These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Stop re-releasing "limited edition" ships

First post
Author
Yusef Yeasef Yosef
Doomheim
#21 - 2013-04-11 19:02:44 UTC
Risk should apply to collectables as well.

There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk.
Nothing in eve should be risk free.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#22 - 2013-04-11 19:03:35 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
The first release had black borders and more rounded edges on the pixels.

The new ones are all foil bordered pixels.

If you were a true collector you could tell the difference.



Lol magic the Gathering player? :P


How'd you guess? :)

Spent hundreds on cards, sold them for thousands, bought a rare car. Later, sold the car for more than I paid for it after getting good use out of it. I got good use out of the cards too - won a few prizes in small tournaments.

Somehow I don't see collecting database records in a game world on the same level. If the collectors items had inherent value, like the tournament prize ships or the Guardian Vexor, then you've got something worth isk. Collecting Zephyrs and Primae and the like simply because there aren't a lot of them, despite the fact that they're junk, to me, is silly.

Most collectors items are gimmicks. Words like "special edition" and "limited edition" should be signals that someone is after your money or just wants to make you feel special. Look for real value, not marketing buzzwords.

Anyone want to buy an Echelon?


Didn't think so.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Josef Djugashvilis
#23 - 2013-04-11 19:17:19 UTC
Eli Green wrote:
inb4 this turns into another tippia vs. XXXX thread


^^^ made me smileSmile

This is not a signature.

Holgrak Blacksmith
Prophets of Motav
#24 - 2013-04-11 19:19:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Holgrak Blacksmith
I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale. To anyone who claims rare ship collectors need to accept risk too, I put this to you; regular market traders do their thing based on speculation from info released PRIOR to upcoming patches, in pvp we get to look at upcoming patch data then make choices as to which skills to invest in and which ships are going to be hot. But here, ccp, with absolutely no notice, **** collectors out of billions. That's not risk/reward. Today collectors logged on to find several inches of CCP lodged in their hole.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-04-11 19:24:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Did something recent precipitate this or is this a delayed reaction?

Edit: NVM, just saw the Quafe catalyst thread.
Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2013-04-11 19:30:59 UTC
I still remember a time when we were supposed to be able to skin our own ships and CCP hadn't decided to waste all the ship skins for special edition money grabs.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#27 - 2013-04-11 19:32:34 UTC
Holgrak Blacksmith wrote:
I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale.
…but then again, they've never really done that. Something handed out by the thousands as promotion and event-swag is not “limited”.

The only ships that could reasonably be considered “limited edition” are the unique ships of old and the AT ships, all of which have remained unique or AT-exclusive.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#28 - 2013-04-11 19:39:12 UTC
I'm not gonna say this is a ton of RL money involved or anything.......

But normally a monthly sub costs $14.95 or a $20 PLEX value. I spent $26.00 for a 30 day GTC from a 3rd Party company, which I never otherwise would have used, just expressly to get the Intaki Syndicate Catalyst.

Now they are just being handed out like candy for Buddy Subscriptions.

It's not the end of the world or anything, but it sure will stop me from trusting anything CCP says is limited edition from now on, especially with RL currency involved.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

MrDiao
Fuxi Legion
Fraternity.
#29 - 2013-04-11 19:44:10 UTC
CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it".
Holgrak Blacksmith
Prophets of Motav
#30 - 2013-04-11 19:53:48 UTC
MrDiao wrote:
CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it".


Your avatar won't stop looking at my groin.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2013-04-11 19:56:56 UTC
MrDiao wrote:
CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it".

Personally if one person having something they will never use makes another person unhappy I'm not sure that is worth considering over the opinions of players who do enjoy them. After all since the ships go unused there is no actual harm or change in gameplay to those that lack them.

And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.
None ofthe Above
#32 - 2013-04-11 20:04:57 UTC
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:
Risk should apply to collectables as well.

There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk.
Nothing in eve should be risk free.


+1

There are certain classes of limited edition ships that are PROMISED to have a certain run. Tournament ships for example.

Otherwise I think CCP should be free to do additional promotions or what have you at their will.

Collectors are not entitled to have CCP not reuse ships they have not promised to never use again.

You are taking your chances speculating on their value.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

Garreth Vlox
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2013-04-11 20:06:54 UTC
Nova Satar wrote:
the post above sums everything up.

The destroyers are just todays example, they have released plenty of special and limited editions over time but then closed production runs thus making them a collectable. Now today announce they are suddenly giving out more as buddy program rewards!

it just seems when it comes to draining a few more dollars out the playerbase, anything is possible. Like the guy said above, in 3 years time will they be giving away Adrestias t everyone who buys a pack of 20 plex? probably not, but the point is you can't be sure.



Think back through the history of this game, especially the recent history, why are you surprised that CCP decided to screw over a small part of the player base in a new effort to whore their out "limited" edition items to make just one more dollar? They were willing to insight a riot among the player base when releasing the micro transaction/walking in station debacle because they wanted to try and attract the WoW/hello kitty online crowd.

The LULZ Boat.

MrDiao
Fuxi Legion
Fraternity.
#34 - 2013-04-11 20:08:32 UTC  |  Edited by: MrDiao
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.


Do you include Gnosis, Etana, Echelon , Zephyr , or the pirate noobships?
Nova Satar
Pator Tech School
#35 - 2013-04-11 20:09:32 UTC
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:
Risk should apply to collectables as well.

There is always a risk of some more being found/released, so invest at your own risk.
Nothing in eve should be risk free.


not really the right kind of risk though..... Devs making changes at a whim? Thats like saying theres risk in PVE is ccp halved rat bounties every now and then
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2013-04-11 20:29:50 UTC
MrDiao wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

And I would imagine it doesn't take too much time to make them since they are intentionally weak or clones of existing cheaper ships and in some cases even use already existing visual assets.


Do you include Gnosis, Etana, Echelon , Zephyr , or the pirate noobships?

Gnosis - Isn't this just a scaled up version of an asset already in NPC use?

Etana - Existing hull, with V3 it seems creating new variants for ship skins became easier (or so I was led to believe by the blog about it) so I'd still qualify this as reduced visual effort. The balance effort to make it desirable from a stat perspective on the other hand was justified by it's place as an earned reward in the AT.

Echelon/Zephyr - They exemplify the "exceptionally weak" portion, to the point that I'd have a hard time thinking that there was any long period of time balancing them, but I will concede they required new art assets. You could also include the Primae in this catagory as it was created before the noctis and at the time doesn't seem it was slated to have another ship created for wider use based off the hull.

Pirate noob ships - All weak variants of existing assets, which aer actually the best example of my point when viewed as a whole
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#37 - 2013-04-11 20:33:54 UTC
The Gnosis, so far, has not been promoted as a limited edition.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#38 - 2013-04-11 20:35:28 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Holgrak Blacksmith wrote:
I agree, it really annoys me when "limited edition" ships get handed out wholesale. To anyone who claims rare ship collectors need to accept risk too, I put this to you; regular market traders do their thing based on speculation from info released PRIOR to upcoming patches, in pvp we get to look at upcoming patch data then make choices as to which skills to invest in and which ships are going to be hot. But here, ccp, with absolutely no notice, **** collectors out of billions. That's not risk/reward. Today collectors logged on to find several inches of CCP up in their hole.


And Market traders are left holding the bag when the info comes out on SISI and they're left holding the item long when they should be short. Just because they take their bath a few days/weeks before patch day doesn't mean they don't smell just as fresh.

Besides, if you're just collecting the things, why do you care how many other people are also able to collect them? I mean, I'd understand caring if you were trying to resell them for a profit, but then you run into the bus of "Speculators get given baths by CCP all the time."

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#39 - 2013-04-11 20:38:08 UTC
MrDiao wrote:
CCP should just stop releasing the useless limited edition ships at all. As they don't have any practical use(does not help to enhance the game context) and only make few collectors happy, while waste the resource and make many other players unhappy: people will just think "Well those limited issues are only for rich people I would never gotta use it".

Or how about letting people with unique ships invent more? Would that be so bad? The only caveat might be the alliance tourny ships... you should be able to invent more but w/ a different skin. I'm all for more ships for all...

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2013-04-12 00:05:38 UTC
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
I am also a collector so I appreciate what you are saying, but as long as they do not start being seeded they are still special /limited edition.


They aren't exactly 'limited edition' if they are a player referral reward. They can even be created inifinitely through the creation of new accounts and subscriptions. Does this put a real dollar value on them? Sure. But that doesn't make them limited edition, simply because they cost a different form of currency. Someone who wanted to put enough money into it, could acquire tens of thousands of them a week. This is simply not the case for a limited edition ship.

CCP, thankyou for making the destroyer models essentially a micro-transaction reward. (Create other email address, send referral to it, use other email to create eve account with referall, accept, claim destroyer pack as referral reward). We were all SO worried you weren't going to try to sneak in more micro-transactions into eve, after the failure of the decade that was Aurum in eve.