These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Mass-test feedback - May 16

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2013-05-16 17:58:29 UTC
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 16th of May, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version:
  • CPU:
  • GPU:
  • RAM:
  • How many clients were you running at the same time?
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • - Anti-Aliasing:
    - Shader Quality:
    - Texture Quality:
    - LOD Quality:

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
  • Memory usage of the client (if checked):
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing
Me ofcourse
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2013-05-16 18:02:09 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Pro
  • CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770 XFX XXX
  • RAM: 16384 MB RAM (16 GB)
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? = 3
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • - Anti-Aliasing: high
    - Shader Quality: high
    - Texture Quality: high
    - LOD Quality: high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 7-8 / 10-12
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 5-6 / 7-8
  • Memory usage of the client (if checked): (peaked at 2.5 gb)
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 9 (during the gate jumps, there was minimal traffic control)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: n/a
[/quote]
Me of Course
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2013-05-16 18:02:45 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 Pro
  • CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770 XFX XXX
  • RAM: 16384 MB RAM (16 GB)
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? = 3
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • - Anti-Aliasing: high
    - Shader Quality: high
    - Texture Quality: high
    - LOD Quality: high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 7-8 / 10-12
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 5-6 / 7-8
  • Memory usage of the client (if checked): (peaked at 2.5 gb)
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 9 (during the gate jumps, there was minimal traffic control)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: n/a
[/quote]

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=268764&find=unread <<< Skin's for ships COMON, YOU KNOW YOU WANT IT!
johnx360
Community of Independent Tax Systems
#4 - 2013-05-16 18:04:46 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: WINDOWS 7
CPU: i7 3770k 3.5 GHz
GPU: XFX HD 6870
RAM: 8GB 1600mHz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 30FPS (lowered and locked by client?) with brackets.
Memory usage of the client (if checked):
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Got disonnected at the titan (socket closed) and wasent able to reconnect to test server. (my connection worked perfectly and nothing else dced) could connect to Tranquility but couldnt reconnect to Singularity.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: New jump effect is cool but it shouldnt hide the GUI.
Frangus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-05-16 18:04:52 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (8 CPUs), ~3.1GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series
RAM: 12286MB RAM
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 20 / 30
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):20/30
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 8
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Pretty big lag spike when coming out of the new jumping animations. Down to 1-3 fps. Other than that it was smooth sailing
DarkRazorPL
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2013-05-16 18:06:28 UTC  |  Edited by: DarkRazorPL
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
CPU: Core i5 2500K
GPU: Sapphire Radeon HD7950 OC
RAM: Adata 8GB 1600Mhz DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 50-60 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 30-50 FPS
Memory usage of the client (if checked): Around 2 GB?
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): OMGGGGGGGG 10
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
So, I noticed only 2 bugs: first, when you turn on the radial menu and move mouse around, there is HUGE constant fps drop; second, new jump animation sometimes glitches at the and or at the beginning.
I also had all brackets turned on.
Cheshire Kitten
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-05-16 18:11:34 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win 7 x64 Enterprise SP1
CPU: intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2540 CPU @ 2.60GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.6GHz
GPU: Nvidia NVS 4200M 2Gb
RAM: 4Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? = 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 4-5 / 7-8
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 3-4 / 4-5
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: cool new jump effect, some framedrops after it ended.
Pillihp Sinned
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2013-05-16 18:12:23 UTC
I enjoyed the test. Had no problems except never got a fleet invite. No invites seems to be a problem for me in these tests. It is hard to follow the instructions at times but know u guys have ur hands full.
Love to graphic when ur podded. I neeed to make more ships for next test.
TY TY
...so says Phillip

...so says Pillihp

http://www.prosynergyeve.com/ Check it out.
Roland Erata
Stone Circle
U N K N O W N
#9 - 2013-05-16 18:12:28 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Win 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core i5 - 2400 3.1GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GTX560
RAM:4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time?
2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: no
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality :high
- LOD Quality :high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 30
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):20/30
Memory usage of the client (if checked):~1.5Gb
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5=same
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
clone pod animation not always correct
Destoya
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#10 - 2013-05-16 18:12:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Destoya
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 8 Pro x64
CPU: Intel i7 930 @ 4.0 GHz
GPU: 2x GTX 460 1GB, SLI
RAM: 12GB 1600MHz DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: Off
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: Low

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 40-60 FPS w/ brackets
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 30-50 FPS w/ brackets
Memory usage of the client (if checked): n/a
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 6? Felt pretty much the same, maybe a bit faster
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: Yes, two: client disconnected when I was spamming jump on a gate and also a "CCPexefile has stopped working" crash near the end of the fight.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: There is a lot of lag coming out of gate jumps and jump bridges, not to mention that it hiding the GUI is pretty bad. New titan deaths are really good!
GvR0078
GVR's Heroes
#11 - 2013-05-16 18:13:59 UTC

OS version:
CPU: Intel core i7 2600
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GTX 560 Ti
RAM: 10 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: med
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 18 / 30
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 19 / 30
Memory usage of the client (if checked): no
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: All did run pritty smooth considereing the number of ppl on grid
Wallyx
Masterderizando
#12 - 2013-05-16 18:16:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Wallyx
OS version: Windows 7
CPU: Intel Core2 Quad CPU 2,66GHz
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 17 - 25 / 35 - 40
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):15 - 20 / 30-35
Memory usage of the client (if checked): 2 - 2,5 GB
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: FPS Drop when using Radial Menu. Last seconds of Jump Animation buged with Traffic Control. Bridge option on Radial Menu could be nice.
Pritovsky Pootis
Eschelon Directive
Quantum Inquisition
#13 - 2013-05-16 18:18:02 UTC
OS: Windows 7 64bit SP1
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 (Driver: 9.18.13.1422)
CPU: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9, GenuineIntel @ 3.27 GHz (4 CPUs)
RAM: 16GB

How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 50/60
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 40/50
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: During the first jump bridge the warp tunnel effect was absent and could only see the nebulas around. Also as soon as the second bridge went up, there was no option to "jump to". Had to wait for the titan to reactivate jump portal for the action to appear. Also, after getting podded, the camera seemed to spin around randomly. Everything else was fine, however.
Smith Aldeland
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2013-05-16 18:18:07 UTC
Os version : Windows 7 home premium 64-bit
CPU: Intell Core I5-2300 Quad core @2.80GHZ
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 650
RAM: Unknown brand 8gb DDR3
Number of clients running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low/medium/high):
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS 30-60fps
Memory usage of the client (if checked): Not checked
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1-way worse, 5-same, 10=OMG this is awesome): A pink, fluffy brutix out of ten, or in other words a good solid 9
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Not during the test, but before it my client crashed when my ship was destroyed, but this did not happen again
Discribe you experience, make comments, suggestions, etc:
Noticed only a very few glitches, one of which being the jump effects cutting out prematurely, the other being the radial menu causing the mouse to move sluggishly. Other than that, this is truely an amazing upgrade to TQ, and I look forward to seeing it launched officially :D
Mary Uchonela
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-05-16 18:19:39 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 home premium
CPU: Intel (R) Core (TM) i7 CPU
GPU:
RAM: 6 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? = 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 20/20
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15/15
Memory usage of the client (if checked):
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? = Yes
Chadral Kortjak
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#16 - 2013-05-16 18:21:01 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate
CPU: Intel Core i7-3770
GPU: Nvidia GTX 470
RAM: 8GB 1600Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: high
- Shader Quality:high
- Texture Quality:high
- LOD Quality:high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 40/60
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):35/60
Memory usage of the client (if checked):
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was running very well.
Irish626 Saintors
Royal Lancer Knights
#17 - 2013-05-16 18:21:08 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
CPU: AMD Phenom II 565 3.8ghz OC'd
GPU: PNY GTX 560ti
RAM: 16GB 1600mHz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: Medium
- Texture Quality: Medium
- LOD Quality: Medium


User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 50-60 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in(brackets / no brackets) : 40-60 FPS
Memory usage of the client (if checked): about 2GB
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Don't like a MASSIVE UNDOCK BUTTON but undock effects are cool Gate Jump effects are cool but a little glitchy and you should be able to see chat at least apart from that can't say i noticed any bugs
Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services
The Possum Lodge
#18 - 2013-05-16 18:22:20 UTC
Ran two PC's for a total of 3 chars. (more than one client on my 8gigs of ram in the MassTests will crash out the who system each time)

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Both Win7
  • CPU: i5 2400, i7 960 (crashed out)
  • GPU: GTX 670, GTX 480 (crashed out)
  • RAM: 8gig, 12gig (crashed out)
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1, and 2 (crashed out)
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium, low? (crashed)
    • - Anti-Aliasing: OFF, OFF (crashed)
    - Shader Quality: medium, low (crashed)
    - Texture Quality: high, medium (crashed)
    - LOD Quality: don't remember

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): did not measure
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): n/a

  • Memory usage of the client (if checked): On my primary client it peaked at 1.8gigs (that i saw), didn't even get into the fleet fight before my secondary machine crashed out, i tried to check ram, but it went unresponsive.

  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Better, but i'm guessing that is because it is a very controlled environment. (eventhough alot of Jackholes still break rules and SB/engage everyone long before spossed to, and are not punished)

  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, secondary machine crashed out after first system jump. One of its clients went fully unresponsive, system prompted error saying something about a C++ Runtime or some such. System as a whole was unresponsive (left the remaining client from that PC in test until podded).

  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: not a fan of the not-so-'seemless' jump transition. Allow my to have my GUI still, please.

    • Also, please, for the love of all that is good, if you are getting paid to run a MassTest, make sure you get your crap together...."warp to Hab..." Hab's not in system...."warp to hab"....hab's still not in system...really guys? And "start fighting"....but ignore this continual ECM burst that prevents you from...i don't know...fighting...for the first 5 minutes of the 'fight'...

http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing    < Unified Inventory is NOT ready...
Daneel Trevize
Give my 11percent back
#19 - 2013-05-16 18:23:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Daneel Trevize
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win7 Home Premium 64bit
  • CPU: Phenom II tri-core
  • GPU: Radeon 5770
  • RAM: 10gigs
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • - Anti-Aliasing: low
    - Shader Quality: high
    - Texture Quality: high
    - LOD Quality: high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): ~20-30 zoomed out, brackets on
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): am bad/pro, didn't test
  • Memory usage of the client (if checked): ditto
  • Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7, compared to many months ago, it honestly seemed a lot smoother without even turning brackets off, just no drone brackets iirc. that's not to say it's without some stutter, & the warp effects do kick in some fps lag, but generally the fights seemed smoother.
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No, for a change
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: As mentioned to CCP Macheen(sp?) in FleetX, the radial menu conflicts somewhat with trying to drag&drop locked targets. 1 char of mine was flying logi, reordering locked things, and this was awkard.

    • Also the last entry in the right click->orbit menu was the label/tag's code name rather than value.

    The loss of the UI when jumping, but the ominous present warning of traffic control, leaves one wondering quite how safe their ship is at that time.
    Also, you can't seem to reposition said warning from the ui while it's showing in these transitions.
Sneevil 2
Cognitive Horizons Inc.
#20 - 2013-05-16 18:32:33 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows 7
• CPU: Intel Core i7-3820
• GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 580
• RAM: 16 GB
• How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high on both clients
- Anti-Aliasing: high on both clients
- Shader Quality: high on both clients
- Texture Quality: high on both clients
- LOD Quality: high on both clients

User Experience

• Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6E-578, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): Forgot to check fps but everything felt smooth with brackets on.
• Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): Still smooth, but I was keeping to the edge of the battle.
• Memory usage of the client (if checked): -
• Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): Upgraded PC too recently so I can't tell.
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: -
12Next page