These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Being a cop in China is tough

Author
Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2013-06-27 17:12:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Tumahub
Micheal Dietrich wrote:

Capitalize security leaving the rich secure and the poor to fend for themselves, allowing for individual rule sets to be created and companies like Blackwater to uphold them while completely ignoring to look into the issues that lead to crime such as low social or economic standing and poor education. Sounds great, where do I sign up.


Except that isn't what happened in Detroit at all. The poor are covered pro bono because it's good for business. Companies like blackwater are nothing like the domestic security firms that I mentioned. Blackwater is a mercenary corporation created to support the state military. That is the diametric opposite of a local security firm who has no special privileged and works in the interest of customers and their community.

I think you should avail yourself of a little more information.
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#22 - 2013-06-27 17:49:36 UTC
Tumahub wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:

Capitalize security leaving the rich secure and the poor to fend for themselves, allowing for individual rule sets to be created and companies like Blackwater to uphold them while completely ignoring to look into the issues that lead to crime such as low social or economic standing and poor education. Sounds great, where do I sign up.


Except that isn't what happened in Detroit at all. The poor are covered pro bono because it's good for business. Companies like blackwater are nothing like the domestic security firms that I mentioned. Blackwater is a mercenary corporation created to support the state military. That is the diametric opposite of a local security firm who has no special privileged and works in the interest of customers and their community.

I think you should avail yourself of a little more information.


Blackwater is a training facility as well as a security provider for state law enforcement, military, and private domestic firms. They also provide R&D technologies and intelligence/counterintelligence. They had 200 people contracted for security during Katrina. They work with the DEA and the DOD, and provided similar training to Afghans police and military forces.

Is that enough avail information for you or would you like to know more about one of the largest global security firms?

And that quip about working in the special interest of customers and community is silly. What company wouldn't have their customers in their best interest? Blackwater didn't become global just because, it because global because of its service to its customers.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2013-06-27 18:21:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Tumahub
Micheal Dietrich wrote:

Blackwater is a training facility as well as a security provider for state law enforcement, military, and private domestic firms. They also provide R&D technologies and intelligence/counterintelligence. They had 200 people contracted for security during Katrina. They work with the DEA and the DOD, and provided similar training to Afghans police and military forces.


Right, they're a state mercenary corporation that provides for the state. They are to private security what the Federal Reserve Bank is to private finance, that is, not actually private and completely reliant on state money and authority.

Micheal Dietrich wrote:

And that quip about working in the special interest of customers and community is silly. What company wouldn't have their customers in their best interest? Blackwater didn't become global just because, it because global because of its service to its customers.


A company doesn't make money if the customers don't like their service. Unlike the state, which taxes and provides whatever service it wants, they have to work in the best interest of their customers or the customers will go elsewhere. Blackwater didn't become "global," because of it's service for precisely because it serves the state and not individual customers.

You seem to be conflating the relationship between the guy who sells you a hot-dog and the guy who robs you at gun-point and might give you a hot-dog later, if you're nice and he likes you. Private voluntary interaction is always a better solution because it provides a service that people want and not the service that the state monopolist feels like providing.
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#24 - 2013-06-27 18:30:50 UTC
Tumahub wrote:

Right, they're a state mercenary corporation that provides for the state. They are to private security what the Federal Reserve Bank is to private finance, that is, not actually private and completely reliant on state money and authority.


Wrong.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2013-06-27 18:47:24 UTC
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Tumahub wrote:

Right, they're a state mercenary corporation that provides for the state. They are to private security what the Federal Reserve Bank is to private finance, that is, not actually private and completely reliant on state money and authority.


Wrong.


That's not an argument. I have to conclude that you cede the point.
Kirjava
Lothian Enterprises
#26 - 2013-06-27 18:54:14 UTC
Slade Trillgon wrote:
I find it ironic that in a country that martial arts is such a big part of the history and culture, this guy could not keep his grip on his short sword Pirate

This, I don't think I've ever dropped my Rapier or Foil, but then I use a pistol grip What?

[center]Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. /人◕‿‿◕人\ Unban Saede![/center]

Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#27 - 2013-06-27 19:10:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Micheal Dietrich
Tumahub wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Tumahub wrote:

Right, they're a state mercenary corporation that provides for the state. They are to private security what the Federal Reserve Bank is to private finance, that is, not actually private and completely reliant on state money and authority.


Wrong.


That's not an argument. I have to conclude that you cede the point.


You go right ahead, I can't argue with somebody who keeps mistaking a security firm as a murika merc army. I gave you the definition above and you've had ample time to visit their website to learn a little about them but you insist on making up your own definition and saying its what they are.

Go ahead and get your last post in if you like, claim your little internet forum victory, I'm done talking to brick walls.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

ZeeWolf Novus
Saor Alba
#28 - 2013-06-27 19:47:02 UTC
Worst camera skills. Ever.
Angelique Duchemin
Team Evil
#29 - 2013-06-27 20:06:25 UTC
Tumahub wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
I have a lot of respect for our police force, and usually not much for those who don't.


That doesn't really have any bearing on the argument except to explain your bias, which is entirely fair. Most people do readily associate a badge with respectability and I am sure there are some uniformed men and women who don't act like thugs, despite the system giving them the leeway and incentive to do so.

Micheal Dietrich wrote:

They do the work that no one wants to see and they put their lives at risk so yours can be safe. I can understand their use of force when force when necessary, given the danger we put ourselves in by allowing certain liberties.


I don't find a lot of merit in this argument. The job that "nobody wants," is vacant, because nobody takes the job. If one is economically desperate then they take whatever comes their way, sure, but to imply that getting into a reasonably well-paying government job with a whole lot of benefits is an act of desperation I think stretched reality.

I certainly wouldn't suggest the job isn't dangerous, but if you consider the on-the-job fatality/injury rate for police is lower than that of fishermen, farmers, loggers, power linemen, and a host of other physically dangerous professions, you begin to understand that the axiomatic assumption that it should pay more because -danger- doesn't really fly. I don't suggest anyone is over payed because the market makes that decision, but since a state employee is not subject to the market there is no way to tell.

In terms of keeping people safe, the track-record is pretty grim. Check out the track record of the private security companies who have set up shop in the now-defunct and un-policed districts of Detroit. Their streets are far safer and the number of times they discharge their weapons is much much lower. Since they are subject to the demands of their customers, they are able to respond to that by providing the best protection, rather than whatever fits into the current state budget. They've done well enough that they even patrol the poor neighborhoods for free. By the numbers they appear to be doing the job better by any metric and they have no extrajudicial power to abuse. If they shoot someone down in the street, they'll be on the hook for murder, not some misdemeanor conduct charge.

Micheal Dietrich wrote:

That's not to imply that there aren't bad apples in the bunch; we have plenty of evidence to support that, but they are not above the law as many like you claim and they are routinely shaken off their horse like anyone else.


I assume it's as much a regional problem as anything else, but it is well established that the criminal justice system does not regularly prosecute officers who violate the law, in letter or spirit, on the job. Whether it is excused by fiat or because of some extraordinary circumstance doesn't really matter. Just last week a case closed where a 9 year old girl was killed when a SWAT team broke into her home to apprehend one of her parents. The team corroborated the fact that there was no struggle and the shooter had simply popped the kid. He got off without a day in the pen. Fast forward a few days when another child accidentally kills his younger neighbor wile wrestling and he goes right away, charged as an adult.

I think we have a serious problem with young children are being punished more harshly than fully grown and trained adults.

Micheal Dietrich wrote:

Tell me, who do you refer to when your car gets broken into? It certainly wouldn't be the thugs now would it? Or do they suddenly become the good guys when you need them? What is your solution to our broken system?


I've never had that problem, personally, and if something was stolen from me I would contact my insurance agent. My understanding of reporting something missing is that it won't be found and if it is found, you will not likely find it in one piece. Not to mention any cash or material of significant value will probably be claimed as a lawful seizure.

The solution, as I indicated earlier, is private security and self-defense. The firms in Detroit are just confirming what our long American history or armed private citizens has taught us. Criminals think twice when they know that the proprietor of the establishment they marked is going to do something other than "call the cops," which is exactly what they want.

Having a class of uniforms that operates above the law in order to safe-guard that law, doesn't seem to be working. That's more or less how I view the situation anyway. Hope that clears things up and kudos to your police friends if they are some of the few that do good from within a bad system.


The Eve forums is a ridiculous place to vomit this agenda of yours.

The very sun of heaven seemed distorted when viewed through the polarising miasma welling out from this sea-soaked perversion, and twisted menace and suspense lurked leeringly in those crazily elusive angles of carven rock where a second glance shewed concavity after the first shewed convexity.

Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2013-06-27 20:41:01 UTC
Well at least there was some reasoned debate before the inevitable deluge of ad hominem.

Sorry if pointing out the obvious flaws in the status quo makes you feel bad, but don't shoot the messenger.
Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
#31 - 2013-06-28 18:29:49 UTC
In my country, Police never stop you unless you look milkable enough to get bribe money off. Also people on bikes are a PLAGUE in my country, they all are mostly criminals, armed to the teeth, and unlike the video, would stab/shoot you for the sheer fun of it knowing NO SANE COP WOULD EVER follow them inside the slums.

Only way someone would be able to get in the slums is with a tank and air support or heavily protected by local thugs.

In some countries police react brutally, in others people react brutally to cops.

There is no middle ground. This is the reality we live in.

Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco

Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-06-28 19:05:49 UTC
Brujo Loco wrote:

In some countries police react brutally, in others people react brutally to cops.

There is no middle ground. This is the reality we live in.


Partially true, but I beg to differ on the point that I don't see this as a trade-off. Police brutality and organized crime go hand in hand. During the height of prohibition in the US, when federal agents were given leeway to do just about anything in the name of shutting down bootleggers, there was a massive boom in organized criminality and the national murder rate doubled. During that era families with strong ties to organized crime gained a substantial amount of money from the then-illegal trade and turned those fortunes into political dynasties (ie. Kennedy Sr.).

Same story plays out in reverse elsewhere. During the mafioso wars in southern Italy/Sicily the state seemed completely powerless to do anything about it. Fast forward to around the second world war, where the state had plenty of fire-power and martial control to tamp down on any unrest, and you find that the mafia was going strong. In fact it's been well documented that the mafia worked with both allied and axis leadership to kill their enemies and terrorize enemy civilian populations.

So while I do agree that socialist law enforcement is fairly universal in the world today and that you have brutal people on both sides of the blue line, I don't think there's any reasonable case to be made that we need ultra-judicial-power in the hands of a few in order to prevent the criminally insane from running amok. Just eliminate the prohibition on drugs and you relieve most criminal syndicates of their income (which is exactly what happened when alcohol prohibition ended) and free up the police from a lot of work. 92% of criminals in US prisons are in for non-violent crime.
Ten Ton Testes
Zoners
#33 - 2013-06-29 11:38:10 UTC
Tumahub wrote:
Most people, smartly, do not antagonize the uniformed thug who can quite literally get away with murder.


How incredibly ignorant. You assume that all police are thugs?
Q 5
999 HOLDINGS LLC
#34 - 2013-06-30 21:39:41 UTC
Shocked could you imagine if it was a real biker and not a scooter biker....sheesh hate to see one of those guys if a scooter biker pulls a knife a real Harley biker in China pulls out a????

He's got balls tho, them Chinese gulags aren't no joke, waaahka, slapped with a karate slap.
Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2013-06-30 21:52:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Tumahub
Ten Ton Testes wrote:
Tumahub wrote:
Most people, smartly, do not antagonize the uniformed thug who can quite literally get away with murder.


How incredibly ignorant. You assume that all police are thugs?


That wasn't implied in the statement you quoted. What was implied is the fact that a uniform generally means getting off with a reduced sentence instead of the full penalty of the law, which is applied to civilians.

Ignorance would be to ignore the fact that huge amounts of extrajudicial power in the hands of these uniformed men and women isn't corrupting them.

Quote:
Chicago Police Officer Richard A. Rizzo has been arrested four times in the past seven years, but that’s not enough to get him fired from the department. Rizzo has been arrested for domestic battery, child endangerment and aggravated assault with a gun. Yet while members of the general public are expected to pay fines or go to jail, prosecutors have dropped charges against Rizzo each and every time.

The Chicago Sun-Times reports:

On Dec. 30, 2010, Rizzo was arrested for aggravated assault with a gun and domestic battery after a fight with a 40-year-old man and the man’s 18-year-old son. Both of them lived with Rizzo in a Garfield Ridge bungalow.

The arresting officers said Rizzo punched the older man, grabbed the gun, put the muzzle in the man’s eye and told him, “How about I shoot you in the face?”

A month later, on Jan. 31, 2011, Rizzo was arrested again, this time for domestic battery, after officers said he grabbed his girlfriend “by her throat and began to strangle her.” The arresting officers said she broke away and locked herself in a bedroom. They said Rizzo kicked in the door just before they arrived.

The officers “photographed alleged injuries to victim and damage to the bedroom door,” and the incident was referred to the city’s Independent Police Review Authority for investigation.

According to the Sun-Times, Rizzo has never been disciplined for violating Chicago Police Department (CPD) rules that “generally target officers who break the law or otherwise bring discredit upon the department,” and records show he continues to make $80,724 a year working for the CPD.

Rizzo is not alone. The Chicago Police Department has a history of allowing officers who break the laws they are entrusted to uphold and enforce to remain employed--collecting high salaries and pensions.

Since 2004, 32 officers have been fired, or quit prior to being fired, collecting pensions that cost the city more than $1.2 million a year. Chicago officers cannot be stripped of their pensions unless they break the law while on duty.

Rizzo was reportedly relieved of his “police powers” on June 13, 2013 and placed on "call back" (desk duty), only after the Chicago Sun-Times asked about his status. Just as his fellow law-breaking officers, Rizzo remains eligible to collect his pension.
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#36 - 2013-07-01 21:39:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Slade Trillgon
Although Blackwater has private contracts with private firms, it was started by ex US Military and Intelligence officers for the sole purpose of gaining lucrative military security contracts that could have been done in house. All other 'domestic' contracts were icing on the cake. Also, the fact that they do 'it' more efficiently then the US Military, speaks volumes about the state of the US military and its leadership imho Ugh


EDIT:

Ten Ton Testes wrote:
Tumahub wrote:
Most people, smartly, do not antagonize the uniformed thug who can quite literally get away with murder.


How incredibly ignorant. You assume that all police are thugs?


Tumahub responded effectively enough, but the fact that you inferred what you did speaks volumes about your comprehension skills.
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#37 - 2013-07-01 22:31:23 UTC
Slade Trillgon wrote:
Although Blackwater has private contracts with private firms, it was started by ex US Military and Intelligence officers for the sole purpose of gaining lucrative military security contracts that could have been done in house. All other 'domestic' contracts were icing on the cake. Also, the fact that they do 'it' more efficiently then the US Military, speaks volumes about the state of the US military and its leadership imho Ugh


At least you understand that they do have contracts with private firms.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Tumahub
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2013-07-01 22:36:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Tumahub
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Slade Trillgon wrote:
Although Blackwater has private contracts with private firms, it was started by ex US Military and Intelligence officers for the sole purpose of gaining lucrative military security contracts that could have been done in house. All other 'domestic' contracts were icing on the cake. Also, the fact that they do 'it' more efficiently then the US Military, speaks volumes about the state of the US military and its leadership imho Ugh


At least you understand that they do have contracts with private firms.



And that in no way conflicts with anything I posted earlier.

Without public contracts through DoD, blackwater would not exist as in its current form. So to use it as a cudgel against any kind of private security is a strawman argument.
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2013-07-01 22:55:06 UTC
Slade Trillgon wrote:
Although Blackwater has private contracts with private firms, it was started by ex US Military and Intelligence officers for the sole purpose of gaining lucrative military security contracts that could have been done in house. All other 'domestic' contracts were icing on the cake. Also, the fact that they do 'it' more efficiently then the US Military, speaks volumes about the state of the US military and its leadership imho Ugh

I distinctly recall a Congressional primer being released showing the ridiculous amount of money that the Pentagon pisses away on some pretty insane stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the military.
For some examples:
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/341573/pentagon-budget-beef-jerky-trekkie-conventions-and-17000-drip-pans

I can't be assed to find the original document right this second, but it should be easy to find with a little effort. It basically read like 40+ .pdf pages of "wtf, are you serious?"
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#40 - 2013-07-01 23:31:09 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Slade Trillgon wrote:
Although Blackwater has private contracts with private firms, it was started by ex US Military and Intelligence officers for the sole purpose of gaining lucrative military security contracts that could have been done in house. All other 'domestic' contracts were icing on the cake. Also, the fact that they do 'it' more efficiently then the US Military, speaks volumes about the state of the US military and its leadership imho Ugh

I distinctly recall a Congressional primer being released showing the ridiculous amount of money that the Pentagon pisses away on some pretty insane stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the military.
For some examples:
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/341573/pentagon-budget-beef-jerky-trekkie-conventions-and-17000-drip-pans

I can't be assed to find the original document right this second, but it should be easy to find with a little effort. It basically read like 40+ .pdf pages of "wtf, are you serious?"


yep, the old saying that the government spends $40 on a bolt and a $1000 on a ladder isn't far from the truth.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Previous page123Next page