Player Features and Ideas Discussion

What i find odd is that they think navy should have an extra slot when these CS need that extra high so they wouldn't need to remove so many turrets/launchers.

I'm not inclined to believe you have the slightest clue what you're talking about, since you don't state facts and don't use grammar. So I'm an incidental troll at best, legitimately confused by the ramblings of what for all intents and purposes appear to be people that fly around in hisec and have never done anything interesting.

Also I think people rage on forums because they're incapable of calm, intelligent discourse. I am continually confirmed in this belief.

As a final point, these changes did not break further anything that was already broken, and in fact improved a large number of things; so these are good changes.

You guys need to understand, the devs have absolutely no clear vision of what is needed, nor what they want to do about it. Instead, they want to rush through changes that make little to no sense (hacs & commands) and promise us they'll watch them perform terribly and tweak later just so they can provide maximum "content" every patch. It's literally the Obama Care of Eve the way the push through this crap without any thought.

What's most amazing is that they explicitly said Commands need a lot more survivability last year.... and look at the total fail they provided.

Commands should be one of the few ship classes in game that are pretty easy to fit however desired, have silly tank, and some sort of legitimate role outside of bonuses so that more than 5 of them in fleet doesn't somehow defeat the purpose of having them in the first place.

I'd actually be totally fine with the damage they project not changing (with the exception of the NH) if they would just add some constructive ways to make these ship actually useful.


What's hilarious is that they could do some unique defensive things for the active tankers like a role bonus to fit larger repairers with reduced capacitor and fitting needs... thus making them super strong local tanks. People might actually care about the local repairs much more if they would do such a thing.

They could also inflate their actual HP bases significantly so that these things would be solid bricks...and they could easily do t with an active module that boost resist and regen effects while turning off logistics support (a mechanic they already have in game with HICs) Personally, I think a 1-2 minute timer with an non-stacking big resist boosting modifier could be the key... It basically becomes a mini siege style platform where the ship gains massive defense, but loses all support abilities from a fleet. If they had to take it further, It could also prevent any ECM effects meaning the ship would lose the ability to tackle, web, etc... allowing the opponents free movement and attack for the duration..

Something so simple like that would help to fix the majority of issues with commands.

I know, it's so funny that t2 minmatar has a giant kin hole. Shame no one flies them.
Oh wait...

But this wont happen sooo, yeah would be cool, would change everything to do with fleets, so cool sure, likely to changes, no.

Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.

The dronebay on Eos is ******** small. It should have WAY bigger bay, or ishtarlike bonus to it.

I like the changes more or less. However, the nighthawk's slot layout is strange for a Caldari missile ship. Should be more like 7/6/4 or even 7/7/3 to make it more in line with ships like Hawk or Raven.

No, just no

fozzie just tell us what the Nighthawk is for?

it will be beautiful, but what does it mean?? (ooo double rainbow!)