These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Technology and Research Center » Test Server Feedback » Mass-test feedback - April 18

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Mass-test feedback - April 18 First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

CCP Habakuk

C C P

C C P Alliance

Likes received: 1,695

#1 - 2013-04-18 18:55:30 UTC

Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 18th of April, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version:
CPU:
GPU:
RAM:
How many clients were you running at the same time?
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):
Memory usage of the client (if checked):
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing

Hern Choker

Shadow Haven

Likes received: 0

#2 - 2013-04-18 19:14:02 UTC

"The EVE cluster has reached its maximum user limit. Please try logging in again later. You are #43 in line for logon."

I tried at least a dozen times to log on and take part in today's test. At one point the number of logged on users went from 635 to 641, but I was never able to get on. If that's a bug, please fix it. If not, please state before the test that you will be limiting connections so people don't rearrange their schedules for nothing. Also, the interaction of the launcher and the game client is really bad when the above error happens. Pressing "Connect" again results in this message:

"The client is already connecting to the server (whether or not the login progress bar is showing). Please wait."

But the truth of the matter is you will never connect from that screen. You must completely shut down the game client and re-start the launcher before you'll ever successfully connect. What is this 'progress bar' you speak of here? Eh, it's a mess.

Oh well, thought I'd add at least a little feedback since the main test is off limits for me today.

Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation 32
Era'kanath Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation Likes received: 32	#3 - 2013-04-18 19:45:24 UTC woke up at 4am... (18:00) fell asleep until 19:44, woke up with a panic attack to get into a masstest xD Too bad there was a 600 person cap. #35 in queue Well, I hope theres another masstest in the next week or two "The more we sweat in peacetime, the less we bleed in war."

Xhao Wei

Relapse Anonymous

Sedition.

Likes received: 2

#4 - 2013-04-18 19:46:25 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7
CPU: i7 - 2600k
GPU: 6900 Radeon
RAM: 16gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? LOD
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: High
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 3/5
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 8/10
Memory usage of the client (if checked): 2.5GB
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/A
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: My client ran better than during the last Mass Test. Could be random

Hayata Takamachi

The Argon Initiative

Likes received: 0

#5 - 2013-04-18 19:59:52 UTC

OS version: Windows 7
CPU: intel core i& 920
GPU: ATI radeon hd 5870
RAM: 6 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: medium
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 6/5
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 16/14
Memory usage of the client (if checked): 2.1 GB
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Overal wasn't bad, but mainly low fps during massive fight on high graphics. But was better then last time

Jamir Von Lietuva

Nameless Minions

GaNg BaNg TeAm

Likes received: 34

#6 - 2013-04-18 20:00:03 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7
CPU: Intel i3-2310
GPU: Nvidia 525m
RAM:8GB
@ clients
Low Graphics

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 8-10/15-25
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):4-8/10-20
Memory usage of the client (if checked): Did not check
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: All good

Ghanar Drraba

Royal Guard of Anacreon

Likes received: 10

#7 - 2013-04-18 20:08:24 UTC

OS version:
CPU: Intel Core i3 M380 2,53GHZ
GPU: Nvidia GT 610M 1GB
RAM: 4 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: on
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 25 fps/30 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 15fps/20 fps
Memory usage of the client (if checked): 2 GB
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5-same
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no crashes this time
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: was my best mass test experience since i started participating in them

Seelen Jager

Perkone

Caldari State

Likes received: 22

#8 - 2013-04-18 20:24:51 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: windows 7
CPU: amd 965 BE
GPU: evga 560TI
RAM:4 gigs
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: medium
- Shader Quality:high
- Texture Quality:high
- LOD Quality:high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): x/12.5
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): x/x
Memory usage of the client (if checked): not checked
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: not too bad, client did freeze for a few seconds switching overview tabs.

Eptesicus Nilssoni

Untied Dysleckticks

Likes received: 6

#9 - 2013-04-18 20:28:54 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
CPU: i7 - 2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 6570 1024 MB
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 3, all same settings.
Graphic setting of the clients (low / medium / high): low
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: Low
- Texture Quality: Low
- LOD Quality: Low

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):7/9

Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):10/12

Memory usage of the client (if checked): 1 620 000

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
Never do this size of fleet fights on TQ.

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Not a single crash or disconnect.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Was another amazing masstest, no real comments for now :)

Meritsa

Caldari Provisions

Caldari State

Likes received: 8,884

#10 - 2013-04-18 20:55:35 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: I5 3570K @5.0ghz (OC, watercooled)
GPU: GeForce GTX 560 Ti (driver 314.22)
RAM: 8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 31-60
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 31-60
Memory usage of the client (if checked): ---
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Everything ran smoothly
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Had really good experience. While fitting new ship when the gate camp hitted at X-BV98 had some delay when fitting, but nothing else.

I had VirtuMVP on and Vsync from there to boost performance from CPU for GPU

rachann

Mine and More Ind

Likes received: 9

#11 - 2013-04-18 21:08:38 UTC

OS version: Windows 7 Professional

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8600 @ 2.40GHz

GPU: Nvidia GeForce 9700M GTS

RAM: 8.00 GB

How many clients were you running at the same time? 1

- Anti-Aliasing: disabled

- Shader Quality: Low

- Texture Quality: Low

- LOD Quality: low

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):18 - 18
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):7 - 12
Memory usage of the client (if checked): Not checked

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

8

no gray screens, crashes or freezes just a bit slow jumping through gates.

keep up the good work:)

Tonto Auri

Vhero' Multipurpose Corp

Likes received: 300

#12 - 2013-04-18 21:15:39 UTC | Edited by: Tonto Auri

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: XP SP3
CPU: i5-3550
GPU: nVidia GT-640
RAM: 4Gb (effectively)
How many clients were you running at the same time?

Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets):

Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):

Memory usage of the client (if checked):

Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

One final note. When I was moved from the battlefeild (used moveme channel), all models disappeared. My ship, ships around me, stations, celestials, stars and capital jump range on the star map was also invisible.
Station interior was all pitch black hole.

Two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison

Nemcija Valjean

Sebiestor Tribe

Minmatar Republic

Likes received: 0

#13 - 2013-04-18 21:18:58 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit (fully patched)
CPU: Intel® Core i7-3930K (3,2-3,9 GHz; 6 Cores [12 Threads];12 MB L3)
GPU: EVGA GTX 680 (2GB; 1050MHz; 1,5k Shaders)
RAM: 32GB (4x8GB; DDR3 1333; CL9-9-9-24; Quad Channel)
How many clients were you running at the same time? 5 + a HD Video stream in background + some other computing power intensive tasks in the background.
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: none
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 40-60 (brackets)
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 8-10 (brackets)
Memory usage of the client (if checked): (unknown sorry)
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

During the fight at the gate I've experienced a Bug or strange behaviour with my drones:
I let them attack an enemy ship. During the fight my drones received damage by an enemy. Two of them where down at 0% 0% 0% and should get destroyed. Instead of getting destroyed they returned to my ship and orbited me. Furthermore they started to regenerate thier shield. But I had no control anymore about these drones. Additionally I could only control my 3 remaining drones.

Blackrainbow Elite

Tagwache

Likes received: 0

#14 - 2013-04-18 21:29:14 UTC | Edited by: Blackrainbow Elite

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: win8 64bit up2date
CPU: intel Q6600 @ 4x 2,40ghz
GPU: geforce 260gtx
RAM: 4gb ddr3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high
- Anti-Aliasing: disabled
- Shader Quality: high
- Texture Quality: high
- LOD Quality: high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 10/16
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 9 / 15
Memory usage of the client (if checked): acc in combat 1,6 gb / client different region 786mb
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? second acc finaly crashes due ram sucking from first acc
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: sometimes unplayable thanks ram eating, massive lag, huge ammout of low fps cuz hadware used gpu ram in try to fix main ram problem, dont know what happen but it apears since last patch

edit:

nothing else was running only 2 eve clients, i can run on tq with same settings up to 5 clients without problems every driver is up2date

Flemming Crendraven

The Scope

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 0

#15 - 2013-04-18 21:36:41 UTC

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 home Premium 64 bit
CPU: Intel Core i7-2670QM @ 2.20GHz
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX560M
RAM: 16GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): Did not check.
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets):Did not check.
Memory usage of the client (if checked):Did not check.
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 time on test
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Impressive. All running OK. Some slack in the heat of battle.

Zesty M

Likes received: 1

#16 - 2013-04-18 22:42:54 UTC | Edited by: Zesty M

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Ubuntu 12.10 running EVE with WINE 1.4.1
CPU: Intel Core i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz x 4
GPU: GeForce GTX 560 Ti/PCIe/SSE2
RAM: 8 GBs
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 60 Yes and No Brackets
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 30 Brackets 45 No Brackets
Memory usage of the client (if checked): 1.5 - 2 gb
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes 2, 1 because of internet change, the other after an error about call groups.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Good other than the que :p

-Zesty M


Tonto Auri Vhero' Multipurpose Corp Likes received: 300	#17 - 2013-04-18 23:05:31 UTC P.S. Just checked, Singularity client consistently consuming ~20% more memory on equal or lower gfx settings, with smaller viewport size. TQ runs at 1488x1008, 550-700Mb. SiSi is on 1440x900, 630-900Mb. Two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. -- Harlan Ellison

Celestial One

Militant Miners

Likes received: 25

#18 - 2013-04-19 01:18:08 UTC

Hern Choker wrote:

Go read the post announcing this mass test again.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=226099&find=unread

Hint: read it starting with the very last line.

Thycoon

Patrician Space Incorporation

Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance

Likes received: 7

#19 - 2013-04-19 04:25:21 UTC

Machine Info and Settings
OS version: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3820 CPU @ 3.60GHz (8 CPUs) +4GHz (Turbo boost)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, Display Memory: 4014 MB
RAM: 65.536 GB RAM DDR3 (OC to 1600 MHz)
How many clients were you running at the same time? 6 (six Titan's) had to log out 5 to make place for others :)
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimized Settings for Performance
All clients running in "Fixed Window", Window Size: 1920x1080, Present Interval: Interval one
Effects: Camera Shake set
Miscellaneous: Use LOD, Sun is Occluded by Objects are set
Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
Shader Quality: Low
Texture Quality: Medium
LOD Quality: Low

User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): heavy fight +59
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): +60 docked, no fight +59, heavy fight +59 (no difference)
Memory usage of the client (if checked):
docked 15% RAM memory usage; docked 35% CPU usage (6 clients - 6 titans)
undocked 10% RAM memory usage; undocked 25% CPU usage (1 clients - 1 titans)
while jumping 10% RAM memory usage; while jumping 25% CPU usage (1 clients - 1 titans)
after jump 10% RAM memory usage; after jump 30% CPU usage (1 clients - 1 titans)
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Not participated in big fleet fights on TQ a "10"!
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
While playing only one client everything was perfect! Experienced very short TD effects after jumping/warping but no crashes. FPS changed plus minus 2 while changing brackets.
While OC (1600 MHz) for the memories and turbo boost (CPU to 4 GHz) there were no issues at all but the real challenge for the hardware (with 6 titans) was missing because of player limits (Had to log out 5 clients). I hope there will be no limit in future! :)

Argon Inkura

Shadows of Earth

Likes received: 0

#20 - 2013-04-19 10:35:32 UTC | Edited by: Argon Inkura

OS version: Windows 7
CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 (4 x 3.2Ghz)
GPU: NVidia GeForce GTX 460
RAM: 8 GB Corsair 1333 Mhz
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): HIgh
- Anti-Aliasing: Disabled
- Shader Quality: High
- Texture Quality: High
- LOD Quality: High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in X-BV98, zoomed out (brackets / no brackets): 8
Average FPS - Zoomed in (brackets / no brackets): 8
Memory usage of the client (if checked): Not Checked
Was client performance better or worse compared to your TQ experience with the same settings and fleet size? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) never had that high fleet size, sorry.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No, not even a freez. it ran quite good over all
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

The fight was good over all. i think it was possible to act and fight. Of course it was not perfect. but okay.

12Next page

Test Server Feedback

C C P

C C P Alliance

Shadow Haven

Zebra Corp

Goonswarm Federation

Relapse Anonymous

Sedition.

The Argon Initiative

Nameless Minions

GaNg BaNg TeAm

Royal Guard of Anacreon

Perkone

Caldari State

Untied Dysleckticks

Caldari Provisions

Caldari State

Mine and More Ind

Vhero' Multipurpose Corp

Sebiestor Tribe

Minmatar Republic

Tagwache

The Scope

Gallente Federation

Militant Miners

Patrician Space Incorporation

Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance

Shadows of Earth