These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Change Incursion Mechanics

Author
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2013-03-13 12:02:45 UTC
Recent drama in the incursion communities has lead me to consider that perhaps incursion mechanics should be changed.

I have 2 proposals:

#1) Change payout to be a pool that is split amongst each on grid member, rather than a payout based upon some formula related to number of fleet members

#2) Eliminate the "winner take all" mechanic of site contests, if a fleet does 51% of the damage, it gets 51% of the payout instead of 100%, while a fleet that does 49% of the damage gets 49% instead of 0%


The most recent drama involves TVP and DIN taking generally effective action to prevent ISN from running sites. Previously DIN has done this by killing moms. Most recently however, DIN+TVP have decided to make ISK when ISN is not on, and then to form >70 man blob fleets and just follow ISN around so that they can win contests. The current payout formula means that if your fleet has 70 members, the payout is zero (for non Mothership sites) - in essence, nobody gets paid for the site at all. Increasing numbers to match the size of the blob may result in "winning" the site, but with so many people on grid, that there is again no payout.
One of DIN's complaints about ISN, is that they often contest weaker fleets, preventing the weaker fleets from making ISK.
I will note that in ISN's case, ISN does it for faster ISK, whereas in DINs case, they do it to punish ISN.

Most recently, ISN left an incursion where this massive payout-less blob was harassing them, and went to the other high sec incursion. DIN killed the mom and followed ISN to blob some more to shut ISN isk flow. ISN responded by killing the mom (where you can get payouts with larger numbers), resulting in no high sec incursions, so that DIN/TVP can't make ISK when ISN isn't on.

Very entertaining drama to be sure, but ultimately the result of the payout mechanics.
Perhaps working as intended, and this sort of emergent "scorch Ear-- err incursion" gameplay is desirable as a whole.

But it would disappear if #1 is implemented. In this case, no more waitlists for engaging in group PvE content.. which seems desirable... but then the massive blobs of Nullsec would come to incursion space, and people would be forced to join a blob (often with leaders with *ahem* abrasive *ahem personalities), or simply not get paid.
Implementing suggestion #2 would eliminate the incentive to form blobs, and I think combined, the would be very beneficial for group PvE content.

Of course, it wouldn't end the drama...
There is still the DIN/TVP community that wants to "schedule" mom kills so each group gets a turn, while other groups like ISN want mothership kills to remain free-for alls - with the only agreement being that the last high sec mothership won't get popped until it goes into withdraw, or at least when withdraws happen, its a free for all rather than taking turns.

DIN doesn't like the ISN idea, and has many times previously killed all high sec moms when ISN killed a single high sec mom when there were other high sec incursions.
Blizzaro
Vahalla La
Rainbow Knights
#2 - 2013-03-13 15:07:19 UTC
Do not like!
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2013-03-13 15:10:36 UTC
Care to explain why?
Dianila Artemisa
Macabre Votum
Northern Coalition.
#4 - 2013-03-13 15:12:20 UTC
Verity Sovereign wrote:
Most recently, ISN left an incursion where this massive payout-less blob was harassing them, and went to the other high sec incursion. DIN killed the mom and followed ISN to blob some more to shut ISN isk flow.


That part is incorrect. The two most recent incursions have been closed by a Russian group (don't remember their name) and TDF (an armor group). I agree with your statement that there is a problem, but it's up to the leaders of the incursion communities to end it.
I don't know who you fly with, but I would like to point out that ISN doesn't like being contested by a blob they can't beat, but that's the same way people in a TVP fleet feel when ISN contests them, they can't beat ISN and get a payout, but they also can't get a payout because with equal numbers, ISN wins.

tl;dr: The incursion community leaders should fix the problems they have instead of escalating the current situation.
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#5 - 2013-03-13 15:13:10 UTC
Verity Sovereign wrote:

Most recently, ISN left an incursion where this massive payout-less blob was harassing them, and went to the other high sec incursion. DIN killed the mom and followed ISN to blob some more to shut ISN isk flow. ISN responded by killing the mom (where you can get payouts with larger numbers), resulting in no high sec incursions, so that DIN/TVP can't make ISK when ISN isn't on.

So first, it is OK if ISN follows weaker Fleets as TVP from site to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "game mechanic".
DIN and TVP teamed up, to counter it. By blobbing ISN and following from sit to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "griefing"
see the problem?
Second: DIN didnt killed the Mom, TDF did, because it was their mom to kill and it was on schedule, wait. it wasnt, we delayed it one day, to let ISN fly alone in the other Incursion. BTW: ISN is not able to blue that incursion out. without the help from another fleet.

Actually every Incursioncommunity Part of the agreement is fed up with ISN.

WE take action against that.
WE are not Charadrass nor DIN alone.
WE use game mechanics to prevent ISN payout everytime they show up.

WE wish you a nice day.
Tiberia Liva
Feuer Schwerter
#6 - 2013-03-13 15:19:20 UTC
Quote:
will note that in ISN's case, ISN does it for faster ISK, whereas in DINs case, they do it to punish ISN.


It's okay that other fleets don't earn money because you want to earn more money.

But it's not okay if u don't earn money.

Okay, i understand.
Liam Li
Kings.Guard.
#7 - 2013-03-13 15:24:27 UTC
Dislike.


EVE mechanics shouldn't change as a consequence of "drama."

"Did I do That"....Nice Corpse

Bane Andven
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2013-03-13 15:25:51 UTC
Dislike

Mechanics are fine
Bozl1n
Shiva
Northern Coalition.
#9 - 2013-03-13 15:32:32 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Suvetar
Charadrass wrote:

So first, it is OK if ISN follows weaker Fleets as TVP from site to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "game mechanic".
.


Snipped trolling - ISD Suvetar

On topic - interesting idea, but not a very good one imo
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#10 - 2013-03-13 15:33:54 UTC
you should write more about that "game mechanic" we use to prevent you from beeing paid.
goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#11 - 2013-03-13 15:35:00 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Eterne
Charadrass wrote:
Verity Sovereign wrote:

Most recently, ISN left an incursion where this massive payout-less blob was harassing them, and went to the other high sec incursion. DIN killed the mom and followed ISN to blob some more to shut ISN isk flow. ISN responded by killing the mom (where you can get payouts with larger numbers), resulting in no high sec incursions, so that DIN/TVP can't make ISK when ISN isn't on.

So first, it is OK if ISN follows weaker Fleets as TVP from site to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "game mechanic".
DIN and TVP teamed up, to counter it. By blobbing ISN and following from sit to site into fleet disband, ISN calls this "griefing"
see the problem?
Second: DIN didnt killed the Mom, TDF did, because it was their mom to kill and it was on schedule, wait. it wasnt, we delayed it one day, to let ISN fly alone in the other Incursion. BTW: ISN is not able to blue that incursion out. without the help from another fleet.

Actually every Incursioncommunity Part of the agreement is fed up with ISN.

WE take action against that.
WE are not Charadrass nor DIN alone.
WE use game mechanics to prevent ISN payout everytime they show up.

WE wish you a nice day.

Are you really helping the Incursion community? As you were a member of ISN and since you took all the things you learned there and incorporated it into DIN (since ISN does not endorse Boxxing). Are you helping the community when 1/3 of the fleet is you? *snipped*

DIN has been in a contest mode since it's inception, just like ISN. *snipped*

*snipped* Your actions affected everyone, and this is your legacy, you have managed to remove Incursions from high sec entirely, congrats. ISN response to your Blob tactic is the logical progression and escalation of your personal war.

You bring Blob, ISN pops mom, next move is yours :)

*snipped personal attacks* - CCP Eterne

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-03-13 15:48:26 UTC
On the concept of winner take all, if that is what was intended then concord should be disabled in high sec incursion pockets. If not then payouts should be split between fleets.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Awarus Viliana
Doomheim
#13 - 2013-03-13 15:50:50 UTC
Charadrass
Angry Germans
#14 - 2013-03-13 15:57:47 UTC
besides the harrassement i just petitioned against goldiiee.
its not my personal war.

even i cant multibox 100 pilots.
so there must be a reason why over 100 pilots are willingly to sacrifice their payout to make absolutley sure that ISN wont get a single isk.

again. its US. not my person alone.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#15 - 2013-03-13 16:08:31 UTC
correct me if I'm wrong (likely am) -- but the "majority" of the incursion runners are corps/alliances these days, right (or at least that's how it sounds with this ISN/DIN/etc talk).

so ... um ... with that in mind ... can't you just dec the guys you don't like?

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#16 - 2013-03-13 16:12:39 UTC
Charadrass wrote:
besides the harrassement i just petitioned against goldiiee.
its not my personal war.

even i cant multibox 100 pilots.
so there must be a reason why over 100 pilots are willingly to sacrifice their payout to make absolutley sure that ISN wont get a single isk.

again. its US. not my person alone.

I apoligize if you took my statement as a personal attack, I assumed you were role playing and the similarities of Propaganda and Screaming from a soap box were in line with the persona I thought you were trying to emulate. Again I didn't not know this was your personality and I am extreemly sorry for my misjudging of your intent.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2013-03-13 16:12:46 UTC
Tiberia Liva wrote:
Quote:
will note that in ISN's case, ISN does it for faster ISK, whereas in DINs case, they do it to punish ISN.


It's okay that other fleets don't earn money because you want to earn more money.

But it's not okay if u don't earn money.

Okay, i understand.



ISN doesn't set out with the goal of denying other fleets from making ISK.
It doesn't see TVP forming a fleet, and then form a fleet to follow it.
TVP can easily make isk when ISN is running, often their ISK is reduced... but its not eliminated.
The solution is simple, when ISN enters a site, enter a different one (and not a TPPH, where its easy to do come from behind wins on the tower bash)

DINs goal is not to make ISK faster, but to deny ISK to others.
If ISN wanted that, then they'd follow the TVP fleet when DIN was blobbing (as was suggested, before the mom kill was decided on)


The mechanics make the drama, maybe thats good. My post assumes it is generally not.

#1) No more wait lists, no point in it.

#2) No more point in ISN contesting, can't parasitize the DPS of others. TVP/DINs greivances are alleviated, as are ISN

#3) No incentive to form blobs

#4) Still disagreements over who gets the mom kills, still some drama

I think overall, its a good idea (thus I posted it)
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2013-03-13 16:13:48 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
correct me if I'm wrong (likely am) -- but the "majority" of the incursion runners are corps/alliances these days, right (or at least that's how it sounds with this ISN/DIN/etc talk).

so ... um ... with that in mind ... can't you just dec the guys you don't like?


No, they are chat channels/ out of game groups, they're all different corps/alliances.
Otherwise, wardecs would have been used long ago
Kodavor
Iz Doge Korp .
#19 - 2013-03-13 16:27:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Kodavor
If TVP and DIN leaders would be genuinely concerned about their ENTIRE community across all timezones ( because they run 24/7 ) then they would advise their EU timezone to improve and adjust for the times when ISN form for some hours of HQ's . What they do instead is provoke ISN to the extent of closing the last empire incursion resulting in No fleet for absolutely no one . And then you claim that is is for the benefit for the bigger community ? You have 90% of the incursion HQ time to yourselves and you STILL WANT THE LAST 10% . How greedy can you be ?

No matter what you say ... TVP has HQ fleets 24/7 . That is a fact . So why do you press for a complete monopoly ?
Well ... then don't spout random BS about your noble cause . Just say it out loud that you want it all .
Noble Ranger
Noodle Shooters
#20 - 2013-03-13 16:34:53 UTC
Greeting's Incursion interested people...

First off, i will apologize to the thread starter, it seems despite your best intentions, that you shall have the drama spill in here; we apologize for the inconvenience. Also on behalf of the angry German, i apologize, please bear with him, he has a personal obsessive grudge with us in ISN, and he seems to desperately need to spread his grudge to everyone doing incursions, it's alright, it's a sandbox. Don't panic.

Secondly, just to comment on the actual suggestion:

"#1 is implemented. In this case, no more wait lists for engaging in group PvE content.."

We in ISN sort of "invented" using a waiting list, I'm not here to take credit for that, i would just say, no one is forcing anyone to sit on a waiting list, or make one, it is simply more efficient to maintain a fleet with one, and we are glad that others still learn from us, this is good; better contests. Contrary to popular propaganda, we actually don't mind loosing a proper contest once in a while, because it shows us there is still room for improvement. So if we, an ISK/Hour oriented community, don't mind loosing our payout on occasion, why does the majority? We are, in fact, not really bothered by this blob, we just reacted to it, in this lovely sandbox. We will most likely again, mind you, in a similar fashion react to the blob if we see it again, action; reaction.

I can tell you a little secret though, how to avoid this happening again: Don't join the blob. We just want to do our HQ fleet when we can, with the contests of chance that follows, which is not every day and not for many hours at a time, as opposed to the blob communities, who matter of factual run fleets 23/7. But it seems the blob does not agree, which is completely fair of course, everyone is entitled to their opinions. It seems the blob is of the opinion that ISN is not allowed to make ISK at all for these 4-5 hours ever second day that we can. Help help, we're being oppressed :D I suppose all there is to do, is stay tuned and see to which side the sand castle topples. I know I'm entertained.

Back to the topic at hand; the contest mechanic actually works pretty well as is i think, and i will reveal to you, since other communities have improved greatly the last half year, out of necessity i suspect (Yeah, you are welcome ^^), they have mostly improved so much that the window for actually coming in late and "yoinking" a site, is very very small to non existent. These communities now make better ISK for their members as a result of this improvement, they are safer, they should be quite happy (No really, your welcome). We don't complain about this, we have just done what we do best, adjusted, to maintain the best ISK/Hour we can, by even shifting our focus away from other communities and just been alone and done what i sadly consider (by now) the mindless grind. Contesting sites have always elevated this mindlessness somewhat, which i have been most thankful for. In fact, the first incursions i did, i was contested by these "shiny" folks, and i thought "Well daaamn, that's cool, i want to do this, i want to be better, richer, faster". Of course this was in Vanguard sites back then, but i just transfer the same mentality to the larger sites/fleets, so please execute me.

Anyway, to sum up: The contest mechanic is fine as it is, blobbing is ok too, it's a sandbox, don't ask the Dev's to change it, change it your self. With the short time I've played this game, I've already learned that this is quite possible.


Regards space cap'n o/

Fly fast



P.S.: Dear charadass, please, keep doing it; "Nein nein nein!", you have no idea how you endlessly amuse us. Keep playing that propaganda war, it's hilarious, just have some consideration for the thread starters please, and address their issues as well. I just have a piece of friendly advice, since an ISN pilot pointed this out to me: "This guy, it's like, when he wakes up, he must think ISN, when he takes a leak, he must think ISN, when he goes to bed, he must think ISN..." Seriously, it's can't be healthy with that kind of obsession, take a step back man :) I wouldn't want anyone to become ill just for my own entertainment.


Life sucks and then you die...

123Next pageLast page