These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics

First post
Author
AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#21 - 2011-09-09 04:23:22 UTC
White Tree wrote:
Saerathus wrote:
White Tree wrote:
An interesting post and while I find myself agreeing with some elements, others are, at their core: Flawed.

Without knowing what is occurring in the background you've filled holes in the story then supplied them as inherent truths. This is incorrect.

As someone who also 'works in the Industry' I've learned never to assume, I mark and note postulation as just that, postulation.

A fine collection of thoughts but, as I said, flawed on a fundamental level as you've simply generated connective bridges between available facts, connective bridges which I can tell you with authority that are misplaced.

That being said, I encourage you to continue to speculate but be mindful of the nature of speculation.


If I've made mistakes you're more than welcome to correct me in front of everyone else instead of acting mysteriously about it.


Ahh, I can vaguely point out your err but it does not mean that I am at liberty to correct it. An unfortunate consequence of being on the CSM.


In other words you can't provide any more proof then he can? If you can't correct someone, don't tell them they are wrong.
White Tree
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2011-09-09 04:24:14 UTC
AnzacPaul wrote:
White Tree wrote:
Saerathus wrote:
White Tree wrote:
An interesting post and while I find myself agreeing with some elements, others are, at their core: Flawed.

Without knowing what is occurring in the background you've filled holes in the story then supplied them as inherent truths. This is incorrect.

As someone who also 'works in the Industry' I've learned never to assume, I mark and note postulation as just that, postulation.

A fine collection of thoughts but, as I said, flawed on a fundamental level as you've simply generated connective bridges between available facts, connective bridges which I can tell you with authority that are misplaced.

That being said, I encourage you to continue to speculate but be mindful of the nature of speculation.


If I've made mistakes you're more than welcome to correct me in front of everyone else instead of acting mysteriously about it.


Ahh, I can vaguely point out your err but it does not mean that I am at liberty to correct it. An unfortunate consequence of being on the CSM.


In other words you can't provide any more proof then he can? If you can't correct someone, don't tell them they are wrong.


The difference being that I am legally bound to not provide proof, he is not.

Former member of CSM6.

London
Center for Advanced Studies
#23 - 2011-09-09 04:28:41 UTC
Bravo, excellent post. I wholeheartedly agree with you.
Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
#24 - 2011-09-09 04:28:58 UTC
White Tree wrote:


Ahh, I can vaguely point out your err but it does not mean that I am at liberty to correct it. An unfortunate consequence of being on the CSM.


That sort of seems to validate some of my concerns about how the CSM is acting then, doesn't it? I mean, unless you're going to refute something related to the NDA.. such as how much money CCP has on hand.. or specific internal conversations with CCP that I've somehow not referenced.. then you're pretty much blowing yourself up to be more than you are, aren't you?

I don't know for sure. Maybe you are. It doesn't seem like it though. I know that there's enough people bashing the CSM in that silly "CSM doesn't represent me" thread, and that's unfair since right now you guys are the only ones that are visibly out there for "the cause", but if you're not going to report what's happening to the people that you're advocating for, I think that makes you a pretty terrible player advocate.

Consider this, then. I may not know "the whole story", but I've spent maybe a dozen hours alone reading about what's going on, across the various blogs (Jester's, Seleene's, Robert's, The Mittani's, the various press sites that picked up the story yesterday, and many threads in this forum). Doesn't it seem ODD TO YOU that based on that much effort I still have "half the story" and the CSM won't elaborate on it when confronted with what they claim is not the truth? :/

AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#25 - 2011-09-09 04:29:05 UTC
White Tree wrote:


The difference being that I am legally bound to not provide proof, he is not.



So "your wrong but I can't prove it or tell you why" is an acceptable use of rebuttal these days?

Please. Don't tell someone they are wrong if you can't prove it.
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#26 - 2011-09-09 04:30:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Meryl SinGarda
I actually read everything that you wrote here and it was good up until, here:

Saerathus wrote:
TL;DR:

I'm not anyone special.
CCP doesn't need your money to survive, but would like it.
CCP isn't going to play stupid media games with amateur politicians.
CSM made a dog's breakfast of handling the outrage over the last 3 months.
The MIttani is acting like a putz.
CCP doesn't care about what future players of its other games are gonna think.
CSM doesn't deserve to get ragged on for being one of the only groups to actually do anything
CSM needs to grow some balls if it wants to actually advocate for its players
People outside the game think the players of this game are getting what they deserve for being assholes


While I do believe that people should do whatever they please with their money, (and I can't help but feel this was just an over-convoluted "I quit" thread), I am on the side of the fence that doesn't really see a whole lot of wrong going on in EVE (or with CCP). Maybe a little lacking on the FiS side of things, but I guess that's what you get after 5+ years of FiS material and "only" talk of WiS.

I think you're right in saying that a lot of people seem to be deluded and that The Mittani (along with a few other CSM members *cough*WhiteTree*cough*) is making a fool out of himself. But on my principles, my agenda and goals, I can't say that I am mad at CCP for anything, because everything that's been released this year, thus far, are things I've been waiting years for. (Aside from the NEX. I actually had no idea this was coming, but I'm pretty neutral on the subject, since every other game has an MT market and they're really not cause for problems or alarm, unless you put game-breaking material into them)

So, simpler terms, you guys had your turn for almost a decade, let the people who want station environments have a turn.

(Not that I have anything against FiS. I do it everyday.)

Don't get me wrong, all of this could have been done differently, maybe. But last I checked we were players who agreed to a EULA. We're not paying an extra fee for these expansions, so maybe we should decide to be grateful, instead of setting a match to the forums.

And if none of this convinces anyone that maybe a little bit of irrationality is going on here, and you still feel like taking your money to whatever other game you'd rather play, which will fulfill your needs for about a month, you know where The Door is.
Puppet Mas'ter
The Merchants of War
#27 - 2011-09-09 04:34:09 UTC
Shamrock1 wrote:
So someone that doesn't know enough about eve, just made an opinion on "why the company won't listen" based on what he knows about different companies.... You be trollin'


How funny would it be if this thread gets locked

CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? chuckle (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Us: THIS IS EVE

Rhaegor Stormborn
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2011-09-09 04:35:33 UTC
Mittani is turning out to be the best CSM ever IMO.
Puppet Mas'ter
The Merchants of War
#29 - 2011-09-09 04:37:13 UTC
White Tree wrote:
Saerathus wrote:
White Tree wrote:
An interesting post and while I find myself agreeing with some elements, others are, at their core: Flawed.

Without knowing what is occurring in the background you've filled holes in the story then supplied them as inherent truths. This is incorrect.

As someone who also 'works in the Industry' I've learned never to assume, I mark and note postulation as just that, postulation.

A fine collection of thoughts but, as I said, flawed on a fundamental level as you've simply generated connective bridges between available facts, connective bridges which I can tell you with authority that are misplaced.

That being said, I encourage you to continue to speculate but be mindful of the nature of speculation.


If I've made mistakes you're more than welcome to correct me in front of everyone else instead of acting mysteriously about it.


Ahh, I can vaguely point out your err but it does not mean that I am at liberty to correct it. An unfortunate consequence of being on the CSM.


lol... I could do that but I cant find any

CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? chuckle (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Us: THIS IS EVE

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
#30 - 2011-09-09 04:37:28 UTC
Meryl SinGarda wrote:

While I do believe that people should do whatever they please with their money, (and I can't help but feel this was just an over-convoluted "I quit" thread), I am on the side of the fence that doesn't really see a whole lot of wrong going on in EVE (or with CCP). Maybe a little lacking on the FiS side of things, but I guess that's what you get after 5+ years of FiS material and "only" talk of WiS.


To clarify myself - I'm not trying to come down on one particular side, which is why I made several mentions of basically having no investment to nullsec or what-have-you. I thought that the idea of WiS was neat when they were talking about it back when.. I was playing last. I thought that the CQ was cool, but when I tried to walk out of my cabin and got denied by the door, I frowned.

I'm not a 0.0 player. I can't pretend to know why people are so passionate about what's going on right now, but I can say that as an observer whatever the community is trying to get done, it seems like they are flopping around and not being very effective, and in general thinking a lot of things and giving themselves a lot of false confidence about their ability to leverage CCP into doing whatever they want. I just wanted to point those fallacies out, and give some ideas as to how they might want to proceed.

WiS is cool with me, so is FiS. I play this game to fly ships around and lament being so terrible at PvP and not having the time to devote to the game that I can't enjoy nullsec. But I don't think that the game should go in one direction or another save that it be in a direction that does not alienate the player base.
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#31 - 2011-09-09 04:37:35 UTC
Rhaegor Stormborn wrote:
Mittani is turning out to be the best CSM ever IMO.


Coming from a guy who's corp. name is "BURN EDEN."

AnzacPaul
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#32 - 2011-09-09 04:38:39 UTC
Puppet Mas'ter wrote:
Shamrock1 wrote:
So someone that doesn't know enough about eve, just made an opinion on "why the company won't listen" based on what he knows about different companies.... You be trollin'


How funny would it be if this thread gets locked



No what he said was why would CCP care about what players say when they continue to pay their subs, and their only form of hurf durf is to whine on the forums.

He makes a vaild point. You think CCP care how much you whine on the forums as long as you continue to pay your subs? This is my only account left, I gave CCP a chance after Iceland summit, but once I saw nothing changed I unsubbed this char and have given my money to perpetuum. Yes it's not Eve, or anywhere near as good atm, but I'd rather pay a company that I know is putting development into the game, and actually listening to player concerns.

As I always say, that's my opinion only.
Puppet Mas'ter
The Merchants of War
#33 - 2011-09-09 04:39:20 UTC
Saerathus wrote:


Consider this, then. I may not know "the whole story", but I've spent maybe a dozen hours alone reading about what's going on, across the various blogs (Jester's, Seleene's, Robert's, The Mittani's, the various press sites that picked up the story yesterday, and many threads in this forum). Doesn't it seem ODD TO YOU that based on that much effort I still have "half the story" and the CSM won't elaborate on it when confronted with what they claim is not the truth? :/




ooooooo sick burn!!!

CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? chuckle (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Us: THIS IS EVE

Rhaegor Stormborn
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2011-09-09 04:39:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Rhaegor Stormborn
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Rhaegor Stormborn wrote:
Mittani is turning out to be the best CSM ever IMO.


Coming from a guy who's corp. name is "BURN EDEN."




You must be a noob. Burn Eden
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#35 - 2011-09-09 04:40:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Meryl SinGarda
Saerathus wrote:
Meryl SinGarda wrote:

While I do believe that people should do whatever they please with their money, (and I can't help but feel this was just an over-convoluted "I quit" thread), I am on the side of the fence that doesn't really see a whole lot of wrong going on in EVE (or with CCP). Maybe a little lacking on the FiS side of things, but I guess that's what you get after 5+ years of FiS material and "only" talk of WiS.


To clarify myself - I'm not trying to come down on one particular side, which is why I made several mentions of basically having no investment to nullsec or what-have-you. I thought that the idea of WiS was neat when they were talking about it back when.. I was playing last. I thought that the CQ was cool, but when I tried to walk out of my cabin and got denied by the door, I frowned.

I'm not a 0.0 player. I can't pretend to know why people are so passionate about what's going on right now, but I can say that as an observer whatever the community is trying to get done, it seems like they are flopping around and not being very effective, and in general thinking a lot of things and giving themselves a lot of false confidence about their ability to leverage CCP into doing whatever they want. I just wanted to point those fallacies out, and give some ideas as to how they might want to proceed.

WiS is cool with me, so is FiS. I play this game to fly ships around and lament being so terrible at PvP and not having the time to devote to the game that I can't enjoy nullsec. But I don't think that the game should go in one direction or another save that it be in a direction that does not alienate the player base.


That's what I'm saying though, at least, in another thread. WiS is totally great. Awesome. Want more! But I do agree that there needs to be a balance between both aspects.

Although, even if balance is achieved, don't think that the troll/flaming war will stop. There will always be a reason to fight.

War never changes.

Rhaegor Stormborn wrote:


You must be a noob if you don't know who Burn Eden is.


I don't particularly care, but you are free to enlighten me.
Puppet Mas'ter
The Merchants of War
#36 - 2011-09-09 04:43:24 UTC
AnzacPaul wrote:
Puppet Mas'ter wrote:
Shamrock1 wrote:
So someone that doesn't know enough about eve, just made an opinion on "why the company won't listen" based on what he knows about different companies.... You be trollin'


How funny would it be if this thread gets locked



No what he said was why would CCP care about what players say when they continue to pay their subs, and their only form of hurf durf is to whine on the forums.

He makes a vaild point. You think CCP care how much you whine on the forums as long as you continue to pay your subs? This is my only account left, I gave CCP a chance after Iceland summit, but once I saw nothing changed I unsubbed this char and have given my money to perpetuum. Yes it's not Eve, or anywhere near as good atm, but I'd rather pay a company that I know is putting development into the game, and actually listening to player concerns.

As I always say, that's my opinion only.


I know what was said, I read it. Theres also a lotta CSM trying to be coy hinting at NDA things (that CCP usually dislikes) and ranting (though not really, just a long good post) but I was saying I wouldnt be surprised if it gets locked still.

CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? chuckle (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Us: THIS IS EVE

The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2011-09-09 05:05:07 UTC  |  Edited by: The Mittani
I'll just come back to this thread when the drama ends, one way or another, to either smug at you or concede defeat.

For the sake of the game, let's hope I get to mock you relentlessly for being both uninformed and wrong. Since you'd never heard of me before this drama, much like the badposter who has never heard of Burn Eden, my bet is on mockery.

You also make the usual hypocritical false dichotomy between 'The Mittani' and 'The CSM' on the issue of FiS Neglect. We are of one voice, and the tactic of media pressure was chosen by the entire CSM. Yet you spend a while patting yourself on the back for being ~mature~ while denigrating my supposedly individual 'tantrums'.

~hi~

Puppet Mas'ter
The Merchants of War
#38 - 2011-09-09 05:10:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Puppet Mas'ter
The Mittani wrote:
or concede defeat.



lloooooooooooooooooool right

The Mittani wrote:
Yet you spend a while patting yourself on the back for being ~mature~ while denigrating my supposedly individual 'tantrums'.


quoted for irony

an i like the "you never heard of me" part. theres no right answer. Either youre a noob/badposter/pubbie/whatever trolling term you feel like using or we have heard of you an it inflates your ego

CCP: Madness!!! This is FiS Us: Fis? chuckle (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Us: THIS IS EVE

The Mittani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#39 - 2011-09-09 05:14:40 UTC
There's always someone who will attempt to feign superior wisdom by prostrating themselves in front of authority, declaring the status quo unchangeable. These are the speedbumps in the way of progress; it is incredibly satisfying when they get run over.

~hi~

Saerathus
Vocatio Ad Virtutem
#40 - 2011-09-09 05:21:52 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
I'll just come back to this thread when the drama ends, one way or another, to either smug at you or concede defeat.

For the sake of the game, let's hope I get to mock you relentlessly for being both uninformed and wrong. Since you'd never heard of me before this drama, much like the badposter who has never heard of Burn Eden, my bet is on mockery.

You also make the usual hypocritical false dichotomy between 'The Mittani' and 'The CSM' on the issue of FiS Neglect. We are of one voice, and the tactic of media pressure was chosen by the entire CSM. Yet you spend a while patting yourself on the back for being ~mature~ while denigrating my supposedly individual 'tantrums'.


Again, I'm looking to the CSM to "inform" me since the CSM felt the need to go to press over something that the average player couldn't wrangle out of the various blogs, posts, news posts and what not.

I question your position to cast aspersions on my maturity, since I've said multiple times that the CSM is worthy of being commended and not having their state of representation called into question, while you wade in here to call me names and make vague allusions to why I'm not right, wrap yourself in the metaphorical flag of Eve, and in general treat me with the very contempt I pointed out in the OP. The CSM may be acting with "one voice", but they sure as hell don't look like they are from the layman's point of view - all we see is you up there acting big and bad. Where is this "public condemnation" the CSM put together that you all signed, that was going to be put out in a week but apparently someone couldn't keep their mouth shut about? How inept do you have to be to say something like that to your corp when it's a matter that affects the entire game - and that question is even assuming that you didn't orchestrate all this sudden "surprise emergency press coverage", as some people are wondering. All we see right now is you, the CSM chair giving interviews, while the rest of your colleagues of one voice are making vague assertions of action in their blogs - if that.

I'm willing to accept the fact that I might not know everything about the situation, but I find it exceptionally disquieting that when the CSM goes to the press to complain about how CCP is "neglecting FiS" and how this affects all of the players, finding the actual reasoning behind all of this is about as easy as finding a sober man in Rekjavik.

And if -I- am pointing out these flaws in your reasoning, a relative nobody, you think that CCP won't? Hmm.