These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AMD/ATI Dropping Windows XP Support

Author
FluffyDice
Kronos Research
#21 - 2013-06-30 05:54:11 UTC  |  Edited by: FluffyDice
I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used.

edit: Cost to business and supporting old software I definitely see as valid reasons for not wanting to upgrade. People trying to argue that it is "less user friendly than DOS," not so much.
Erok Careynah
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-06-30 05:56:41 UTC
FluffyDice wrote:
I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used.


Games actually do run better on Windows 8 for me, on my hardware, atleast.

My problem with Windows 8 is that I simply didn't see the need for an upgrade, and so I reverted to Windows 7 since it was more kind to the RAM and processor.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2013-06-30 06:21:43 UTC
Erok Careynah wrote:
PS: You can still get newer builds of nVidia/ATI drivers for Windows NT/2000, even though they "dropped" support for that OS ages ago. This doesn't effect people very much. Dropping support doesn't mean you won't be able to get updated drivers/software for your OS, it simply means that they won't be building code around that OS anymore.


Oh, they keep the drivers updated. But it's not pretty. My relative can spend a weekend just trying to install archaic Xerox drivers for an office. There's so many businesses out there that doesn't update their OS, support companies cater to them. But to work on them, for the techs, it's pounding heads against many a desk. Old OSes suck, they really really do.

And this makes me wonder how it is with these older MMOs. They're stuck with a really old engine and it's limitations.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#24 - 2013-06-30 06:30:05 UTC
FluffyDice wrote:
I wish everyone would drop support for XP. Having to support something that old is just ridiculous.

Also Win 8 is fine. Stop listening to people who only tried it to look for flaws. Everyone is stuck complaining about the start menu disappearing. Hit the Windows key on your keyboard. Type the first 3 letters of the program you want. Hit enter. Put everything on your task bar and desktop and make a mess just like you used to. It isn't hard to adapt to change and act like an adult.

Fine isn't good enough. It needs to be a must have and amazing. The days of changing an OS just because a new one came out are over. The apps are the things that matter and as long as I can use my familiar and perfectly functional OS to run them, I'm not going to change the OS. The benefits of changing are pretty much zero from my perspective and usually tend to be negative, since Microsoft seems to forget how to make a user friendly OS every other version and it'll take time for them to fix their mistakes.
Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-06-30 10:35:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Inokuma Yawara
Zenos Ebeth wrote:
The only way to stop certain people from using XP would be to physically destroy all copies of it in existence.

well since Nvidia hasn't dropped support it's not yet an issue for everyone , but xp users might as well take this as their wake up call if they don't want to log on one day and realize That Eve doesn't work anymore on their outdated OS.


Or just get an nVidia card.

There are still something like 40% of PC users that still use WinXP world wide. That's a crap-load of customers to lose to your competitor. What if nVidia continues to support WinXP? Wouldn't that be exactly the case? A crap-load of people are gonna start buying nVidia graphics cards for their machines, and keep using XP.

Watch this space.  New exciting signature in development.

Abon
Pandorum Research Incorporated
#26 - 2013-06-30 10:37:35 UTC
About 103% of all statistics are made up on the spot. No kidding!
Obunagawe
#27 - 2013-06-30 10:38:47 UTC
Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT.
Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-06-30 10:41:46 UTC
Abon wrote:
About 103% of all statistics are made up on the spot. No kidding!


Heh... Good one.

Watch this space.  New exciting signature in development.

Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#29 - 2013-06-30 10:52:08 UTC
xarjin wrote:
Aliventi wrote:
Pewty McPew wrote:
... and about 2% Win 8

Those poor souls...


/agree

Windows 8: The Animated Evaluation

Doing any productivity tasks with windows 8 is like trying to knit a wool sweater while wearing multiple Chinese finger puzzles.

Oh look, it's this circlejerk again!

That is the most ******** video I have ever seen, and I have seen some ****.

Windows 8 is basically a copy of Windows 7 who just runs a bit faster and has the metro UI. Basically nothing he says in the video is true. Yeah, it takes some getting used to, but I can use it just as fine as I could any other OS.

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}

Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#30 - 2013-06-30 10:54:19 UTC
Obunagawe wrote:
Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT.

Oh wow, someone is misinformed.

Using more ram while idle = good thing! Things are preloaded and starts faster
Clearing ram takes microseconds. Why would you want unused ram?

I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason.

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}

Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2013-06-30 10:57:56 UTC
xarjin wrote:
Just read about this on slashdot.

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-support

Hopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11.

Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp.

Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.


Pretty much, since microsoft are dropping XP support from April 2014. No reason for anyone to not get on at least windows 7, can pick a legit unused license and disk on ebay for 30 quid or so.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Doc Spectre
Doomheim
#32 - 2013-06-30 11:04:07 UTC
Great, I'm still using Windows for Workgroups 3.11...
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2013-06-30 11:09:05 UTC
Knights Armament wrote:
they also switched to openoffice



wait, isn't openoffice a bit closed up and people are shifting to LibreOffice instead?

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#34 - 2013-06-30 11:09:19 UTC
Hannott Thanos wrote:

I can't think of a single thing that runs better on XP than on win7/8 except for outdated software that only runs on xp for some reason.


Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.

I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.

So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).

Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2013-06-30 11:13:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Mr Kidd
Caldari Citizen 20120308 wrote:
Pewty McPew wrote:
XP rocks fully 80%+ of my corporate customers sill run XP 18% Win 7 and about 2% Win 8




lol maybe in Siberia wherever the heck that is.



Hmm, the multinational company, in the US, that's been around for over 100 years that I work for....lets see....about 85% of the productivity computers use XP. The remaining 15% is Windows 7....for low to mid level managers and those employees that require unfettered internet access. High level management gets their choice of MacOS....on laptops and Windows 8....on tablets. Of course, as anyone knows, high level management doesn't really do anything but waste O2 and throw their superiority around.

So, you can say what you want. But there's a reason XP has hung on with an iron grip. That reason is, from a productivity perspective, no other Windows OS since has been able to provide compelling reasons to upgrade. Windows 8 certainly hasn't. Instead Windows 8 has ignored productivity...completely. But then, Windows 8 isn't an OS to be used by the user but instead it uses the user...consumption.

My main problem with Windows 8 and Ubuntu's Unity is the utter and complete lack of user control where they took the concept of contextual menus, threw it out, and replaced it with a search interface that isn't much of an improvement over a CLI. Well, if I have a choice, just give me a CLI. At least there I can navigate, have control and see at a glance what my options are rather than playing guessing games with a search tool before I can get to the business of my business.

It's not like XP can't be made to be secure. It can be. It just won't be functional for anything other than getting work done assuming one doesn't need to randomly use the internet.

I upgraded to Windows 7, will not upgrade to Windows 8. The only reasons I don't ditch Windows and use Linux instead is that it generally suffers from poorly performing drivers and no Eve client. Otherwise, I would. I just won't get caught up in the issues of Wine....won't. I have a Foxconn Netbox that, in windows, plays 1080p videos no problems. In Linux, even using proprietary drivers, it chokes. Otherwise, it would be running Linux.

Don't ban me, bro!

Hannott Thanos
Squadron 15
#36 - 2013-06-30 11:58:26 UTC
Lors Dornick wrote:

Outdated software that many people are required to run to get paid.

I've used win7 on my main box for over a year now and XP on my two backups.

So far I haven't noted any difference at all between them except that some old but required software still doesn't play nice with win7 (and esp with UAC).

Paying 2x840SEK (or 250 USD) to upgrade my backups to win7 (or 8) with no noticeable result doesn't feel like the first thing I'd like to spend my money on.

UAC is for noobs. Just turn it off all together.

Performance and graphics in games are a lot better on newer OS's because of drivers and later versions of DX. Almost everything can be run in compatability mode on win7. I have actually never used a program that can not in some way, shape or form be run on win7/8. Heck, even command & conquer can be run on win8.

while (CurrentSelectedTarget.Status == ShipStatus.Alive) {

     _myShip.FireAllGuns(CurrentSelectedTarget);

}

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#37 - 2013-06-30 16:50:43 UTC
xarjin wrote:
Just read about this on slashdot.

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-support

Hopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11.

Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp.

Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.



You don't realize just how dirt poor many EvE players are, do you? Shocked

Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#38 - 2013-06-30 16:58:06 UTC
FluffyDice wrote:
I'd honestly like a specific example of a technical task made more difficult between 7 and 8. I see the argument a lot but I haven't actually seen a real situation used.

edit: Cost to business and supporting old software I definitely see as valid reasons for not wanting to upgrade. People trying to argue that it is "less user friendly than DOS," not so much.

The Metro interface is vastly less discoverable because it relies on unhinted touch-centric gestures that have no equivalent (and no place) on a mouse-kb-driven desktop, and which are purposefully designed around not being seen, since that kind of hinting would steal precious screen real-estate on a tablet…

…which is a braindead design decision when applied to multiple-2560×1440-resolution screens.

It's not quite as bad as DOS, but at least in DOS you could get a list of (and get help for) the available commands with some ease — not so in Win8.
Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
#39 - 2013-06-30 17:36:30 UTC
xarjin wrote:
Just read about this on slashdot.

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/13/06/29/2235257/amdati-drops-windows-xp-support

Hopefully any stragglers playing eve on windows xp will finally get updated to windows 7 so ccp can update eve to support directx11.

Nvidia likely wont be far behind ATI in dropping support for windows xp.

Update your systems windows xp users or you will be left behind to the annals of computing history.

Nope, not all video cards running Windows 7 support Directx 11. All of them support at least Directx 10 because that was the initial release that came with 7.
Jimmy Morane
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#40 - 2013-06-30 17:41:25 UTC
Obunagawe wrote:
Sure, I'd love to upgrade to Windows 7 and use 1.5GB of RAM instead of 0.4GB of RAM at idle, and have no actual performance increase. That would be GREAT.


What are you talking about? Not even a month ago you were on here yelling something like ......you people with old shiiit are holding the cool kids back from getting new shinies in the game....GET NEW SHIIT OR GTFO RAAAAWWWRRRRR

And now you are implying that you still use XP. LOL