These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Have CCP ever considered giving the green light on botting?

First post
Author
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#21 - 2013-02-18 16:19:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Karrl Tian
"Why greenlight botting when you can encourage people to act like bots?"

---CCP's consideration.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-02-18 16:34:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Tippia wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Gas thread, ban OP, reset test, get out.
People always get those first two mixed up…
Quoted because ... well, that was bad.

Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
He's from TEST !


So what? -what if he was NC/RED/RVB/GOON/PL would it change anything?

He's the one expressing his opinion or opening a new discussion, you're the only one trolling.
*lol*
No, it wouldn't change anything if he was from the goons. It probably wouldn't change anything if he was
from all the others, because i wouldn't consider any of these people dumb enough to make such a thread
and meaning it seriously.

It'd still be a troll, no matter what, and you'd still be an idiot for thinking that the OP isn't trolling.
But hey, you believe what you want anyway ... *lol*
Joran Dravius
Doomheim
#23 - 2013-02-18 16:36:26 UTC
DrunkenNinja wrote:
Ok, so I know the thread title sounds ridiculous but hear me out.

No. Go end yourself.
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#24 - 2013-02-18 16:58:59 UTC
The way I see it, people bot for two reasons:

1. The game mechanic is so tedious and boring that it is simply impossible for human being to perform it for the requisite amount of hours without suffering permanent brain damage.

2. The amount of requisite hours is too much for an average person to handle.

Both of these are game design flaws, not player flaws.

Case in point - mining in EVE. Find me someone who thinks that this is just absolutely the most fun activity ever. By itself, without bringing PvP or social aspects into it. You'll find nobody except some seriously messed up people, possibly with a history of substance abuse.

Another example is skill leveling in Darkfall. Where the best/fastest/easiest way to level your endurance, so you could run faster and longer, was to jump into the water, aim yourself at a sheer shore cliffside, put a heavy weight onto your W key and walk away for a few days. Yes, eventually most people would get max endurance from regular gameplay, but it took years of casual game time. Whereas you could just "bot" (even though this is not really botting, no 3rd party software is used) your way to maximum which in turn was a significant quality of life increase for your character. When travel time was measured in hours, being able to sprint faster and longer was kind of a big deal.

Both of these are example of hideously flawed game design. Plain and simple. If you want to stop botting, don't make a game with hideously flawed design choices. It's that simple. When every activity in the game is active, involving, addictive and FUN, people won't bot. Not because they can't. Not because they would get punished. But because they would want to have fun playing the game in the first place. It's that simple.
Skorpynekomimi
#25 - 2013-02-18 17:15:22 UTC
That wouldn't 'solve' the problem at all. It would just declare it as not-a-problem.

Economic PVP

kari bourza
Shield of Iron Crown
#26 - 2013-02-18 17:40:56 UTC
Maybe they should make it possible for you to drop a deployable relatively cheap tower that mine belts for you and you just need to protect it from others, i mean we are in the future right ? everything should be run by robots, and it would make the game more fun for miners, kind of how moons work.
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#27 - 2013-02-18 17:46:30 UTC
botting was, for all intents and purposes, legal before sreegs was hired

sure, every once in a blue moon they'd ban bots but generally only if forced to

it wasn't good for the game

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#28 - 2013-02-18 17:46:54 UTC
that said the mackinaw is basically legalizing highsec miner bots

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2013-02-18 17:59:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
allowing botting would require ccp to design a game that requires more than two braincells to play.

as is only a few metagaming aspects of eve (which only the 1% participate in) are such a game while the other 99% of us just enjoy the mindless skinner box grind.

take away that grind (or take away the sense of achievement from that grind) and there's not much left of eve.

.

Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2013-02-18 18:04:42 UTC
legalizing botting is an idea I bring up every now and then in trade channels and instead of "YESSS, less menial order updating, more time to focus on strategy. Algorithmic trading, here we go!" the usual reaction is "OMG this would kill trading! how can you even suggest something like this!"

People abhor the idea of having to think.

.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#31 - 2013-02-18 18:07:35 UTC
Pewty McPew wrote:
CCP could, if they wanted to, use the banhammer and eliminate a vast majority of botting that is occouring ingame now. Why they don't hit harder and more often is anyone's guess.


If laying down super ban-hammer kills off 1000 bot subscriptions then what you've actually done is just reduce CCP revenues by about $15,000 a month.

Ever read those new articles where large amounts of money mysteriously vanish from the evidence rooms at police stations?

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#32 - 2013-02-18 18:14:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Katran Luftschreck
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:
Another example is skill leveling in Darkfall...


Equally unrelated: With "Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion" on the Xbox, after doing the Mages Guild intro I made custom spells in all disciplines that did 1 point of whatever, lasted 1 second and cost 1 mana. Since mana regenerates fast than that (as EvE would say, it was "cap stable") I would then max all my magic skills by picking a spell and clamping a pair of pliers to the controller to hold down the X button, thus creating improve auto-casting unto infinity (or until I took the pliers off).

I wonder if that would be considered botting by CCP's twisted definitions? After all, no 3rd party software was involved. Hardware on the other hand... Pirate

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#33 - 2013-02-18 18:15:27 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Pewty McPew wrote:
CCP could, if they wanted to, use the banhammer and eliminate a vast majority of botting that is occouring ingame now. Why they don't hit harder and more often is anyone's guess.


If laying down super ban-hammer kills off 1000 bot subscriptions then what you've actually done is just reduce CCP revenues by about $15,000 a month.

Ever read those new articles where large amounts of money mysteriously vanish from the evidence rooms at police stations?


They banned more than that in the purge before fanfest least year. They also banned a few hundred mining bots in our interdictions.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#34 - 2013-02-18 18:19:10 UTC
This thread can only go places.



There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#35 - 2013-02-18 18:19:40 UTC
DrunkenNinja wrote:
Ok, so I know the thread title sounds ridiculous but hear me out.
Let's say botting gets so bad (or is already but we don't know) that a significant number of players are gaining huge advantages from activities such as mining, mission running in high security space, etc.
CCP, despite struggling valiantly, has failed to defeat the onslaught of botting.

One way to fix the problem would be to actually allow botting. The materials aquired through doing so would become almost worthless, so rare materials that are found in lowsec and nullsec would gain a lot of value.

Concerned that nullsec and lowsec denizens could also make a killing with bots?
No problem, just destroy their ships and take their loot Big smile.

This would, as James 315 might say (please don't stop reading) place emphasis on tasks that require a lot of player skill—and could not just be completed by a simple machine.


This is a bad idea, and you should feel bad.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#36 - 2013-02-18 18:20:13 UTC
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:
Fractal Muse wrote:
I have always wondered about the people who claim botting is super prevalent in the game. I can't tell the difference between an AFK player and a bot so I can't decide if there is a lot of botting going on or a lot of AFKing going on.

For those who claim that there is a ton of botting happening could you provide evidence to back that claim?


1. Suicide the target
2. Does the target whine in local? If not, bot. If yes, not a bot.

Simple :)

When I lose a ship to another player I NEVER talk in local. Talking in local gains me nothing. So its not that simple.

Bots mess up the economy, which effects everyone. Its not a victimless activity. It should not be allowed.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#37 - 2013-02-18 18:20:36 UTC
Vera Algaert wrote:
legalizing botting is an idea I bring up every now and then in trade channels and instead of "YESSS, less menial order updating, more time to focus on strategy. Algorithmic trading, here we go!" the usual reaction is "OMG this would kill trading! how can you even suggest something like this!"

People abhor the idea of having to think.


You don't understand basic game design.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Monocle Winski
Doomheim
#38 - 2013-02-18 18:22:43 UTC

Get a job at Mc Donalds working one 4 hour shift one day per week

Thats would be 4 Subscriptions per month, and maybe a free burger and fries to boot

Do it
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#39 - 2013-02-18 18:24:05 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Pewty McPew wrote:
CCP could, if they wanted to, use the banhammer and eliminate a vast majority of botting that is occouring ingame now. Why they don't hit harder and more often is anyone's guess.


If laying down super ban-hammer kills off 1000 bot subscriptions then what you've actually done is just reduce CCP revenues by about $15,000 a month.

Ever read those new articles where large amounts of money mysteriously vanish from the evidence rooms at police stations?

This has been asked of CCP before, with this reply:

CCP Sreegs wrote:
The first question is one I haven't FULLY researched but the general consensus is that removing bots actually increases CCP's income because we have more happy customers. The idea that we would want people to bot for $15 is a false one, though I could see why some people would leap to that conclusion.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#40 - 2013-02-18 19:03:42 UTC
…and speaking of botting, I just discovered that my Roomba is racist! Shocked
Previous page123Next page