These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Why do you think CCP deemed T1 BS worthy of the mighty nerf-hammer?

First post
Author
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#1 - 2013-05-12 22:33:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Large Collidable Object
Okay - just came back from Sisi testing the new BS and I'd classify them as nerfed throughout the whole roster accross all races, except for those that largely remained unchanged.

In the current TQ build, they're more expensive in base price, far more expensive to rig, more expensive to fit and less efficient than any other subcap, whilst taking considerably longer to train. Acumulation of the reasons stated above is the reason why they're hardly seen outside of nullsec blobs or station games (the odd disco ship aside).

They were in need of a buff, similar to the one T1 Cruisers received - after all T1 cruiser ad BS stats all hail from the same era of the game -everything around them was buffed whilst they stayed the same.

Furtehrmore, BS lost quite a few niches they were viable in, such as being AOE DD proof, which obviouly is irrelevant now, small gang roaming (largely irrelevenat since the web & nano nerf), or sniping BS fleets (obsolete thanks to ongrid probing and being outperformed by ABCs in that area).

Yes - they will remain viable in nullsec blobs because they will still have the EHP advantage going for them, but outside of those, I see BS in a sharp decline from an unpopular status quo.

Increased build cost on top of the nerfs just adds insult to injury.

So why do you think CCP obviously has such a strong dislike for the class?
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
lovatus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-05-13 02:53:29 UTC
on paper I don't think its that bad but I don't think the nerfs will change much. the ships everyone liked before are still more or less the same and ships that sucked before will still suck (with special mention going to the raven which gains next to nothing and still has a mostly useless weapon system) sniper bc's will still be popular because they tend to be more survivable than ABC's and slightly more forgiving to fit. you're right about them becoming rare outside nullsec aside from incursions or pvp gangs and i'm disapointed more wasn't done
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#3 - 2013-05-13 03:10:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Ines Tegator
Large Collidable Object wrote:

So why do you think CCP obviously has such a strong dislike for the class?


I think they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the class. The few reasons BS are used in pvp have been glossed over, and the many reasons they are NOT used are completely unchanged. It's not really a nerf or a buff imo, it's just going to force newb mission runners (ie, pre-faction BS pilots) to change their fits. It's pretty clear they are putting a square peg into a round hole with their 3 ship roles, instead of deciding what the BS class is for.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-05-13 03:32:50 UTC
Um...which ones got nerfed?
Last I checked they got a pretty heft buff across the board...

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Liam Inkuras
Furnace
#5 - 2013-05-13 04:17:36 UTC
The new Hyperion disagrees with your statement of a BS nerf.

I wear my goggles at night.

Any spelling/grammatical errors come complimentary with my typing on a phone

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#6 - 2013-05-13 05:14:19 UTC
Battleships should be versatile DPS monsters with plenty of staying power to justify their massive drawbacks (speed, size, scan res). They would have all needed one more slot + fitting to use it, and 20-30% EHP across the board, along with sensor strength.

Squishing them into attack/combat roles doesn't suit the ship class, and this small ship division is the source of the changes that appear as nerfs.



.

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#7 - 2013-05-13 05:19:23 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Um...which ones got nerfed?
Last I checked they got a pretty heft buff across the board...



rokh...

less reists and more ehp basically cancel each other out. Most fleet rokhs I have seen can't shoe horn in a decent omni tank that can can deal with the em hole well. The 4-5% resist of lv 4 or 5 will be missed. And then you factor in 3 races have ammo that jsut runs right through this hole.

I do see the need to nerf resistance on some ships....rokh was not one of them. I never heard omfg its a rokh, this will take all day to kill it. And rokh sure as hell never tanked by gank. It would need to actually need a damage or even a tracking bonus to do that.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-05-13 05:21:22 UTC
I think one of the reasons CCP did this nerf was because people said "omg its a rokh"
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-05-13 05:30:28 UTC
Right, cos no one uses rokhs for large scale fleet comps.
oh wait...

I seriously doubt a 1% bonus difference is going to make any difference to how they are used.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Dato Koppla
Spaghetti Militia
#10 - 2013-05-13 05:40:24 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Right, cos no one uses rokhs for large scale fleet comps.
oh wait...

I seriously doubt a 1% bonus difference is going to make any difference to how they are used.


5% in total =P

but yeah, saying that BS got a massive nerfhammer is an exaggeration, it was just a bunch of tweaks (with some ships getting rehauls) so there are some winners and losers coming out of it but it isn't just a massive blanket nerf.
Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-05-13 13:57:27 UTC
Just making tier3 BC even better than they already are.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#12 - 2013-05-13 14:22:07 UTC
Anyone who doesn't think that the new geddon isn't going to be a murdermobile should go back to EVE Uni.

And dat phoon! Shocked

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Ersahi Kir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2013-05-13 17:05:33 UTC
The only battleship I think is going to be complete trash after the update is the tempest. It's getting more expensive to be the same, while everything around it is getting better. I think it's going to be in a world of hurt.
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-05-13 17:18:15 UTC
while i agree that battleships are becoming less cost effective in anything but blob warfare, i'm perfectly OK with it. it's a BATTLEship, so it should be used in BATTLES, not skirmishes.

that said, i also tend to think that ABCs are kind of stealing BSs thunder in blob warfare. one way to combat this would be to introduce a battleship specific damage control which gives larger resistance bonuses or buffs RR (while at the same time nerfing max speed or some other feature that is less relevant in blobs but makes it unattractive in other areas). with the resistance boost from the new module, battleships could showcase their higher EHP and gain an edge in the role they are best suited for.

I should buy an Ishtar.

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#15 - 2013-05-13 17:30:33 UTC
Roime wrote:
Battleships should be versatile DPS monsters with plenty of staying power to justify their massive drawbacks (speed, size, scan res). They would have all needed one more slot + fitting to use it, and 20-30% EHP across the board, along with sensor strength.

Squishing them into attack/combat roles doesn't suit the ship class, and this small ship division is the source of the changes that appear as nerfs.





What? BS already have more slots than they know what to do with



BS's weren't nerfed, stop being bad.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Large Collidable Object
morons.
#16 - 2013-05-14 22:29:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Large Collidable Object
Malcanis wrote:
Anyone who doesn't think that the new geddon isn't going to be a murdermobile should go back to EVE Uni.

And dat phoon! Shocked



A murdermobile that is outperformed by the abaddon in it's own neuting role except for neut range, which is admittedly important. However the Abaddon has an easier time fitting them, can sustain them for longer due to a better cap and tanks better (at least on yesterdays Sisi build), whereas the Abaddons tank has been nerfed without any other change.

Considering the Abaddon was the only viable Amarr ship in blobs and that it wasn't exactly outstanding except when used by PL against -A-'s DRAEK blobs they kept throwing at them, I don't think the nerf is justified.

The Geddon will be a neat Gimmick ship - the poor mans Bhaal, but comparing ABS to ABCs whilst ABCs cost 1/4 is a plain joke.

Someone put a reasonable reply, claiming they mostly got reshuflled, and I'd basically agree with that (an OP always has to be somewhat exagerated to spark discussion, imho), but that's the very point I'm criticising - they weren't buffed (except for Caldari, but that's mostly due to CM changes),

Regarding their overall roles, it's mostly nerfs - whoever claimed they were buffed should please state which ones where, except for the ones undergoing complete rolechanges, making the future meta quite unpredictable.

However, as I stated in the OP, they have been in about as much of a sad state as T1 cruisers before the buff.

Now what happened to T1 frigs and cruisers was a buff accross the board (except for the rifter and rupture, which were OP beyond recoginition before rebelance).

T1 BS needed even more of a buff, but sadly, it didn't happen.

Have you ever seen an overproptortional amount of BS outside blobs similar to the terrible DRAEK/CAEN monoculture we've been facing during last years? I think not.

Now with these changes, I can't see BS reemerge outside blobs or station games.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Cap James Tkirk
Baba Yagas
The Initiative.
#17 - 2013-05-14 22:52:10 UTC
New BS Blob tactics?????
Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
#18 - 2013-05-14 23:47:24 UTC
Increased build cost on top of what looks like a nerf disguised to look like a general balancing.I like to know how they justify that.

......................................................

Alexa Coates
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2013-05-14 23:55:36 UTC
posting in a "never using bs's" thread because I agree. BS's blow.

That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2013-05-15 00:19:36 UTC
Alexa Coates wrote:
posting in a "never using bs's" thread because I agree. BS's blow.


I miss the Chivalry Ravens. When will CCP make them cool again?Sad
12Next page