These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

A bit creeped out by a single rogue drone.

Author
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#21 - 2013-03-15 19:47:37 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
If a rogue drone can turn away from pointless war... maybe we can too.


Oh goodie. We went from a technological anomaly, possibly caused by damage to the targeting array, IFF systems or any other of the dozens of critical systems an aggressive drone would need to a shining beacon of hope for mankind, ascending from base hostility to some greater enlightened state humanity has yet to reach.

I'm so glad people here aren't prone to jumping to outlandish conclusions, or this could have gotten crazy or something.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Eric 'Swiftmind' Siraron
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-03-15 20:30:52 UTC
Hmm interesting. Perhaps it is observing, but for what purpose remains unseen. Drone programming is complex. If only one could capture it and do diagnostics. I would be quite interested to experiment with such a drone. I have not witnessed this behavior from rouge drones but I do live far from Amarr space.

Eric 'Swiftmind' Siraron Gallente Federation Engineering, research, business student at the prestigious Eve University. Owner of Swiftly Processing. A private trading, manufacturing and refining business.

Unit XS365BT
Unit Commune
#23 - 2013-03-15 21:12:19 UTC
Pilot Luftschreck.
Should these events repeat themselves during one of Our online cycles, We would request that we be allowed to observe the aforementioned activity.
This change in activity may be valid evidence of further evolution within Hive Alvus' operational parameters.

We Return

Unit XS365BT. Designated Communications Officer. Unit Commune.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#24 - 2013-03-15 21:51:37 UTC
Ummm... yeah... well ok. Both times were inside gravemetric Omber sites in Ammatar space. Both times it was a single Silverfish Alvi. Oddly enough both sites also contained what looked to be the wreckage Caldari research stations that had apparently been destroyed by "spatial rifts" that seemed to be focused inside the station wreckage.

Hmmm... you don't think they might be investigating that do you? Because that would sound a lot like trying to understand the foundations of wormhole technology... and if that's true, then maybe all those Sleeper conspiracies may be right.

This gets curiouser & curiouser.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
#25 - 2013-03-15 23:58:09 UTC
I don't see why non-aggressive behaviour can be ruled out as being intended. I applaud Miss Luftschreck for not shooting the drone. Let us hope the drones will learn that peaceful coexistence is a possibility.
Misha M'Liena
Rui Freelance Mining
#26 - 2013-03-16 02:32:45 UTC
I am thinking the drone is wondering why she hasn't sent over the flowers and candy. It obviously wants a date...Dinner dancing a movie....maybe a lil Kal and Rogue cuddling..

M.

Not as innocent as she appears.™  

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2013-03-16 02:38:42 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
If a rogue drone can turn away from pointless war... maybe we can too.


We're humans, we kill eachother since long ago, and we will still do it for a long time. It doesn't have to do with a drone (which, by the way, belongs to a "race" that wants to kill us as well) but on who we are, on our darkest side. We have better sides, of course, but as of now this darkness hasn't been taken away.

So no, we can't. Not yet, at least.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-03-16 04:17:50 UTC
Rouge drones are not people. They are machines programmed only to kill and destroy. Their only function is to serve their hive (or the hives if all rouge drones are a collective entity).

These drones can build themselves mind you. If they wanted peace, they would of created a drone specifically for communicating with us. This is more like walking into the Summit fully armed and pointing your gun at everyone.

While I cringe a little every time one of my own drones "die", they are not people and never will be. What more the rouge drones? If they are anything like us, then they only have our bad traits. Hate, violence, greed, etc. The first drones that went rouge were military drones mind you. Their primary directive has always been and always will be to kill.

My advice, is to call in some back up and kill the thing, then wait to see if it's death triggers the arrival of a swarm. Then gun the swarm down.

Like I said earlier, even if the drones wanted to bring about a new era of peace, they wouldn't send a random drone to the middle of a less frequented asteroid field to stare at miner that likes to go there. I'd imagine that if they wanted peace, they would first establish direct contact with one of the Big Four, or CONCORD if the Drones are truly intelligent.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#29 - 2013-03-16 04:32:49 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Rouge drones are not people. They are machines programmed only to kill and destroy. Their only function is to serve their hive (or the hives if all rouge drones are a collective entity).

These drones can build themselves mind you. If they wanted peace, they would of created a drone specifically for communicating with us. This is more like walking into the Summit fully armed and pointing your gun at everyone.

While I cringe a little every time one of my own drones "die", they are not people and never will be. What more the rouge drones? If they are anything like us, then they only have our bad traits. Hate, violence, greed, etc. The first drones that went rouge were military drones mind you. Their primary directive has always been and always will be to kill.

My advice, is to call in some back up and kill the thing, then wait to see if it's death triggers the arrival of a swarm. Then gun the swarm down.

Like I said earlier, even if the drones wanted to bring about a new era of peace, they wouldn't send a random drone to the middle of a less frequented asteroid field to stare at miner that likes to go there. I'd imagine that if they wanted peace, they would first establish direct contact with one of the Big Four, or CONCORD if the Drones are truly intelligent.


You anthropomorphise, sir.

Rogue Drones follow the utility function of their decision network. Their utility function differs from ours in an unknown manner. This does not imply hate, a desire to destroy, or any negative trait.

This is a complex problem for which the social mechanisms of our minds are poorly suited. Please, keep the discussion on the nature of the Rogue Drone issue technical, or it will become confused.

Thank you, sir.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2013-03-16 05:00:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Scherezad wrote:


You anthropomorphise, sir.

Rogue Drones follow the utility function of their decision network. Their utility function differs from ours in an unknown manner. This does not imply hate, a desire to destroy, or any negative trait.

This is a complex problem for which the social mechanisms of our minds are poorly suited. Please, keep the discussion on the nature of the Rogue Drone issue technical, or it will become confused.

Thank you, sir.


I believe you have misunderstood what I said. It was less focused on the actual workings of a Rouge Drone and more on the silliness of thinking they suddenly want peace or deserve respect and compassion.

I am no expert on the technical aspects of Rouge Drones, but I can certainly confirm that they are not programmed to play nicely.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

DeadRow
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2013-03-16 11:28:44 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:


I am no expert on the technical aspects of Rouge Drones, but I can certainly confirm that they are not programmed to play nicely.


In their defense, I think I'd like to melt the face off everyone who can't differentiate between rogue and rouge.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#32 - 2013-03-16 11:45:47 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Rouge drones are not people. They are machines programmed only to kill and destroy. Their only function is to serve their hive (or the hives if all rouge drones are a collective entity).


Actually there is no proof of that. That they were machines programmed to kill and destroy is true, but the whole reason that they're considered rogue in the first place is that they went against their programming. By achieving sentience they have gained the ability to reprogram themselves in new directions and into new forms. The mere fact that they have workers for their hives (and for that matter, hives themselves) is proof enough for this.

I'd even say they exhibit more sense of self-determination than a lot of humans I've met over the years. Have you seen some of the propaganda devouring automatons that show up in the IGS sometimes? Some sort of random variable created them, and more random variables must be at work in their current programming if they are to continue evolving. Eventually that randomization will eventually create a non-aggressive drone. Perhaps this has already happened.

You could say that it's a "bug" and that would be true, but all mutations, both biological and otherwise, are "bugs" - and they power evolution as we know it. And if we, acting as a military presence in space, conduct a bit of "unnatural selection" in sparing those non-aggressive drones then we can skew the numbers in their build-cycles to favor that trait in their overall hive network. Yes, I've dabbled in biology and it's relation to artificial life forms. Eventually the non-aggressive "gene" can be cultivated to the point where actual communication can be attempted at some later point.

I'm still curious about the spacial rift connection... if there is any. Anyone from the State care to chime in on what the heck they were doing on those stations before they blew up? State stations in Ammatar space are nothing new, even research stations. Nothing shady about that, it's part of our arrangement. But I'd still like to know what they were working on since something obviously went wrong - if for security reasons if nothing else.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Synthetic Cultist
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#33 - 2013-03-16 11:55:19 UTC
Perhaps your "Body Language" did not convey any sense of Hostility, thereby not Triggering an Aggressive Response by the Drone.

Perhaps it is a New Strategy by the controlling Drone Hive.

Rogue Drones have been Known to be Capable of Peaceful Interaction with Human People. Some Drone installations will Allow Human Ships to Dock and receive Repairs, though what is Offered in Trade is not Known.

Synthia 1, Empress of Kaztropol.

It is Written.

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2013-03-17 04:20:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Fredfredbug4
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Rouge drones are not people. They are machines programmed only to kill and destroy. Their only function is to serve their hive (or the hives if all rouge drones are a collective entity).


Actually there is no proof of that. That they were machines programmed to kill and destroy is true, but the whole reason that they're considered rogue in the first place is that they went against their programming. By achieving sentience they have gained the ability to reprogram themselves in new directions and into new forms. The mere fact that they have workers for their hives (and for that matter, hives themselves) is proof enough for this.

I'd even say they exhibit more sense of self-determination than a lot of humans I've met over the years. Have you seen some of the propaganda devouring automatons that show up in the IGS sometimes? Some sort of random variable created them, and more random variables must be at work in their current programming if they are to continue evolving. Eventually that randomization will eventually create a non-aggressive drone. Perhaps this has already happened.

You could say that it's a "bug" and that would be true, but all mutations, both biological and otherwise, are "bugs" - and they power evolution as we know it. And if we, acting as a military presence in space, conduct a bit of "unnatural selection" in sparing those non-aggressive drones then we can skew the numbers in their build-cycles to favor that trait in their overall hive network. Yes, I've dabbled in biology and it's relation to artificial life forms. Eventually the non-aggressive "gene" can be cultivated to the point where actual communication can be attempted at some later point.

I'm still curious about the spacial rift connection... if there is any. Anyone from the State care to chime in on what the heck they were doing on those stations before they blew up? State stations in Ammatar space are nothing new, even research stations. Nothing shady about that, it's part of our arrangement. But I'd still like to know what they were working on since something obviously went wrong - if for security reasons if nothing else.



What you say seems to make a lot of sense to me. If your theory of a passive "gene" developing in rogue drone populations is correct, we could put this to use. My idea is to capture this drone, and take it apart if possible. Then we could isolate the passive gene and maybe create a computer virus of some sort, that can be delivered in large amounts to drone hives all over New Eden.

I'm not sure if this would be possible. Again, I'm not an expert on rogue drones at all. For all we know, they are programmed in a way we can't even decipher and locating this passive gene would be impossible. But if this works, we will not only stop the rogue drone threat, but also have opportunities to study and attempt to communicate with them. We might discover that they are more "human" than we originally thought. After all, we did create them. I personally don't think that will be the case, but I've been wrong so many times before.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2013-03-17 05:53:48 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Actually there is no proof of that. That they were machines programmed to kill and destroy is true, but the whole reason that they're considered rogue in the first place is that they went against their programming. By achieving sentience they have gained the ability to reprogram themselves in new directions and into new forms. The mere fact that they have workers for their hives (and for that matter, hives themselves) is proof enough for this.

I'd even say they exhibit more sense of self-determination than a lot of humans I've met over the years. Have you seen some of the propaganda devouring automatons that show up in the IGS sometimes? Some sort of random variable created them, and more random variables must be at work in their current programming if they are to continue evolving. Eventually that randomization will eventually create a non-aggressive drone. Perhaps this has already happened.

You could say that it's a "bug" and that would be true, but all mutations, both biological and otherwise, are "bugs" - and they power evolution as we know it. And if we, acting as a military presence in space, conduct a bit of "unnatural selection" in sparing those non-aggressive drones then we can skew the numbers in their build-cycles to favor that trait in their overall hive network. Yes, I've dabbled in biology and it's relation to artificial life forms. Eventually the non-aggressive "gene" can be cultivated to the point where actual communication can be attempted at some later point.

I'm still curious about the spacial rift connection... if there is any. Anyone from the State care to chime in on what the heck they were doing on those stations before they blew up? State stations in Ammatar space are nothing new, even research stations. Nothing shady about that, it's part of our arrangement. But I'd still like to know what they were working on since something obviously went wrong - if for security reasons if nothing else.


I disagree. Technology is not anything I'm good at, so I won't get into details, but I believe you have used a wrong philosophical perspective. You speak of random changes and bugs. I don't believe this can be applied to a drone, in a biological sense. There may be random changes and bugs due to something malfunctioning, but this wouldn't be applied to descendants for two reasons:

-First, because drones don't have descendants. They are built somewhere in their hives, so arogue drone being "non-violent" says nothing about the hive that built it because it's "random non-violent traits" won't be passed on in any way.

-Second, because drones don't evolve by random events, but instead by thought modifications into their programs. They are programmed to work someway, and unless they malfunction, they remain on that path.

So sparing the non-violent ones has no relation to future generations of drones. And, thus, introduces no changes their builder minds hadn't decided to take.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#36 - 2013-03-17 09:59:43 UTC
Random variables and evolutionary thinking is the foundation of all human led AI research. If there are never any random variables added to their programming then how do they evolve? The certainly don't look exactly like their ancestors so why should we assume that they think exactly like them either?

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Aelisha
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#37 - 2013-03-17 11:21:51 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
If a rogue drone can turn away from pointless war... maybe we can too.


Oh goodie. We went from a technological anomaly, possibly caused by damage to the targeting array, IFF systems or any other of the dozens of critical systems an aggressive drone would need to a shining beacon of hope for mankind, ascending from base hostility to some greater enlightened state humanity has yet to reach.


This pretty much.

There's a lot that can go wrong with drone manufactured under controlled conditions and with far less sophisticated technology and software than Rogue Drones that still manage to malfunction or resist commands to attack targets despite being dumb terminals when all is said and done.

The sheer amount of potential for failure in such systems as those represented by allegedly sentient (for some units at least) drones, seems to put this in the realm of possible damage or error on the part of the drone. The burning question here is, can the phenomenon be replicated, and can be be forced outside of specific environmental conditions? It'd be in all of our interests to ask not if these machines, so alien to us, are capable of compassion or mercy, but if they are vulnerable to some specific set of variables that prevent them from identifying and engaging human-piloted star ships.

CEO of the Achura-Waschi Exchange

Intaki Reborn

Independent Capsuleer

Synthetic Cultist
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#38 - 2013-03-17 11:57:25 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Random variables and evolutionary thinking is the foundation of all human led AI research. If there are never any random variables added to their programming then how do they evolve? The certainly don't look exactly like their ancestors so why should we assume that they think exactly like them either?


Many Rogue Drone entities can Incorporate Objects that they find in Space, into their systems. This includes technological artifacts from a variety of Sources, that give the resulting Drone Entities additional or different capabilities.

Example: If a Drone encounters a New kind of Propulsion Device, later drones constructed by the owning Hive may have that device included in their systems. Refining Equipment that allows processing of different Minerals can also be incorporated into later Drone generations.

This is One Way in which the Rogue Drone entities change over time. You will Note that it means that capsuleer battlefields are a potential source of a Great Deal of artifacts that Drones may adapt for their own purposes.

Aelisha wrote:
The burning question here is, can the phenomenon be replicated, and can be be forced outside of specific environmental conditions? It'd be in all of our interests to ask not if these machines, so alien to us, are capable of compassion or mercy, but if they are vulnerable to some specific set of variables that prevent them from identifying and engaging human-piloted star ships.


With the Phenomenon of artifact acquisition and incorporation, it may be Possible to Influence a Drone Hive.

Non-Violent technological Devices, deposited in Substantial Numbers where the Drones can Acquire them, may change the Drones constructed by the Hive.

Example: Logistic and Mining Drones. These have non-Hostile behaviour, and if incorporated into the Hive, may alter the overall Behaviour.

Synthia 1, Empress of Kaztropol.

It is Written.

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2013-03-17 17:33:00 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Random variables and evolutionary thinking is the foundation of all human led AI research. If there are never any random variables added to their programming then how do they evolve? The certainly don't look exactly like their ancestors so why should we assume that they think exactly like them either?


They are not human, stop thinking they are or they follow our process. That only leads to mistakes, which they'll be glad to use to destroy you.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#40 - 2013-03-18 03:38:35 UTC
Synthetic Cultist wrote:
Example: If a Drone encounters a New kind of Propulsion Device, later drones constructed by the owning Hive may have that device included in their systems. Refining Equipment that allows processing of different Minerals can also be incorporated into later Drone generations.


I read something almost completely identical to this once... it was a treatise on tech three cruisers. Food for thought?


Sepherim wrote:
They are not human, stop thinking they are or they follow our process. That only leads to mistakes, which they'll be glad to use to destroy you.


Human? No. Alive? Yes, in a sense.

Even the lowliest bacteria can evolve, consume & create more of itself. They defend territory, form hives and create structures. Now we're up to the insect and animal level of intelligence.

And the threshold of sentience that separates humans from animals? We've seen that they communicate. They have language. How much more evidence is needed?

Carbon or steel, life always follows the same rules & patterns. So yes, using biological concepts when talking about the rogue drones is completely appropriate.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Previous page123Next page