These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mining Barge SP Reimbursement

First post First post
Author
Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#241 - 2013-02-11 18:05:54 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Aren Madigan wrote:

Considering I've ran into coders that have been put what could have been 5, 6 lines of code into literally 20-25, and still gotten good grades out of it because it worked, and not to mention how a large majority of schools teach theory rather than hands on and your treatment of a rather simple aspect as being this grand undertaking. Yeah. Don't rightly care. Not to mention, everyone and their mom on forums seems to claim to be a programmer. No, what I care about is showing that experience. Also don't recall mentioning anything that could be summed up as a is true, so b must be true kind of deal. In fact, relatively sure I didn't. Also not seeing where your certificate is shown.


So, let me get this straight. I, someone with programming experience, can't know how long it would take for this change to be made. But you seem to understand exactly how long it will take CCP, even though they are programmers themselves and therefore could be better or or worse than me? How do you even function on a daily basis when you can't follow a simple argument.

You say "You can't tell how good a programmer is, just because they are a programmer"
Then you say "I understand better than you how quick it would take CCP, who are programmers".

Really? You do understand why that is stupid right? I'm done with debating with you (I won't call it debating, its more like banging my head against a brick wall). All your doing now is repeating yourself. Everyone can see that you have no idea what your talking about, except yourself.


Not the only one repeating myself. I'm repeating myself because others are, you just don't want to draw attention to the ones that are on your side of the fence :).

Also I said I judge by someone SHOWING that experience. CCP has very very clearly shown experience and skill with what they've done. While you describe it as this grand undertaking with only your own word to back it up... yeeeah.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#242 - 2013-02-11 18:10:39 UTC
Maggeridon Thoraz wrote:
somehow i get the feeling ccp is changing so many fundamental things at all that they should give all players a totall reset of the skillpoints and let the users decide where to redistribute them :-)


Smile Nice try, but no that's not going to happen. It would be a terrible prescedent that would haunt them though all balancing/tweaking they do from that point on.

If BS were reworked people would say they want to reset their skills again.
If a new ship class was added people would ask for a skill reset again.
If industry was reworked, same thing.

It would completely invalidate a core tenet of the game, that being that your choices will have consequences... often unforseen ones.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#243 - 2013-02-11 18:10:49 UTC
I think at some point you stopped arguing about skill prerequisites.
I can't for the life of me figure out where that transition happened.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#244 - 2013-02-11 18:25:02 UTC
Mag's wrote:
One thing I'd like to add. I would actually agree to a mechanic, that removed skills if you wanted them gone. But only if you don't get the SP back. Big smile


I've been pushing this for years.

Good to see that the movement to make it happen has just doubled in members.

Mr Epeen Cool
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#245 - 2013-02-11 18:29:37 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:
So I guess time is valueless.
No, time is value and you got exactly what you wanted for that expenditure. If you want to get the same thing now, you will have to spend less time to get it, but that doesn't change how much it was worth in the past, nor does it mean that you should be reimbursed because the price has changed.

Again, if it was worth it at the time, it was worth it at the time, and it's current worth is largely irrelevant (especially in this case since that value doesn't change in any way among those who complain).

Quote:
And nope, only two ways would it have never existed. removing SP they gained as a result of it, or giving people who didn't have it the SP they would have with it.
…or if the mechanic did not create any history of advantages. Had there been, say, a ”pink ship” skill that did what it said on the can, and then that skill and mechanic were removed and replaced by a simple drop-down in your fitting screen, then the skill pretty much never existed from an ability standpoint.

Quote:
And umm.. I don't think a new person is going to be running many L4s... just saying. Took me weeks to get into my Myrmidon. Me being able to cheapen it that much would be less a nerf and more an indication of progress >_>
…and that's exactly what we have here. Getting into the ship takes less time now. Progress. Just like grinding to get a Drake takes less time now than it did in the past. Also progress. Having to walk in the snow, bare-foot, uphill, against the wind doesn't mean that now that I have a car, I should be allowed to ignore the speed limit to make up for all the time I lost during those walks. It just means that now I have a car instead — yay! Should I run out of petrol, I also know how long it takes to walk to the petrol station — so also yay!

Quote:
Then I guess no value was lost when learning skills were removed either. They could still train at the same speed. Roll In fact, they gained from it in many cases.
The difference was that in that case, the idiotic and counter-productive meta-mechanic was rightfully removed. The time spent was turned into a black hole, and they had every right to have that time actually count for something. In this case, the time spent still counts for the same thing it did before.
Whitehound
#246 - 2013-02-11 18:53:31 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Smile Nice try, but no that's not going to happen. It would be a terrible prescedent that would haunt them though all balancing/tweaking they do from that point on.

So? What would this prove?

It would prove the skill system to be a failure. Now do you or CCP think this is the case? No, I doubt it.

So stop saying things like it would be a terrible thing to do and haunt them.

If the skill system is good then players will choose the same skills again! Attention

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#247 - 2013-02-11 18:54:07 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:


Then I guess no value was lost when learning skills were removed either. They could still train at the same speed. Roll In fact, they gained from it in many cases. There are only two differences between the situations. The number of people with access to the benefits and it no longer being something on the skill bar. It didn't lose its value though because they still had the increased training rate they had before AND they had an edge over those who didn't take them.



This is different because after the change the learning skills had no purpose in the game anymore. Their function was removed. On the other hand the people with mining barge V will still to their utter joy still be able to fly a maxed out covetor.

The only time the reimbursement of this kind would make sense is if they removed the mining barge skill from the game entirely.

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#248 - 2013-02-11 18:54:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Pop quiz, which of the following statements is a valid request?

A: I bought this TV 6 months ago and now it's on sale for less. I want a refund.
B: I bought this new car at a reasonable price, then I drove it off the lot and it devalued. I want a refund.
C: I got my degree in 4 years at University, but then they reworked the curriculum and I could get it in 3 1/2 years if I were taking those courses now. I want a refund.
D: In 6 months the ship I skilled for last year is going to cost less time to train for. I want a refund.
E: None of the above.

(Correct answer: E: None of the above.)

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#249 - 2013-02-11 19:00:55 UTC  |  Edited by: samualvimes
Ranger 1 wrote:
Pop quiz, which of the following statements is a valid request?

A: I bought this TV 6 months ago and now it's on sale for less. I want a refund.
B: I bought this new car at a reasonable price, then I drove it off the lot and it devalued. I want a refund.
C: I got my degree in 4 years at University, but then they reworked the curriculum and I could get it in 3 1/2 years if I were taking those courses now. I want a refund.
D: In 6 months the ship I skilled for last year is going to cost less time to train for. I want a refund.
E: None of the above.

(Correct answer: E: None of the above.



close brackets/parenthesis (sorry that bugged me)

ninja edit: also yes E

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#250 - 2013-02-11 19:02:41 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Smile Nice try, but no that's not going to happen. It would be a terrible prescedent that would haunt them though all balancing/tweaking they do from that point on.

So? What would this prove?

It would prove the skill system to be a failure. Now do you or CCP think this is the case? No, I doubt it.

So stop saying things like it would be a terrible thing to do and haunt them.

If the skill system is good then players will choose the same skills again! Attention


One of the reasons the skill system is good is because it requires you to make choices and deal with the sometimes unforseen consequences of those choices.

If every time a balance tweak or game mechanics change happened people demanded a skill reset (and if this were done now, they would) that would invalidate one of the main points of the skill system and of the game design in general.

If you think this would not happen I'll remind you that in this very thread we have people trying to justify either reskilling or reimbursement based on what was done when the learning skill removal occured... which is a clearly different case (skills being removed).

Respectfully disagreeing with you, this would be an incredibly bad idea.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Virginia Virdana
RSM Inc
#251 - 2013-02-11 19:02:47 UTC
If you go and buy a car and then 2 months later you find out that the car is now 2 grand cheaper do you stand in the dealership and argue with the salesman? If you do, what do you think the response will be?

And before you come back with an arguement along the lines of "if he wants my repeat business, then he'll give me my cash back" then I'm not interested, because this has not happened in the history of people buying stuff ever. *

It is unfortunate (for some posters) that due to the changes CCP has in the pipeline, they perceive that they are getting short changed. I am sympathetic. Unfortunately, as has been pointed out, the price for an Orca before was Mining Barge V. In the future it won't be. Thats the way of it. You could fly it before. You can now. In the future new players will have a slight advantage in getting to that skill.

However you are already [insert your number of skillpoints here] ahead of of Bob the day old newb, so I think you can probably let them have that relatively small advantage.


* On the advice of my lawyer, I will caveat this. It may of happened once, but the chances of it happening are so freakishly and outstandingly remote, that it's pretty much zero.
They say never come to a gunfight armed with a knife.   You appear to have come armed with a spoon.
LoneEcho
Mining and Salvage Corporation
#252 - 2013-02-11 19:07:22 UTC
Virginia Virdana wrote:
If you go and buy a car and then 2 months later you find out that the car is now 2 grand cheaper do you stand in the dealership and argue with the salesman? If you do, what do you think the response will be?

And before you come back with an arguement along the lines of "if he wants my repeat business, then he'll give me my cash back" then I'm not interested, because this has not happened in the history of people buying stuff ever. *

It is unfortunate (for some posters) that due to the changes CCP has in the pipeline, they perceive that they are getting short changed. I am sympathetic. Unfortunately, as has been pointed out, the price for an Orca before was Mining Barge V. In the future it won't be. Thats the way of it. You could fly it before. You can now. In the future new players will have a slight advantage in getting to that skill.

However you are already [insert your number of skillpoints here] ahead of of Bob the day old newb, so I think you can probably let them have that relatively small advantage.


* On the advice of my lawyer, I will caveat this. It may of happened once, but the chances of it happening are so freakishly and outstandingly remote, that it's pretty much zero.


When you buy a car, you know the price is devalued the second you drove it off the lot. That's the fact of life. As for the Orca, there are requirements that are set in stone and assume that won't change because when have ship requirements ever changed. Just another thought out there :P

Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#253 - 2013-02-11 19:07:50 UTC
Again you keep using reasoning that can be applied to removed skills too. The ones removed were rightfully removed much like prereqs were rightfully adjusted but your entire reasoning for this, them not losing what they gained applies to both. Because more people get access to it than others? But wouldn't that just be the jealousy argument on a larger scale? Or "I spent my time on those skills, I want that time back." Well, people spent the time on the mining barges too. In fact, you could apply the learning skill removable as them reducing the time to train the skills to zero. For some pilots, its similar, the training time for the skills got reduced. So what it comes down to is what the end benefit of the changes were

Learning Skill owners: Got faster SP than others at the time and bonus SP they could use freely.
Ship skill affected by change: Can fly a ship they may or may not use better than someone else who trained up to the skill after the change...

Now my impression, of what your thinking is this:

Ship skill benefit >= Learning skill owner.

Some others though see it like this

Ship skill benefit < Learning skill owner.

I see it as kind of varying from person to person and situation. There ARE reasons to not give it. Especially since certain aspects can't be kept track of. I personally think its better for some to unfairly benefit than it is for some to be detrimented by being forced to keep skills that never applied to anything they did besides that which it no longer affects.
On the other hand, I can see it being argued that doing this would allow them to ignore even the previous prerequisites as well, which wouldn't be an acceptable at all.
samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#254 - 2013-02-11 19:10:44 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:
Again you keep using reasoning that can be applied to removed skills too. The ones removed were rightfully removed much like prereqs were rightfully adjusted but your entire reasoning for this, them not losing what they gained applies to both. Because more people get access to it than others? But wouldn't that just be the jealousy argument on a larger scale? Or "I spent my time on those skills, I want that time back." Well, people spent the time on the mining barges too. In fact, you could apply the learning skill removable as them reducing the time to train the skills to zero. For some pilots, its similar, the training time for the skills got reduced. So what it comes down to is what the end benefit of the changes were

Learning Skill owners: Got faster SP than others at the time and bonus SP they could use freely.
Ship skill affected by change: Can fly a ship they may or may not use better than someone else who trained up to the skill after the change...

Now my impression, of what your thinking is this:

Ship skill benefit >= Learning skill owner.

Some others though see it like this

Ship skill benefit < Learning skill owner.

I see it as kind of varying from person to person and situation. There ARE reasons to not give it. Especially since certain aspects can't be kept track of. I personally think its better for some to unfairly benefit than it is for some to be detrimented by being forced to keep skills that never applied to anything they did besides that which it no longer affects.
On the other hand, I can see it being argued that doing this would allow them to ignore even the previous prerequisites as well, which wouldn't be an acceptable at all.


OK we're going around the same arguments again and again. There are 3 people in this thread on one side and the population of the forums-3 on the other. (slight exaggeration) I'm not saying who's right or wrong but the majority is not with you my friend.

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Whitehound
#255 - 2013-02-11 19:13:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
Ranger 1 wrote:
One of the reasons the skill system is good is because it requires you to make choices and deal with the sometimes unforseen consequences of those choices...

What has this got to do with anything? It is bullshit.

Some players have trained for an Orca and trained all the skills they needed for it, knowing that they do not need/want all of them, but they did it because they had no other choice if they wanted to get into this ship. They accepted the nonsense knowingly and moved on so that they can continue with their game in the way they want to play it.

These players knew back then, and before CCP did, how stupid some of the requirements were.

Now does CCP finally come to realize this for themselves and fixes this.

Why would CCP not want to give these players their points back and to allow them to redistribute these points in whatever way they see fit?

You have to be a total douche to stand here and to argue that they cannot have this. It reminds me of someone having a God complex, believing they are the only ones who figured out how wrong this, everyone else is dumb and little, and only they have the power to fix this, and their players not deserving any kind of compensation for running around with the skill for years!

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#256 - 2013-02-11 19:14:57 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:
Again you keep using reasoning that can be applied to removed skills too. The ones removed were rightfully removed much like prereqs were rightfully adjusted but your entire reasoning for this, them not losing what they gained applies to both. Because more people get access to it than others? But wouldn't that just be the jealousy argument on a larger scale? Or "I spent my time on those skills, I want that time back." Well, people spent the time on the mining barges too. In fact, you could apply the learning skill removable as them reducing the time to train the skills to zero. For some pilots, its similar, the training time for the skills got reduced. So what it comes down to is what the end benefit of the changes were

The advantages of learning skills were instantly negated when the skills were taken away, so in effect it is the same as taking away something that has been trained. They reimbursed what they took away.
Nobody has taken anything away from you by changing the skill prerequisites for Orcas. You still have Mining Barge 5. You can still use Mining Barge 5. In fact, you stopped needing Mining Barge 5 for the Orca the instant you injected the Industrial Command Ships skill, so changing the prerequisites for the Orca changes NOTHING for you. If you think that Mining Barge 5 is wasted because the prerequisites were changed, you should probably consider the fact that it was wasted before because you weren't using it anyway.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#257 - 2013-02-11 19:15:54 UTC
LoneEcho wrote:
Virginia Virdana wrote:
If you go and buy a car and then 2 months later you find out that the car is now 2 grand cheaper do you stand in the dealership and argue with the salesman? If you do, what do you think the response will be?

And before you come back with an arguement along the lines of "if he wants my repeat business, then he'll give me my cash back" then I'm not interested, because this has not happened in the history of people buying stuff ever. *

It is unfortunate (for some posters) that due to the changes CCP has in the pipeline, they perceive that they are getting short changed. I am sympathetic. Unfortunately, as has been pointed out, the price for an Orca before was Mining Barge V. In the future it won't be. Thats the way of it. You could fly it before. You can now. In the future new players will have a slight advantage in getting to that skill.

However you are already [insert your number of skillpoints here] ahead of of Bob the day old newb, so I think you can probably let them have that relatively small advantage.


* On the advice of my lawyer, I will caveat this. It may of happened once, but the chances of it happening are so freakishly and outstandingly remote, that it's pretty much zero.


When you buy a car, you know the price is devalued the second you drove it off the lot. That's the fact of life. As for the Orca, there are requirements that are set in stone and assume that won't change because when have ship requirements ever changed. Just another thought out there :P


Why would ever assume anything in a video game is set in stone? Tweaks happen all the time, especially in MMO's.

That is somewhat silly on your part my friend.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#258 - 2013-02-11 19:15:59 UTC
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
For playing the game ourselves


Dammit, there goes my preconception that Devs don't play this "awful" game. Twisted

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

samualvimes
Brothers At Arms
#259 - 2013-02-11 19:16:46 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
One of the reasons the skill system is good is because it requires you to make choices and deal with the sometimes unforseen consequences of those choices...

What has this got to do with anything? It is bullshit.

Some players have trained for an Orca and trained all the skills they needed for it, knowing that they do not need/want all of them, but they did it because they had no other choice if they wanted to get into this ship. They accepted the nonsense knowingly and moved on so that they can continue with their game in the way they want to play it.

These players knew back then, and before CCP did, how stupid some of the requirements were.

Now does CCP finally come to realize this for themselves and fixes this.

Why would CCP not want to give these players their points back and to allow them to redistribute these points in whatever way they see fit?

You have to be a total douche to stand here and to argue that they cannot have this. It reminds me of someone having a God complex, believing they are the only ones who figured out how wrong this, everyone else is dumb and little, and only they have the power to fix this, and not deserving any kind of compensation the have been running around with the skill for years!


Speaking as a total douche. I HAVE a toon that specced just for an Orca and I'm still not on your side. Calling it a god complex is a bit rich. I try and look at it more that I had the added bonus of having it for longer than the guys who will now rush for it. I really don't see the problem. maybe I'm just an idiot what with being a total douche and all.

If you've never tried PvP in EvE it's quite possible you've missed out on one of the greatest rushes available in modern gaming.

Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#260 - 2013-02-11 19:18:35 UTC
samualvimes wrote:
OK we're going around the same arguments again and again. There are 3 people in this thread on one side and the population of the forums-3 on the other. (slight exaggeration) I'm not saying who's right or wrong but the majority is not with you my friend.


I could go on and on about how the majority isn't always right, but then we'd start getting into a lot of volatile topics that wouldn't end well for anyone no matter how true they are.

Also Whitehound... going a liiiiittle overboard and angry, but yeah, big part of the point.