Jita Park Speakers Corner

Hello there!

I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)

POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?

Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)

Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?

The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.

The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.

Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.

Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.

Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.

Explain please.

I apologize for writing Dust 512 instead of 514, i should feel bad and such... bla bla hey.

Why should Eve players have to put up with excessive intrusion from a console shooter?

Why should Eve players have to put up with excessive intrusion from a console shooter?

Because CCP has designed a shooter game to go together with our beloved eve online, why not make the best of it?

That's not what I asked. What I asked is why should we have to put up with it? Your proposal is to expand on whatever minimal links already exist, and expand on them in quite drastic and game-altering fashion. It's on you to demonstrate why that would be a good thing. "Why not?" is a pretty awful answer.

This was the answer given to you, if you do not like it i can answer it goonswarm style.
The answer wasn't why not it was Because CCP has designed a shooter game to go together with our beloved eve online, why not make the best of it?


" Goonswarm style "

Yo man, terrorists with uzis and stuff. Running round, but merica, burger king... You know m16 in wheelchair.

Ahh, so you've got no answer to why major game-altering changes should be made beside "why not?". I'm sure that level of deep thought and insight into this wonderfully complex game of ours will make you a fantastic candidate.

Well as much as i would love to say, that they should scrap dust and world of darkness. They won't do that, so instead of bitching and whining about it. Figure out a solution to make it more involved in the game. For example dust is dependent upon eve to work, but it hasn't been decided how it should affect the game. I believe bringing it to 0.0 and have as a game changer for timers would get people to value dust mercenaries and dust players.

Should I ask you about your moon depletion idea or is that just another "why not?" or "lol ur goon" answer waiting as well?

As far as depletion goes, everything has an end in eve. By extracting moon material from the same moon, over and over again. Shouldn't it be affected like all other resources in the game?
As far as i know, asteroids deplete, gas clouds deplete, ice asteroids deplete, why wouldn't moons do that but during longer intervals?

It seems like what answer you will get from this wont be enough of a reason to convince you otherwise, also ice asteroids deplete FYI, but they have a huge mass. You can go and check that right now by scanning one of those.

I have probed out 2 regions where I've lived, i know it ain't fun but allowing people to enter a gold mine which they can tap endless defies all reasoning that you can muster.

Also to your hate on Dust, i didnt just say why not, i formulated an answer which you had to contradict in order to enlighten self-esteem. As you cannot give a good reasoning to something that doesnt exist to have it countered by why? Which was your question. :)

So uh, do you play DUST? What corp?

I don't play dust at all for the moment, the lack of funds i have at the moment isn't enough to purchase a Playstation. Perhaps in a close future i can buy it to play Dust.