These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Different T2 warfare links proposal

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Shizo Lang
Little Red Riding Hole
Wolves Amongst Strangers
#1 - 2011-10-25 21:51:15 UTC
Why do you try to break the game by even givin the t2 version more boost?
Why not boost something that isnt boosted yet like warpspeed?

Question

i.e. set the warpspeed with activated bonuses to 10 au/s and 9 au/s for fleet warps

or less overheat damage to modules per cycle

or reduced mass

maybe make t2 command modules only available to t2 battlecruisers and not any t3.

let the t3 cruiser t1 command bonuses still be that 5 % better
Antal Marius
Allied Operations
Mechanicus Macabre Immortale
#2 - 2011-10-26 07:56:22 UTC
Seems moot to me, since the ones "leaked" are still the roughest of the rough and are no where near finalized yet
CCP Lemur
#3 - 2011-10-26 13:56:07 UTC
Antal Marius wrote:
Seems moot to me, since the ones "leaked" are still the roughest of the rough and are no where near finalized yet


What he said.
While we absolutely like the enthusiasm you guys put into this these numbers came from an internal test server and mostly present a "let's get this modules made and just put some numbers in there to start with"-state.
I assume there will be a blog about these things once they are about to hit Sisi and then we are happy to hear from you again on the the more planned out numbers on things.

Cheers

QA Guy | Special Ops Picture up to your IMGination.
Antal Marius
Allied Operations
Mechanicus Macabre Immortale
#4 - 2011-10-26 18:26:54 UTC
Amazing....I got a post quoted by CCP =P
Tamiya Sarossa
Resistance is Character Forming
#5 - 2011-10-26 22:20:04 UTC
Make them only work on grid! Only on griddddddddd!
Bob Niac
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2011-10-27 04:24:16 UTC
Tamiya .. that is a really well done mug shot / avatar.

Just sayin

[u]I <3 Logistics:[/u] Pilot of all  T2 logi and my shiny Archon [deceased.] Also a Chimera which may or may not be horrid. I don't make games, I play them. I get that ppl are passionate about change. I post here to plant seeds. You see your idea as is? Holy **** you win! So let's post, and see what the DEVs and our peers use.
Leovarian Lavitz
Ninjuggernauts
Fly Fearless
#7 - 2011-10-27 10:34:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Leovarian Lavitz
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Leovarian_Lavitz

I <3 the new warfare link changes.

http://eveboard.com/fullranks/21-most-sp-in-leadership Ranked 84 in leadership

Leadership is my specialty. I fly command ships, industrial command ships, battle cruisers, use any links to get the job done. I've got several jump clones, each with it's own command ship and link for that. These changes are amazing and definitely reward the year and six months I've put into leadership skills, even so, they must be tested.

As far as the numbers, gotta get on singularity to see how much of an impact they actually have. When I'm done testing, I'll come post my findings.
TrollFace TrololMcFluf
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2011-10-27 15:53:31 UTC
Shizo Lang wrote:
Why do you try to break the game by even givin the t2 version more boost?
Why not boost something that isnt boosted yet like warpspeed?

Question

i.e. set the warpspeed with activated bonuses to 10 au/s and 9 au/s for fleet warps

or less overheat damage to modules per cycle

or reduced mass

maybe make t2 command modules only available to t2 battlecruisers and not any t3.

let the t3 cruiser t1 command bonuses still be that 5 % better



crybabys like you is what is wrong with eve atm
Pesadel0
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2011-10-27 16:25:39 UTC
TrollFace TrololMcFluf wrote:
Shizo Lang wrote:
Why do you try to break the game by even givin the t2 version more boost?
Why not boost something that isnt boosted yet like warpspeed?

Question

i.e. set the warpspeed with activated bonuses to 10 au/s and 9 au/s for fleet warps

or less overheat damage to modules per cycle

or reduced mass

maybe make t2 command modules only available to t2 battlecruisers and not any t3.

let the t3 cruiser t1 command bonuses still be that 5 % better



crybabys like you is what is wrong with eve atm



That is some of the worse changes i ever heard, more is better in this case.
Shizo Lang
Little Red Riding Hole
Wolves Amongst Strangers
#10 - 2011-10-27 19:57:11 UTC
i wasnt really serious about the changes i proposed, i am just against even more % on the warfare links.

Though i am kinda serious about the fleet warp speed, not the actual number like 10 au/s, but more about the possibilies that open up to fleet commanders.
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2011-10-28 01:28:57 UTC
First draught by the experts. Just be patient :)

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Kent Reeves
#12 - 2011-10-28 02:45:06 UTC
Shizo Lang wrote:
maybe make t2 command modules only available to t2 battlecruisers and not any t3.

Honestly, I like that one.
Yvan Ratamnim
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2011-10-28 15:38:28 UTC
lol, ya t2 command modules on t2 battlecruisers only is a good idea, but honestly stop whining you panzies, how is t2 command modules breaking anything, both sides of any decent fleet can fit the module thereby making it even, but still giving people something that have great skills something to train towards, i know a few command pilots that wouldnt mind training skills to V actually resulting in a new shiny module.
NeoShocker
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#14 - 2011-10-28 19:02:37 UTC  |  Edited by: NeoShocker
Leovarian Lavitz wrote:
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Leovarian_Lavitz

I <3 the new warfare link changes.

http://eveboard.com/fullranks/21-most-sp-in-leadership Ranked 84 in leadership

Leadership is my specialty. I fly command ships, industrial command ships, battle cruisers, use any links to get the job done. I've got several jump clones, each with it's own command ship and link for that. These changes are amazing and definitely reward the year and six months I've put into leadership skills, even so, they must be tested.

As far as the numbers, gotta get on singularity to see how much of an impact they actually have. When I'm done testing, I'll come post my findings.


Ranked 17 in leadership :-)

Maxed out CS and leadersip pilot here. Can you tell me more about the new mods? Did update sisi last night but did not get the chance, was late. But will check out after work!
NeoShocker
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#15 - 2011-10-28 19:03:31 UTC  |  Edited by: NeoShocker
Delete plz
NeoShocker
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#16 - 2011-10-28 19:04:55 UTC  |  Edited by: NeoShocker
For some reason, lagged to hell, posted three times Ugh
Lili Lu
#17 - 2011-10-30 21:47:40 UTC
Leovarian Lavitz wrote:
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Leovarian_Lavitz

I <3 the new warfare link changes.

http://eveboard.com/fullranks/21-most-sp-in-leadership Ranked 84 in leadership

Leadership is my specialty. I fly command ships, industrial command ships, battle cruisers, use any links to get the job done. I've got several jump clones, each with it's own command ship and link for that. These changes are amazing and definitely reward the year and six months I've put into leadership skills, even so, they must be tested.

As far as the numbers, gotta get on singularity to see how much of an impact they actually have. When I'm done testing, I'll come post my findings.


Maxed command ship and leadership/link skills also. Can someone mention or link what these are? I appear to have missed it.

Is this a way to buff commands back over tech III? Tired of people putting less sp into tech III cruisers and having better buffs to hand out. Are these new links not fit(able) on tech III? Regardless, another vote for making warfare links only operate with ships on grid. That will fix the tech III posers.Twisted
The Economist
Logically Consistent
#18 - 2011-10-31 18:48:13 UTC
Headerman wrote:
First draught by the experts. Just be patient :)


Lol

Historically the first draft very often ends up as the final draft, so we shall see.
Matuk Grymwal
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#19 - 2011-11-02 23:54:12 UTC
NeoShocker wrote:
Leovarian Lavitz wrote:
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Leovarian_Lavitz

I <3 the new warfare link changes.

http://eveboard.com/fullranks/21-most-sp-in-leadership Ranked 84 in leadership

Leadership is my specialty. I fly command ships, industrial command ships, battle cruisers, use any links to get the job done. I've got several jump clones, each with it's own command ship and link for that. These changes are amazing and definitely reward the year and six months I've put into leadership skills, even so, they must be tested.

As far as the numbers, gotta get on singularity to see how much of an impact they actually have. When I'm done testing, I'll come post my findings.


Ranked 17 in leadership :-)

Maxed out CS and leadersip pilot here. Can you tell me more about the new mods? Did update sisi last night but did not get the chance, was late. But will check out after work!

The mods aren't seeded yet. But the command boost amount changes from a base of 2 up to 2.5. I forgot to check the fitting, so I'm not sure what the changes are there.
Zelphinine
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#20 - 2011-11-03 02:23:44 UTC
I think it'd be cool if Information Warfare links had one or two solid 'utility' links. I've never seen the bonuses the Infolinks provide as ever being at useful compared to pretty much any of the others. Maybe give infowar a + cap regen link, or something.

I mean who flies Gallente command ships? Nobody :p