These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Just Another Work Around for Gankers in Hi Sec
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
dark heartt
#21 - 2013-05-07 07:06:27 UTC
The Reaper J wrote:
This is just another way to show ccp rather support crime.


Also just wanted to point out that they have always supported crime. That is one of the corner stones of Eve gameplay. Stop being such a whiner and learn to fit ships properly.

http://tetrisisunrealistic.blogspot.com.au/
Froggy Storm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#22 - 2013-05-07 07:29:11 UTC
A firm thank you must go out to the rifter pilot for destroying that abomination. Heaven help us all if it had lived long enough to breed.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#23 - 2013-05-07 07:33:50 UTC
I honestly can't believe that someone would complain CCP are making it too easy for gankers after the hundreds of nerfs combat/aggression in highsec have received over the years.

This may not be the game for you if you can't handle PVP, bro
Bi-Mi Lansatha
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2013-05-07 07:33:55 UTC
The Reaper J wrote:
Should have seen this coming......allowing hi sec gankers that committed the crimes to work their way back into hi sec safely so they can go and gank more players, by giving them the means to do so. WOW. Unbelievable. The idea is that if they commit the crime, do the time...
I am not a ganker or criminal myself, but.. this feature should add game play to lowsec, if the tags are rare enough.

That isn't bad.
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#25 - 2013-05-07 08:19:20 UTC
Sir Marksalot wrote:
You do realize sec is/will be trivially easy to get if you want it, right? It's not the reason people don't gank.

The reason it doesn't happen more often is that every couple of months CCP rolls out another round of nerfs to it. Go back to mining and cry in corp chat, not here.


OMG....what is it with you lot and the term crying. It seems like you do a lot of it if you keep using it. There is no crying here. That's why miners should have combat support when mining. Not my fault or anyone's if they sit out in the belt completely alone.
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2013-05-07 08:50:00 UTC
Combat support? What do you think combat support is going to do about a suicide gank?

Belligerent Undesirables Selling Griefer Immunity
Chal82
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2013-05-07 09:09:42 UTC
Posting in a kill Highsec thread
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#28 - 2013-05-07 09:28:43 UTC
Psychotic Monk wrote:
Combat support? What do you think combat support is going to do about a suicide gank?


Not worried. But if they really want to have fun, go suicide a carrier. That might be more fun for them, but of course that's almost impossible. Which would not matter much anyways seeing that is would be in null or low sec anyways.
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#29 - 2013-05-07 09:33:16 UTC
412nv Yaken wrote:
The Reaper J wrote:
Should have seen this coming......allowing hi sec gankers that committed the crimes to work their way back into hi sec safely so they can go and gank more players, by giving them the means to do so. WOW. Unbelievable. The idea is that if they commit the crime, do the time.

Don't go and give them easy ways out. Now there is no point to mining, industry, or anything. They will just gank, go to low sec, collect tags, give to concord, and then come back to hi sec and gank again, OMG, that is the most ridiculous update i have ever seen.

What about the players they gank? The excuse ccp uses is that people will rather stop playing than grind their way back up in security status. That is bull. Then if that's the case, remove hi sec space. There is no point to it. As gankers will be much more, there is no reforming a gank. There is a very well known phrase, "do the crime, do the time". Grinding their way up is the time they doing for being stupid enough to do the crime. Doing that update is just another loophole for things to kill even the noobs in hi sec space, and easily find a way back to hi sec after doing a crime.

This is just another way to show ccp rather support crime. Hey what the heck. So what.

I VOTE REMOVE HIGH SEC SPACE......hahahaha.....that could be good fun.


Why would a ganker, go and spend money/time on getting their sec status up to lose it again. Also why are you crying on the forums about something not yet released and really nobody has any idea how this is actually gunna work.....


I am pretty damn sure anyone is allowed to make their own opinions and suggestions whether is be before a release or after.
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#30 - 2013-05-07 09:56:54 UTC  |  Edited by: The Reaper J
It does not matter what i say in any case. Most of you seem to have temper tantrums when you don't like someone's opinion or comments, and if some of you don't have temper tantrums, you're completely disrepectful, rude ***holes. Then again, that's probably why the world will never have peace in any way at all. No respect or tolerance for anyone else.

Makes no difference whether this is game related or not. A simple show of respect and respecting someone's thought's and ideas cannot kill you.
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#31 - 2013-05-07 10:05:14 UTC
The Reaper J wrote:
It does not matter what i say in any case. Most of you seem to have temper tantrums when you don't like someone's opinion or comments, and if some of you don't have temper tantrums, you're completely disrepectful, rude ***holes. Then again, that's probably why the world will never have peace in any way at all. No respect or tolerance for anyone else.

Makes no difference whether this is game related or not. A simple show of respect and respecting someone's thought's and ideas cannot kill you.

Actually it's because you've hilariously failed to understand the change in mechanics or it's implications, and gone and posted a whine thread about it.

Why should we respect that.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#32 - 2013-05-07 10:06:36 UTC
Like maybe the first thing to do is to work out whether this change would lead to more or less ganking, and if you don't understand why either might be the case, ask.

You're being mocked because your FIRST post is a massive misunderstanding AND a whine post.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Esha Ditrix
#33 - 2013-05-07 10:07:09 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Actually it's because you've hilariously failed to understand the change in mechanics or it's implications, and gone and posted a whine thread about it.

Why should we respect that.


deleted post, as it whas identical to this duder....
quoted for emphasis

Its not an exploit, if the game lets you do it...
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#34 - 2013-05-07 10:35:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Mike Adoulin
The Reaper J wrote:
rabblerabblerabbletears




*looks at Megathron kill*

Shocked

Ugh

Roll

Straight

See that killmail?

Yeah, that one.

The Mega lossmail.

You know, the one that you bought with plex because your crap toon didn't have the skills to fly it.

Go die in a properly fitted Mega and maybe we will all stop laughing at you.

Considering those lossmails (lolmails, actually) show you don't even know how to play EVE properly, we give your 'expert opinion' the proper consideration it deserves, which is to say, none at all.

Jesus wept.

That poor innocent Mega. It didn't deserve that. You inhuman monster, it was just sitting there minding its own business until you came along!

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2013-05-07 10:41:51 UTC
aaii tog...

Vir iemand wat in vrede will wees... jy hou daarvan om mense se attention op jou te sit.

Ek sou sterk aan geraai het dat jy seker maak oor hoe die goed werk voor jy hierdie post gepost het. Hierdie gaan tien teen een net nog kak veroorsaak.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#36 - 2013-05-07 12:32:40 UTC  |  Edited by: The Reaper J
Cannibal Kane wrote:
aaii tog...

Vir iemand wat in vrede will wees... jy hou daarvan om mense se attention op jou te sit.

Ek sou sterk aan geraai het dat jy seker maak oor hoe die goed werk voor jy hierdie post gepost het. Hierdie gaan tien teen een net nog kak veroorsaak.


Ja nee, seker ook maar waar. Dit maak in elk geval nie saak nie. Want niemand gee om wat ek se nie, hulle gee in elkgeval vir my kak. Hulle respecteer niemand se oepinie nie, tensy dit hulle pelle is. En nee ek sit nie vir jou in die selfde boot nie.

Dit maak nie meer saak nie, ek gaan in elk geval maar seker net uit my groep uit trek. Dit help maar boggerol nie. Ek magnie n oepienie he nie, al is dit n kak oepinie. Almal lyk my vergeet, dat ons almal moes onder begin met geen idea hoe om te speel nie, of hoe om enig iets te doen nie. So, ek gaan maar nie eers uit die stasie uitkilm nie, ek gaan maar net my interne goed doen en op my alt speel.

Maar nie om soos n pyn te klink nie. Is dit nie wat julle almal wil he nie? Dat hi sec weg gevat word nie, wat dan meer pvp sal vorseer? So waar was ek verkeerd toe ek dit se, as ek mag vra? Want bie keer klink dit of mense dit wil he, anderste verstaan ek nie hoekom hulle meer pvp wil he nie, maar wil nie hi sec weg vat nie. Want dan sou dit meer pvp vorseer.
Mike Mulder
Imperial Phoenix Legion
#37 - 2013-05-07 12:40:08 UTC
I might be a noob, but I'm pretty sure that 2nd kill mail is a fake (not API verified), as the poster of it even hints at.

Again, I might be a noob, but I haven't seen any dedicated gankers that give a rat's ass about their security status, and, in fact, wear their -10 sec status proudly. IMO the main purchaser/farmer of these tags will be non criminal low sec PvPers.
The Reaper J
Kings.Guard.
#38 - 2013-05-07 12:56:23 UTC
Mike Mulder wrote:
I might be a noob, but I'm pretty sure that 2nd kill mail is a fake (not API verified), as the poster of it even hints at.

Again, I might be a noob, but I haven't seen any dedicated gankers that give a rat's ass about their security status, and, in fact, wear their -10 sec status proudly. IMO the main purchaser/farmer of these tags will be non criminal low sec PvPers.



I would imagine those tags would be pretty valuable too. lol
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#39 - 2013-05-07 13:16:09 UTC
Psychotic Monk wrote:
Combat support? What do you think combat support is going to do about a suicide gank?


Do unto others before they do unto you? Of course, that would detract from the holy isk / hour ratio. Big smile

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Velicitia
XS Tech
#40 - 2013-05-07 13:22:46 UTC
The Reaper J wrote:

I VOTE REMOVE HIGH SEC SPACE......hahahaha.....that could be good fun.


I support this product and/or service.

the rest of your ranting leading up to this ... not so much.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia