These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites

First post First post First post
Author
Bronco Platz
Doomheim
#341 - 2013-09-27 10:51:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Bronco Platz
T'kimat wrote:
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Best case scenario - Somer makes a lot of ISK out of the extra lotteries, then steals the unique ships, some interesting EVE history is made and the game gets some publicity.

Most likely scenario - the biggest act of CCP/individual player collusion since the fraudulent T2 BPO handouts occurs.


Most likely scenario: Largest whinefest since monoclegate and CCP stops supporting player-run events, since there is no sign of constructive feedback - only blind rage.


I fear something simular.
The "Summer of Rage" ended so: "Hmm, you don´t like microtransactions? Okay, we cancel them, but you won´t get WiS."

"T20 2.0" could(!) end so: "Hmm, you don´t like we favor one playergroup over all the others? Okay, we cancel it, but there will be no other sponsorship in future."

But this can´t stop us! Until now, CCP has no reason to react. Our outcry isn´t loud enough! Mobilize your reserves! Post about this concern in your allychat, corpchats, your blogs and Forums! Write your CSM about it! Give CCP headaches to think about that they have done here! They need to know, that they can´t deal in such a way with us, their playerbase, their income! This is a great Chance for the CSM to show, that you are really representatives of the players! There has to be emergency meetings over and over!

Together we can do a lot, that Eve stays what it is, our favourit game!

This signature is under NDA. Sorry.

Tinman Spectacular
The Long Range Foundation
#342 - 2013-09-27 11:15:58 UTC
Want to know why this doesn't pass the smell test? Replace "Somer Blink" with whatever in-game entity you despise the most and read this out loud.

"In an effort to promote the Winter Expansion, we will be giving Somer Blink several unique prizes to auction off, including rare ships and fan-fest trips. They are a very special little snowflake and do so much for the community we think this is a great idea for everyone and see no problems at all with this directly or indirectly benefiting Somer Blink with loyal followers, customers, and ISK."

0.02 ISK
Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#343 - 2013-09-27 11:22:45 UTC
Innominate wrote:
Way to miss the point.

The giving away of unique ships IS an issue, but it's not even the main issue.

YOU ARE GIVING A FOR-PROFIT GROUP HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS(now possibly TRILLIONS) OF ISK WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED.

Edit:
I would like to run a promotion, you can send me one (1) coupon good for an all expenses paid trip to fanfest, I promise my winning of my own lottery will be entirely fair and well accounted for.



CCP, you might have changed the prizes, but you are still showing favouritism to a group of players.

As such, IMHO, you have not solved this issue, (as I belive it is).
Matias Otero
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#344 - 2013-09-27 11:25:21 UTC
While better, it's still a fundamentally wrong move.

To be truthful, it's not that different from invite PLEX, where you get money every time one of your contacts subscribes. It's also an ISK reward for promoting and making EVE bigger and better so I can understand that. Yes, it is an intrusion into the "pure" market mechanics of EVE but to be honest it's a justifiable one. Without new players, EVE dies. Thing is, invite PLEX are very straightforward. Someone pays CCP, you get paid. Content is added to the universe, money to CCP's coffers. Everyone wins.

This a whole other story. It's essentially a blank check and an official endorsement to a player-run for-profit corporation (running something as pedestrian as a lottery of all things) that's potentially valued in the 100's of billions. I know for a fact I've gotten at least a 100 accounts to subscribe through my founding and promoting of Brave Newbies. My in-game reward was becoming space-rich from invite PLEX. Now should I go ask CCP for a special-edition vessel that I can sell for billions? No, because I believe the unique player-driven concept of EVE is more valuable than myself or my organization.

I applaud CCP for promoting player-run organizations that increase EVE's visibility, they absolutely deserve rewards and recognition, but injecting 100's of billions into their wallets and thus violating the very principles of the EVE universe is the wrong way to go about it. Give people something, yes, but not in a way that affects the economy or gives an unfair advantage.
HVAC Repairman
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#345 - 2013-09-27 11:27:25 UTC
since the summer of rage has been taken already, can this be called the autumn of autism?
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#346 - 2013-09-27 11:41:06 UTC

I thought CCP thousand dollar jeans had left the building?
(this is terrible)
Time for the new CSM to throw their weight around.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Thelos Morgenstein
Doomheim
#347 - 2013-09-27 11:46:37 UTC
Somer Blink website is on shared hosting, one of those sites is also a porn site, I wonder how many adults will be happy seeing the same IP addy for a porn site show up in the history of where their kids go to game ?

How much money/plex do Somer Blink get from their deal with "markee dragon game codes" ?

As I look at it CCP are giving goods to a player so he can use them to gain real money in the outside world ?
RMT'ing by any chance ?
RAW23
#348 - 2013-09-27 11:47:57 UTC
Quote:
CCP seems only guilty of increasing traffic through an in-game corporation's site.


Only?

For the economic side of the game, that is the equivalent of saying 'CCP is only guilty of making it easier for a single chosen corp to kill its enemies'. Businesses in EVE compete with each other and deliberately handing a business an unearned edge is no different from handing combat advantages to a favourite PvP corp.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Jori McKie
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#349 - 2013-09-27 11:57:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jori McKie
Sorry CCP but having Somer Blink doing the Distribution/Lottery for whatever unique ingame items is the dumbest idea ever. As long as you as CCP can't make 100% sure the Distribution/Lottery isn't rigged at all you never ever use a 3rd party for it.

Second point why on earth should i have to register on Somer Blink to be eligible for the prizes, i want the chance to win unqiue ingame items within EVE not on a 3rd party site. I understand that you want to promote Somer Blink but then do not use unique ingame items for promotion, use something else as prizes like the free trip to Fanfest or Grafic Cards, Mousepads or anything from your Fanshop, T-Shirts etc.

You as CCP do not want to have the fallout of any conspiracy theory after you used Somer Blink, imagine thousands player who obviously didn't won are crying foul on the forum and saying the Lottery was rigged and a Somer guy got all the goodies.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." - Abrazzar

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#350 - 2013-09-27 12:03:52 UTC
T'kimat wrote:
Most likely scenario: Largest whinefest since monoclegate and CCP stops supporting player-run events, since there is no sign of constructive feedback - only blind rage.
Well, if the supported events are ingame and for-profit then I hope that CCP stops supporting them, that's what this is all about.

If they choose to sponsor non-profit out-of-game things I don't mind, that doesn't distort competition in the sandbox. And if they choose to sponsor for-profit ingame things like Somer with small out-of-game stuff like free subscriptions or mentions in dev blogs I don't care much either.

Memnon Shepard wrote:
I guess I'm most confused as to whether people are against CCP providing prizes for organizations who choose to sponsor events (which only players outside of those organizations can win), or if it was the selection process itself that’s getting the backlash.
First of all, you don't know if the Somer employees can't win the prizes they are given, if they do it smart neither you nor CCP would ever know if they did.

But that's beside the point really, the problem is that an ingame for-profit organization is supported, on top of that it's a very successful for-profit organization which therefore doesn't require support anyway. This distorts the competition with similar organizations and CCP is de facto acting as a kind of kingmaker, crowning Somer as the CCP-endorsed lottery provider. They are making it even worse by officially claiming that Somer has not scammed in the past, which they can't possibly know (unless Somer is Navigator's alt) and even if they magically knew it they have no business commenting on the legitimacy of ingame for-profit organizations.

Quote:
There’s talk about SOMER Blink as if it isn’t Eve content, assuming it’s a scam, implying other in-game profit ventures are somehow superior or more true to Eve and that SOMER Blink does nothing to benefit the community. Every individual and organization in the game had the opportunity to sponsor this tournament to promote their own businesses and offer prizes for participants (without quid-pro-quo expectation). SOMER did this time, and in the future other corps may get the same opportunity. It's either easy to do or there's something special about these guys.
Most people do not have anything as such against Somer, and most people do not believe that Somer is a scam (it could be however, no outsider including CCP can know for sure), and most people do not think that Somer isn't contributing something to the community.

However I dislike the philanthropy angle cause as I've said in the older thread: If they close down their gambling site and continue sponsoring all kinds of stuff then it's philanthropy, as long as they run the site it's simply called marketing.

And yes, other ingame for-profit organizations can use marketing too, and doing marketing is totally ok. Getting support from CCP is not ok however.

HVAC Repairman wrote:
since the summer of rage has been taken already, can this be called the autumn of autism?
I like it. It has this certain je ne sais quoi.
Alexi Steele
St. Albans' Refuge
#351 - 2013-09-27 12:10:31 UTC
HVAC Repairman wrote:
since the summer of rage has been taken already, can this be called the autumn of autism?



It fits better, since every single whinging minge in this thread is too new to know that BIG was given limited edition ships multiple times before, and "officially endorsed" before. This **** isn't new - just the people being jealous of it are.
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#352 - 2013-09-27 12:19:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Inquisitor Kitchner
I don't know why everyone is so mad really. Would you all be annoyed if they teamed up with Budwiser to do a give away based on codes on bottle tops?

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#353 - 2013-09-27 12:22:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Abernie
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
I don't know why everyone is so mad really. Would you all be annoyed if they teamed up with Budwiser to do a give away based on codes on bottle tops?

What does this have to do with anything?

And what people are mad for, among other things:
1. CCP giving somerblink a trillion isk in form of unique ships and paid trips to Iceland
2. CCP vouching for somerblink, claiming to have audited all of their operation in-game and on their website
3. CCP skipping CSM again and thus causing an outrage
X ATM092
The Hatchery
RAZOR Alliance
#354 - 2013-09-27 12:29:01 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:

Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?

A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged.


Just for clarification. Is this CCP giving a guarantee that they have examined Blink's workings, their RNG and so forth and are willing to guarantee the legitimacy of the service that Blink offers?

Is this unheard of audit of a player run service by CCP going to become available to other player run enterprises?
Doris Dents
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#355 - 2013-09-27 12:40:59 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
I don't know why everyone is so mad really. Would you all be annoyed if they teamed up with Budwiser to do a give away based on codes on bottle tops?

The difference being Budweiser doesn't have a commanding in-game presence like Somer Blink. If CCP decided to give themittani.com a trillion isk or so of swag to disperse as Mittens saw fit I'm sure the rage would make monoclegate look like a couple of old ladies tutting over tea and biscuits.
Ellumielle
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#356 - 2013-09-27 12:56:49 UTC
I think the idea of supporting player run corps/groups/events like that is awesome, but giving items to a gambling site is somewhat questionable (regardless of what exactly they receive).
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#357 - 2013-09-27 12:58:22 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Cursan Voran wrote:
Also, as someone who does not use somer blink, how do I get a chance at these giveaways?


You can register and play a free promo blink which happen often and get an entry.

I like that the only response Navigator has to 18 pages of replies is...an advertisement for SOMER blink.

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Sirane Elrek
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#358 - 2013-09-27 13:01:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Sirane Elrek
Ellumielle wrote:
I think the idea of supporting player run corps/groups/events like that is awesome, but giving items to a gambling site is somewhat questionable (regardless of what exactly they receive).

Giving in-game items to any player or group of players to do with as they see fit is "somewhat questionable" (as you put it), regardless of who they actually are or what they get. If there was even a modicum of oversight, it would be vastly less questionable, but since Navigator outright stated they couldn't police the lottery, this promotion shouldn't have ever left the idea stage.
T'kimat
Inner Geek
#359 - 2013-09-27 13:02:50 UTC
Weaselior wrote:

I like that the only response Navigator has to 18 pages of replies is...an advertisement for SOMER blink.


I like how 90% of these 18 pages are goon tears
Abernie
Thoroughly Incompetent
#360 - 2013-09-27 13:02:51 UTC
Ellumielle wrote:
I think the idea of supporting player run corps/groups/events like that is awesome, but giving items to a gambling site is somewhat questionable (regardless of what exactly they receive).

A gambling site that makes a profit out of the deal in form of both ISK and $$$. Nothing 'somewhat' about it.

Not to mention the general idea of supporting a fansite/service/anything into a tune of a trillion isk to "test the waters" is completely insane.