These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION)

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Zkarya
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#81 - 2013-08-08 02:31:54 UTC
CCP take this and run with it. It's not perfect but damn it's good.
Tylo Tungsten
Mega Global Compucon
#82 - 2013-08-08 02:35:46 UTC
As a person looking to get into Moons, I too am against the reduction of profitable moons idea.

It might make some logistics lives easier (though if they didn't like doing it, wouldn't they just quit?), but make an innumerable amount of smaller groups unable to have access to money moons.
Shreddy Krueger
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#83 - 2013-08-08 02:41:08 UTC
I would like to play the game that you have described.
Callidus Marus
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#84 - 2013-08-08 03:04:57 UTC
bumb nice ideas
Dr Cupid
State War Academy
Caldari State
#85 - 2013-08-08 04:54:53 UTC
CCP hire this man!!
Beatrice Ushiromiya
Yukkuri Pharmaceuticals
#86 - 2013-08-08 05:17:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Beatrice Ushiromiya
Thanks to OP I lost rest, dreaming about changes he suggested come to life.
Aimee Maken
Atasaki Holdings
#87 - 2013-08-08 05:52:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Aimee Maken
i would add that supers are nerfed in cost and effectiveness

their design goal was neigh invincible, with a huge cost to prevent proliferation, now that the cost is "small" enough that people can own them easily it is time to remove those two aspects of the super design.

a capitol tiercide if you will, remove the distinction of super vs cap and make them into roles that you want and equalize the cost of ship (to somewhere normal, and not like super cost). may need someway to reimburse the current pilots tho, since the price is a lot higher than anything else.

also, provide subcap play with the tiercide, so that it simply becomes another tier sized ships.
Civ Kado
State War Academy
Caldari State
#88 - 2013-08-08 05:57:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Civ Kado
Damn that was good.

Love the idea of making group PvE easier to access. A lot of MMOs have queues for such things. I can see how that wouldn't work with Eve due to it's ruthless nature. But a similar way of finding random players who want to group up, and do fleet PvE would be fantastic. As it stands right now, apart from PvP, the game is too solo. It's hard to get people or even find people who want to do PvE. I really hope the next update focuses on your points, because I agree wholeheartedly with this.

They got the gist of it right with incursions, but the types of ships required for those are from long time players. Most players can't either afford those ships, or they are four months away from training a mediocre fit at best.

LISTEN TO WHAT OP SAID.
DaveTheGreat
Mine 'N' Refine
Goonswarm Federation
#89 - 2013-08-08 06:09:21 UTC
This all sounds like a good idea.. Come on CCP
Cosah
Masters of Zen
Nomad Alliance
#90 - 2013-08-08 06:22:40 UTC
I hit like, but I like this post so much I had to bump it. Looks like an armchair game designer is gunning for a job at CCP.
Estarthu
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#91 - 2013-08-08 06:33:41 UTC
wow that sounds nice, please listen to that guy
Rochnarl
No Fixed Abode
Solyaris Chtonium
#92 - 2013-08-08 07:22:14 UTC
I support this message.
Ashina Sito
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2013-08-08 07:48:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Ashina Sito
Sigras wrote:

Lastly, sov should not be based on PvE, for example, NC. was deployed to fountain to assist TEST, the whole alliance basically did nothing with their space for months; should they be punished for that?


Simple answer, yes.

AFK ownership is a bad thing. Holding sov should be the same as holding NPC space. You have to live there to "own" it.

Ironic that the only sov space that is working right is Providence.
Bruce McRaven
Doomheim
#94 - 2013-08-08 08:03:00 UTC
do it CCP! Cool
KIATolon
Black Omega Security
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#95 - 2013-08-08 08:07:48 UTC  |  Edited by: KIATolon
I think that hi-sec SHOULD be significantly nerfed, as should wormholes
Covert0ne
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#96 - 2013-08-08 08:20:06 UTC
I approve.

War Crime Syndicate are recruiting!
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#97 - 2013-08-08 09:09:59 UTC
Have all sov indexes decay when not used. The core Sov level being capped by the other indexes.

Have each index spawn plexes where if an enemy takes them, it damages the index. These plex should be size limited, much like FW plex. Small doing less damage than large. No indexes, no sov.

Shift moon mining into a stand-alone structure which can be hacked to drain some of the moon goo from a silo.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Matias Otero
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#98 - 2013-08-08 09:20:51 UTC
I approve.
Gheyna
Hoover Inc.
#99 - 2013-08-08 11:09:36 UTC
Guud post
Kazruw Drol
State War Academy
Caldari State
#100 - 2013-08-08 11:23:15 UTC
Simply brilliant.

I may or may not be impersonating one of my alts or vice versa.