These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Experienced Players duel baiting in starter mission system

First post First post
Author
GM The Doctor
Game Masters
C C P Alliance
#41 - 2013-05-05 15:40:12 UTC  |  Edited by: GM The Doctor
Greetings,

First I would like to note that this is not open for discussion with us at CCP customer support, the rules are quite clear regarding this behavior.

Quote:
Tricking, or attempting to trick new players into situations where you can fire on them freely in rookie systems is strictly prohibited.

This information is publicly available and is displayed on the Evelopedia article for rookie systems which is managed by CCP Customer Support. The article can be found here:

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_Systems

To quote SGM Homonoia from 2012.10.15 10:48

"In all seriousness, do NOT try and game the system to go after rookies. We do not care how well you argue or how well your internet lawyering skills are. We do NOT allow this and the spirit of this principle trumps any and all other rules about game play we have. If you do this and your argument is "but this rule or this mechanic states..." then stop right there and do not bother; we WILL hammer down on that. No exceptions."

We can fully understand that you wish to use the various PVP options available to you, however such activity may draw unwanted attention of new players towards you, so we strongly suggest you move such activity out of the 25 solar systems currently listed and move it to any of the 7,674 other solar systems available to you.

With regards,
GM The Doctor

CCP Customer Support | EVE Online | DUST 514

Othran
Route One
#42 - 2013-05-05 16:00:42 UTC
hennep wrote:
Are the Noob starter mission systems policed by GM´s or do they rely on Rookie chat?


They are not actively policed. They should be but they're not.

CCP relies 100% on people reporting this bullshit.

Frankly I think they should be a LOT more pro-active about this - you're only going to get one chance with many people on a trial. I know killboards are inherently unreliable but its not hard to set a filter on a system and see who is ganking newbs. Once you have a list of names its pretty trivial to see if the killmails are genuine - if you're on the CCP side of things.

PvP is inherent to Eve but there's no benefit to anyone playing the game if people gank newbs who are hours old. Its just lame crap from people who are too scared to have a decent fight.

tl;dr CCP needs to do more....
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#43 - 2013-05-05 16:59:46 UTC
Thank you for your response and link to SGM Homonoia's post. I didn't see that one when I looked for something solid on the new mechanics and it is much more clear than the old pages. Using the system like a jackass will get the same old reaction as sitting there with a bait can....if they are used as intended they are fine....no need to go into my version of "as intended" everyone knows if you have to ask yourself if what you're doing is "as intended use" then you're being a jackass.

Now I can go back to being a jackass in 7,674 other solar systems.


...and since we have yas on the line could you poke someone to look at the duel text and take out the "no interference" part or add something about interfering ships will become suspect?
Millard Audene
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2013-05-05 18:57:36 UTC
There is one real simple fix CCP could implement to prevent this, and there is one that involves more effort on their part. Currently, in the Chat options, Decline All Duel Requests is currently not checked by default. Simple fix, is make this enabled. The current mechanic will automatically accept a duel challenge when the timer runs down, and the decline button has not been hit.

The more time intensive fix for CCP is to not only make that change, but to incorporate the dueling mechanics into one of the tutorials, even if just to mention it. Make the rookie player aware that PVP can happen at any time, and to choose not to participate in duels, they can leave the Chat option as is. Should they deactivate that safety, then they are at risk, and will be considered to be consenting to all PVP they encounter because of it.

Now of course, this isn't CCP's fault. People will be asshats. But since they have gone so far as to make rules preventing rookie baiting, in my opinion they should take an extra step to help prevent it on the client side.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#45 - 2013-05-05 19:40:06 UTC
GM The Doctor wrote:
We can fully understand that you wish to PVP, however you can't do that in the 25 solar systems currently listed and we encourage you to move to any of the 7,674 other solar systems available to you.

Pretty sure you're going to want to rephrase that.

Because you just said that PVP is prohibited in rookie systems and I'm pretty sure that's not what you meant.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#46 - 2013-05-05 20:32:36 UTC
Only phrase that comes to mind:

Told you so

Thank you GM The Doctor for clarifying the policy.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#47 - 2013-05-05 22:31:51 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Only phrase that comes to mind:

Told you so

Thank you GM The Doctor for clarifying the policy.


You told us under all circumstances retribution mechanics in rookie systems is the same as can baiting. The link Doctor provided to the official post from Homonoia about the new stuff is as clear as it needs to be. Had you linked that at the begining of this conversation there would have been no thread.
Katie Frost
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2013-05-05 23:14:11 UTC
Call Rollard wrote:

If I was a newbie in EVE who played for an hour, I doubt I'd even know what a duel is. And I accept it and find myself blown up and podded I'd wonder what the hell happened. It's tricking newbies into fights in rookie systems. You can trick newbies outside the starter systems however you can not in the rookie systems.


Great news... you don't need EVE at all to know what a "duel" is... just look it up in a dictionary.

So when you hit accept, after 1hr of playing a game... guess what that makes you? So now look up 'clue' in the dictionary as well, because you really need one.

I believe that CCPs stance on this matter breaks down to this:

1) If you go into a starter system and spam duels, suspect flag yourself or use general in-game mechanics to purposely engage in combat with day-old characters, you will be punished. This activity can be characterised as persistent and with malicious intent - the former part can be easily tracked via in-game logs.

2) There is no patch for stupid... and on that note Call Rollard, I will be sending you a contract request soon... just hit accept, it will work out great for you.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#49 - 2013-05-06 01:51:24 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
GM The Doctor wrote:
Greetings,

First I would like to note that this is not open for discussion with us at CCP customer support, the rules are quite clear regarding this behavior.

Quote:
Tricking, or attempting to trick new players into situations where you can fire on them freely in rookie systems is strictly prohibited.

This information is publicly available and is displayed on the Evelopedia article for rookie systems which is managed by CCP Customer Support. The article can be found here:

http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_Systems

To quote SGM Homonoia from 2012.10.15 10:48

"In all seriousness, do NOT try and game the system to go after rookies. We do not care how well you argue or how well your internet lawyering skills are. We do NOT allow this and the spirit of this principle trumps any and all other rules about game play we have. If you do this and your argument is "but this rule or this mechanic states..." then stop right there and do not bother; we WILL hammer down on that. No exceptions."

We can fully understand that you wish to PVP, however you can't do that in the 25 solar systems currently listed and we encourage you to move to any of the 7,674 other solar systems available to you.

With regards,
GM The Doctor



I for one, am confused as to how politely asking "Excuse, me good sir, would you terribly mind allowing me to shoot at you" aka a Duel constitutes a "trick."

Second, is the rule "you can't tricknewbies into being able to shoot them" or is it "you can't PvP in the rookie systems?"

Because one of those is a well designed rule for protecting newbies (the kind of rule I suggested repeatedly in another thread like this one), and one requires a definition of both "newbies" and "trick" to be effective at preventing bad behavior.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Katie Frost
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#50 - 2013-05-06 02:14:33 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

I for one, am confused as to how politely asking "Excuse, me good sir, would you terribly mind allowing me to shoot at you" aka a Duel constitutes a "trick."


I don't believe it does. Spamming it to multiple characters in rookie systems or sitting on the undock with a suspect flag for prolonged periods of time in order to gank people that do not understand aggression mechanics, on the other hand does. From my understanding, it is on a case-by-case basis to justify persistency and malice versus "let's have a fair, friendly duel" between two players in a rookie system be it two rookies or otherwise.

RubyPorto wrote:

Second, is the rule "you can't tricknewbies into being able to shoot them" or is it "you can't PvP in the rookie systems?"


This is where the GM reply in this thread is clumsy. He quotes the Senior GM as specifically talking about 'gaming the system' or rather using game mechanics to trick people into fighting you - previously can flipping and now suspect flagging; but then goes on to say that no PvP should take place in the 25 rookie systems. The latter statement is out of place as surely, if two rookies decide to go at it in the rookie system, they cannot ban them for having a duel. Likewise, if a suspect moves through the system and gets tackled by rookies or even other players, is he not meant to be fight back? Or can he petition his loss as a "GM said no PvP in this system so reimburse my ship plz"?

However, given the inconsistent message provided in this thread, the GM may want to revise the reply and provide further clarity to the matter.
Ylariana
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#51 - 2013-05-06 10:34:50 UTC
25 systems out of 7600+ systems that are "reserved" as paddling pools for new players.

What possible reason can there be for going to these 25 systems to look for "PVP" fights ?
Lets be blunt, if youre looking for a fight here what you are likely to find is a very quick explosion and some tears if the victim didnt fully understand what he/she was getting themselves in to.
Yes, lots of the "new fish" are alts of long standing players, but seriously, are your PVP skills so weak that you have to go there to get your jollies ?

From a Cause and Effect point of view, if you show all the genuine new players a one-sided You Cant Win example of PVP on day one, its a fair bet that a significant amount of them are going to take a LOT longer to go looking for fun in Low/Null space, so all you achieve is to restrict your own target opportunities later on.

All the Leet-PVPers whine about not enough targets in Low forcing them to find their fun in High-Sec, If you made it less of a Gank and more of a Match then people might be more willing to engage with you.
But wait, If its not a Gank, that means you might lose, and you "Leet-PVPers" that pull this kind of Mickey Mouse Ass-Hattery hating Losing almost as much as you hate not being free to be wankers where-ever you choose to be.

A T2 ship to Duel Bait ? Talk about stacking the odds. Risk Averse Much ?
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#52 - 2013-05-06 10:56:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
RubyPorto wrote:
I for one, am confused as to how politely asking "Excuse, me good sir, would you terribly mind allowing me to shoot at you" aka a Duel constitutes a "trick."

Second, is the rule "you can't tricknewbies into being able to shoot them" or is it "you can't PvP in the rookie systems?"

Because one of those is a well designed rule for protecting newbies (the kind of rule I suggested repeatedly in another thread like this one), and one requires a definition of both "newbies" and "trick" to be effective at preventing bad behavior.


Stop being ****, it's unbecoming.


Spamming duel invites in newbie systems at anyone who undocks, where newbies have no real clue about the UI as a whole and are struggling with their first ship/mission is terrible and only ******* morons would do that. I'm sure you don't have trouble figuring that out.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#53 - 2013-05-06 11:35:34 UTC
Ylariana wrote:
25 systems out of 7600+ systems that are "reserved" as paddling pools for new players.

What possible reason can there be for going to these 25 systems to look for "PVP" fights ?
Lets be blunt, if youre looking for a fight here what you are likely to find is a very quick explosion and some tears if the victim didnt fully understand what he/she was getting themselves in to.
Yes, lots of the "new fish" are alts of long standing players, but seriously, are your PVP skills so weak that you have to go there to get your jollies ?

From a Cause and Effect point of view, if you show all the genuine new players a one-sided You Cant Win example of PVP on day one, its a fair bet that a significant amount of them are going to take a LOT longer to go looking for fun in Low/Null space, so all you achieve is to restrict your own target opportunities later on.

All the Leet-PVPers whine about not enough targets in Low forcing them to find their fun in High-Sec, If you made it less of a Gank and more of a Match then people might be more willing to engage with you.
But wait, If its not a Gank, that means you might lose, and you "Leet-PVPers" that pull this kind of Mickey Mouse Ass-Hattery hating Losing almost as much as you hate not being free to be wankers where-ever you choose to be.

A T2 ship to Duel Bait ? Talk about stacking the odds. Risk Averse Much ?


This.

Why do you pick a starting system to PvP while their are loads of other places to look.

Answer: because you pick on new players. Which is not allowed.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
#54 - 2013-05-06 13:45:45 UTC
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2047866#post2047866

Check the SGM post in that thread. You don't have to avoid these systems just don't sit on the undock with a suspect flag on spamming duels to the same people 50 times just to be a jerk. The logs will show what happened if some dummy wanted to be a bounty hunter on day one, activated a killright and threw a point on you while passing through.

Duels?...eh if ya want to but don't sit in there blind spamming invites to every noob. Asking in local first if anyone is interested and being helpful rather than looking for kills would be prudent if you even want to step on that landmine.

See nice and easy now.
Tec Nine
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2013-05-06 17:34:08 UTC
J'Poll wrote:
Only phrase that comes to mind:

Told you so

Thank you GM The Doctor for clarifying the policy.


Most of the thread was about what should be allowed - very little debate was had about what the rules were. The whole thread you supported your arguments with terrible reasons. Not to say that the Minmatar guy had great reasons, but they were certainly better than yours.

As a rookie with less than a week experience in EVE, I think sheltering new players from duels - even with elite veterans - goes against everything EVE stands for. Of course, tricking new players is different. Duels are definitely not tricking.

Back to my point: just because a GM comes in and confirms a rule doesn't mean you were right about what you've said in the previous posts. Saying 'I told you so' is just not cool on any level and is wrong as well.
Durzel
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#56 - 2013-05-06 18:05:09 UTC
Othran wrote:
Frankly I think they should be a LOT more pro-active about this - you're only going to get one chance with many people on a trial.

+1
Ilkahn
Ideal Mechanisms
#57 - 2013-05-06 18:08:20 UTC
J'Poll wrote:


This.

Why do you pick a starting system to PvP while their are loads of other places to look.

Answer: because you pick on new players. Which is not allowed.


J'Poll, you are debating with people who will not acknowledge anything other than what they wish to believe. The only way to get the point across is for CCP to put a watch on every account in this thread and when they kill a noob in a starter system to ban them for 30 days. That, may, just very might, get through their thick heads. But i doubt it. CCP needs to partrol their new systems and they should ensure that what is going on doesn't run off new players who are the future cash supply of eve.

By not patrolling the new systems and helping new accounts it's akin to McDonalds employees walking away from the counter while you are standing there waiting to place your order. At some point you just give up and go elsewhere.
Ilkahn
Ideal Mechanisms
#58 - 2013-05-06 18:17:02 UTC
Tec Nine wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Only phrase that comes to mind:

Told you so

Thank you GM The Doctor for clarifying the policy.


.......

As a rookie with less than a week experience in EVE, I think sheltering new players from duels - even with elite veterans - goes against everything EVE stands for. Of course, tricking new players is different. Duels are definitely not tricking.

......


I call hogwash on you being a new player. The typical new player in eve is so underwater and overwhelmed by commands and UI boxes that even completing the starter missions is a challenge. If you were a new player i'd expect you to be asking more about "How do i challenge someone to a duel?".

Instead, you are making a political and intellectual statement that as a 1 week old player you actually have a complete understanding of what EVE online is about and i find that just fascinating.

Gotta love posting under your cyno alt eh?

P.S. for new players, a cyno alt is a toon trained just enough to be able to light cyno beacons for capital ships to jump to.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#59 - 2013-05-06 18:25:01 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Tec Nine wrote:
J'Poll wrote:
Only phrase that comes to mind:

Told you so

Thank you GM The Doctor for clarifying the policy.


Most of the thread was about what should be allowed - very little debate was had about what the rules were. The whole thread you supported your arguments with terrible reasons. Not to say that the Minmatar guy had great reasons, but they were certainly better than yours.

As a rookie with less than a week experience in EVE, I think sheltering new players from duels - even with elite veterans - goes against everything EVE stands for. Of course, tricking new players is different. Duels are definitely not tricking.

Back to my point: just because a GM comes in and confirms a rule doesn't mean you were right about what you've said in the previous posts. Saying 'I told you so' is just not cool on any level and is wrong as well.


Obvious alts don't class as new player

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#60 - 2013-05-06 18:28:01 UTC
Ilkahn wrote:
J'Poll wrote:


This.

Why do you pick a starting system to PvP while their are loads of other places to look.

Answer: because you pick on new players. Which is not allowed.


J'Poll, you are debating with people who will not acknowledge anything other than what they wish to believe. The only way to get the point across is for CCP to put a watch on every account in this thread and when they kill a noob in a starter system to ban them for 30 days. That, may, just very might, get through their thick heads. But i doubt it. CCP needs to partrol their new systems and they should ensure that what is going on doesn't run off new players who are the future cash supply of eve.

By not patrolling the new systems and helping new accounts it's akin to McDonalds employees walking away from the counter while you are standing there waiting to place your order. At some point you just give up and go elsewhere.


That's why I already voice my opinion that ISD-Star should stop with mass monitoring the 2 help channels and have a full presence in noob systems. If they see suspicious behavior they can notify CCP.

But in general. Yes, noob systems should ACTIVELY be monitored.

Much like most newbs don't know their heads from the asses in the EVE UI, they also don't know about noob system rules and how to petition a player. So most likely most of them just quit the game and don't notify CCP why.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club