These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

patch 1.1 changes to rattlesnake?

First post First post
Author
CCP Ytterbium
C C P
C C P Alliance
#21 - 2013-08-19 17:28:27 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.

Thank you, madam.

I hope I can say "madam" and it does not count as abuse of staff. *treads carefully*


Shocked It only counts as abuse if you picture me wearing a pink tutu dress practicing the Dying Swan ballet with the music and all the other glittery stuff all over the place.

You may want to ask CCP Soundwave or CCP Unifex for to do that for you though, they look far better than I do in this kind of activity P
Novah Soul
#22 - 2013-08-19 17:40:03 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.

Thank you, madam.

I hope I can say "madam" and it does not count as abuse of staff. *treads carefully*


Shocked It only counts as abuse if you picture me wearing a pink tutu dress practicing the Dying Swan ballet with the music and all the other glittery stuff all over the place.

You may want to ask CCP Soundwave or CCP Unifex for to do that for you though, they look far better than I do in this kind of activity P

Aww now come on Ytt, I'm sure you'd look absolutely stunning in a ballerina dress. Cool

A man is known by the quality of his friends. - Lex Luthor

Darth Khasei
Wavestar Business Ventures Inc.
#23 - 2013-08-19 17:50:15 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.



Resepct. Cool

To be honest I really am searching for the reasoning behind any further nerfs/rebalancing to the pirate faction ships since they were already done twice before in the past four years.

I am slightly encouraged to see the word "if".

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#24 - 2013-08-19 18:26:33 UTC
Sylvester Tweet wrote:
Maximus Andendare wrote:
Sylvester Tweet wrote:
Bumping for confirmation
i've seen it mentioned 2-3 times as well, but no Dev confirm yet.
There's an easy way to find out if you're looking for "confirmation." The forums have this neat tool that allows you to....to.....search for things. You should start there. Even the most basic search would have found nothing on the topic.


By devs? no, not til now (above). If you had actually used the search function, the comment made 2-3 times over the last few days actually was one of googles first results so perhaps you should brush up on your own search-fu as it has been mentioned in a few various posts by various players, clearly at this point confirmed as rumor mongering.


The trick is that unless a DEV had made a post about it before the current ones, it was silly to belive any rumor since all ship balancing project are proposed in a threads since quite some time now. "If it's not presented by a dev, consider it BS" is the best rule to follow.
Whitehound
#25 - 2013-08-19 19:36:48 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.

Thank you, madam.

I hope I can say "madam" and it does not count as abuse of staff. *treads carefully*


Shocked It only counts as abuse if you picture me wearing a pink tutu dress practicing the Dying Swan ballet with the music and all the other glittery stuff all over the place.

You may want to ask CCP Soundwave or CCP Unifex for to do that for you though, they look far better than I do in this kind of activity P

I guess I am safe then. Or rather we all are. X

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Sylvester Tweet
State War Academy
Caldari State
#26 - 2013-08-19 19:56:47 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Sylvester Tweet wrote:
Maximus Andendare wrote:
Sylvester Tweet wrote:
Bumping for confirmation
i've seen it mentioned 2-3 times as well, but no Dev confirm yet.
There's an easy way to find out if you're looking for "confirmation." The forums have this neat tool that allows you to....to.....search for things. You should start there. Even the most basic search would have found nothing on the topic.


By devs? no, not til now (above). If you had actually used the search function, the comment made 2-3 times over the last few days actually was one of googles first results so perhaps you should brush up on your own search-fu as it has been mentioned in a few various posts by various players, clearly at this point confirmed as rumor mongering.


The trick is that unless a DEV had made a post about it before the current ones, it was silly to belive any rumor since all ship balancing project are proposed in a threads since quite some time now. "If it's not presented by a dev, consider it BS" is the best rule to follow.



More than one time something has been found out by the player base and forced CCP's hand to divulging infos early. Cool trick though.
brinelan
#27 - 2013-08-19 20:32:10 UTC
Changes are posted in the Feature and Ideas discussion forums (except industry ones which are usually in science and industry) when they are announced, and also normally in dev blogs.

If you don't see anything in any of these places from someone with a dev tag then it isn't happening.
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#28 - 2013-08-19 20:39:57 UTC
brinelan wrote:
Changes are posted in the Feature and Ideas discussion forums (except industry ones which are usually in science and industry) when they are announced, and also normally in dev blogs.

If you don't see anything in any of these places from someone with a dev tag then it isn't happening.


Except when they're not.

/me glares at compensation skill changes....
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#29 - 2013-08-19 21:05:48 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Shocked It only counts as abuse if you picture me wearing a pink tutu dress practicing the Dying Swan ballet with the music and all the other glittery stuff all over the place.

So... would that be abuse of you, or of our imaginations? If I pod myself with a non-upgraded clone, will I forget about this?

ISD LackOfFaith

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums.

Abishai
#30 - 2013-08-20 18:13:20 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.


Commence the planning!
Soporo
#31 - 2013-08-20 22:16:32 UTC
Darth Khasei wrote:
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.



Resepct. Cool

To be honest I really am searching for the reasoning behind any further nerfs/rebalancing to the pirate faction ships since they were already done twice before in the past four years.

I am slightly encouraged to see the word "if".



I'm guessing you don't fly a Rattlesnake.

Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - H.L. Mencken

Scott Webb
Scott Webb Corp
#32 - 2013-08-30 18:06:03 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
There are no planned changes for the Rattlesnake for 1.1. Sorry boyz P

If and when it happens, this will be at the same time than the other pirate ships.



For the amount of skilling needed to max out the Rattlesnake it deserves a lot more buffing. RESPECT the RAT.
Previous page12