These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

What disqualifies a CSM candidate in your eyes?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#21 - 2013-04-05 06:35:16 UTC
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#22 - 2013-04-05 06:38:52 UTC
That they are male. We NEED more female representation on the CSM.
Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2013-04-05 06:40:58 UTC
Everything.

They will never take my vote!

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#24 - 2013-04-05 06:50:50 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
For CCP accusations of racist ideas does I'm guessing more due to bad publicity then the veracity that he'd really have a problem sitting with others in honest conversation.


Don't forget that the other CSMs might have a problem working with him.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Eight Two
SWIFT Inc.
#25 - 2013-04-05 07:26:11 UTC
Only one point really: coming up with a clear point of focus rather than the usual "I will listen to the players" this and "I will represent everyone" that.

It's a job after all, not coming up with specifics for whatever reason does not leave a very professional impression all in my opinion..
ACE McFACE
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-04-05 07:38:26 UTC
That one guy that only had "0.0/PvP candidate" as his description, put a little effort into it! (Yes I know theres a full forum post but still.)

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#27 - 2013-04-05 07:42:57 UTC
Being a proponent of typical backwards carebear ideas like "ISK-tanking" and "fairness".

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
pussnheels
Viziam
#28 - 2013-04-05 08:25:06 UTC
the fact that less than 20% of all voters will actually vote
disqualifies all of them

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire
Karadion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#29 - 2013-04-05 08:28:43 UTC
High-sec pubbies.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#30 - 2013-04-05 08:31:38 UTC
Personally, anyone who mentions subscriptions or revenue.

The CSMs job is to represent the players and help gameplay, not to be concerned with CCP's bottom line. CCP can do that, I'm sure they hire people for that exact purpose. We don't need people selling out the players and fun in order to do that.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#31 - 2013-04-05 08:48:02 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
the fact that less than 20% of all voters will actually vote
disqualifies all of them


No, that just means 80% of voters refuse to take 60 seconds to act in their own interest.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#32 - 2013-04-05 09:09:44 UTC
pussnheels wrote:
the fact that less than 20% of all voters will actually vote
disqualifies all of them

No it just means the 80% who dont vote clearly dont care about the game they play to spend the 30 seconds it takes to vote and therefor have no valid opinion in reguards to the CSM for the next year.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#33 - 2013-04-05 09:59:41 UTC
1) being a no-name member of a null voting bloc with nothing to bring to the table

.
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#34 - 2013-04-05 10:42:56 UTC
It is important for the canditates to be able to respect others view points, even those whom he disagrees with, and communicate with the player base in a mature manner. Realise that they are a representative of the playerbase and are accountable to them.

As long as they don't stand for any stupid ideas such as turning all of high sec into a theme park.

And finally, it does bother me when they start worrying about CCPs bottom line and generally being a parrot for CCP. They are a representative of the playerbase, not CCP, as per point number 1.
Previous page12