These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Recruitment Scamming. Now a bannable offense.

First post
Author
Raptor217
Nomadic Spacial Bunnies Support Division
#141 - 2011-11-11 10:29:11 UTC
CCP introduced this scamming block in the recruitment channel to help out the new players. What they don't realize is that many old, naive players, come there looking for corps as well. Recruitment scammers don't go after the newbies because spending a half hour to get 5m and an omen isn't worth it. I myself have scammed billions of isk out of 2 or 3 year old players who think they can just give me their stuff.

So, I have no issue if CCP decided we couldn't recruitment scam people who are less than a month old, or have less than 1m SP. But protecting the 5 year old player who is stupid enough to contract me his faction fit BS and tengu is beyond me.

Also, there are going to be a lot of people posting who want nothing more than the sandbox be whats best for them, rather than eve as a whole.
HELIC0N ONE
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#142 - 2011-11-11 11:38:00 UTC
CCP Guard wrote:
Some food for discussion:

1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere?
2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?

I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.

I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.

Let's discuss.


1. CCP designating particular channels to be scam-free-zones is a bad thing, yes. I will quote my corpmate from the other thread:

Yeep wrote:
The main currency in EvE is not ISK or AUR, its trust. In a player run channel I have to trust that the people running the channel are going to uphold the rules, that they're not colluding with scammers to take my money. Those people have to earn my trust either directly or through the opinions of other people I already trust. In a CCP run channel where scamming is banned it completely removes trust from the equation. Nobody has to work for my trust because it is provided for them by CCP.

This is why this change is stupid.


If people claim that the effect is minimal because 'you can still recruitment scam people out of local, or set up your own recruitment channel' then those people have totally missed the point. Given the choice between a CCP-approved 'no scamming allowed' channel and other venues where they are open to scams, every player looking for a new corp will choose the safe option. There won't be anyone looking for a new corp in local, or in an unofficial channel, because CCP has provided a recruitment channel which caters to all their needs and is a guaranteed safe haven from scamming. Remember, risk versus reward: why would a player looking for a new corp choose the unsafe option when it provides no advantage? And why would a corp legitimately seeking out new players advertise in an unsafe channel rather than the CCP-approved no scamming zone?

The equivalent would be if CCP designated a particular highsec ice system in each empire's space to be a CCP-approved miner-only zone where suicide ganking, can flipping, and other methods of interdiction are banned and all dead hulks are reimbursed by GMs. After all, if we don't like the new rules we could always go and gank miners somewhere else! The result, of course, would be that every ice miner flocked to the safe systems to do their mining in complete safety, and all other ice belts where ganking was permitted would be deserted.

2. My understanding is that allowing the character bazaar to scam in would be unworkable because CCP charges a real-money fee for transfers, thus opening a hilarious can of worms since scamming somebody out of pretend spacebucks in a pretend space game is somewhat different from taking 20 dollars/euros (if that's still the fee?) from them in real life with the associated legal implications that would follow.

Can baiting etc in the newbie systems is, again, different to recruitment scamming since it deliberately targets new, inexperienced players who are unfamiliar with fairly basic game mechanics. Recruitment scamming rarely targets new, inexperienced players since they don't have significant assets to make the scam worthwhile (a recruitment scam often involves lengthy, time-consuming conversations that make them not worth pulling just for a few million isk and some T1 cruisers). I can say on the occasions where our members have recruitment scammed newbies they've generally been yelled at and mocked in our chat channels.
HELIC0N ONE
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#143 - 2011-11-11 11:49:23 UTC
Raptor217 wrote:
So, I have no issue if CCP decided we couldn't recruitment scam people who are less than a month old, or have less than 1m SP. But protecting the 5 year old player who is stupid enough to contract me his faction fit BS and tengu is beyond me.


Indeed. If CCP wants to protect naive newbies from recruitment scams, in the same way that it protects them from can baiting in the starter systems, then I've really no problem with that, since there's little skill or material gain from scamming week old newbies out of their missioning cormorant and their 2000 units of veldspar. But make an exemption that specifically protects newbies, not a blanket ban which covers everybody.

The current situation seems a clear example of Malcanis' Law in action: "Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players"
Zowie Powers
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#144 - 2011-11-11 12:38:13 UTC
CCP desperately want Pay To Win and Barbie Doll Vampires. I know you think they recanted because they said they did, but perhaps you didn't pay attention to Hilmar's actual words. He desperately sees that as Eve's future.

YOU PESKY CUSTOMERS ARE GETTING IN THE WAY.

Since you rejected his vision for Eve, then it's clear to him that the first thing that needs changing is you lot.

Back to chipping away at the current customers to replace them with children that like shiney baubles.

ATX: The best of the rest.

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#145 - 2011-11-11 12:39:16 UTC
too much drama for "nothing really happened".
DelBoy Trades
Trotter Independent Traders.
Stealth Alliance
#146 - 2011-11-11 13:22:29 UTC
Personally I like this change, it's one more step towards flying mounts, battlegrounds and the sword of a thousand truths.

Damn nature, you scary!

Myxx
The Scope
#147 - 2011-11-11 14:18:57 UTC
'CCP Guard' wrote:
Some food for discussion:

1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere?
2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?

I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.

I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.

Let's discuss.



1) I don't think that its good for the game, I made a post earlier about how scamming is good for the game
2) It is my opinion that the only skullduggery-free zones in the entire game should be the help channel, the newbie channel and the newbie starter systems. Thats it. Anywhere else should be free game for all of the ruthlessness that EVE is known for.
Morganta
The Greater Goon
#148 - 2011-11-11 15:16:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Morganta
HELIC0N ONE wrote:


Given the choice between a CCP-approved 'no scamming allowed' channel and other venues where they are open to scams, every player looking for a new corp will choose the safe option. There won't be anyone looking for a new corp in local, or in an unofficial channel, because CCP has provided a recruitment channel which caters to all their needs and is a guaranteed safe haven from scamming. Remember, risk versus reward: why would a player looking for a new corp choose the unsafe option when it provides no advantage? And why would a corp legitimately seeking out new players advertise in an unsafe channel rather than the CCP-approved no scamming zone?


this makes no sense to me.
"if given the choice" indicates a knowledge of the fact that scamming happens in EVE, in which case a scam-free channel is a moot point since the entire idea of a scam free channel is to protect those who don't know any better.

someone aware enough of scams to choose a scam free channel is not going to be the best target for a scam if you know what I mean.

its not like someone is waving a banner around that says "come to this channel, for completely safe happy fun time"
but a stoopid n00b will most likely manage to find the recruitment channel just because its the recruitment channel and not have any idea that the place is a scam free zone anyway.
Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#149 - 2011-11-11 15:31:13 UTC
AlleyKat wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
One of our newer members scammed 500 million from some pubbie within 30 minutes of joining Goonwaffe.

He's a goddamn Goon hero.


Just out of curiosity, what do you to members who get successfully scammed and someone proves this with evidence...

Not trolling, just want to know whether it's a slap on the wrists or a kick in the ass...or something more sinister involving a shovel and duct tape.

AK



It's early and Skyrim still isn't done downloading (thanks Qwest DSL!) so I'm not quite certain I'm following what you're asking.

What would we do, if, we happened to discover one of the members of Goonswarm Federation had just happened to get scammed by another ... Player? Goon?

If it's another player, we laugh our asses off and tell the cute newbie to be more intelligent in the future, and usually kick him some isk to lessen the sting. Not much though, and if they're not a cute newbie they probably can expect nothing more than laughter. Maybe put him in a Rifter and drag him off killing idiots in Delve so he learns the important lesson of "I'm mad so THEY must die," where THEY is anyone not blue. (An important life lesson for anyone in EVE.)

If it's another goon scamming a goon we get the stick, cause that's a paddlin' offence. Gently Caressing another Goon is not allowed, unless it's hilarious, at which point it had damn well better not be permanent. But we're big kids, and there are plenty of us (Mittani, for example) who are outright adults, so it usually all works out. And hey, if it doesn't, shootin' blues is fun too.

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#150 - 2011-11-11 16:21:49 UTC
The Sanbox needs 2x8s to keep all the sand in.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

HELIC0N ONE
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#151 - 2011-11-11 17:12:55 UTC
Morganta wrote:
this makes no sense to me.
"if given the choice" indicates a knowledge of the fact that scamming happens in EVE, in which case a scam-free channel is a moot point since the entire idea of a scam free channel is to protect those who don't know any better.

You'd be surprised at the amount of chatlogs we have of people worrying about scams and then being talked into handing all their crap over anyway.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#152 - 2011-11-11 17:30:15 UTC
So basically, if I ever visit the recruitment channel, I can forever petition to have any recruitment scams reversed, because I can just claim that the scammers used it to know that I wanted a corp?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#153 - 2011-11-11 17:31:13 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
So basically, if I ever visit the recruitment channel, I can forever petition to have any recruitment scams reversed, because I can just claim that the scammers used it to know that I wanted a corp?


and ? This concerns you how ?

Its just more pointless work for GMs.
Medio Morde
Army of n0ne
#154 - 2011-11-11 17:46:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Medio Morde
I understand CCP wants to make more money by softening the emo rage going on in eve online right now, but I think they are seriously hurting the game by thinking this way.

The fact that eve is so real, in a social sense, is what makes it fantastic. Not only do your skills learned ingame matter, but your social skills RL as well. This makes this game much more difficult to play and a hell of alot more enjoyable and mature then any other MMO to date. If CCP continues to try and find a way to appeal to a bigger audience I fear that the original audience will not be happy and the game will suffer because of it.

The fact is, it is only a game after all. So let them 10 year olds emo rage when they get scammed. Most other games 10 year olds spank us older players (jobless little twerps with nothing to do but master exploits), but in EVE older players have the advantage becaue RL experience can make a difference. Don't take that away from us.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#155 - 2011-11-11 17:55:44 UTC
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
So basically, if I ever visit the recruitment channel, I can forever petition to have any recruitment scams reversed, because I can just claim that the scammers used it to know that I wanted a corp?


and ? This concerns you how ?

Its just more pointless work for GMs.


It concerns me because anyone who leaves a corp on unfriendly terms can baww to the GMs to kiss it better.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
#156 - 2011-11-11 19:04:02 UTC
Haven't you heard? CCP are nerfing all aspects of highsec combat in order to make it a 100% safe utopia. It's all part of the plan to nab all of the people who have been quitting WOW.

Ris Dnalor
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2011-11-12 03:23:25 UTC
CCP Guard wrote:
Ris Dnalor wrote:
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:
Yeah let's lock the thread with good well thought out posts (by zagdul f.i.) and redirect to this old steaming pile of *****, good call there CCP Phantom, and by that I mean you're terrible, especially considering you locked it right after CCP Guard said "Let's discuss".

.


Bad Phantom

Good Guard.

Forum natzi's in regards to duplicate threads need to figure out that it hasn't gone away in 8+ years, they have never been able to be vigilant enough to stop it all the time. If they persist in the stupidity, I've no problem reporting every thread that could be considered a 'duplicate', but I guarantee they won't have time to lock them all, and there'll be like 12 threads left on the forum that are active.


Now now, my comment is here and the discussion has been streamlined to one thread.

I'd like to hear if people have any comments on my post which is quoted above. Smile


well.... ok.... if you're happy mr. Guard, then so shall I be :P

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961

EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody

  • Qolde