These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Should Ganking be profitable?

First post
Author
HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#1 - 2013-03-19 01:04:48 UTC
Dev soundwave wrote.

"Yeah my point is that I don't think they should be profitable to gank. I think it should be possible, but not necessarily profitable (profitable might be the wrong word, but more that the expenses should be higher for the attacker than the defender)."

What is everyones opinion?
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#2 - 2013-03-19 01:06:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Karl Hobb
Insofar as the ganker can figure out how to make it profitable, yes.

E: Also, that quote is out of context, there's a "they" that isn't clear in the first sentence.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Alara IonStorm
#3 - 2013-03-19 01:13:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
I don't think Ganking a ship that has a tank should be profitable. However Ganking a ship with a strong tank but an overly valuable cargo should be.

Management of tank to wealth of cargo ratio should be an important factor and certain ships like T1 Industrials should not be safe reward wise while caring valuable items above their strength. Instead players should require skill time and money invested into better ships or to hire people with skill into stronger haulers to ferry the goods.

Ganking is your reminder to use the right types of ships for the right jobs with the proper fit. Otherwise people will profit by taking your overstuffed wallet off your bullet ridden corpse.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#4 - 2013-03-19 01:19:56 UTC
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
Dev soundwave wrote.

"Yeah my point is that I don't think they should be profitable to gank. I think it should be possible, but not necessarily profitable (profitable might be the wrong word, but more that the expenses should be higher for the attacker than the defender)."

What is everyones opinion?


First, cite your sources. Especially when you're amputating context.


Second, He was specifically talking about Exhumers when he said that. And while I disagree with his thesis (that fitted, AFK, and untanked Exhumers shouldn't be profitable to gank*), the Exhumer buff has largely put to rest the for-profit Exhumer ganking venture.


Third, since (judging from another thread) you seem to think that all ships should be unprofitable to gank, why do you feel that my Freighter should gain EHP proportional to the amount of valuable stuff I put into it?


*Because if a fitted, AFK, but untanked Exhumer isn't likely to be ganked, why in the world would you bother being ATK or fitting a Tank?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#5 - 2013-03-19 01:27:36 UTC
Ganking shouldn't always be profitable.

It /should/ be profitable, when someone's done their research and picked their target appropriately.

Ganking Exhumers probably won't be profitable. At least not if the exhumer pilot has a clue what they're doing. If they're an idiot who doesn't have any tank (small shield booster doesn't count) then sure. Though profit is iffy. Not a huge amount to get a profit from with it.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Theron Vetrus
Doomheim
#6 - 2013-03-19 02:16:21 UTC
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:
What is everyones opinion?


My opinion is, if there were a poster child for carebears, you would be it.

Take what you can, give nothing back. Psychotic Monk for CSM8

GreenSeed
#7 - 2013-03-19 02:36:52 UTC  |  Edited by: GreenSeed
by ganking not being profitable hes obviously talking about 2 catalysts killing a 200m barge and salvaging looting it for a profit. even if the barge is fitted with meta crap it will still make the gank a profit, thats not ok. hes not talking about blowing up a fail faction fit tengu thats sitting afk at a gate. that's a good gank, with planning and coordination, plus a lot of work to check the fit and find a target.


by just making gank targets drop a can only and no wreck mission runners still drop all the goodies, while barges don't drop t2 salvage.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#8 - 2013-03-19 02:49:40 UTC
Why shouldn't it be profitable to gank a Tengu carrying officer fittings?
Olf Barrenbur
Guardians of Asceticism
#9 - 2013-03-19 03:02:48 UTC
GreenSeed wrote:
by ganking not being profitable hes obviously talking about 2 catalysts killing a 200m barge and salvaging looting it for a profit. even if the barge is fitted with meta crap it will still make the gank a profit, thats not ok. hes not talking about blowing up a fail faction fit tengu thats sitting afk at a gate. that's a good gank, with planning and coordination, plus a lot of work to check the fit and find a target.


by just making gank targets drop a can only and no wreck mission runners still drop all the goodies, while barges don't drop t2 salvage.


Tough to gank a T2 barge with only 2 catas profitably, friend. It will have to be completely untanked and in a low enough security system (min 0.6) to allow enough volleys to land. It's just too easy to fit a tank on a Hulk/Mac/Skiff and prevent this scenario (mid slots/rigs??). It definitely is ok to learn the hard way, even if its only 2 catalysts teaching them.

They'll only get ganked once, then they'll learn to EVE.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#10 - 2013-03-19 03:17:09 UTC
GreenSeed wrote:
by ganking not being profitable hes obviously talking about 2 catalysts killing a 200m barge and salvaging looting it for a profit. even if the barge is fitted with meta crap it will still make the gank a profit, thats not ok.


Why should a untanked but otherwise fully fit ship not be profitable to gank?

I've never gotten a good, straight answer for that question.

PS. An untanked, fitted (guns and damage mods) Zealot is still profitable to gank.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Alara IonStorm
#11 - 2013-03-19 03:26:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
RubyPorto wrote:

Why should a untanked but otherwise fully fit ship not be profitable to gank?

I've never gotten a good, straight answer for that question.

I never liked the Procurer and Skiff update for this reason. I said that they should have gotten 150-250 Grid for Large Shield Extenders instead of base huge HP so people would have to fit the tank.

I also wished that the Covetor and Retriever got 3 Mids, the same T1 to T2 Mid Slot Ratio as the Procurer to the Skiff to fit a small tank + min scanner.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#12 - 2013-03-19 03:52:38 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
I never liked the Procurer and Skiff update for this reason. I said that they should have gotten 150-250 Grid for Large Shield Extenders instead of base huge HP so people would have to fit the tank.


Yup. EVE design philosophy should be about giving pilots enough rope to hang themselves.
NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#13 - 2013-03-19 03:58:42 UTC
Yes and no.

If someone is flying around with **** plexes in an untanked hauled on AP, well yea that should be profitable and potentially the AFK pilot will learn a lesson (or more likely just rage quit).
But for ganking miners..No this should not be profitable. Please note im not saying im against ganking barges and similar, but it should be for a reason beyond "ohh shiny". Weather or not its the "tears" as people put it, because its marco miners, or some other reason that can make it..play more into the story of EVE (like defending "your" belts, cutting down on competition or you just dont like the name of that corp and you want to harass them).

For the hauler it takes work and dediction to find a suitable target and people should be rewarded for their effort.
For the barges.. Well go to the closest ice belt and have fun! Not much work requiered thus a player should have a... deeper reason beyond the ISK value to see those barges dead.

But thats just my opinion, and since i have never done this my self there might be something im missing or have not considered.

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#14 - 2013-03-19 04:01:55 UTC
As a ganker, I'm gonna say yes.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Raiz Nhell
State War Academy
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-03-19 04:17:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Raiz Nhell
Last time I checked it was the Gankee not the Ganker that made a gank profitable...

If your dumb and you carry too much stuff... you should always be open to a gank...

You put Cal Navy Invuls on a Mack... of course someone is going to shoot you...
Plex in that noobship... its going to disappear in a rapidly expanding cloud of high energy particles...

Even The New Order get profit from their ganks... they get the warm and fuzzy feeling of steering the miner away from the path that leads to botdom...

There is no such thing as a fair fight...

If your fighting fair you have automatically put yourself at a disadvantage.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#16 - 2013-03-19 04:18:01 UTC
Of course the correct answer is "if the pilot of the ship in question is stupid, then yes". Why should a frieighter pilot be able to stuff 30 bil worth of stuff (for example) into a scannable ship and not suffer consequences? if it's just a normal ship with normal mods, then no, or course not, but flying shiney stuff and taking no precautions is begging for negative results.

That's what EVE is, consequences for actions. When EVE stops allowing playuers to punish other players for being stupid ANYWHERE including high sec, it' stops being EVE Online and starts being damn near every other video game ever. If people want that that's fine, but they don't belong in EVE.

No matter how much i play games, i will never ever understand people's reactions to imagninary losses of pixels....
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#17 - 2013-03-19 04:59:12 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
As a ganker, I'm gonna say yes.


As a miner, mission-runner and general hisec carebear, I also say yes.
Silvara Nocturn
Nocturn Industries
#18 - 2013-03-19 05:59:17 UTC
Ganking should be profitable if you have a brain. It should not be free lunch money.
Josef Djugashvilis
#19 - 2013-03-19 07:35:14 UTC
This is a new and never before discussed topic in Eve.

So many new and interesting viewpoints to consider.

Thank you.

This is not a signature.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#20 - 2013-03-19 07:39:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Of course it should be profitable to gank loot piñatas (loot piñata being defined as any ship that carries more equipment or cargo than its tank can really protect).

…and no, cost does not, and should not, affect how easy something is to kill. It's been tried. It failed, as expected.
123Next pageLast page