These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Can possible CCP create role for access and access denied for Ship Maintenance Array / POS

First post
Author
GemBi
Bulgarian Experienced Crackers
#1 - 2013-06-25 21:55:39 UTC  |  Edited by: GemBi
We live in W-Space
Please establish a role for accessing Ship Maintenance Array/POS because we had an accident in the corporation. pilot tried to steal our ships after adopted him just before the incident he eject all ships in the space and began push one from them. Please add new role/grande role for access to Ship Maintenance Array/POS as Corporate Hangar Array.

we are not giving him roles, just newly clean with bad intentions theft
chris elliot
Oblivion Watch
HYDRA RELOADED
#2 - 2013-06-25 22:52:29 UTC
The current pos coding is really really old, and really really bad. CCP wants to touch it about as much as one wants to kiss a diseased horse on the mouth.

Any changes to the roles or pos permission structure will come, likely with an entirely new back end of both code, but also permissions and roles, but not any time soon.

Take care to screen your recruits and make use of passwords until then.
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#3 - 2013-06-25 22:57:31 UTC
GemBi wrote:
We live in W-Space
Please establish a role for accessing Ship Maintenance Array/POS because we had an accident in the corporation. pilot tried to steal our ships after adopted him just before the incident he eject all ships in the space and began push one from them. Please add new role/grande role for access to Ship Maintenance Array/POS as Corporate Hangar Array.

we are not giving him roles, just newly clean with bad intentions theft

Like OMGCCP, give us a way of doing background checks on new recruits!

Personal ship maint arrays are coming soon™.

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.

Chitsa Jason
Out of Focus
Odin's Call
#4 - 2013-06-25 23:01:46 UTC
CSM7 was pushing hard for POS changes and we got the personal CHAs. Personal SMAs is something that is a must in my humble opinion.

Burn the land and boil the sea You can't take the sky from me

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#5 - 2013-06-26 01:19:21 UTC
You can already do this, tho its a bit clunky and I'm on my tablet and can't quickly explain it properly. Involves changing access masks for individual smas through pos management screen and allocating starbase roles (don't need to give out the ones that give full pos management ability).
Phoenix Jones
The Markoni Dragons
#6 - 2013-06-26 02:42:40 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
CSM7 was pushing hard for POS changes and we got the personal CHAs. Personal SMAs is something that is a must in my humble opinion.


All of eve wants personal sma's. no clue why the devs are face dragging themselves on it. They've already updated the graphics engine, recoded every ship, interfaced and built an entirely new game, but can't handle some fossile code?

Regardless this chicken feed is not working. Time to scrap the ENTIRE pos program, and redo it from square 1, ground up. Roles, modules, interface, the whole thing. It'll take 2 months but it will be something you can be proud of.

What to do has been beaten to death already, and is gong th way of the graphical upgrade that magically hasn't happened, even with the 200 page threadnaught going on.

Yaay!!!!

Evangelina Nolen
Sama Guild
#7 - 2013-06-26 02:59:37 UTC
The answer is simple. Make every1 run their own POS.
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#8 - 2013-06-26 04:14:39 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:
They've already updated the graphics engine, recoded every ship, interfaced and built an entirely new game, but can't handle some fossile code?


Confirming that if I don't understand it, it must be easy.

http://www.wormholes.info

Dring Dingle
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2013-06-26 04:22:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Dring Dingle
this got me for a while....


right click manage on your tower. go to the access tab. find the SMA, change the use option to "Star base fuel Technician"
Create a title in your corp management area.
Call the title. " SMA Approved or Corpie or anything" and select starbase fuel tech.
Only grant that title with the "starbase fuel tech role" to your trusted corpies.

as far as i know the star base fuel technician doesn't allow the member to remove fuel. Just view how much is left. i think you need the "configure starbase equipment" role to remove fuel.

^ correct me if i am wrong

o7

ps.. you can set the sma access to the "config star base equip" role..... but remember granting this will give them the ability to offline the whole thing
Hopelesshobo
Hoboland
#10 - 2013-06-26 04:40:06 UTC
Wormhole life would be alot easier if you could set up outposts in them...

Lowering the average to make you look better since 2012.

Axloth Okiah
Ehefkae
#11 - 2013-06-26 05:17:18 UTC
Hopelesshobo wrote:
Wormhole life would be alot easier if you could set up outposts in them...
no
Jack Miton
Perkone
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-06-26 05:20:09 UTC
if he has no roles you can already do this.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Random Woman
Very Professional Corporation
#13 - 2013-06-26 06:00:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Random Woman
Well this change would probably invoke a thing called "effort" on CCP's side. I wouldnt hold my breath for it if I were you.

Also if they really do it I would only log out on a savespot with a covertops, because CCP quality software engineering would probably prevent me from acessing the hangar at all for at least 3 month, while the POS itself is trying to murder me in the meantime.
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations
#14 - 2013-06-26 12:23:51 UTC
Evangelina Nolen wrote:
The answer is simple. Make every1 run their own POS.


You sir are a genius!!! Oh by the way, what if you have an alliance of over 100 actual pilots in a WH? Yeah, that's what I thought. Perhaps CCP could actually fix the problem...
Kalel Nimrott
Caldari Provisions
#15 - 2013-06-26 12:52:00 UTC
Nathan Jameson wrote:
Phoenix Jones wrote:
They've already updated the graphics engine, recoded every ship, interfaced and built an entirely new game, but can't handle some fossile code?


Confirming that if I don't understand it, it must be easy.


Wait. CHAs have tabs and SMAs dont. Why? They are both the same old code.....

Bob Artis, you will be missed.

O7

Quinn Corvez
Perkone
Caldari State
#16 - 2013-06-26 13:03:52 UTC
The introduced personal hangers so I don't see why they can't just add a new pos structures that do the things we want and then phase out the old broken stuff.
Hopelesshobo
Hoboland
#17 - 2013-06-26 14:29:51 UTC
Axloth Okiah wrote:
Hopelesshobo wrote:
Wormhole life would be alot easier if you could set up outposts in them...
no


Easier is different from a good idea

Lowering the average to make you look better since 2012.

Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#18 - 2013-06-26 17:41:40 UTC
Kalel Nimrott wrote:
Nathan Jameson wrote:
Phoenix Jones wrote:
They've already updated the graphics engine, recoded every ship, interfaced and built an entirely new game, but can't handle some fossile code?


Confirming that if I don't understand it, it must be easy.


Wait. CHAs have tabs and SMAs dont. Why? They are both the same old code.....


And Edsels and Ferraris are both cars.

http://www.wormholes.info

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-06-26 17:59:52 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:
Chitsa Jason wrote:
CSM7 was pushing hard for POS changes and we got the personal CHAs. Personal SMAs is something that is a must in my humble opinion.


All of eve wants personal sma's. no clue why the devs are face dragging themselves on it. They've already updated the graphics engine, recoded every ship, interfaced and built an entirely new game, but can't handle some fossile code?

Regardless this chicken feed is not working. Time to scrap the ENTIRE pos program, and redo it from square 1, ground up. Roles, modules, interface, the whole thing. It'll take 2 months but it will be something you can be proud of.

What to do has been beaten to death already, and is gong th way of the graphical upgrade that magically hasn't happened, even with the 200 page threadnaught going on.



You realize that POS's are the backbone of sov, right? That, should CCP make such changes to POS's and they accidentally some code, that those major alliances will go broke in about 15 years once their moon mining operations go down.

So, I can understand their trepidation. On the other hand, they do need to get off their butts and just do it.

Fact is the current mechanics work and can be made to work to secure SMA's and CHA's albeit very clumsily.

Don't ban me, bro!

calaretu
Honestly We didnt know
#20 - 2013-06-26 23:15:06 UTC
xl ship assembly array have tabs. just sayin
12Next page