These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

removal of strategic cruisers from 3/10 and 4/10 sites

Author
MisterNick
The Sagan Clan
#21 - 2013-06-05 10:29:31 UTC
Copper Rei wrote:
I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP


How can you avoid a huge part of the game for so long? Shocked

"Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom."

Jonas Staal
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-06-05 10:39:54 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
T3 were total overkill for those sites.

Most people used T3's simply because of the scanning bonus on a combat ship.

Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
Most T3's didn't even run them, they just followed the triggers to make the good lootsies spawn ASAP and GTFO.

Does that mean "blitzing" missions is not really running missions either?
Anyway removing T3's won't stop blitzing sites.


Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
I never understood why anyone capable of flying a T3 would stick around in hisec to run these sites anyway.

Because they are PROFITABLE. The CAPS probably didn't even show how profitable they are. In which point we get to the OP part.
The drops of ded3/4's are OP.

On a side note, I don't understand the "Don't run these sites, they're meant for newer players".
Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites"


PS: I believe newer players are getting the short end of the stick, since vets will run sites as fast in HACs as they did in T3's.
Yet, new players will lose the "easy accessable T3's to run sites quickly themselves", and HACs are (much?) more skill intensive.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#23 - 2013-06-05 10:40:01 UTC
The Gnosis most of us received (at least one), fit for exploration and sites is an excellent ship for 3/10 and 4/10.
Perfect for these sites along with probing and hacking.

T3 was total overkill on 3/10 and 4/10.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#24 - 2013-06-05 11:23:59 UTC
There have been ship restrictions on gates since I started playing three years ago. CCP simply modified them. Don't act like this is "the end of the sandbox."

Personally, I think they should have left 4/10s open to T3s, as they are the top end of of highsec exploration. Lowering the number of accessible sites and funneling all the pro explorers into a smaller number of sites would have created the pressure to push some of them into lowsec anyway.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Octoven
Stellar Production
#25 - 2013-06-05 11:32:30 UTC
Oh yes the glorious tears Big smile I never ran them anyway, i just used a tengu to steal other people's loot by shooting the faction before they could Twisted

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
I agree. It's no longer a player driven universe.





DMC



Its a bit difficult to hold true to a player driven universe when there is a ship in the game that is a swiss army knife and pretty much can do anything better then other ships.
Signal11th
#26 - 2013-06-05 12:06:58 UTC
Copper Rei wrote:
why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........
I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that..........
I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.

I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.

I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.

This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.

I have never been so pissed.

I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.




This has been CCP's mantra from the beginning find something you like doing on your own and burn it to the ground or force you to do it in a group. You will get used to it eventually.

God Said "Come Forth and receive eternal life!" I came fifth and won a toaster!

Ylariana
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#27 - 2013-06-05 12:47:31 UTC
The people who blitzed these sites in T3s are already just moving to other ships. I've already had Ishtar cruisers sweep on by me while I clear my way to the end of a site (you know, actually RUNNING the site instead of cherry picking). They force extra spawns on some gates, warp on through leaving me to deal with the extra rats, blow up the pinata, loot the cherry then swan off to do the same elsewhere.

Blocking T3s just moved them into other ships.

Removing the cherry from the site would hurt everyone be they Vet or Newbie, as this would simply make the site not worth the hassle to run for most people since the bounties and scrap loot take so much longer to gather.

I run the sites in smaller ships because I enjoy the challenge of trying to complete them in the smallest ship possible while still being semi efficient. I find I learn more about flying a ship if i'm actually in danger of losing it *shrug* It would be nice if people would stop ignoring the early room trash, or even, gods forbid, leave the site if its already being run, but, hand-on-heart I know that that will never happen, and I fully expect to be flamed for even voicing the suggestion.

Its annoying to have people Cherry Pop the site, but I live with it and just try to clear it faster myself.

Trying to prevent it happening by blocking X Y or Z ship class will just end with people doing the same lowlife thing in a different ship. Its a sandbox after all, and since "If you can, you should" is how a lot of people prefer to play the game......
Spurty
#28 - 2013-06-05 12:48:29 UTC
Even a sandbox has walls

That or "why can't I use my NYX in 3/10!!!!"

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP

Van Hiaasen
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2013-06-05 12:49:59 UTC
Copper Rei wrote:
why? this change makes no sense to me.


Because T3's are far overpowered for any content you will find in high security space. You are talking about a ship that can fly cloaked, can be bubble-immune, can tank thousands of DPS and dish out hundreds, all while remaining mobile and small and fast and having all your exploration equipment. Why waste all that power and ability on crappy little high sec sites? Get out to low and null, have fun, make real isk.

Copper Rei wrote:
I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.

I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.


So go do solo exploration in low sec. I don't see the issue here. I survived well on low sec exploration from around 6 months into the game until around 3 years into the game before moving on. Its fun. Nothing is stopping you, literally nothing, from doing solo exploration.

Copper Rei wrote:
I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.


Great so whats the issue again? That you cant take your high level incredibly powerful ship into pissy little easy high sec sites?

Copper Rei wrote:
This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.


Im sure it does indeed suck your ass.

Copper Rei wrote:
I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.


ALL your training is out the window? So now that you cant do high sec DED sites you literally cant do ANYTHING in this game? You sound like a child sweeping a game off the table and shouting 'Im not playing the whole game is RUINED!!!' because of one little thing and going to sulk somewhere. Seriously quit the game man, if this is your attitude, we would probably be better without you
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2013-06-05 13:18:05 UTC
It was becoming a joke seeing 3 or 4 tengus competing in a 4/10, now the jokes on them as they sit on the gate in their 6 month old tengu pilot unable to get in. Ah tengu tears are the finest quality Pirate
This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.  Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#31 - 2013-06-05 13:40:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Murk Paradox
Xercodo wrote:
Quiet simply T3s were too OP for those sites



Because using subsystems that have bonuses to scanning would be unheard of to use that same ship to fly into the site =(

(highsec sites do suck however).

On a good note, my navy omen lost a turret slot without much ding to dps with a new bonus damage modifier (not to mention upgrade to drone bay for hammerhead II) and can equip a probe launcher now.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Jonas Staal
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-06-05 14:17:19 UTC
Ylariana wrote:
(you know, actually RUNNING the site instead of cherry picking).


I understand what you mean, but cherry picking is refered to as using DPS to only scan possible DED4's.

Exploration in high sec is all about competition. It *IS* part of exploration. If someone enters "your" site (since it's in no way your site) and you are in high sec you lose the loot, in low sec you die.

This also makes the Gnosis a bad choice imo, as it's slow as ****.
UKBigWolf
#33 - 2013-06-05 15:54:35 UTC  |  Edited by: UKBigWolf
Surely the solution is, instead of further restricting what ships can be used, they should simply alter the triggers to prevent blitzing
A few examples
* The loot piñata only shows once ALL ships & trigger structures have been destroyed
* It has insane repping powers until all triggers are killed meaning it adds to incoming dps, but effectively can't be killed until it's alone
* It will never drop faction gear if killed before everythingthing else (opens up exploration to creating even more tears ;) )

Lets be honest, a HAC/faction cruiser runs them as quick (I've seen people do them in AFs as well), the only real change this create for some will be to use a 2nd account to scan instead of all-in-one ships
If anything, it can be argued, it simply means more training/isk before you can blitz them like before, which puts the advantage even more into veteran's hands
Haulie Berry
#34 - 2013-06-05 15:58:40 UTC
The only problem I have with this is that it apparently applies to 4/10s in low sec, as well.
Derdrom Utida
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#35 - 2013-06-05 16:07:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Derdrom Utida
Jonas Staal wrote:
Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites"


Stop right there.

It isn't reward balancing.

People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that.

EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#36 - 2013-06-05 16:50:45 UTC
If you have the vaguest clue what you're doing you can take a T3 to solo lowsec/nullsec exploration sites for a lot more ISK. Stop worrying about the big bad piwate gate camps: it's not as if they have bubbles in lowsec.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#37 - 2013-06-05 17:05:33 UTC
Derdrom Utida wrote:
Jonas Staal wrote:
Logical solution would be "balance the rewards in such a way that old vets feel no need to run new players' sites"


Stop right there.

It isn't reward balancing.

People just don't want to run the *risk* of losing their ships. It isn't about loot distribution, it isn't about being entitled to do X because you have Y sp. It's because people want super-shiny loot with as little risk, and as little effort as possible. Don't even try to pretend it isn't about that.

EDIT: This only applies in hi-sec.

It's also about the intensity of the gaming experience. From my perspective the best thing about highsec PvE is that you don't have to remain alert and tense all the time. No cat and mouse games with locals or roaming gangs, no directional scanner spamming, running gate camps and no scouting and traveling by your personal safespot network. You can actually enjoy the game casually for once doing an activity you like in exchage for a reduced reward level. Increased income is nice, but it's just one thing among many, that decide where and how people spend their time in the game.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#38 - 2013-06-05 17:10:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
I do love the fact that you have dudes running highsec exploration sites in T3s to rob newbies of their income. Then when their T3s get suicide ganked for their shiny mods they'll whine on the forums about how suicide gankers are destroying the game and driving new players away

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Dez Affinity
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#39 - 2013-06-05 17:12:43 UTC
Andski wrote:
I do love the fact that you have dudes running highsec exploration sites in T3s to rob newbies from their income. Then when their T3s get suicide ganked for their shiny mods they'll whine on the forums about how suicide gankers are destroying the game and driving new players away


pains me to +1 andski but yeah p much

3/10s and 4/10s arent meant for oyu scrubs to go around ALL of high sec speed running every single noob plex.

How about you just go to 0.0 or low sec and stop being 'giners
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#40 - 2013-06-05 17:40:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
Copper Rei wrote:
why? this change makes no sense to me. I trained to fly a scanning frig...found I needed to also be able to run the sites if I wanted to make anything out of the sites I found.....so I trained to skill everything I needed for exploration to lvl V and then I trained combat to be able to fly decent cruisers...this didn't work as well as the frig due to loss of scan bonuses....so the long awaited t3 which offered scan bonus options........I trained to cruiser V and weapons and all subsystems so I could fly a decent cruiser with scan bonus comparable to my frig........
I just found a good fit that holds all my gear for scanning....analyzer, salvager, codebreaker, and launcher as well as having weapons enough to run the site so I didn't have to fly a second account and tag along another toon while dual boxing and all that..........
I finially get there and you block my access to every known site in h-sec.

I am a 3+ year pilot with no ability to PVP and I enjoy solo exploration.

I found a game I could play and have fun and I have tried damn near every aspect of the game.

This move to eliminate the t3 from the only available sites in h-sec SUCKS MY ASS.

I have never been so pissed.

I am forced into l-sec. and ALL my training is out the window.





Hello OP.


Back in the days of yor, I used to run 4/10s with a T1 BC fit for exploration. This was before the T3 cruisers proliferated.

Eventually, it got to a point where you could go into a 4/10 and find a Tengue (usually a Tengue) tanking all of the rats and taking out the boss.

This would "spike" after the bot-hunts as some nullsec corporations would cool their heels in hisec. (Probably could not pay their rent after their botters got banned).

When I brought this up in the Exploration chat, I got yelled at most ferociously, as if I recommended that people should consider eating babies or something.

The deep dark secret is that you can blitz 4/10 in hisec in less than a minute with a T3. This has been a problem for a while now, since 2010.

And a lot of people, afraid of going to lowsec or null, were doing it.

So, something became easy mode, and people were abusing it - and also lied about it too.

As far as I'm concerned, a lot of people getting PO'ed by this probably deserve it.

Eventually I adapted and took my BC to nullsec and started hitting exploration sites there, where none of these blitzing Tengues could be found. I never encountered anybody else because I used a lot of intel to avoid contact. So there should be plenty of room for your T3.

Good luck.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!