These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Walking around in station is it dead?

Author
Baggo Hammers
#101 - 2013-05-04 16:40:40 UTC
Kimberly Menage wrote:
its like COME ON its walking every other game and there mama walks in them why not this one about time 10 years and all we do is stand there or walk with a mouse cant even use the keys.




Oooh then we can have houses we can decorate! And we can dance in our underwear!


If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there.

Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#102 - 2013-05-04 16:45:51 UTC
Baggo Hammers wrote:

Oooh then we can have houses we can decorate! And we can dance in our underwear!

Yay! Gimme a flamethrower! Twisted
Adela Talvanen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#103 - 2013-05-04 16:47:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Adela Talvanen
Varius Xeral wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
WiS will come, as CCP's audience on the last key note speech showed they want it.


Yes, just like wrestling attendees obviously can indeed "smell what the rock is cooking".


Silly reply.

CCP needn't have developed Dust, but they have and have started the merging of the two game formats. WiS is just another branch that will be developed, to create an all encompassing sci-fi space based game.

You want to fly around in your ship fine, have a blast. I want to play a totally immersible space based game, and not be restricted to a single aspect.
Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#104 - 2013-05-04 16:52:37 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:
CCP needn't have developed Dust, but they have and have started the merging of the two game formats. WiS is just another branch that will be developed, to create an all encompassing sci-fi space based game.

You want to fly around in you ship fine, have a blast. I want to play a totally immersible space based game, and not be restricted to a single aspect.


Sure, I think WiS is inevitable (as long as Eve survives), though I'm hesitant to put any real estimates on when it will start happening and what shape the implementation will take.

That in no way, however, supports your argument concerning what people want and what CCP will do based on your subjective interpretation of one crowd response to one comment by one person from CCP.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Adela Talvanen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#105 - 2013-05-04 16:56:16 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
CCP needn't have developed Dust, but they have and have started the merging of the two game formats. WiS is just another branch that will be developed, to create an all encompassing sci-fi space based game.

You want to fly around in you ship fine, have a blast. I want to play a totally immersible space based game, and not be restricted to a single aspect.


Sure, I think WiS is inevitable (as long as Eve survives), though I'm hesitant to put any real estimates on when it will start happening and what shape the implementation will take.

That in no way, however, supports your argument concerning what people want and what CCP will do based on your subjective interpretation of one crowd response to one comment by one person from CCP.


You will also recall he said they will talk about it next year, so at FF 2014 we'll have some more solid answers.

In the mean time I and some here want WiS to come, and some here don't.

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#106 - 2013-05-04 16:59:49 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:
You will also recall he said they will talk about it next year, so at FF 2014 we'll have some more solid answers.

In the mean time I and some here want WiS to come, and some here don't.


Powerful insight. Thank you for your contribution.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Bolow Santosi
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#107 - 2013-05-04 17:00:22 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:



Silly reply.

CCP needn't have developed Dust, but they have and have started the merging of the two game formats. WiS is just another branch that will be developed, to create an all encompassing sci-fi space based game.

You want to fly around in you ship fine, have a blast. I want to play a totally immersible space based game, and not be restricted to a single aspect.


There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. What the vast majority of the anti-WiS crowd including myself have a problem with is making WiS nothing more than a glorified irc client. I am opposed to the idea of them wasting resources so a few people can talk in local with a better background. If there's actual gameplay, and reasons to do WiS I'll support it.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#108 - 2013-05-04 17:35:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Varius Xeral wrote:

Instead of looking to collectively articulate a coherent and consistent vision for WiS that addresses the concerns and objections of those who either don't support it or are outright against it, you will continue to make circle-jerking threads among an insular and limited crowd based on anecdotal evidence, pie-in-the-sky visions of subscription boosts for following some amorphous plan, and chickenlittlist doomcalling for not doing so. Meanwhile, those of us with a connection to reality will continue to laugh at you, until the point, if it ever comes, that WiS moves naturally back into the realm of commonly accepted discourse.


I have never done any of those things (unless you can use the word jerking to refer to female genitalia, in which case two people can make a circle). What I want for WiS is for CCP to start... that's it. I fully support their wreck diving prototype idea which covers all the antis concerns. Amorphous plan?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=161511&find=unread

The above doesn't look very amorphous to me. And that's what I, and a substantial amount of the pro crowd, are asking for.

Also, your doing it again... talking about 'evidence' when you don't know what your talking about. It's not smart, it just makes you look like a ******. I don't even know why I bother replying to you. Your posts are just poorly thought out offensive stupid bullshit.

Bolow Santosi wrote:
If there's actual gameplay, and reasons to do WiS I'll support it.


CCP have a fantastic vision of how they want to expand WiS. Plenty of meaningful gameplay content that fits with the Eve universe perfectly.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=161511&find=unread

Read it, think about it, and start supporting it.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#109 - 2013-05-04 17:47:41 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
and a substantial amount of the pro crowd, are asking for.


That's the part I don't believe. For every pro-WiS comment I read, there is another version of what they imagine they're supporting. Until I see some jive between a majority of comments and what CCP intends to actually implement, I personally will not support WiS, and will continue to mock any allusions to either great success from its implementation or great failure from its lack thereof.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#110 - 2013-05-04 17:52:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Varius Xeral wrote:
Until I see some jive between a majority of comments and what CCP intends to actually implement, I personally will not support WiS, and will continue to mock any allusions to either great success from its implementation or great failure from its lack thereof.


So.. when people are supporting CCPs meaningful vision, you will support it too? I knew you were a secret supporter yourself. A bit like how a surprisingly high number of homophobes turn out to be gay. From this point forward you will be referred to you as a closet barbie lover.

Bolow Santosi wrote:
If there's actual gameplay, and reasons to do WiS I'll support it.


You too.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#111 - 2013-05-04 17:53:19 UTC
Just tested, I can still walk around my CQ which is part of the stations, so to answer the OP.

No you can walk around in stations just fine presently.

Now with 100% less Troll.

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#112 - 2013-05-04 18:01:27 UTC
It takes a huge amount of development resources to produce WIS related content and in the past the content produced has been hugely behind schedule, questionably functional and devoid of actual gameplay. Subsequently people were very upset that their subscription money was being spent developing a set of features that sucked, didn't work properly and didn't improve the game for them in any way when there are large portions of the game that people interact with every day that suck ass and could have been improved if they had just had a little dev time dedicated to them.

Dedicating resources to developing content that is effectively not actually part of the game at the expense of improving the game is a bad idea and CCP seems to have caught on to that.

So don't expect to see any large WIS based expansions any time soon. They'll probably work on it incrementally over time though.
Bolow Santosi
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#113 - 2013-05-04 18:02:41 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Varius Xeral wrote:
Until I see some jive between a majority of comments and what CCP intends to actually implement, I personally will not support WiS, and will continue to mock any allusions to either great success from its implementation or great failure from its lack thereof.


So.. when people are supporting CCPs meaningful vision, you will support it too? I knew you were a secret supporter yourself. A bit like how a surprisingly high number of homophobes turn out to be gay. From this point forward you will be referred to you as a closet barbie lover.

Bolow Santosi wrote:
If there's actual gameplay, and reasons to do WiS I'll support it.


You too.


Absolutely, if the prototype of WiS showed EVA's exploring wrecks for loot, or walking around in a Sleeper station scavenging things while a couple of Dust Mercs provide security I'd support the hell out of it, because it sounds cool as hell and there's actual gameplay involved. The problem is the most vocal supporters of WiS don't mention this vision or don't care. They want second life in space. If we got the exploration and such and the social aspect was just kind of tacked on I doubt anyone would care. But actual gameplay must be first and foremost, especially after the disaster that was Incarna.
thunXaII
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#114 - 2013-05-04 18:02:50 UTC  |  Edited by: thunXaII
...
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#115 - 2013-05-04 18:08:02 UTC
WIS is dead and buried, you simply can't see the gravestone behind the door......Cool


Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#116 - 2013-05-04 18:08:11 UTC
Bolow Santosi wrote:

Absolutely, if the prototype of WiS showed EVA's exploring wrecks for loot, or walking around in a Sleeper station scavenging things while a couple of Dust Mercs provide security I'd support the hell out of it, because it sounds cool as hell and there's actual gameplay involved. The problem is the most vocal supporters of WiS don't mention this vision or don't care. They want second life in space. If we got the exploration and such and the social aspect was just kind of tacked on I doubt anyone would care. But actual gameplay must be first and foremost, especially after the disaster that was Incarna.

Agree with the Goon (where the world is coming to?).

That said, exploration, dusties for backup and other such things were mentioned quite a lot on feature discussion in the very same thread that got linked in the first page.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#117 - 2013-05-04 18:18:19 UTC
Pierre Echerie wrote:
Agree with the Goon (where the world is coming to?).

Protip: Goons are (mostly) normal human beings who are interested in playing a game that is good.
Tank Talbot
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#118 - 2013-05-04 18:25:10 UTC
This was written in reply to a post now gone yet all points are thread relevant. I had put some little work and thought into it so please forgive me the recycling.

***

Please do it right and buy a monocle before ranting over the Jita statue attack. The riot was never about content that would grow the player base. There are so many dirty things I might call EVE players but spoiled is not one of them. They are passionate and rioted over a silly change in direction that threatened their core play values while offering up nothing in return. CCP should be thankful as most companies never have a consumer base with such love for their product.

Not every game needs ten million subscribers to be successful. Let me remind you of a term that espoused the perfect philosophy of population growth and feature development for this game once upon a time. EVE: “EVOLUTION.” The mechanics and lore of New Eden have always provided a solid foundation to evolve new game play from. The real problem developed when CCP lost focus upon this idea and attempted to sell out for a combination of purchasable vanity, easy and active click / twitch play under the guise of increasing accessibility.

Factional Warfare, Pirate Nations, Agent Missioning, Worm Holes, all of these examples are underdeveloped existing content waiting for the next spurt of applied features to create the evolution of new game play that will delight the old while drawing in the new and can be done while remaining true, internally consistent, with the existing game mechanics. Instead, someone is trying to entertain us with can vomiting wrecks where the loot vanishes in a few seconds unless you click again and again uselessly (to feel active) to secure X.

I like and respect CCP but must point out, considering, that any failure in growth is clearly in their hands when so many potential opportunities we actually want are sitting there looking everyone in the face. Staff and project layoffs (and overs) play a role as I am sure that when some team members left no one remained to carry on their particular torch. So the work sat there discarded while some one ran off in a new direction to make “their” mark. This has lead to a scattered vision as some should have carried on what was started before.

You are correct, in my view, in asserting that CCP needs to consider adjusting their business model in the age of free to play and would be severely compromised by adopting the industry standard. However, they are a perfect candidate for adopting a buy to play model. It would even be a means of getting everyone out of the ship and walking in stations or through explorable ancient ship wrecks as you clearly want through the EVOLUTION of game play. Incarna with a point outside of vanity sales and video card pwnage.

Make DUST514 a buy to play addition to an EVE account. Maybe even allow capsuleers to train ground skills and vice versa as a natural EVOLUTION and just look what could come of it. Instead, we have just another console shooter inbound because some one wants to code every part of EVE as a standalone game for accessibility, short term profit, and supposed strength of delivery method. Whose fault is that again? I would not be blaming the player base as somehow holding CCP back...
Cesar Caltrans
Doomheim
#119 - 2013-05-05 02:09:34 UTC
Star Citizen I just started hearing about this game here in this forum looked it up and I gotta say DAMN
it looks nice.
cant wait to play it :)

[i][b]I Really Love LIKES..   PLEASE Sir / Miss Can I get a Like :)  Thank you [/b][/i]

Tiberius Amzadee
The Night Stalker Syndicate
#120 - 2013-05-05 02:15:49 UTC
WIS dead? I have a feeling it's far from it and Dust is proof of that. As the devs gain experience from Dust it's only a matter of time before other walking avatar based games CCP no doubt is currently working on behind the scenes will come into existence. This game alone had changed so much in 10 years,just imagine 10 years from now.