These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#541 - 2011-10-29 10:03:54 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Zleon Leigh wrote:
@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.

Just in case you were counting votes


apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.


If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.

Issler


yeah.... cause likes matter

as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts



That was me. For accuracy I was referring to the Incarna feedback thread which reached some 12000 replies in 3 days where as this thread is on 520ish after 5 days


So everyone that seems to like to point out the huge backlash after Incarna has to acknowledge that this was a result that after years of promise of awesome WiS coming soon (tm) we got one room and the only single player per room MMO in the 'verse. What we got was NOTHING like what we were promised. It was the I got you a pony and instead we got a steaming pile of pony droppings.

So now CCP says that four piles of pony droppings is in fact the Incarna we always were promised by CCP "now shut up and play with your ponies!"

Oh, and why this is all the Incarna you will ever get is because you have told us you hate ponies.

You also have to admit that since the forums changed threadnaughts are different. This is with out a doubt one of the most active threads "new forum".

I don't know why but for some reason old forum threads were bigger than new forums ones.

Issler
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#542 - 2011-10-29 10:23:17 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Zleon Leigh wrote:
@OP No, never wanted WiS. Still don't.

Just in case you were counting votes


apparently theyre only counting votes FOR WiS not against them, sorry.


If there was a way to make this a poll I would have gladly done it. Never said everyone wanted it, I just said a non-trivial amount of us do and 1029 thread likes as of now make that point.

Issler


yeah.... cause likes matter

as someone said earlier, 1000 pages in three day, significant. 500 in 5 days not so, especially when half that number are nay sayers or alts


But half the numbers in this thread when you go back and remove the same negative poster that posted the same thing over and over aren't against WiS. Most of the thread when you filter the same haters that post over and over want CCP to say some form of WiS is still in plan after this expansion.

This reply should also be considered a reply to the other recent posters that basically said the same thing.

Bottom line, I didn't ask for WiS over FiS. I asked for folks to post here to tell Hilmar that a lot of us want WiS to keep being worked on in parallel to FiS going forward. That seemed to open the door for a lot of intellectually limited folk to get to explain to us how getting out of their ships confuses and frightens them. It also seemed to let a lot of closetted barbie fans to post anti-barbie sentiment to try and an hide their secret dress up fetishness.

So this thread should be making my point to CCP, many of us want WiS back in plan and want CCP to tell us it will be worked on after this expansion. To folks that the idea of WiS still happening threatens them all I can say is "F" you, we WiS fans pay our subscriptions too and if Eve is to survive WiS has to happen.

CCP, get WiS back in plan and get rich! Pretty simple!

Issler

P.S. Stop comparing old forum post numbers to new forum post numbers! The lameness of the new forums seem to make that impossible. The new forums are just too unstable to compare the two.
Zendoren
Aktaeon Industries
#543 - 2011-10-29 11:50:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Zendoren
Jill Xelitras wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.

"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. "
Issler



No Hilmar, we don't want more spaceships. We want you to fix the current ones ! You may even want to release the promised ones.

And then we want you to walk over to your marketing department and tell them to stop telling everybody that "walking in stations" has been finally released until it really is ready to be released on TQ.

I saw Torfi walking a character through a bar and playing a cool game ... Now go and make that happen ! That's when you should start marketing WIS.

Also, I'm very surprised (although I shouldn't be) that it took you until NOW to figure out that PI could be used to make low-sec interesting ... really CCP ? After all those years ?

I wonder why I keep paying.


GTFO of MY EvE Online!!!!

Fix old content or bust. We want internet Spaceships in our internet spaceship game.....

If you want barbies online, go play 2nd life!

❒ Single ❒ Taken ✔ Playing EVE Online

CCP Guard > Where's the shoot button on this thing?

CCP Space Cadet > What's this "offline guns" button do?

T-Jay Charante
Black Sun Industry and Research
#544 - 2011-10-29 12:24:18 UTC
Zendoren wrote:
Jill Xelitras wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Reading the CCP CEO interview I was taken by this comment.

"but the voice of the community is quite clear. People want more spaceships, and more flying in space features. That's very much what we are responding to. "
Issler



No Hilmar, we don't want more spaceships. We want you to fix the current ones ! You may even want to release the promised ones.

And then we want you to walk over to your marketing department and tell them to stop telling everybody that "walking in stations" has been finally released until it really is ready to be released on TQ.

I saw Torfi walking a character through a bar and playing a cool game ... Now go and make that happen ! That's when you should start marketing WIS.

Also, I'm very surprised (although I shouldn't be) that it took you until NOW to figure out that PI could be used to make low-sec interesting ... really CCP ? After all those years ?

I wonder why I keep paying.


GTFO of MY EvE Online!!!!

Fix old content or bust. We want internet Spaceships in our internet spaceship game.....

If you want barbies online, go play 2nd life!


Everyone should indeed take this guys advice. EvE is old and stale, the sooner people leave and let it die, the quicker some competent gaming company can make a complete sci-fi simulator, not just a bad Elite clone.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#545 - 2011-10-29 13:11:50 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
OP posted a thread with the title -
Quote:
CCP! A lot of us want WiS


OP stated in it -
Quote:
So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now.



Just exactly which part of this do you nay sayers not understand?


This thread was made for players to show their positive support for WiS. It didn't say anything about supporting NEX or abandoning FiS. It didn't say spam your negative opinions or bad attitudes here. It didn't say post unsubstantiated rumors or rough estimates or to speculate on reasons.

The funny thing about this is you stubborn nay sayers just don't get it. Every time you post a negative reply, another positive reply gets posted. Thanks to that this thread is turning into a threadnaught. It probably would have died out already if you didn't keep posting here.


Bottom line:
Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS. Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content. The combination of DUST and EVE with FiS and WiS will accomplish that. We the players need to change our mind set and be open to that change.

To those that can't adapt, go jump into the nearest Bio-Vat and be done with it.




Firstly. This is a public forum accessible for all subscribers of Eve Online. This sub forum is General Discussion. It is not designed as forum for building a consensus of ideas (there are other sub forums for that). It is not designed as a forum for genteel discussion from a specific user group. It is open to anyone to express any view on any topic started which does not breach the Forum Rules.

tl:dr: Don't tell people what to post and what not to post.

Secondly: Content can be expanded in numerous ways both in FIS and WIS anyone who claims either doesn't have a future is being narrow minded. An integrated approach will have the most wow factor and make for the most dynamic playing environment.

tl:dr: A black and white viewpoint is stupid whatever position you hold in an arguement

Thirdly: Eve Online is not surviving? You are theory crafting. You are theory crafting after telling others they are not allowed to theory craft.

tl:dr: Roll

Lastly: I came to this thread as an individual putting my mouth forward to say: "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development" Reading this thread however I find a lack of rationality and pragmatism, by a subset of posters who are hypocritical in nature.

tl:dr: this thread is a petty in fight not a discussion of how WIS is positive.

PS: this is not a thread naught. 12000 posts in 3 days is a thread naught. 500 posts in 5 days is not.


Go back to school and learn reading comprehension. Twisting my statements around in an attempt to justify your self-righteous attitude is fail troll.

Firstly - OP asked for only those who wanted WiS to please post in this thread. Doesn't matter what you think, any anti-WiS reply or negative personal attacks against those who post support for WiS could be considered, per Forum Rules, as flaming and trolling in an attempt to derail thread and cause Flame war. As per Forum rules, that alone could be used as reason for removal of said posted replies..

Secondly - My statement >'Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS.< I never posted against FiS. This thread isn't about adding new FiS game content but since you want to make my statement about it an issue, please enlighten me with a few of your ideas pertaining to new game content strictly for FiS.

Thirdly - Again you twist my statements around and portray them out of context. My statement > 'Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content.'< I'm not gonna list all the details/events or go into 'Theory Crafting' as to why, but when a company does internal restructuring and changes it's direction, shelves projects and does mass personnel lay-offs, it's hurting.

Lastly - If you indeed wanted to post support for WiS, you wouldn't have adopted a self-righteous attitude and twisted the context of my post into something completely different. Your statement > "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development"< is hypocritical when compared to the other statements listed in this and your other posted replies.

P.S. Again you twist my statement around and portray it out of context. My statement >'Thanks to that this thread is turning into a thread-naught'< I never said it is a thread-naught. 'Turning into' and 'is' are 2 different things. Also comparing the new forums to the old forums is like comparing Apples to Oranges. Both are completely different entities.
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#546 - 2011-10-29 13:51:10 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:


P.S. Stop comparing old forum post numbers to new forum post numbers! The lameness of the new forums seem to make that impossible. The new forums are just too unstable to compare the two.


Issler Dainze wrote:

You also have to admit that since the forums changed threadnaughts are different. This is with out a doubt one of the most active threads "new forum".

I don't know why but for some reason old forum threads were bigger than new forums ones.


"Stop doing what Im doing its making me look bad!"

YOU bring up the comparison then try to get ppl to stop the comparison cause its not going your way
Kinda like this thread.

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#547 - 2011-10-29 13:53:00 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
stuff


Firstly, you fail at understanding forums
Secondly, you fail at understanding forums
Thirdly, you fail at understanding forums
Lastly, you fail at understanding forums

P.S. you fail at understanding forums

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#548 - 2011-10-29 14:26:37 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
stuff


Failed troll


+1 for troll effort.

-10 for lack of reading comprehension and vocabulary skills..

Slatiska Wolfovna
Eve's Communist Party
#549 - 2011-10-29 15:26:09 UTC
I too want WiS, for no logical reason, I just like the idea.

However, showing us a door and a laggy room is extremly frustrating, as everyone on the thread already said !
Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
#550 - 2011-10-29 15:27:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Myfanwy Heimdal
blip

Pam:  I wonder what my name means in Welsh?Nessa: Why?

Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#551 - 2011-10-29 15:45:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Hammond II
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
stuff


Failed troll


+1 for troll effort.

-10 for lack of reading comprehension and vocabulary skills..




Quote:
Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS.


shows your bias against FiS cause YOU think theres no point in further developing it.
Thats why people react negatively to your argument. Thats not that hard to figure out
Quote:

This thread isn't about adding new FiS game content.


yes, its about not abandoning WiS. But given the people in this thread that ARE championing for WiS over FiS (there are some, ppl; that say "Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS." comes to mind on that) of course thats gonna come up.

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#552 - 2011-10-29 15:52:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Hammond II
Quote:
'Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content.'


I agree but I disagree that the only direction they can go in is WiS

Quote:
Lastly - If you indeed wanted to post support for WiS, you wouldn't have adopted a self-righteous attitude and twisted the context of my post into something completely different. Your statement > "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development"< is hypocritical when compared to the other statements listed in this and your other posted replies.


damn lol ok I didnt read it the first time and I agree

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Jita Alt666
#553 - 2011-10-29 20:36:15 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
OP posted a thread with the title -
Quote:
CCP! A lot of us want WiS


OP stated in it -
Quote:
So if you wanted WiS please post in this thread because I think a lot of us want CCP to deliver more of what they have promised use for years now.



Just exactly which part of this do you nay sayers not understand?



This thread was made for players to show their positive support for WiS. It didn't say anything about supporting NEX or abandoning FiS. It didn't say spam your negative opinions or bad attitudes here. It didn't say post unsubstantiated rumors or rough estimates or to speculate on reasons.

The funny thing about this is you stubborn nay sayers just don't get it. Every time you post a negative reply, another positive reply gets posted. Thanks to that this thread is turning into a threadnaught. It probably would have died out already if you didn't keep posting here.


Bottom line:
Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS. Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content. The combination of DUST and EVE with FiS and WiS will accomplish that. We the players need to change our mind set and be open to that change.

To those that can't adapt, go jump into the nearest Bio-Vat and be done with it.




Firstly. This is a public forum accessible for all subscribers of Eve Online. This sub forum is General Discussion. It is not designed as forum for building a consensus of ideas (there are other sub forums for that). It is not designed as a forum for genteel discussion from a specific user group. It is open to anyone to express any view on any topic started which does not breach the Forum Rules.

tl:dr: Don't tell people what to post and what not to post.

Secondly: Content can be expanded in numerous ways both in FIS and WIS anyone who claims either doesn't have a future is being narrow minded. An integrated approach will have the most wow factor and make for the most dynamic playing environment.

tl:dr: A black and white viewpoint is stupid whatever position you hold in an arguement

Thirdly: Eve Online is not surviving? You are theory crafting. You are theory crafting after telling others they are not allowed to theory craft.

tl:dr: Roll

Lastly: I came to this thread as an individual putting my mouth forward to say: "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development" Reading this thread however I find a lack of rationality and pragmatism, by a subset of posters who are hypocritical in nature.

tl:dr: this thread is a petty in fight not a discussion of how WIS is positive.

PS: this is not a thread naught. 12000 posts in 3 days is a thread naught. 500 posts in 5 days is not.


Go back to school and learn reading comprehension. Twisting my statements around in an attempt to justify your self-righteous attitude is fail troll.

Firstly - OP asked for only those who wanted WiS to please post in this thread. Doesn't matter what you think, any anti-WiS reply or negative personal attacks against those who post support for WiS could be considered, per Forum Rules, as flaming and trolling in an attempt to derail thread and cause Flame war. As per Forum rules, that alone could be used as reason for removal of said posted replies..

Secondly - My statement >'Other than fixing all the problems and finishing existing game content, there isn't that many options left available to add new game content to FiS.< I never posted against FiS. This thread isn't about adding new FiS game content but since you want to make my statement about it an issue, please enlighten me with a few of your ideas pertaining to new game content strictly for FiS.

Thirdly - Again you twist my statements around and portray them out of context. My statement > 'Everyone needs to accept the fact that in order for Eve Online to survive and grow it needs to change by expanding it's current game content.'< I'm not gonna list all the details/events or go into 'Theory Crafting' as to why, but when a company does internal restructuring and changes it's direction, shelves projects and does mass personnel lay-offs, it's hurting.

Lastly - If you indeed wanted to post support for WiS, you wouldn't have adopted a self-righteous attitude and twisted the context of my post into something completely different. Your statement > "CCP please don't abandon WIS, I understand you have financial issues and are trying to get your house in order, but please keep the door open on this development"< is hypocritical when compared to the other statements listed in this and your other posted replies.

P.S. Again you twist my statement around and portray it out of context. My statement >'Thanks to that this thread is turning into a thread-naught'< I never said it is a thread-naught. 'Turning into' and 'is' are 2 different things. Also comparing the new forums to the old forums is like comparing Apples to Oranges. Both are completely different entities.


I support the development of WIS concept. I have engaged with the OP in rationale discussion regarding the how and the when.

I have no respect for your posting. You are attempting to out shout every view you think may descent from yours - even those who fundamentally agree with you. Your logic is flawed, your understanding of the issues at hand is limited. Please stop posting as you are making those of us who see a future for WIS look like ******** wow players.
Pent'nor
#554 - 2011-10-30 00:02:43 UTC
I've been thinking about that small developer team over a wod. Incarna clearly had problems with lag, even with all of the graphic options turned off/low I would still lag around, but ofcourse i'm not playing eve on a gaming computer. (i'm surprised the asus slate can run eve at all.) So before the incarna platform can be used in wod, they would have to fix the lag issue or find a way too dumb down the graphics enough that most newer non gaming camputers can run it without lag. If that small team at wod are coders, then i would think that this is their first priority, which would be a framework thing that can be reused in wis. If I go with this thinking, then they are working on wis, but are hiding it from the eve community. I would much rather have them say this if my thinking is on the right path. Of course I still want balanced fis/wis development after the winter expansion, but i thought the speculation was interesting, so i'd share it.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#555 - 2011-10-30 00:57:44 UTC

Jita Alt666 wrote:
I support the development of WIS concept. I have engaged with the OP in rationale discussion regarding the how and the when.

I have no respect for your posting. You are attempting to out shout every view you think may descent from yours - even those who fundamentally agree with you. Your logic is flawed, your understanding of the issues at hand is limited. Please stop posting as you are making those of us who see a future for WIS look like ******** wow players.


Actually, the feeling is mutual. Gotta say you're good at being manipulative and twisting statements around to suit your own warped version of the facts. What's really ironic is you condemning others for things you constantly do.

To use a quote made by you: You are theory crafting. You are theory crafting after telling others they are not allowed to theory craft.

How about you start practicing what you preach.

Jita Alt666 wrote:
This is a public forum accessible for all subscribers of Eve Online. This sub forum is General Discussion. It is not designed as forum for building a consensus of ideas (there are other sub forums for that). It is not designed as a forum for genteel discussion from a specific user group. It is open to anyone to express any view on any topic started which does not breach the Forum Rules.

tl:dr: Don't tell people what to post and what not to post.

tl:dr: A black and white viewpoint is stupid whatever position you hold in an arguement

tl:dr: Roll

tl:dr: this thread is a petty in fight not a discussion of how WIS is positive.


Nice try at trying to make me look like the bad guy while trolling me with a couple of your characters/alts. Personally I think you're intentionally trying to derail this thread by starting a flame war. You not only spam your biased opinions but you're also the loudest hypocrite posting in this thread.
Jita Alt666
#556 - 2011-10-30 02:06:46 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

Jita Alt666 wrote:
I support the development of WIS concept. I have engaged with the OP in rationale discussion regarding the how and the when.

I have no respect for your posting. You are attempting to out shout every view you think may descent from yours - even those who fundamentally agree with you. Your logic is flawed, your understanding of the issues at hand is limited. Please stop posting as you are making those of us who see a future for WIS look like ******** wow players.


Actually, the feeling is mutual. Gotta say you're good at being manipulative and twisting statements around to suit your own warped version of the facts. What's really ironic is you condemning others for things you constantly do.

To use a quote made by you: You are theory crafting. You are theory crafting after telling others they are not allowed to theory craft.

How about you start practicing what you preach.

Jita Alt666 wrote:
This is a public forum accessible for all subscribers of Eve Online. This sub forum is General Discussion. It is not designed as forum for building a consensus of ideas (there are other sub forums for that). It is not designed as a forum for genteel discussion from a specific user group. It is open to anyone to express any view on any topic started which does not breach the Forum Rules.

tl:dr: Don't tell people what to post and what not to post.

tl:dr: A black and white viewpoint is stupid whatever position you hold in an arguement

tl:dr: Roll

tl:dr: this thread is a petty in fight not a discussion of how WIS is positive.


Nice try at trying to make me look like the bad guy while trolling me with a couple of your characters/alts. Personally I think you're intentionally trying to derail this thread by starting a flame war. You not only spam your biased opinions but you're also the loudest hypocrite posting in this thread.



I am not using multiple alts, the suggestion that I do reveals more about you than me. I have done and am continuing to discuss this and other issues in a constructive manner.

WIS implementation is one way forward for Eve Online. I think it is possibly important to the future of the game over the next 5 years.

I also understand that CCP are going through a rough patch - a rough patch that has not been caused by the performance of Eve Online in its current incarnation (sic) but by out of Eve factors.

Now if you can not take that rationale clear view as presented but wish to engage in petty personal attacks - be my guest. The future of this thread is in your hands. My impression is that thus far you have been treating you friends as foes and aiming to win the argument post by post.

Lastly I have to comment on your use of the term theory crafting; please go and check any common definitions you wish. The way you use the term is akin to calling an apple.an orange simply because both are items of fruit.
Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
#557 - 2011-10-30 02:16:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Che Biko
Well, as long as we are trying to bend statistics to our viewpoint I might as well join the party.

1st post: "We want WiS" 88 likes around time of this post.
2nd post: "Abandon WiS" 29 likes around time of this post.
3rd post: "most people DO want walking in stations, just not the way it was implemented." 33 likes around the time of this post.
Make of this what you will.
Edit: I changed my mind, after reviewing this thread again, it is clear to me that a majority of those liking/posting on this thread want WiS in some form at some point in time.

Now, on to more significant stuff, as this thread is mostly off-topic anyway:
Ranger 1 wrote:
[Also, WOD content is a far, far cry from Teenvamp Wonderland. Smile

QFT
On a side note, I strongly oppose the view that WiS is just a WoD beta.
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
yet another WiS-er that ignores the fact that they had to drop 20% of the staff FOR A REASON
AND that you got two years of non stop attention while FiS SAT.

You should be grateful they didnt rip what you HAVE of WiS out of the game instead of them working on it after the work on FiS (That theyve neglected, again for two years to work on WiS)

Yes, and wether that reason is that people are against WiS is an oversimplification in my opinion. People would have hated Apocrypha if CCP took the same strategy as they did with WiS, which would amount to "you have your wormholes, you just can't enter them." I was also one of the people posting in the threadnaughts of last summer. Personally I think the opposition to WiS is mostly because it is associated with "no FiS" and all the accumulated frustration, and because people are thinking CQ = WiS.
I may have gotten 2 years of non-stop attention, but I got nearly nothing of what was promised, on top of that I am also affected by the rest of EVE not getting the attention it should get. I wouldn't care much if they ripped out CQ at this point. At this moment it just reminds me of something I will not get, and might never get.

Side note: I remember a graphical representation of Incarna's workload. ~1/4 was the new character creator, ~1/2 was CQ, and ~1/4 is WiS. If this is still true, than WiS could be part of an expansion that still contains a lot of FiS content. It is kind of a waste to have all that time invested without getting anything meaningful in return. If WiS is cancelled, it's all this suffering for nothing. Would you rather have payed the price of no FiS development for something or for nothing?
Issler Dainze wrote:
One thing I find really dissappointing about CCP's response in this is that this thread is the most active and "liked" thread in the general discussion section of the forums and we still have only a single dev response and that was to tell us some posts are being moderated to the cornfield.

I would have liked to see even a lame "CCP knows that there are players interested in WiS and we will continue to take that into account in future planning for Eve feature work" from a dev. But the total lack of any response is surprising

It might be the slow response of a corporate entity, but it is indeed starting to look like a "won't touch this with a 10 AU pole" kind of thing (this approach also goes for the CSM). That looks like they are influenced by fear (ironic, considering their newsletter's name is "Fearless"). I don't think that's a good thing.
Also, the CSM is quite clear that they are not interested in even asking for a devblog about Incarna's future, or lack of future, which is also disappointing and may add to Hilmar's concern also mentioned in that interview:
Quote:
some of my concerns right now relate to whether the CSM is maybe focused on a particular aspect of the game and I'm starting to get feedback from players that they worry the CSM is too pre-occupied by a certain playstyle.
Alpheias
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#558 - 2011-10-30 02:23:15 UTC
Che Biko wrote:


Wall of text



I got news for you then. WiS isn't the focus anymore. Deal with it like we dealt with it for 18 months.

Agent of Chaos, Sower of Discord.

Don't talk to me unless you are IQ verified and certified with three references from non-family members. Please have your certificate of authenticity on hand.

Hershman
Creepers Corporation
#559 - 2011-10-30 02:25:04 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Sadly, this is exactly why a lot of game developers don't promise to implement whatever the players demand.

For the record, Incarna/WiS was lusted after for years, it was very popular and used to be know as Ambulation back when everyone wanted it.

Even more hilarious is that hundreds of players unsubbed over that time because CCP hadn't delivered Ambulation yet, and they were all waiting.

Than, CCP finally gets to it, calls it Incarna, and every cries foul and wants their spaceships back.

CCP promises to give spaceships more attention, and people start unsubbing again because they've stopped work on Incarna.

Its almost comical, but the lesson to be learned is that player demand/feedback is only worth so much. Apparently, the player base has no patience when it comes to having a company develop custom technologies to suit their every whim.

No matter what CCP does, they are "screwing over" someone. No matter what they announce, people will unsub over it.


This is how these things are, as the story goes on...

I play EVE every day! Follow me at http://www.twitch.tv/matthershman

Gevlin
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#560 - 2011-10-30 03:32:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Gevlin
So many arguments.
Well Eve under-estimated many players willingness to wait in see. More Development of FIS during the process or a faster roll out of complete Incarna would have diverted the situations we were in. Sadly there is not enough resources to go around.

It is frustrating as a WIS supporter to read:

“CCP Guard wrote:
We´ve built a lot of solid character tech that can be used for all kinds of great game play in the future. Right now our focus will be on classic EVE game play, as we've committed to, so all that is on ice while we figure out what we want to do with it. And more importantly...what you guys want us to do with it.”

Knowing that WIS is not going to be looked at for some time.

I understand that Eve can't abandon FIS the core game, for expansions, like PI, Eve Gate, and Incarna.

I would just show my support to continue WIS – at least on a limited scale. The base programing is there so a little work will go a long way.

Am I saying I am unsubscribing my accounts? Nope, But I have 3 Accounts and This is what I would like.

If a Person runs for CSM on the Campaign to Support Incarna – I will re activate my other 3 accounts to vote for them.


I would like to see a road map what is planned, Notes if feature is experiencing delayed or Just going to be practical at this moment and time and an eta when this will be looked at. If possible. - note sure if it can cause problems with keeping company secrets, secrets.

Someday I will have the time to play. For now it is mining afk in High sec. In Cheap ships