These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Rozzie: nice job on cmd ships..not fearing marauder change now...
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#1 - 2013-08-01 23:04:17 UTC
enough said. i cant wait for these ships to hit the game...
Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#2 - 2013-08-01 23:29:10 UTC
Who's this Rozzie guy?

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.
Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#3 - 2013-08-01 23:47:19 UTC
rise+fozzie=rozzie
it was brought up in a post once and i thought it was catchy
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#4 - 2013-08-02 00:06:10 UTC
Yeah. Great changes. Somehow, you managed to make the Nighthawk worse than it is now, and make another Minmatar missile ship better than the Caldari one in it's same size bracket for no reason whatsoever. Instead of trying to seek some sort of parity, maybe.

I do not want to see what happens to the Golem based on the trend that the Raven, NH and Cerberus have received. I just don't.
Rayzilla Zaraki
Yin Jian Enterprises
#5 - 2013-08-02 00:39:35 UTC
Mole Guy wrote:
rise+fozzie=rozzie
it was brought up in a post once and i thought it was catchy



Ohhh.....like Brangelina! Got it!

Gate campers are just Carebears with anger issues.
Endeavour Starfleet
#6 - 2013-08-02 01:46:07 UTC
I want to see the T2 battleship line get a swath of new roles.

Especially with the nerfs to links that had been assisting incursions. The Golem needs to be rebalanced into a ship that is all tank and attracts aggro. It would make that ship extremely handy for a bunch of PVE content including incursions.
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#7 - 2013-08-02 01:53:59 UTC
Aglais wrote:
Yeah. Great changes. Somehow, you managed to make the Nighthawk worse than it is now, and make another Minmatar missile ship better than the Caldari one in it's same size bracket for no reason whatsoever. Instead of trying to seek some sort of parity, maybe.

I do not want to see what happens to the Golem based on the trend that the Raven, NH and Cerberus have received. I just don't.

But raven was buffed... Cruise missiles uhh...

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#8 - 2013-08-02 02:03:40 UTC
Arya Regnar wrote:
Aglais wrote:
Yeah. Great changes. Somehow, you managed to make the Nighthawk worse than it is now, and make another Minmatar missile ship better than the Caldari one in it's same size bracket for no reason whatsoever. Instead of trying to seek some sort of parity, maybe.

I do not want to see what happens to the Golem based on the trend that the Raven, NH and Cerberus have received. I just don't.

But raven was buffed... Cruise missiles uhh...


Cruise missiles were buffed. The Raven had a bunch of it's already poor EHP lopped off in return for a meh speed increase. Not really a buff, more of a stat shuffle IMO. The Raven was 'buffed' because cruise missiles aren't horrible now.
Caleb Seremshur
Commando Guri
Guristas Pirates
#9 - 2013-08-02 20:26:06 UTC
the main thing about the cruise raven is that you can push it to 1300-1500m/s now. Couple that with MJD and a cap booster and you can get fairly sustainable levels of this mobility. At 200+ km the raven loses none of its effectiveness against the target. Like all other missile snipers the main issue is pinning the enemy down while you blap them. But thats what mallers are for.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#10 - 2013-08-02 20:38:45 UTC
Mole Guy wrote:
rise+fozzie=rozzie
it was brought up in a post once and i thought it was catchy



I want confirmation that they are now called this at HQ.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Mole Guy
Bob's Bait and Tackle
#11 - 2013-08-02 22:04:38 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Mole Guy wrote:
rise+fozzie=rozzie
it was brought up in a post once and i thought it was catchy



I want confirmation that they are now called this at HQ.

what?

its something someone in a post called them.
Shereza
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-08-03 18:25:14 UTC
Aglais wrote:
Yeah. Great changes. Somehow, you managed to make the Nighthawk worse than it is now, and make another Minmatar missile ship better than the Caldari one in it's same size bracket for no reason whatsoever. Instead of trying to seek some sort of parity, maybe.

I do not want to see what happens to the Golem based on the trend that the Raven, NH and Cerberus have received. I just don't.


For all that the claymore is superior to the nighthawk it's better than it was, as are the damnation and eos, at least from a combat perspective. Hell, the eos is in a better position now than it would have been had what I suggested years ago, which is dropping the damage bonus completely and just giving the eos 125mb bandwidth in exchange, been implemented.
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#13 - 2013-08-03 18:31:54 UTC
Can we change the colors? I want an all black Vargur.

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Legion40k
Hard Knocks Inc.
Hard Knocks Citizens
#14 - 2013-08-03 20:49:00 UTC
I'd like marauders to be able to tractor asteroids to smash them into outposts -> destructible outposts.

YARRR
Nagarythe Tinurandir
Einheit X-6
#15 - 2013-08-03 21:13:32 UTC
Arthur Aihaken wrote:
Can we change the colors? I want an all black Vargur.


stop propagating this non-sense ;P
brutor colours look way more ferocious. especially with this blood red lights.