about making highsec safer or easier for freighters it's about consequences, cargo scanning is equal to truck scanning or someone openning the lock of your car to check out what's inside, looking through a car irl is the same as look at ship command has nothing to do with cargo scanning, and ship scanning is like popping the hood.

Great idea.



this guy gets it. we dont want less ganks, we just want the scanner ship concorded along with the rest of the ganking team. all you NPC corp carebears (haulers and gankers) have totally missed the point of the OP. we dont want high sec safer, and we dont want ganking to be easier. we just want all members of a ganking team to be treated equally. if that extra 500k totally throws your ganking profitability out the window then you are doing it wrong and suck at high sec ganks.

just a side note for the "gtfo and play wow" guy:

idk if you've ever played wow but i did back in highschool ('05 or so?) so i can clear up some confusion. on PVP servers in WoW there is no place on the map that you can avoid being jumped and ganked. you dont get to "scan" someones items for free, or have the benefit of being "a grey". In wow, if i see you, you are gonna die. simple as that. its actually less carebearish then how many people play EvE. I was the World PvP commander for my guild and i can attest that many, many, folks learned the hard way that by signing into Azeroth youve agreed to get ganked at any moment, at any time, by anyone that feels like it. so although its fun and easy to say "go play wow, carebear" its not really that much of a carebears game if your on a PvP server. and mind you there are no aggression timers in wow, no police to save the newbs, and no "docking up". quite frankly, i think many eve players (especially mission runners) would rage quite a PvP server on WoW faster than a nerd goes through mountain dew and funions.

and now you know.

"buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"

  • you
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#133 - 2013-10-02 19:39:00 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Tyrozan
Trolling post and personal atttack post were removed.

Forum rule 5. Trolling is prohibited.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL

Drake Doe
88Th Tax Haven
#134 - 2013-10-02 19:49:31 UTC
After giving it a bit of thought, I like this idea. Another bonus this has is that it makes it a bit easier for high sec pvpers to get suspect flagged faster than before, at a cost to fitting, but faster.

"The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."---Vermaak Doe-- "Ohh squabbles ohh I love my dust trolls like watching an episode of Maury with less " Is he my Dad " but more of " My Neighbor took a dump on my lawn " good episode! pops more corn" ---Evernub--

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#135 - 2013-10-02 20:40:49 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Can we please keep the name calling and derisory comments on other peoples play style out if this. You can justify your ideas without such things.

Also it still remains against the rules to post personal mail here. You're not helping your stance by doing any of these things.


While I agree with both statements Mole Guy didn't "name and shame" who sent him the message, or even if they did send it Twisted
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#136 - 2013-10-02 20:43:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximus Aerelius
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
alternate ways of securely transporting it - from wrapping it inside of a container


Wrong and this hasn't worked for some time now. Not even the good old double wrap as AFAIK. Also they removed the immunity from the Orca so you can't transport anything now without a Cargo Scanner being able to see it, not the SMA, Fleet Hanger, Ore Hold anything. The only thing you can do is run in a Blockade Runner with crap cargo hold capacity and that doesn't even need the immunity due to it being cloakable.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#137 - 2013-10-02 20:51:41 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Wrong and this hasn't worked for some time now. Not even the good old double wrap as AFAIK. Also they removed the immunity from the Orca so you can't transport anything now without a Cargo Scanner being able to see it, not the SMA, Fleet Hanger, Ore Hold anything. The only thing you can do is run in a Blockade Runner with crap cargo hold capacity and that doesn't even need the immunity due to it being cloakable.

I stand corrected. Most of the stuff I've read still references these as valid tactics.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Gargep Farrow
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#138 - 2013-10-02 21:04:55 UTC
I dont see cargo or ship scanning as an act that needs to be given any kind of timer. You are not and have not committed a crime. What I do have an issue with is that a Cargo Scan is a pretty serious scan that should not be able to be done passively. Scanning cargo through both hull and armor should be detectable. There should be some kind of alarm tone to notify you that you have been scanned. Once the scanner has been identified, its time to bookmark him as a potential ganker, and if you are carrying valuable cargo and you see him or her in system, it might be time to dock up till they leave.

Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#139 - 2013-10-02 21:06:08 UTC
Here we go again. Good luck...

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#140 - 2013-10-02 21:10:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximus Aerelius
Gargep Farrow wrote:
I dont see cargo or ship scanning as an act that needs to be given any kind of timer. You are not and have not committed a crime. What I do have an issue with is that a Cargo Scan is a pretty serious scan that should not be able to be done passively. Scanning cargo through both hull and armor should be detectable. There should be some kind of alarm tone to notify you that you have been scanned. Once the scanner has been identified, its time to bookmark him as a potential ganker, and if you are carrying valuable cargo and you see him or her in system, it might be time to dock up till they leave.


Dock up you say....interesting. Now tell me how you would get anything in any trade hubs in EVE if every hauler was docking up when they spotted a ganker? Please read the whole thread and then post a suitable answer to the OP.

EDIT:

Now I agree with the "Scanning cargo through both hull and armor should be detectable. There should be some kind of alarm tone to notify you that you have been scanned" and it should go further. I refer to the "intent to steal" and "popping the lorry doors" analogy that has been made several times in previous posts.

EDIT 2: While it's not the ganking that this thread is against (that shizz gonna happen) it's the lack of consequences for the person scanning and then tipping of the gankers.