These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Myrmidon and Brutix
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Blue Absinthe
Wardec U
#1 - 2013-03-06 17:54:11 UTC
I own a Myrmidon and the ship's bonus is pretty self explanatory:
"7.5% increase to armor repair amount per level"

I'm now looking at the Brutix (well the Astarte to be exact since you can considerably reduce the training time to fly it if you train to fly it for the next expansion). I'm finding the ship's bonus a little confusing:
"7.5% bonus to Armor Repairer effectiveness per level"

Have CCP confusingly worded the same bonus in two ways or is my understanding of 'effectiveness' (repaired amount) wrong?
Andrew O'Malley
Afterburners Inc.
#2 - 2013-03-06 18:13:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrew O'Malley
Removed due to incorrect data
Blue Absinthe
Wardec U
#3 - 2013-03-06 18:39:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Blue Absinthe
Thanks for the reply, that's very clear. (I do think CCP could word that description significantly better though!)
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#4 - 2013-03-06 18:59:32 UTC
He is wrong, however, the bonus is same, wording different.

.
Deacon Abox
Black Eagle5
#5 - 2013-03-06 19:02:04 UTC
Roime wrote:
He is wrong, however, the bonus is same, wording different.


And that bonus being the same, and it being a ****** bonus even with an AAR makes me Sad

CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, [u]please[/u] give us a persisting off button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals.

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#6 - 2013-03-06 19:04:05 UTC
Roime wrote:
He is wrong, however, the bonus is same, wording different.



This

CCP like making their games simple and intuitive like that.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Andrew O'Malley
Afterburners Inc.
#7 - 2013-03-06 19:27:27 UTC
Yeah my bad everyone. Have a bad fever so i thought i'd help out on the forums. Read it as efficiency.
Blue Absinthe
Wardec U
#8 - 2013-03-06 19:34:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Blue Absinthe
Thanks everyone for the replies. Wow, it's awful that CCP would word the same bonus two way, especially as one is really vague.
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#9 - 2013-03-06 20:21:14 UTC
Blue Absinthe wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replies. Wow, it's awful that CCP would word the same bonus two way, especially as one is really vague.


Welcome to Eve. There's a long and storied history of this. Frankly it's way better now than it was a few years ago.
Andrew O'Malley
Afterburners Inc.
#10 - 2013-03-06 22:56:44 UTC
Zhilia Mann wrote:
Blue Absinthe wrote:
Thanks everyone for the replies. Wow, it's awful that CCP would word the same bonus two way, especially as one is really vague.


Welcome to Eve. There's a long and storied history of this. Frankly it's way better now than it was a few years ago.


Honestly i prefer this to all the hidden changes made.