EVE General Discussion

If this existed I would subscribe another 10 accounts.

if this existed we could ban every one who makes threads about isboxer breaking the eula even though it's been clearly stated that it's perfectly fine!

i'd like that.

This is pretty much my sentiment.

Another thing to consider is the issue of convenience for the multiboxer user. Imagine if CCP were to create its own, exclusive multibox client; and, every other MMO developer did the same. At that point, a multiboxer user has to download several different multibox clients, one for each game, and has to set up individual profiles, keybinds, and so on, for each one of them. Not only is it extra effort, but it is also extra bloat. As it is right now, third-party developers provide unified functionality through a single client, much in the way that multi-platform chat clients like Pidgin and Trillian allow one to simultaneously access multiple chat services like AIM, Facebook, IRC, and so on. I use Pidgin exactly because of that functionality: instead of running a different program, each with its own window(s), for each chat service, I have a single window for all of my chat services, and this makes me happy because it uses less desktop real estate, less processing resources, and gives me less flashing buttons on my taskbar. I am not a multiboxer, but I can easily imagine that if I were then I would also prefer the integrated, multi-game support of a single client to downloading and configuring a separate client for each game I might play.

Having seen CCP developers latest offering in the new "launcher", I certainly wouldn't want to use their attempt at multiboxing software!

In lax we trust!

Id rather see them use their limited developer resources to fix posses, or make new ships to get blown up in, or new regions with cool features ... but that's just my opinion.

CCP programers can't make a decent voice chat, can't get more than one avatar in a room and can barely get a serviceable UI in game. Why would anyone want them to add a broken multi boxing program to that?

Let CCP do what they do best. Spaceships that pew pew. Leave the other stuff to 3rd parties.

There is already so much stuff in need of work, they should just spend time doing what they know best instead of whatever multiboxing crap.

Way to out of context quote to imply something that the full quote doesn't say, Saying that they do not specifically endorse ISboxer because the possibility that it's capabilities may at some point change is a far reach from what you are trying to imply.

They've made it quite clear that they do not currently consider using ISboxer to be a violation of the EULA, what you quoted is just them saying that they reserve the right to change their minds if ISboxer gains functionality that inherently violates the EULA.

You've lost, now go sulk somewhere.

Nice cherrypicking there.

They should design something which allows use of one screen which can hot which between the accounts! Least face it alt tab is getting old, and for some of us we would like to use one screen between the many this could make people want more accounts!