These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Necessary Peace

Author
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#41 - 2013-03-04 03:47:10 UTC
Given the situation, anyone thinking the Levithain is going to attack Gallente Prime is kidding themselves. It's not an offensive threat against it after sitting there in a known position & alignment for so long. The Navy will have it under observation from cloakies, they will have tackle inbetween it and Gallente Prime to pop it out of warp.

The Levithain is there to continue to hold Gallente citizens on Caldari Prime to ransom.
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#42 - 2013-03-04 03:50:40 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

A side note! Really! Simon there is a Titan aimed at Gallente Prime. So forgive me if I don't really care if your distracted by infighting.


Infighting is what keeps that Leviathan from glassing Gallente Prime, James.

The Federal response to such an action is deterrent enough.

Simon Louvaki wrote:
Heth is what prevents the hope of lasting peace, that's how his absence serves the interests of the Federation. That is unless your revising your previously expressed position as a dove to that of a hawk.

Simon I have never been a "dove". I seek an honorable peace yes, but I am not willing to gain it at any price. I invite you to look at my "political" record more carefully.

Simon Louvaki wrote:
What you perceive isn't an opportunity, its the first nail in your coffin. If we must disagree then we must and I will refrain from debating further. I have no interest in turning a friend into an enemy.

And there it is, "the first nail in your coffin". That is the one thing Caldari have in excess, presumed arrogance.

It assumes that the State would win a total war. It wouldn't.

Go ahead, glass Gallente Prime and what follows may teach you a thing or two about those soft peace loving Gallente.

As to friendship, it faces may trials. ~sighs~ I won't bother you further on this topic.

Perhaps we should focus our discussions on ways to build trust. As I believe that is the key to solving our mutual problem.
Aquila Shadow
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#43 - 2013-03-04 04:48:58 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Aquila Shadow wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
What does the Federation get for the concession of Luminaire VII?


The Federation citizens on Caldari Prime and Gallente Prime get to live. Why you want something more?

Rinai's suggestion (or whom ever it was that first suggested it) is probably the most realistic of the ones that have been floating around.

So let me paraphrase, if we give you want you want, you won't murder millions of our people. How very generous of you. Yes we want something more and before we allow you to keep Caldari Prime we will have it.

Ma'dame Rinai, I hope you see the attitude of those you are trying to appease.


Congratulations you have managed to once again take the meaning out of someones statement completely for your own gains. We are not going to kill millions of people on a whim, but Heth might if he had no other choice in the matter ie his government was about to fall. A deal like this would remove the threat of the Titan from your people but also guaranty that Caldari Prime would remain in Caldari hands.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Well we shouldn't settle for anything less than the Black Rise region.


You make it sound like your are in a position to negotiate such a ridiculous demand. Your forces in Black Rise are on the back foot, Placid is being taken by Caldari forces, one of the biggest alliances in your militia just left you. At best you could ask for Intaki back and that is about as unlikely to happen as us giving you Black Rise.

                                              "Let Vigilance Be Your Sword"

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2013-03-04 05:01:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Aquila Shadow wrote:
You make it sound like your are in a position to negotiate such a ridiculous demand. Your forces in Black Rise are on the back foot, Placid is being taken by Caldari forces, one of the biggest alliances in your militia just left you. At best you could ask for Intaki back and that is about as unlikely to happen as us giving you Black Rise.

Look again. Ev0ke are hemmorhaging members and have all but given up their push for the Eha-Oicx corridor, Bloody Ronin have openly abandoned their effort to retake Nennamaila (instead moving to Yvangier of all places), the battle for Esessier has been won and although the Protectorate has had a lot of of luck taking systems in Placid, if you check the current occupancy map they're absolutely terrible at holding them. At the current rate we're going Intaki will likely return to Federation sovereignty in the first half of the month as Caldari power projection in Placid is at an all-time low. We didn't even need to lose all our systems for the pendulum to start swinging back the other way. Once Ev0ke finally bleeds out - and let's be honest here, that's going to happen sooner rather than later - the Caldari war effort will once again be in dire straits, and this time the FDU will have a better understanding of why aiming for Tier 5 is a bad idea.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Aquila Shadow
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#45 - 2013-03-04 06:06:51 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Aquila Shadow wrote:
You make it sound like your are in a position to negotiate such a ridiculous demand. Your forces in Black Rise are on the back foot, Placid is being taken by Caldari forces, one of the biggest alliances in your militia just left you. At best you could ask for Intaki back and that is about as unlikely to happen as us giving you Black Rise.

Look again. Ev0ke are hemmorhaging members and have all but given up their push for the Eha-Oicx corridor, Bloody Ronin have openly abandoned their effort to retake Nennamaila (instead moving to Yvangier of all places), the battle for Esessier has been won and although the Protectorate has had a lot of of luck taking systems in Placid, if you check the current occupancy map they're absolutely terrible at holding them. At the current rate we're going Intaki will likely return to Federation sovereignty in the first half of the month as Caldari power projection in Placid is at an all-time low. We didn't even need to lose all our systems for the pendulum to start swinging back the other way. Once Ev0ke finally bleeds out - and let's be honest here, that's going to happen sooner rather than later - the Caldari war effort will once again be in dire straits, and this time the FDU will have a better understanding of why aiming for Tier 5 is a bad idea.


We are all well aware of the pendulum effect of the war. My point still stands, you have no way to back up your demand for Black Rise in return for Caldari Prime. The fact is we already have the planet a deal like this would just be dotting the I's and crossing the T's and it would also remove the threat of death from orbit which is what the Federation has been asking for since the Titan arrived.

                                              "Let Vigilance Be Your Sword"

Davlos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#46 - 2013-03-04 08:18:35 UTC
* Davlos appears with a fedora hat, a suit, and an unkempt synth-beard that is almost as big as his face.

A two-state solution?! UNPOSSIBLE!
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#47 - 2013-03-04 08:22:19 UTC
Mentas Blaque wrote:
Any nonconformity is disposed of, messily at times, but all more often quietly.


*cough*

Black Eagles

*cough*

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Davlos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#48 - 2013-03-04 08:24:10 UTC
* Davlos appears once again with a scarf wrapped around his face save for two eyes peeking out of it, and has a Forge Gun slung over his shoulder.

A two-state solution?! NEVER!!
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#49 - 2013-03-04 21:50:10 UTC
Sylux Raynes wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

Now your being snide. Where was CONCORD when the State took Caldari Prime?


Where was the Gallente Navy when the State took Caldari Prime ?


Neither one of these questions are relevant if you read the history of what transpired.


Mine was only rhetorical.

Simon Louvaki wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

A side note! Really! Simon there is a Titan aimed at Gallente Prime. So forgive me if I don't really care if your distracted by infighting.


Infighting is what keeps that Leviathan from glassing Gallente Prime, James.


You sure seem convinced that it can actually do it. What makes you so sure if I may ask ?

I, personally, do not have a clear answer on that one for that a I lack of a lot of determining factors.
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#50 - 2013-03-05 03:52:03 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
The patriotic efforts of those loyal to the Federation living on Luminaire VII, both Caldari and Gallente, to oppose the State occupation, must be supported.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#51 - 2013-03-05 04:06:55 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:


You sure seem convinced that it can actually do it. What makes you so sure if I may ask ?

I, personally, do not have a clear answer on that one for that a I lack of a lot of determining factors.


Just to ensure I answer your question Ms. Farel, I'll transpose my answer to the same question you asked in another thread.

Simon Louvaki wrote:
I'm convinced that if Heth had support and enough reason to do it then plenty of innocent people are going to die one way or another. The last time I was around Gallente Prime saw no fleet or orbital structures to fend off the sudden onslaught of a Leviathan and its support fleet.


Its not so much that I'm assured that it can do it as much as I'm sure that Heth would try it and the depending on the response time of Federation/CONCORD ships and the proximity of the Leviathan to the planet when it (inevitably) is destroyed would be catastrophic to those on the planet below. There is but one certainty in all this; Heth is capable of such a travesty. Hopefully the men and women of that ship are not.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#52 - 2013-03-05 05:56:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Rinai Vero
Simon Louvaki wrote:


Its not so much that I'm assured that it can do it as much as I'm sure that Heth would try it and the depending on the response time of Federation/CONCORD ships and the proximity of the Leviathan to the planet when it (inevitably) is destroyed would be catastrophic to those on the planet below. There is but one certainty in all this; Heth is capable of such a travesty. Hopefully the men and women of that ship are not.


If I were to speculate on the one position in the Caldari Navy that Tibus Heth would be most assured in the complete loyalty of the person holding it, the commander of that Leviathan would be at the top of my list.

There's really very little purpose in arguing about the hypothetical outcomes of a battle in Luminaire. We have the means to prevent that battle from ever happening, and we should all be putting out most fervent efforts towards that end.

James Syagrius wrote:


Ma'dame Rinai, I hope you see the attitude of those you are trying to appease.


I'll thank you to never accuse me of appeasement again. My combat record is hardly among the most fearsome of the pilots who fly under the aegis of the FDU, but it is a record of conflict and sacrifice. I'm not afraid to face the Caldari on the field of war, but I don't delude myself about why I fight. I fight to defend the lives of Federation citizens. I'd only truly be a coward if I were afraid to make peace to defend those same lives.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#53 - 2013-03-05 05:59:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
James Syagrius wrote:
The patriotic efforts of those loyal to the Federation living on Luminaire VII, both Caldari and Gallente, to oppose the State occupation, must be supported.


Oh yes, I remember the 'patriotic efforts' of the 'freedom fighters' on Caldari Prime from when they tried to kill me during a hiking holiday. I found our 'full and frank exchange of views' most refreshing.

At least have the testicular fortitude to refer to terrorism as terrorism. I'm quite disappointed to see the same man who was clamouring for peace a few short months ago supporting the efforts of hooligans and criminals.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Johlie
Scorn Again.
#54 - 2013-03-05 06:53:18 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:

Simon Louvaki wrote:
What you perceive isn't an opportunity, its the first nail in your coffin. If we must disagree then we must and I will refrain from debating further. I have no interest in turning a friend into an enemy.

And there it is, "the first nail in your coffin". That is the one thing Caldari have in excess, presumed arrogance.

It assumes that the State would win a total war. It wouldn't.

Go ahead, glass Gallente Prime and what follows may teach you a thing or two about those soft peace loving Gallente.

As to friendship, it faces may trials. ~sighs~ I won't bother you further on this topic.

Perhaps we should focus our discussions on ways to build trust. As I believe that is the key to solving our mutual problem.



Are you really that foolish to think either side would really come out on top in such a war? The State may not win such a war, but I can guarantee it will be a Pyrrhic victory for the Federation.

I believe Cpt. Louvaki was correct in equating such a war to "a bear fighting a hunter with a spear". The bear falls on the hunter and kills him but is mortally wounded by the spear in the process. The bear lumbers around mortally wounded until internally or externally it succumbs to its wounds.

Neither side would win such a war. The only option I can see, is the negotiating table. I don't know what we need to do to find common ground, but it needs to be found.

Forever in the future, Shall I battle as of yore, Dying to be born a fighter, But to die again, once more.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#55 - 2013-03-05 07:14:28 UTC
Johlie wrote:
Are you really that foolish to think either side would really come out on top in such a war? The State may not win such a war, but I can guarantee it will be a Pyrrhic victory for the Federation.

Let me tell you a thing or two about the military realities in New Eden.

The Federation is in the second best if not the best military position in the cluster. In a full-scale war that involved solely the Federation and the State and no-one else, the Federation would very likely win. It wouldn't be an easy fight and we'd most certainly get our money's worth in terms of loss, but we'd win, that's almost certain, and I've actually met few Caldari who'd disagree on this point - given that it's a purely hypothetical scenario anyway. This was not the case a century ago, but it isn't a century ago, and the circumstances have changed significantly since then. Alternatively, in a pitched war against the Amarr with no other parties involved, we'd not lose. We certainly couldn't win, and we'd very likely lose territory, but it's unlikely in the extreme that the Amarr could conquer the entire Federation, and on the remote off-chance that they did, the strain of holding it would most likely cause some manner of internal collapse.

Meanwhile, in a pitched battle between the Republic and the Empire with no intervention, it's most likely the Amarr would win. Again, they'd have a hell of a time of it, and whether they could hold the Republic is an open question, but as strong as the Republic has become it doesn't have the power to repel a full-scale Imperial invasion on its own.

The current situation in New Eden represents an unstable equilibrium. Even if it had any desire to, the Federation couldn't launch a full-scale invasion of the State because it would weaken its borders with the Empire, and contrariwise, the State wouldn't dare do the opposite for fear of opening themselves up to a Minmatar sneak attack (note that Heth didn't launch his invasion of Luminaire until the Republic was thoroughly distracted). Likewise, the Federation can't engage in a joint attack against the Empire with the Republic because they'd leave their back exposed to the State, and the Empire daren't attempt a Reclaiming lest it rapidly find itself devoid of Aridia and northern Genesis, with Khanid begging for help against a Federation counter-offensive.

The only shakeup would come is if one of the empires suddenly had a very convincing reason not to act, or to act in a way outside the parameters of the relations they previously held with the other three major powers.

CONCORD, of course, claims that it renders all of these considerations a moot point. They are certainly entitled to this belief.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#56 - 2013-03-05 07:21:19 UTC
Andreus - it's worth noting that the Federation would only win a war that it had secured popular support for. The Federation has always enjoyed numerical and material advantages over the State - but has traditionally suffered from disadvantages in training, morale and technology. These conditions have not changed.

It's entirely likely that the State Navy would fight the Federal Navy to a bloody impasse that the Senators could no longer support at home.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Johlie
Scorn Again.
#57 - 2013-03-05 07:32:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Johlie
Cpt. Ixiris, you bring up valid points. However, there are to many variables involved with a total war between our respective countries. There is no way to accurately predict an outcome of such a war.

Forever in the future, Shall I battle as of yore, Dying to be born a fighter, But to die again, once more.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#58 - 2013-03-05 09:29:45 UTC
A citizen is entitled to the patriotic belief that his or her nation would win an absolute war of annihilation. I would not fault Andreus for his beliefs, nor would I attempt to rob him of his convictions for it.

Let him think such things.

Katrina Oniseki

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2013-03-05 20:38:01 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
but has traditionally suffered from disadvantages in training, morale and technology. These conditions have not changed.

That's actually an inaccurate assessment of the Federation's weaknesses. Training and technology have never been major issues for the Federation's military, and morale is generally a situational issue - it's been recruitment. The Federation citizenry in general are not particularly warlike, and the only time one generally sees massive surges in recruitment is during periods of political strife.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#60 - 2013-03-05 22:05:35 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
but has traditionally suffered from disadvantages in training, morale and technology. These conditions have not changed.

That's actually an inaccurate assessment of the Federation's weaknesses. Training and technology have never been major issues for the Federation's military, and morale is generally a situational issue - it's been recruitment. The Federation citizenry in general are not particularly warlike, and the only time one generally sees massive surges in recruitment is during periods of political strife.


Military capabilities of the Gallente and Caldari aside, is it your honest belief that the State should make further concessions than the withdrawal of their Titan and its support fleet in order to settle the status of Caldari Prime? In principle I can't say I disagree. The manner in which the Caldari started the One Day War, and the damage they caused resulted in grievous human and economic loss. As a matter of practicality though, I don't see the benefit in insisting on restitution.

Many Caldari feel perfectly justified in their bloody conquest, and nothing anyone says will convince them otherwise. It seems to me that achieving the withdrawal of a looming threat to millions of lives is more than enough compensation for the recognition of the status quo that Caldari Prime is and should stay in Caldari hands.