These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Constructive Feedback Threadnaught
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#21 - 2013-07-07 10:58:41 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:

take this from someone who lived in a C6 black hle for a year: NOTHING about black holes is 'fine'. on paper or otherwise.


Isn't that the place where you have to abandon+scoop your warrior IIs to get them back into the drone bay? Couldn't recall them neither standing still nor moving at 4km/s :|
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#22 - 2013-07-07 11:02:50 UTC
It's only a "threadnaught" if anyone cares.

http://www.wormholes.info
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#23 - 2013-07-07 11:22:13 UTC
Lloyd Roses wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:

take this from someone who lived in a C6 black hle for a year: NOTHING about black holes is 'fine'. on paper or otherwise

Isn't that the place where you have to abandon+scoop your warrior IIs to get them back into the drone bay? Couldn't recall them neither standing still nor moving at 4km/s :|

yeah that or double web them.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2013-07-07 16:14:36 UTC
why do people suggest 'wormhole' stuff on the wormhole subforums? is ur reading skill at 0!?

here's a link to the 'FEATURES & IDEAS DISCUSSION' subforum. go there. move this thread there. BOOM

P.S. here's a link for that forum if it's too hard to find:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270
Evangelina Nolen
Sama Guild
#25 - 2013-07-07 16:26:48 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:
why do people suggest 'wormhole' stuff on the wormhole subforums? is ur reading skill at 0!?

here's a link to the 'FEATURES & IDEAS DISCUSSION' subforum. go there. move this thread there. BOOM

P.S. here's a link for that forum if it's too hard to find:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270


I know about that sub forum. Just wanted specific opinions from WH residents.

I've sobered up now; 4 day weekend Cool
Evangelina Nolen
Sama Guild
#26 - 2013-07-07 16:50:16 UTC
Nix Anteris wrote:

Do not want.

If a wormhole is there, it's there. Why would it suddenly become warpable after X minutes. Remove them from the discovery scanner completely, keep the requirement that they have to be probed down.

It makes it too easy to just race down a chain thats older than 15 minutes with this mechanic. Collapse static, new static has wormholes warpable already, some guys in space notice you and want to escape through a wormhole, but you already have your fleet there because you didn't have to scan.


Yeah, I had roaming around as the main basis for this idea. Not having to scan down every WH would significantly increase the number of systems I visit.

Nix Anteris wrote:

Again, no thanks.

It's -1 space, there are no police, why would your actions in such space matter in empire space?


Yeah, however, highsec wormholes shouldn't be used for station game like non sense.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2013-07-07 18:22:14 UTC
Evangelina Nolen wrote:

Yeah, I had roaming around as the main basis for this idea. Not having to scan down every WH would significantly increase the number of systems I visit.


Scan faster. It's so stupid easy to scan, especially now.

And roaming to what end? You have already stated you don't like WH pvp due to the podding aspect and then annoyance of getting back in.
Messoroz
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#28 - 2013-07-07 19:21:26 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Ellariona wrote:
Black holes are fine the way they are. I haven't tried any, but some doctrines look really cool on paper.

take this from someone who lived in a C6 black hle for a year: NOTHING about black holes is 'fine'. on paper or otherwise.


Black holes are AWESOME to nano in.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#29 - 2013-07-07 21:41:00 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
Ellariona wrote:
Black holes are fine the way they are. I haven't tried any, but some doctrines look really cool on paper.

take this from someone who lived in a C6 black hle for a year: NOTHING about black holes is 'fine'. on paper or otherwise.


Black holes are AWESOME to nano in.


yeah, right.
only if you want to nano in one direction without turning and dont mind being out of range all the time.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Evangelina Nolen
Sama Guild
#30 - 2013-07-08 06:55:16 UTC
Derath Ellecon wrote:

Scan faster. It's so stupid easy to scan, especially now.

And roaming to what end? You have already stated you don't like WH pvp due to the podding aspect and then annoyance of getting back in.


I scan pretty damn fast. I have memorized the variance on the overlays and the corresponding sig strength.
Previous page12