These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Psychotic Monk, Pirate King

Author
Beckie DeLey
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2013-04-29 22:47:36 UTC
I put Monk 1st on my ballot despite me never getting into piracy/griefing myself. Why? Because he 'gets' the game and his style of playing is pretty ******* important to what makes this game great. Not having him or someone like him on the CSM is quite the loss.

To be honest, i don't understand why he hasn't been on the CFC/HBC voting lists. There seems to be some obvious overlap in interests.

My siren's name is Brick and she is the prettiest.

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#42 - 2013-04-29 23:38:30 UTC
Why is there piracy in highsec?

Because as the game currently exists there is very little reason for prey to be in lowsec.

Running missions? More ISK/hour in highsec where you can safely bling your boat, autopilot between systems, and so on. Lowsec you really want to spend slots on a warp scrambler and a buffer tank, both of which cost you speed in PVE.
Incursions? Again almost all done in high.
Mining? It's much more profitable to mine in 6 Mackinaw alts in highsec than to run any ops in low.
Factional Warfare? This might be lowsec only, but it is too unlikely to land tackles on the bears there and even if you get one, their boats are usually dirt cheap, hence little ransom capacity.

When prey move, predators need to move with them or die out, and CCP's changes over the years have driven prey out of lowsec, except for one type of prey: Exploration bears. There's not enough of them to sustain a healthy predator population on their own.

Let's hope that Odyssey adds in new types of lowsec prey - tag farmers, grav site hunters, and the like.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#43 - 2013-04-30 00:29:58 UTC
Famine Aligher'ri wrote:
Haedonism Bot wrote:
Highsec piracy is as old as EVE, and is as much "traditional piracy" as lowsec piracy is. Piracy does not equal living in lowsec or being -10 and it never has. In today's EVE, unfortunately, both areas are hurting. Highsec pirates are suffering from a series of progressive nerfs, and lowsec pirates are suffering from a dearth of targets. We all have the same interest - murdering carebears and making off with their ****. It's a shame that we can't present some sort of a united voice to the developers about the subject. It's counterproductive to get hung up on all this "my kind of piracy is the only real piracy" bullshit.


I hear ya, but the problem is that high-sec piracy will never change. It has too much of a high impact on players that may do more harm than good. While high-sec criminal activities have always existed, the focus should always be low-sec to null-sec gameplay with piracy at the core. It was by far the most popular form of piracy and should continue it's growth as such unless for some reason CCP changes their stance on high-sec criminal activity as in increasing their activity in those systems, which is likely not to happen.

My real question is why waste efforts beating a dead horse of bringing more criminal activity to high-sec when there is a better chance of improving criminal activity in low-to-null sec? Right?


I agree with your stance that criminal activity in low/null and holes needs to be improved, I disagree with your assertion that highsec piracy has a harmful impact on the game. A lot of people are saying that highsec pirates drive people away from the game, but I think that theory is dubious at best.

Sure, some people quit EVE because they get ganked or because their carebear corp gets torn apart by an AWOXer. These things happen. I also see ragequit threads in these forums blaming lowsec gate campers. Some people will quit for anything, and good riddance. I suspect, though, that the majority of highsec players who unsub actually do it because they are bored, not because of anything anybody did to them. It could be argued that more highsec piracy would translate to less highsec boredom, and therefore a positive impact on subscriptions.

I'm also curious where you got your information that CCP doesn't want criminal activity in highsec? Sure, they have nerfed it left and right, but they still let us do all sorts of bad things to people. Historically they have used stories of legendary highsec heists as selling points for the game. Maybe I'm an optimist, but I'm confident that they will always want some bad guys around to keep things interesting - they just have somewhat skewed notions of balance in that regard.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2013-04-30 00:44:29 UTC

Kane Rizzel wrote:
You can stick a feather duster up your butt, doesn't make you a chicken.

D3, and so many others have claimed to have our interests at heart when running for CSM and while they might do, wtf is a pirate doing running for CSM?
We play by our own rules, mold the universe to suit us, when things change, we adapt, or as for so many, just die out.

Piracy in EVE will never die, people on these forums will claim some sort of nobility "LOOK AT ME, I'M YOUR KING" but the real pirates carry on regardless, taking everything, giving nothing back.

If you want a free trip to Iceland to schmooze with the big jobs, just say so, but don't claim to be my king.


I'm sorry, I thought I made it quite clear with that declaration that my tongue was firmly in my cheek. I thought getting a crown from Burger King was a dead giveaway. It's just for a laugh.

Now, with regards to whether or not what I do is piracy, I think it's fairly absurd to think that being a -10 in lowsec constitutes piracy any more than what I do does. If piracy is preying on trade and doing unexpected violence to peoples boats, then what I do is closer to piracy simply because of the amount of targets here in highsec. What I see from lowsec -10s is much more often small gang fights for no real purpose other than to fight. While that is fun and if often very high skilled pvp, that's not piracy. Targetting non-combat ships for profit appears to be the minority work in lowsec.

That's something that pains me greatly, though, as you are correct in that there was a time when pirates were in lowsec and the stories told from that era are fantastic. Lowsec is hurting and it needs help. I empathize very deeply and, while I'm not a lowsec dude, I spend a fair amount of time trying to understand their plight in the hope that I can contribute something to their betterment.

I saw the argument that the word piracy should remain with lowsec -10s because at one point piracy was much more popular in lowsec than elsewhere. There are two problems there: firstly, that's not how the word works, as it's used as a descriptor for an activity. It's not a club, it's an activity. If I were claiming to be a Tusker then there would be legitimate issue here. Secondly, while I would love to see the breath of life blown back into lowsec piracy, that is not where it is currently most popular. That's not due to the pirates there, but rather due to the prey, or lack of. The tags for sec change will hopefully help that. Literally two weeks ago I was talking with a lowsec entity trying to wrap my head around how lowsec could be raised from the half-dead and exactly the system CCP announced was proposed. I think that will do well.

It's also been mentioned that I use tools that people find unfair. My use of neutral logi in safaris and alts were mentioned specifically. These things are immaterial to the discussion of whether or not what I do is piracy, but I'd like to talk about these two things anyways. Neutral logi in safaris is broken. It's so incredibly broken. When it eventually gets fixed I will be over the moon and I hope it happens sooner, rather than later. In the mean time, I would be an idiot to not avail myself of the best tools avalible to me, especially in face of the fact my opponents will hold no such reservations. There is no bushido in space.

As for alts and the inability of people to apply consequences to my main, I don't think that's what's stopping people, but if this were possible, I would love it. It would mean that wardecs, a mechanic that is still not in a good place, would be more poignant in that when people logged to go play on their alts I could go bother them there, too. Increased ability to apply consequences are something I would welcome with open arms because those tools are given to me, too.

Another thing that I've seen in this thread that I'd like to address, and that's the arguement that highsec should be a kiddy pool where nobody can be bothered and everyone should spend a couple of week there before moving to lowsec or nullsec. This is completely divorced from reality. Highsec has the greatest concentration of wealth, has many inherent advantages over other areas of space (I'm thinking specifically of manufactuing here) and contains players running several billions of isk in marauders and pirate BS. While it may have at one time been the intent that highsec should be the newbie area, that is not the effect and at this point basically no change will make it so.

As to the argument that any ill effect to players would cause them to quit and hurt CCP's revenue and ultimately destroy the game, I have two counter-arguements. Firstly, if someone wanted to be entirely safe or removed from the effects of other people, literally any other game, MMO or single player, would be a better choice. EvE was built on this specific niche and is basically the only place you can go to scratch that itch, and trying to change it for a think-of-the-children arguement is somewhat shortsighted. Secondly, you assume that the work we do doesn't generate or keep more subscriptions than we cause to leave. The arc from drake to golem to quitting in boredom is a well-travelled one and leads to players wandering off elsewhere to find the fun, whereas logging on to crush your enemies (whether that makes you good guy or bad guy) has staying power, and I know that for myself and many of my peers, the stories of GHSC and the Suddenly Ninjas dudes were a huge inspiration and caused many people to go get involved in each others business, looking to generate some content.

(That wasn't meant to be as big a wall of text as it was. My bad.)

fake edit: also, some of my replies earlier in this thread were fairly flippant and had a mildly hostile undercurrent to them. I'm sorry. I've had a snickers and a nap and I'm much better now.
Dub Step
Death To Everyone But Us
#45 - 2013-04-30 02:26:32 UTC
Low sec is the 'fix' that you are looking for. High sec is for scrubbers.
Theron Urian
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#46 - 2013-04-30 02:39:20 UTC
culo duro wrote:
As much as i like you monk, how can you be the pirate king when you're hiding in high sec?

As i see it, doing a safari on people who obviously can't defend themselves, or think you're here to mission or mine with them. With Logi on you which cannot be attacked. That's kinda risk averse, so i'm asking again how can you be a pirate king when you're living in a "risk averse" enviroment.

It's like that guy in BU that claimed he's a pirate/merc who never gets a kill. As i see it, the real and only piracy in eve is in low sec.
If you live in Null you're a nullbear, if you live in highsec you're a carebear, there's alpha carebears and there's omega carebears.

As people claim they're awesome at stuff because they're in high sec, because you can make a 10 hour alt to do a safari. Where most corps are just believing you're nice and wanna come mission.
Monk is the perfect example of how little high sec carebear corps check their players.

Sorry Monk but you're not a pirate.


Piracy is typically an act of robbery or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed on land, in the air, or in other major bodies of water or on a shore.

Clueless much? Or do you just like to think of your self as more "Elite" than others?

Famine Aligher'ri
Sheriff.
United Caldari Space Command.
#47 - 2013-04-30 05:42:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Famine Aligher'ri
Theron Urian wrote:
culo duro wrote:
As much as i like you monk, how can you be the pirate king when you're hiding in high sec?

As i see it, doing a safari on people who obviously can't defend themselves, or think you're here to mission or mine with them. With Logi on you which cannot be attacked. That's kinda risk averse, so i'm asking again how can you be a pirate king when you're living in a "risk averse" enviroment.

It's like that guy in BU that claimed he's a pirate/merc who never gets a kill. As i see it, the real and only piracy in eve is in low sec.
If you live in Null you're a nullbear, if you live in highsec you're a carebear, there's alpha carebears and there's omega carebears.

As people claim they're awesome at stuff because they're in high sec, because you can make a 10 hour alt to do a safari. Where most corps are just believing you're nice and wanna come mission.
Monk is the perfect example of how little high sec carebear corps check their players.

Sorry Monk but you're not a pirate.


Piracy is typically an act of robbery or criminal violence at sea. The term can include acts committed on land, in the air, or in other major bodies of water or on a shore.

Clueless much? Or do you just like to think of your self as more "Elite" than others?



No. Otherwise you would have to say every type of robbery is piracy. For example, IRL, an art thief is not considered a pirate simply because they rob someone on land of rich art to sell or ransom back to the victim. They are considered a pirate if they rob a ship via a ship in route and at sea to sell or ransom it back to the victim. "At sea" is the key part to the equation. Unfortunately, everyone is adding "at sea" to their criminal activities in EVE because it's a space simulation game. What myself and others are saying is they are ideally NOT "at sea" simply because it's in EVE.

I would also stress that "at sea", "character security status", "system security status" and even "character standings" has a vital role in what is and is not piracy in EVE. Therefore, high-security, docked, alts and etc make it hard to connect piracy to one another simply because it's not the traditional definition of a pirate in EVE.

Course, you knew that already.

Famine Aligher'ri - Original Solo Pirate

Former The Pirate Syndicate Member

Former D.e.V.i.a.n.c.e member

Former Burn Eden member

Former BioMass Cartel member

Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2013-04-30 06:19:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Cannibal Kane
I have been playing for 2/ half years now. When people talk about piracy in EVE I think about it in an eve sense.

I am still "old minded" in the sense of Piracy. I firmly believe you cannot be called a pirate if your not chased by every single authority in highsec because your -10.

If your not flashing as a threat in low sec I just cannot think of that person as a pirate. Which bring me to another point and this might be a unpopular view.

Before I start, I will say as I always said. I do not care how people play the game, I do not care how you kill ships or what game mechanics you use that is offered to do so. Just don't sugar coat it as something else.

I have always believed that if I am going to go after a target I want them to know that I am a threat and that I am coming. Same with -10 players, when you jump into lowsec and you see a -10 player on gate you know he is a threat. Awoxers does not produce that fear when seen as a corpmate. I cannot and never will shoot at a target considering me a corp mate (unless he shoots at me). I don't like it, never have. but I don't care either that others are doing it.

What does bug me is the growing number of new players calling themselves PVPrs, Mercs, Pirates in BU doing Awoxing. They are not and never will be anything but a Blue/Green killer in my eyes. That is a pretty stubborn mindset I got with regards to how I see things but that is what got me to this point in EVE.

However... we seem to have gotten of track in this thread.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

culo duro
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#49 - 2013-04-30 06:37:49 UTC
Tarsas Phage wrote:
Why is there piracy in highsec?

That's where the challenge is. With so many constraints (and there are far more now than there were even a year ago) it's a real challenge to be a successful pirate in highsec and some find this to be a great challenge to rise to. It's as simple as that, and understandable as it's a game within a game. Though, it seems a lot of people here seem to think that piracy is defined by two things:

1) exists only in lowsec
2) pirates are not members of a 0.0 entity

and that's it. It's pretty simplistic, but a highly myopic understanding of the profession. Piracy isn't just blowing up ships on some lowsec gate, or running a frigate around some lowsec asteroid belt and having a sub -5.0 security status. It's far, far more than just that. Use your imagination.


How can you be a pirate in highsec? And even more important how can you be proud of it?
High sec is generally just putting a wardec on a corp/alliance and then wait for them to undock... That's it. Once they have undocked you have to wait for them to leave a safe area or wait on a gate for them, and have a gazillion webs on your ship.

That's not piracy, that's called griefing.
Monk created BU, BU is awoxers, and people doing blue on blue on unexpecting people. If that's being a "pirate" and pvp (I know it's pvp in the terms of Player Versus Player but meh) and you think you're awesome because of that, meh.

You can claim that Awoxing, and blue on blue is piracy, but the truth is a pirate wouldn't shoot his blues, he does it to whites, and reds.

Declaring war on people in high sec, in a safe enviroment where you can probably go mission as the deccer, because you chose an entity that does not want to be at war with you is griefing, not piracy.

You're not a pirate unless everyone can shoot you everywhere.

I've starting blogging http://www.epvpc.blogspot.comĀ 

Don Purple
Snuggle Society
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#50 - 2013-04-30 06:41:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Don Purple
I voted for you man, will again next year.

Edit: All hail the pirate king

I am just here to snuggle and do spy stuff.

Reppyk
The Black Shell
#51 - 2013-04-30 09:42:57 UTC
First victims of the Pirate King : trolling people with that title.

FIRST PAINT OF THIS THREAD
http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2013/18/1367314943-monk.png

I AM SPACE CAPTAIN REPPYK. BEWARE.

Proud co-admin of frugu.net, a French fansite about EVE !

Esha Ditrix
#52 - 2013-04-30 10:24:41 UTC
Reppyk wrote:
FIRST PAINT OF THIS THREAD

+5

Its not an exploit, if the game lets you do it...

Pilot Error Randomize
Playboy Enterprises
Dark Taboo
#53 - 2013-04-30 10:40:12 UTC
Reppyk wrote:
First victims of the Pirate King : trolling people with that title.

FIRST PAINT OF THIS THREAD
http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2013/18/1367314943-monk.png


Sorry, but I can't take someone groomed that well seriously as being a pirate.

-You're not a pirate. You're a Griefing Carebear.

Mortlake
Republic Military School
#54 - 2013-04-30 10:44:56 UTC
Semantics aside, Monk's opened up a lot of people's eyes to what they could be doing, and how they can do it.

That can only be a good thing.

Nice hat btw.

Sometimes you hit the bar and sometimes the bar hits you...

Pilot Error Randomize
Playboy Enterprises
Dark Taboo
#55 - 2013-04-30 10:53:02 UTC
Mortlake wrote:
Semantics aside, Monk's opened up a lot of people's eyes to what they could be doing, and how they can do it.



You must be new to the internet.

The only difference between what monk is doing and what others have been doing is. Monk requires the most attention.

-You're not a pirate. You're a Griefing Carebear.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2013-04-30 11:05:30 UTC
so you didn't make it to CSM.... that's good Cool

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Manny Moons
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2013-04-30 12:26:08 UTC
culo duro wrote:
You're not a pirate unless everyone can shoot you everywhere.

You're not a pirate in EVE unless you understand that everyone can shoot everyone everywhere.

I don't know what a pirate is or isn't, and I don't care to pigeonhole players based on some arbitrary criteria. But it has become apparent to me that the "carebear mentality" is alive and well in lowsec.
Famine Aligher'ri
Sheriff.
United Caldari Space Command.
#58 - 2013-04-30 13:49:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Famine Aligher'ri
A lot of the pirate outfits I grew up with since beta flew roamed and choked between null-sec and the entrance to high-sec space. It wasn't primarily just about low-sec space to get lower security. It was about finding those trade routes, those miners and those ratters who dared enough to come into dangerous space. Sometimes that meant flying to null-sec to find mining crews mining the rarest of ore in space. Sometimes that meant patrolling around in null-sec to find stragglers ratting the rarest of rats in space. Sometimes that even meant finding secret trade routes where traders are moving goods from one low-sec hub to the next to help feed those early pilots trying to control the universe.

Either way, null-sec or low security, both types of space was about piracy and control. Today, most of the alliances have killed that spirit with their blobs of new recruits and greed to control the universe rather than making a quick coin.

Funny how you look at what EVE has become today. Trade routes exist, but you have jump freighters and elite industrials that can even cloak in space with free warp-to-zero in every system. Then you have worm holes and complexes that delay the discovery time of roaming pirates looking for a quick snack or worse, simply ratting in high-sec space because it was still viable with missions before they moved them out to more dangerious space. Lastly, mining... Let's not go there.

Then some of you have to audacity to question why I said increasing high-sec criminal activity would make alot of people leave. Have most of you not seen the amount of changes that's happened over the years that have contributed to degrading piracy? Most of those changes happened to help protect carebears to minimize their losses so they would quit crying. And I'm not just talking about those in high-sec space either. Cool

Famine Aligher'ri - Original Solo Pirate

Former The Pirate Syndicate Member

Former D.e.V.i.a.n.c.e member

Former Burn Eden member

Former BioMass Cartel member

Wow Wow Wubbzy
Doomheim
#59 - 2013-04-30 15:20:51 UTC
I give Monk credit for one thing - he is the King of Tears (though it seems he's producing more tears than his victims most of the time).

Sorry, I just don't get how abuse of weak/faulty game mechanics equals emergent gameplay.

Is the point that casual high-sec corps shouldn't exist? To abuse alts so CCP can realize they take away consequences and should thus be removed? That joining a player corp should always be like a real life employment application process? No, I think you are just self-indulgent and love forum attention, to be honest. Though you seem like a nice enough guy, for what it's worth.
Theron Urian
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#60 - 2013-04-30 15:25:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Theron Urian
Famine Aligher'ri wrote:




No. Otherwise you would have to say every type of robbery is piracy. For example, IRL, an art thief is not considered a pirate simply because they rob someone on land of rich art to sell or ransom back to the victim. They are considered a pirate if they rob a ship via a ship in route and at sea to sell or ransom it back to the victim. "At sea" is the key part to the equation. Unfortunately, everyone is adding "at sea" to their criminal activities in EVE because it's a space simulation game. What myself and others are saying is they are ideally NOT "at sea" simply because it's in EVE.

I would also stress that "at sea", "character security status", "system security status" and even "character standings" has a vital role in what is and is not piracy in EVE. Therefore, high-security, docked, alts and etc make it hard to connect piracy to one another simply because it's not the traditional definition of a pirate in EVE.

Course, you knew that already.


Eve is a game about space, therefor the term of piracy is "Space Piracy" the definition is still the same. Why does piracy need to be connected to a -10 alt?

Piracy has evolved in to space, why cant it evolve further to gain the trust of targets and then take them for all you can get.

You have an old school out dated and frankly pretentious view of "Piracy"

High value targets are in high sec, while low value faction warfare frigs / cruisers fill low..... smart choice is to move to the money.

We all know low sec is not in a good place, but you fix it by championing ideas and CSM candidates to help it. You don't help low sec by taking a crap on some one who is trying to champion a game play style similar to yours.

And before you say it yes the game play is similar, you blow people up and demand ransoms and so do we, same exact end goal but different execution.