These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

T2 large rigs

First post
Author
Darco Aldent
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-06-10 08:40:54 UTC
Rain6635 wrote:
when you get to do something like increase armor hitpoints by 75%, don't you think it's justified

impressively skilled and T2 fitted, a megathron is equal to more than 2 average megathrons


so u want to tell me that by fitting 3 t2 rigs instead of 3t1 rigs u are equal to 2 ships with t1 rigs. yeah right and u are 800 million poorer .
Darco Aldent
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-06-10 09:09:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Darco Aldent
Lets analize Large Trimark armor pump . I went in pyfa and setup a megatron with 3x armor rigs t1 and t2 , damage controll 2x1600 plates and 2 eano to see how much more armor we get

For t1= armor ehp 91
For t2= armor ehp 103k

that is 12k more ehp for 900 million is. So its too overpriced for battleships now that it can`t be used on capitals
Rain6635
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2013-06-10 09:10:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6635
not only do you get a hitpoint increase, they are resist buffed hit points. so yeah. I stand by my statement that an impressively skilled and T2 fitted T1 battleship is worth two average hulls. the ISK you're paying is for an advantage on just one ship. in the case of T2 Trimarks, you're getting close to what you pay for: nearly a second hull.

did you include implants

how about an armored warfare booster.

this advantage is all part of the cost. it's what you're paying for.

if you want them cheaper, buy the materials and make them. you might even find yourself selling them. hah

Rainf1337 on Twitch

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#24 - 2013-06-10 09:33:55 UTC
Darco Aldent wrote:
Lets analize Large Trimark armor pump . I went in pyfa and setup a megatron with 3x armor rigs t1 and t2 , damage controll 2x1600 plates and 2 eano to see how much more armor we get

For t1= armor ehp 91
For t2= armor ehp 103k

that is 12k more ehp for 900 million is. So its too overpriced for battleships now that it can`t be used on capitals


Small incrememental improvements always have a disporportionate cost.

Compare the EHP:ISk of T2 Trimarks with the EHP:ISK of a +5% Hull Upgrades implant.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#25 - 2013-06-10 10:47:00 UTC
Darco Aldent wrote:
are too expensive for battleships. Now with the new capital rigs please lower the cost of large t2 . ty


why? How are those related to each other?
Prices for all T2 rigs will fall due to increased T2 salvage supply but large ones already cost 1/5 of capital ones.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#26 - 2013-06-10 11:22:43 UTC
OP meant because the demand from capital ships is gone. but OP was also unaware of the build cost, and is probably still unaware of the effect on prices when everyone remembers "how much they've always been."
Battle BV Master
Bacon Never Dies
#27 - 2013-06-10 11:34:09 UTC
Not just large but T2 rigs dishonor the T2 principle.

T2 equals afforadablity as a reward for extra training. This currently does not apply to rigs.

These are slightly better and insanely more expensive in some cases. Just not worth it in the current form.

Call them faction rigs or something that justifies its cost.


So for now just dont use T2 rigs kids, hmmkay?!
DeLindsay
Galaxies Fall
#28 - 2013-06-10 11:40:26 UTC  |  Edited by: DeLindsay
Malcanis wrote:
Darco Aldent wrote:
Lets analize Large Trimark armor pump . I went in pyfa and setup a megatron with 3x armor rigs t1 and t2 , damage controll 2x1600 plates and 2 eano to see how much more armor we get

For t1= armor ehp 91
For t2= armor ehp 103k

that is 12k more ehp for 900 million is. So its too overpriced for battleships now that it can`t be used on capitals


Small incrememental improvements always have a disporportionate cost.

Compare the EHP:ISk of T2 Trimarks with the EHP:ISK of a +5% Hull Upgrades implant.

This.

Take it from another view point, called min/max or twinking. Take your average Megathron with T1 Rigs and standard T2 fitting (that only maybe HALF of Eve can actually afford on a daily basis because everyone is space poor apparently), this ship has average potential, it's similar to any other average player's Megathron. Now take a Megathron and pimp it with some T2 Rigs (you can RARELY, if ever fit all 3 as T2, so that invalidates your argument OP) add in some Faction or deadspace modules, some Faction Ammo, Combat Boosters, +5% Implants and now that Megathron is superior to all the average ones.

Cost is irrelevant, better is better.

The Operative: "There are a lot of innocent people being killed in the air right now".

Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: "You have no idea how true that is".

Marco Magnus
Placementcorpii
#29 - 2013-06-10 11:44:42 UTC
Battle BV Master wrote:
Not just large but T2 rigs dishonor the T2 principle.

T2 equals afforadablity as a reward for extra training. This currently does not apply to rigs.

These are slightly better and insanely more expensive in some cases. Just not worth it in the current form.

Call them faction rigs or something that justifies its cost.


So for now just dont use T2 rigs kids, hmmkay?!



Yes all t2 rigs are to expensive. Lets hope t2 salvage gets seeded more. Explore my minions so that i can buy 100 million t2 rigs
The Djego
Hellequin Inc.
#30 - 2013-06-10 18:12:40 UTC  |  Edited by: The Djego
If anybody could fit T2 rigs on her ships, T2 and even more so T1 rigs would be irrelevant. A similar thing happened with frigs, cruisers and BCs, rigs got so incredible cheap that every hull is rigged, giving you no advantage if you spend some buck(around 30-60M for extender/trimark rigging) back then or if you actually was a bit more creative with the fitting and chose cost effective stuff(3M, weapon rigging/shield resist rigging) back then and you still owned any non rigged fitting.

I got my new navy apoc rigged for like 45M with 2 T2 and 1 T1 rig(would have done 3 but I run out of calibration points for that), I think that is very reasonable and offers a good value/performance ratio and you will probably find a lot better deals for your isk regarding ship performance if you stop focusing on high demand rigs.

Improve discharge rigging: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=246166&find=unread

Karash Amerius
The Seven Shadows
Scotch And Tea.
#31 - 2013-06-10 18:50:34 UTC
You will see a gradual price drop in T2 large rigs mainly due to the fact that demand will lessen from capital pilots. It just takes a bit of time.

Karash Amerius Operative, Sutoka

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#32 - 2013-06-10 22:44:19 UTC
Darco Aldent wrote:
Rigs are a permanet investment in ur ship, so to buy a 250 million t2 rigor for a 150m raven is very expensive . So i still ask that prices should be reduce by about 66% so to about 100 million so u can fit them profitable on t1 hulls . thank you



it wasn't phoenix boosting these prices dude. You don't run flare/rigor on phoenix, its a waste of time. Phoenix pilots learn to live with the fact they can't shoot moving targets. Rigs won't fix this...only a ship or cap missile redo will. They know this. They either resign themselves to structure bash detail or x-train to other racial that can at the minimum hit another cap (phoenix has issues hitting other caps).



this price would be due to CNR and now cruise golem. Both of which unless flown badly will make back the ROI on the rig buy decently quick. You need to stop picking fotm rigs if you want cheaper. Here's how invention and building works. If I make fotm rigs I know someone will pay for them. A CNR pilot is looking to make billions from his ride, he will pay more upfront costs to do that. If I make oddball unloved rigs I sell cheaper, they don't exactly fly off the shelf.

Morale of the story....splurge on CNR and your rigs won't be more than the ship. Or pay to pimp your vanilla t1. this isn't a bs only issue. I have run t2 rigged rifters in the past. The rig (s) cost > cost of the hull. I wanted my edge, had the isk to spare....wtf lets do it.

Want your edge on a vanilla t1 frame gonna pay for it the take away.




Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#33 - 2013-06-10 22:51:03 UTC
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#34 - 2013-06-10 22:57:52 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
you mean flavor of the years



very true lol
Kasutra
No Vacancies
No Vacancies.
#35 - 2013-06-10 22:58:46 UTC
WTF are people yabbering about wanting CCP to lower prices. CCP doesn't lower prices. You lower prices of things by wanting things less.

Quote:
Not just large but T2 rigs dishonor the T2 principle.

T2 equals afforadablity as a reward for extra training. This currently does not apply to rigs.

These are slightly better and insanely more expensive in some cases. Just not worth it in the current form.

Call them faction rigs or something that justifies its cost.


You're confusing the broad benefits of T2 and meta 4 here.

T2 grants greater benefits than T1. This applies to rigs.
T2 is harder to make (read: more expensive) than T1. This applies to rigs.
T2 requires more fitting than T1. This applies to rigs.
T2 requires more skills to use than T1. This applies to rigs.

I don't get it. P
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#36 - 2013-06-11 12:58:18 UTC
Battle BV Master wrote:
Not just large but T2 rigs dishonor the T2 principle.

T2 equals afforadablity as a reward for extra training. This currently does not apply to rigs.

These are slightly better and insanely more expensive in some cases. Just not worth it in the current form.

Call them faction rigs or something that justifies its cost.


So for now just dont use T2 rigs kids, hmmkay?!


T2 modules are typically 5-10x the price of T1.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Effect One
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#37 - 2013-06-11 13:30:26 UTC
I only ever fit T2 large rigs on pirate battleships.

'This might be internet spaceships, but it's not rocket science to protect yourself and fly with a little common sense' - CCP Falcon

Battle BV Master
Bacon Never Dies
#38 - 2013-06-11 16:18:31 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Battle BV Master wrote:
Not just large but T2 rigs dishonor the T2 principle.

T2 equals afforadablity as a reward for extra training. This currently does not apply to rigs.

These are slightly better and insanely more expensive in some cases. Just not worth it in the current form.

Call them faction rigs or something that justifies its cost.


So for now just dont use T2 rigs kids, hmmkay?!


T2 modules are typically 5-10x the price of T1.



Really? 3 random examples.

Strip Miner I vs a T2 is only x2 (2,5mil to 5mil)

Tractor beams? T1 is 1,5mil T2 is 2,7 less then x2

Neutron Blaster Cannon I is 1,6mil a T2 is 4.4mil not even x3.


What it comes down to? If the T1 module is already pretty expensive then the increase doesnt reach the x5 let alone x10 mark.

And well most T1 rigs have a high base value, so they should not get the x5 or let alone x10 punishment since other T2 versions of relatively expensive T1 items dont seem to get this either.
Darco Aldent
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2013-06-11 17:40:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Darco Aldent
All i wanted was to rig my t1 battleship with t2 rigs for about the price of the hull , it seemed to me like a fair price . All i can hope is that T2 salvage will be cheaper in future with the new exploration changes . To clarify i tought large t2 rigs are expensive because they were used on capital ships and thats why the high number of t2 salvage involved.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2013-06-12 09:11:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6637
o.

WTB capital rigs to fit on my battleship! jk. it's the same bonuses.
Previous page123Next page