These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Implant: Poteque 'Prospector' Environmental Analysis EY-1005
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#1 - 2013-06-06 03:18:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Alona Gene
Is this a bug, an over-site, or the way it's supposed to work?

Quote:
Poteque 'Prospector' Environmental Analysis EY-1005

A neural Interface upgrade that boosts the pilot's skill at environmental analysis.

5% reduction in cycle time of salvage, hacking and archaeology modules.


Is this going to be changed like the:
Quote:
Poteque 'Prospector' Archaeology AC-905
A neural Interface upgrade that boosts the pilots exploration skills.

+5 Virus Coherence when accessing archaeology containers.


And

Quote:
Poteque 'Prospector' Hacking HC-905
A neural Interface upgrade that boosts the pilots exploration skills.

+5 Virus Coherence when accessing hacking containers.



Otherwise it's quite useless in my head! :D

EDIT:
As of 7/24/2013, the implant was changed to:
Quote:

Poteque 'Prospector' Environmental Analysis EY-1005
A neural interface upgrade that boosts the pilot's skill at environmental analysis and increases the decay time of scattered containers in exploration sites.

5% reduction in cycle time of salvage, hacking and archaeology modules.

5 second increase to decay time of all scattered containers.
Freyya
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2013-06-06 11:56:25 UTC
It is quite useless in your head right now...i'm guessing it is an oversight on ccp's part or they just dont have a new use for it atm. Might change later on though...
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#3 - 2013-06-06 12:38:12 UTC
It is still useful for salvagers, but I agree that is an oversight on CCP's part.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Alona Gene
Doomheim
#4 - 2013-06-06 17:58:18 UTC
Could someone please move this to the Bug forum then? I would have posted there, but I wasnt sure if because of the salv bonus if it was actually a mistake :)
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#5 - 2013-06-07 06:44:01 UTC
Though, I dont think that CCP has read this, lol
Korvus Falek
Depraved Corruption
Lux Inter Astra
#6 - 2013-06-07 16:37:19 UTC
I have it in my salvagers head. So...dont mess with it unless you replace cycle time with more salvager bonus; sometimes 85% just isnt enough for him.
TeeKay Latef
Seraphim Ltd
#7 - 2013-06-18 19:50:49 UTC
I give this a bump. The Implant wasn't updated in today's minor patch.

Dont worry about the salvaging bonus, it would be more like

Quote:
5% Bonus to Salvager Cycle Time
+5 Virus Coherence when accessing hacking containers.
+5 Virus Coherence when accessing archaeology containers.


Would be also cool to get this Implant change to +5 Strength instead of coherence. It wouldn't be too' overpowerd' as the 10th slot is usually a very valuable one.
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#8 - 2013-06-24 18:50:56 UTC
There have been several patches, and this implant still hasnt changed :(
Praxis Ginimic
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-06-24 22:19:55 UTC
I'm personally taking care of this issue. Just bring yourself out to low sec and get in line. I'm bound to get to you sooner or later.
I will remove these useless plugs from the game 1 pod at a time...2 at a time if you get really close to each other.
urban pioner
Doomheim
#10 - 2013-06-25 14:54:41 UTC
Praxis Ginimic wrote:
I'm personally taking care of this issue. Just bring yourself out to low sec and get in line. I'm bound to get to you sooner or later.
I will remove these useless plugs from the game 1 pod at a time...2 at a time if you get really close to each other.


^^tough guy, watch out for him
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#11 - 2013-07-10 15:50:28 UTC
It's been a whole month...

Can a dev post if this is working as it should be, or if it will be changed?


Thanks!!! :D
Whitehound
#12 - 2013-07-10 16:08:43 UTC
Alona Gene wrote:
It's been a whole month...

Can a dev post if this is working as it should be, or if it will be changed?


Thanks!!! :D

You should try the proper channels and write a bug report in-game with the bug report tool.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Ginger Barbarella
#13 - 2013-07-10 16:13:30 UTC
Praxis Ginimic wrote:
I'm personally taking care of this issue. Just bring yourself out to low sec and get in line. I'm bound to get to you sooner or later.
I will remove these useless plugs from the game 1 pod at a time...2 at a time if you get really close to each other.


"Useless plugs"? Are you intentionally demeaning or otherwise insulting the folically-impaired gamers here? That's not only kinda sorta racist, but just plain mean. Shame... SHAME!!

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-07-10 16:18:17 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
It's been a whole month...

Can a dev post if this is working as it should be, or if it will be changed?


Thanks!!! :D

You should try the proper channels and write a bug report in-game with the bug report tool.


We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D
Ginger Barbarella
#15 - 2013-07-10 16:23:59 UTC
Alona Gene wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
It's been a whole month...

Can a dev post if this is working as it should be, or if it will be changed?


Thanks!!! :D

You should try the proper channels and write a bug report in-game with the bug report tool.


We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D


"Bug" is CCP-ese for "ooops"... changing an item description is almost as low of a priority to them as fixing Faction Warfare.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-07-10 16:25:24 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
It's been a whole month...

Can a dev post if this is working as it should be, or if it will be changed?


Thanks!!! :D

You should try the proper channels and write a bug report in-game with the bug report tool.


We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D


"Bug" is CCP-ese for "ooops"... changing an item description is almost as low of a priority to them as fixing Faction Warfare.


But it wouldn't just be the item description... it is the actual stats
Whitehound
#17 - 2013-07-10 16:30:08 UTC
Alona Gene wrote:
We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D

No, we do not and the judge of all things concerning EVE still is CCP. So no matter how you twist it will you have to report it as a bug and then have CCP tell you what it really is.

Do you think it is a bug?

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#18 - 2013-07-10 16:36:47 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D

No, we do not and the judge of all things concerning EVE still is CCP. So no matter how you twist it will you have to report it as a bug and then have CCP tell you what it really is.

Do you think it is a bug?


I'd like to think it was an oversite.

As long as there isn't some form of punishment for submitting "false" bug reports (in the event that it is not a bug), I could post it. Honestly I never have submitted one before.

I guess I just figured that CCP may read their forums... guess not as much as I thought anyhow lol.
Whitehound
#19 - 2013-07-10 16:54:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
Alona Gene wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Alona Gene wrote:
We don't know it's a bug for sure, do we? :D

No, we do not and the judge of all things concerning EVE still is CCP. So no matter how you twist it will you have to report it as a bug and then have CCP tell you what it really is.

Do you think it is a bug?


I'd like to think it was an oversite.

As long as there isn't some form of punishment for submitting "false" bug reports (in the event that it is not a bug), I could post it. Honestly I never have submitted one before.

I guess I just figured that CCP may read their forums... guess not as much as I thought anyhow lol.

No. They have extra people just for handling the bug reports. Once you wrote a report will it take a few days until you see some of the staff take actions. It is then either attached to an already existing report or you get an explanation like the almighty "working as intended"-explanation. So even when you get it confirmed as a bug may it still take a while before it gets fixed, because there are many small bugs and they will likely give each a priority before they get passed on to the different teams.

Follow each step of the report, it even has a screenshot tool where you can mark stuff in the screenshot to make things clearer, and make full use of it. They have given us this tool for a good reason: it lets us help them to make EVE better. Cool

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Alona Gene
Doomheim
#20 - 2013-07-24 22:17:10 UTC
Im gunna bump this to the top.

Today, I showed info no this implant again. Now it says:

Quote:
A neural interface upgrade that boosts the pilot's skill at environmental analysis and increases the decay time of scattered containers in exploration sites.

5% reduction in cycle time of salvage, hacking and archaeology modules.

5 second increase to decay time of all scattered containers.


....."5 second increase to decay time of all scattered containers."


Hmmm... I didn't see that in any patch notes... even though I was checking for it... hmm.
12Next page