These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Imbalance: Nano Raven Faster than Nano Drake.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#1 - 2013-08-14 17:49:54 UTC
[Raven, Nano]

Prototype 100MN Microwarpdrive I

3x Overdrive Injector System II

1967 km/sec



[Drake, nano]

10MN Microwarpdrive II

3x Overdrive Injector System II


1893 km/sec


I think the Drake was over nerfed when it gets out paced by battleships six times it's size.

Now with 100% less Troll.
Swiftstrike1
Swiftstrike Incorporated
#2 - 2013-08-14 18:51:15 UTC
Raven is an attack battleship which is supposed to be fast. Drake is a combat battlecruiser which is supposed to be pretty slow. Who fits ships like that anyway? There aren't enough low slots on them to deal any meaningful DPS and move quickly at the same time.

Casual Incursion runner & Faction Warfare grunt, ex-Wormholer, ex-Nullbear.
Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#3 - 2013-08-14 18:53:54 UTC
the point of a nano fleet is to stay out of range, you gain dps by adding more ships to your fleet.

Now with 100% less Troll.
HiddenPorpoise
Jarlhettur's Drop
United Federation of Conifers
#4 - 2013-08-14 18:54:06 UTC
The drake also tanks better than a raven.
TehCloud
Guardians of the Dodixie
#5 - 2013-08-14 20:06:50 UTC
"Nano Raven" "Nano Drake"

No Nanos fitted.

Raven is an Attack BS, Drake is a Combat BC.

Combat Role: More tank, less speed
Attack Role: More speed, less tank

Working as intended.

My Condor costs less than that module!
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#6 - 2013-08-14 20:17:06 UTC
TehCloud wrote:
"Nano Raven" "Nano Drake"

No Nanos fitted.



He should have written it as "Nano" Raven and "Nano" Drake.

That way, you know youre getting cheap imitation stuff.

"Crab" salad. Teryaki "Chicken", "Solo" PvP.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2013-08-14 20:48:47 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
TehCloud wrote:
"Nano Raven" "Nano Drake"

No Nanos fitted.



He should have written it as "Nano" Raven and "Nano" Drake.

That way, you know youre getting cheap imitation stuff.

"Crab" salad. Teryaki "Chicken", "Solo" PvP.

Where's that Dr. Evil meme when I need it...
Omega Crendraven
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-08-14 22:34:50 UTC
BUFF DRAEKS!
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#9 - 2013-08-14 22:42:37 UTC
Bad irrelevant fits all around.
Ubat Batuk
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-08-15 10:25:33 UTC
TehCloud wrote:
"Nano Raven" "Nano Drake"

No Nanos fitted.

Raven is an Attack BS, Drake is a Combat BC.

Combat Role: More tank, less speed
Attack Role: More speed, less tank

Working as intended.


How about DPS? Since all nerfs i have stopped using Caldari ships, exception made for Tengu. The Nighthawk is broken anyway.
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-08-15 12:07:44 UTC
Tom Gerard wrote:
[Raven, Nano]

Prototype 100MN Microwarpdrive I

3x Overdrive Injector System II

1967 km/sec



[Drake, nano]

10MN Microwarpdrive II

3x Overdrive Injector System II


1893 km/sec


I think the Drake was over nerfed when it gets out paced by battleships six times it's size.


holy crap, i wish my intercepter could go that fast

best i can manage is 6km/s

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#12 - 2013-08-15 12:27:53 UTC
Thrashers are not interceptors.