These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

new T3 industy proposal

Author
Pilot MSL
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2011-11-05 17:42:58 UTC
so with the t3 cruiser and new battlecruisers, i cant help but think about industry.
eve is built around pvp, but industry is the backbone, someones gonna need a new ship afterall.
that being said i would like to get some ideas flowing for t3 industry similar to strategic cruiser customizability..

my thoughts is a focus on certain areas:
cargo capacityAttention
tractor range
ice mining
ore mining
gas mining
foreman link
and mining drone (make them more than a mere afterthought, u should be able to make a drone barge)
defence (null can be evil at times)
offense (if ur drone mining, maybe be able to pop rats)

im envisioning the bonuses making it on par or "slightly" under par of the current barges, haulers, boosters.
but being able to customize it like t3 cruiserswould enable some unique designs (boost barges, drone mining haulers)
naturally, mix and match modules is going to make a boost barge that doesnt boost as much as an orca, or mine as much as a hulk, but thats just my thoughts.
i really would love a drone barge, mining drones dont see enough use in my opinion.

please comment with your ideas or thoughts on mine. lets get some good t3 indy ideas flowin
Messoroz
AQUILA INC
#2 - 2011-11-05 17:43:46 UTC
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3
Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#3 - 2011-11-05 17:44:46 UTC
Pilot MSL wrote:
so with the t3 cruiser and new battlecruisers, i cant help but think about industry.
eve is built around pvp, but industry is the backbone, someones gonna need a new ship afterall.
that being said i would like to get some ideas flowing for t3 industry similar to strategic cruiser customizability..

my thoughts is a focus on certain areas:
cargo capacityAttention
tractor range
ice mining
ore mining
gas mining
foreman link
and mining drone (make them more than a mere afterthought, u should be able to make a drone barge)
defence (null can be evil at times)
offense (if ur drone mining, maybe be able to pop rats)

im envisioning the bonuses making it on par or "slightly" under par of the current barges, haulers, boosters.
but being able to customize it like t3 cruiserswould enable some unique designs (boost barges, drone mining haulers)
naturally, mix and match modules is going to make a boost barge that doesnt boost as much as an orca, or mine as much as a hulk, but thats just my thoughts.
i really would love a drone barge, mining drones dont see enough use in my opinion.

please comment with your ideas or thoughts on mine. lets get some good t3 indy ideas flowin



Here's an idea: never post again.
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#4 - 2011-11-05 17:45:10 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


He never said they were Tech 3. He just said "new battlecruisers".
mkint
#5 - 2011-11-05 17:45:32 UTC
Pilot MSL wrote:
t3 battlecruisers

RTFM error. Replace user.

No need to read beyond that point.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#6 - 2011-11-05 17:47:23 UTC
I'm telling you, man, this game generates more PEBKAC errors than a senior care home with Windows '95.
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#7 - 2011-11-05 17:51:20 UTC
mkint wrote:
Pilot MSL wrote:
t3 battlecruisers

RTFM error. Replace user.

No need to read beyond that point.


Pilot MSL wrote:
t3 cruiser and new battlecruisers,
...
t3 industry similar to strategic cruiser customizability..

...
able to customize it like t3 cruiserswould enable some unique designs

...
lets get some good t3 indy ideas flowin


Nowhere did he say "t3 battlecruisers".

Troll as much as you want, but at least troll things that actually exist.

Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#8 - 2011-11-05 17:52:08 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


I thank you for point this out to those who are too stupid to realize. I suggest you help support this:

Still to this day, illiterate carebears throughout the New Eden cluster are unable to read and properly make sense of things on the Forum, varying guides, and things that would help them advance forward rather than settling into their niche of semi-uselessness. So with this, I am collecting funds to raise awareness for illiterate carebears.

Make all donations payable to Jack Carrigan with the reason message "Illiterate **** fund"

Maybe someday we can stomp out carebe... err.... illiteracy once and for all.

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||

Jenshae Chiroptera
#9 - 2011-11-05 17:54:52 UTC
Features and Ideas go here

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

mkint
#10 - 2011-11-05 17:56:44 UTC
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:


Troll as much as you want, but at least troll things that actually exist.



Forum Section wrote:
EVE General Discussion


RTFM error. Replace user.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Pilot MSL
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2011-11-05 17:58:12 UTC
my apologies for the troll food. i will revise it and post it where it belongs :)
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#12 - 2011-11-05 17:58:58 UTC
mkint wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:


Troll as much as you want, but at least troll things that actually exist.



Forum Section wrote:
EVE General Discussion


RTFM error. Replace user.


Your point?
Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2011-11-05 17:58:58 UTC
CCP Nav, plz remove off topic posts in this thread.

great job all you goons who never see the whole picture and give an objective , intelligent opinion (ill give you a hint, "Shut up i'm right! ur a noob!" isn't an objective opinion.)

to the OP,

+1 for the idea. Perhaps not necessary for a T3 mining cruiser/ship. But definitely a more specialized ship (flexible).

_____________________________________________________________________________________

"Your Erebus is docked? How the hell did that happen?" "It took a lot of grease and pushing....."
Messoroz
AQUILA INC
#14 - 2011-11-05 18:04:22 UTC
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


He never said they were Tech 3. He just said "new battlecruisers".



He implied it by placing it in the same sentence as t3 cruisers.
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Doomheim
#15 - 2011-11-05 18:05:46 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


He never said they were Tech 3. He just said "new battlecruisers".



He implied it by placing it in the same sentence as t3 cruisers.


I'm pretty sure "t3" modified "cruisers" and and "new" modified "battlecruisers". Proximity in a sentence is important.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#16 - 2011-11-05 18:06:16 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS
THIS

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2011-11-05 18:13:28 UTC
Messoroz wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


He never said they were Tech 3. He just said "new battlecruisers".



He implied it by placing it in the same sentence as t3 cruisers.


He said, and i quote........ "t3 cruisers and new battlecruisers......"

If you are familiar with the english language at all u would know that the word "and" separates nouns, modifiers, phrases, etc. So he is clearly making a difference between T3(strategic cruisers) and new battlecruisers(tier 3).

Had he meant (incorrectly) Tech 3 battlecruisers he would have stated "t3 cruisers and battlecruisers".... which he didn't.

Go back to school for a few years till u learn the english language..........

Again, I beg CCP Navigator to plz remove all off topic posts in this thread.........

It's like talking to an 8 year old isn't it guys........ hmm maybe i am.

plz stop with the Tech 3 , Tier 3 crap........ we all know which is which. plz reply about the topic, not his grammar, which is fine btw.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

"Your Erebus is docked? How the hell did that happen?" "It took a lot of grease and pushing....."
mkint
#18 - 2011-11-05 18:16:09 UTC
Satav wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
Mehrdad Kor-Azor wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
ITS TIER 3 BATTLECRUISERS NOT TECH 3


He never said they were Tech 3. He just said "new battlecruisers".



He implied it by placing it in the same sentence as t3 cruisers.


He said, and i quote........ "t3 cruisers and new battlecruisers......"

If you are familiar with the english language at all u would know that the word "and" separates nouns, modifiers, phrases, etc. So he is clearly making a difference between T3(strategic cruisers) and new battlecruisers(tier 3).

Had he meant (incorrectly) Tech 3 battlecruisers he would have stated "t3 cruisers and battlecruisers".... which he didn't.

Go back to school for a few years till u learn the english language..........

Again, I beg CCP Navigator to plz remove all off topic posts in this thread.........

It's like talking to an 8 year old isn't it guys........ hmm maybe i am.

plz stop with the Tech 3 , Tier 3 crap........ we all know which is which. plz reply about the topic, not his grammar, which is fine btw.



Thread in the wrong forums is trollbait to begin with. Entire thread should just be locked. Who's got the reading failure now?

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.

Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2011-11-05 19:54:19 UTC
While the trolling may be going over the top a little it is really annoying how many people think there are going to be tech 3 battlecruisers in the winter expansion only because people cant be bothered to type tier 3 instead of t3.
t3 = tech 3.
tier 3 = tier 3.

As for the topic itself, now that ccp is back on the right track I expect new t3 (TECH 3) ships as well, sooner or later. But I definitely want to see t3 frigs and bs's before industrials.
David Grogan
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-11-05 22:06:51 UTC  |  Edited by: David Grogan
i would like to see Tech 3 industrial subsystem that works off the existing tech 3 cruiser hulls

the sub systems should allow for the following

Industrial sub system - Cannot be fitted in conjunction with the interdiction nullifier subsystem

Option 1 - Ore hold - 5000m3 increase in Ore Hold Capacity per level
20% bonus to strip miner & ice harvester yield per level
10% reduction in strip miner and ice harvestor duration per level
Adds a 100m3 cargo hold for mining crystals

Option 2 - Gas hold - 1000m3 in Gas Hold Capacity per level
50% bonus to gas harvester yield per level
10% reduction in gas harvestor duration per level

Option 3 - Cargo hold - 2000m3 increase per level
500m3 increase in Command Center Hold capactiy per level
1000m3 increase in Planetary Commodities Hold Capacity per level

Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs.