These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Space Marines are bad, mkay?

Author
Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#1 - 2013-02-10 05:30:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Sentient Blade
So as anyone who follows the industry will know, intellectual property battles are getting so ridiculous that we can expect the entire software sector to come to a grinding halt at some point in the next 5 years.

However, this one really made me facepalm. BBC is reporting that Games Workshop is actively pursuing companies who have products about "Space Marines".

That's right... Space Marines. Marines, in space.

Like Dust 514.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21380003

Cotic wrote:
The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#2 - 2013-02-10 05:38:07 UTC
Only if they pronounce it "Spess Mahreenz" like THQ did.
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2013-02-10 06:07:55 UTC
Games Workshop can take, and its IP rights, and shove them so far up their collective asses that they taste the ink.

seriosuly, i started WH40K tabletop, for 3 eyars i put up with the bulshit fo playing rokz/eldar even tried playing Tau once, but EVERY update of the codexes gave absolutely dozens of fan-**** for marines, OP army lists FOR MARINES, you could throw eldar into star wars, calll them eldar, and GW woudlnt give a ****, but use their ****-material and OHMEHGERD COPYRIGHTS.

had to stop playing 40k 6 months ago because of just getting tired with the **** games workshop puts out, it aint even sci-fi, its just space-knights versus non-space-knights and space-knights always win.



sorry aboutt her ant, but seriosuly, games workshop sucks so much.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2013-02-10 06:55:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Benny Ohu
it's a trademark, and this is how trademarks are defended

Quote:
Games Workshop is actively perusing companies


oh is it now

e: imma not be insulting, i apologise
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-02-10 07:01:48 UTC
I don't think this has anything to do with DUST, though. The contension is over the term 'space marine', not the idea of superdudes in armour. A lot of trademark claims appear riduculous on the face but defending them is a necessity to maintain a a certain image your competitors don't
Cotic
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2013-02-10 07:59:52 UTC
They don't have a trademark for the term 'Space Marine'. That's the problem.

The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#7 - 2013-02-10 08:02:42 UTC
Game Workshop are the same who chose Mythic Entertrainment to completely ruin a possibly awesome MMO.

They are also the same who deliver some of the most asinine IP bulks of papers.

Karma will really give them back one day.
Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#8 - 2013-02-10 09:01:56 UTC
Cotic wrote:
They don't have a trademark for the term 'Space Marine'. That's the problem.

The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.


Thanks for the link. I hadn't seen that one.
Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
#9 - 2013-02-10 09:18:10 UTC
Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine.
Lister Vindaloo
5 Tons of Flax
#10 - 2013-02-10 09:21:34 UTC
As an ex-GW employee I can state with a degree of certainty they will pursue this simply because they have the money, they have defended their niche at every turn, all that needs to happen is for CCP to find a reference to Space marines that predates GW's use. I would personally suggest CCP use the term space mariner, in the true nautical sense, and refer to 'space marines' as a colloquial affectation, btw astro jar heads is still copyright free. GW is litigation happy and as much as you/we don't like it there are ways to work around it. When I worked for them the very mention of a computer version of their games was anathema and discussing it with a customer was grounds for dismissal. From memory (which is old and addled) there is a reference to space marines in the Alien films, which was never pursued by GW.
TL;DR GW is throwing their weight around, another kind of smurf isn't going to affect their income....
Trdina Rasputin
Man-dingo
#11 - 2013-02-10 09:28:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Trdina Rasputin
Who was first? Aliens 2 or workshop marines?




REFERENCE :D

They are BIG part of that movie.
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#12 - 2013-02-10 09:38:27 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with DUST, though. The contension is over the term 'space marine', not the idea of superdudes in armour. A lot of trademark claims appear riduculous on the face but defending them is a necessity to maintain a a certain image your competitors don't


Space - Cannot trademarked

Marine - Cannot be trademarked

Space Marine cannot be trademarked. Not because it is two different words, or even because it is a phrase using two different words, but because it is a generic phrase. I couldn't care less if Games Workshop wants to trademark it; I very much doubt anyone is going to let them do that.

Maybe they will, but then that will mean they are incredibly lacking in foresight. Intel shouldn't even have copyright over x86 architecture imo, let alone 64 which was developed by AMD. The only reason they have both is because some short-sighted individual gave them patent rights over x86 without realizing that it was quite possibly the only way to do it effectively, and those patent rights gave them control over all products and architectures designed off of that architecture.

The fact is, x86-64 is dominant in the world market simply because it controls the software development required to create OS and applications for use on them, and companies like Microsoft produce one of the leading OS on the world market. Even Apple had to move to x86-64 architecture simply because they couldn't get any more out of the PowerPC processor with different architecture.

Some things have a very limited design architecture in order to work. CPUs are one of them. Microsoft, Linux, and MAC all function now on that architecture and limit the ability to develop a new architecture. Tablets and the like open some doors in that they use a variety of much less capable architectures that may move beyond x86-64 at some point, but currently have limited market.

The point of all that, is to provide a precedent for patent laws that conflict with technological advancement and restrict progress while creating monopolies for the holders. Space Marines is similar, though it impacts the world in a very different way.

By limiting the use of such a phrase through trademarking, you are preventing a generic term from being used descriptively in other places. Limiting creativity, as mentioned in the last part of that article.

Starship Troopers
Dust 514 - Less affected than you might think, but nevertheless it applies.
Any other content that has marines in space, or soldiers in space. Marine because space typically involves ships, which implies a navy, and thus any soldiers serving on them, or with them, must then be marines, and they are in space. Hence, Space Marines.

You can't rightfully copyright, trademark, or register as your own or belonging to a limited company a descriptive term, even if it is capitalized. Anyone who granted this would be a fool.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
ACE McFACE
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#13 - 2013-02-10 09:40:05 UTC
Silk daShocka wrote:
Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine.

More like Games Workshop pursuing the US Marines, and the Royal Marines, and any other countries' Marines.

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#14 - 2013-02-10 09:40:58 UTC
ACE McFACE wrote:
Silk daShocka wrote:
Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine.

More like Games Workshop pursuing the US Marine, and the Royal Marines, and any other countries Marines.


Don't forget outboard motors; they use it too. Lol
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2013-02-10 09:41:00 UTC
Lister Vindaloo wrote:
As an ex-GW employee I can state with a degree of certainty they will pursue this simply because they have the money, they have defended their niche at every turn, all that needs to happen is for CCP to find a reference to Space marines that predates GW's use. I would personally suggest CCP use the term space mariner, in the true nautical sense, and refer to 'space marines' as a colloquial affectation, btw astro jar heads is still copyright free. GW is litigation happy and as much as you/we don't like it there are ways to work around it. When I worked for them the very mention of a computer version of their games was anathema and discussing it with a customer was grounds for dismissal. From memory (which is old and addled) there is a reference to space marines in the Alien films, which was never pursued by GW.
TL;DR GW is throwing their weight around, another kind of smurf isn't going to affect their income....

it's a trademark, not a copyright, whoever used it first doesn't matter as much as who's using it now. games workshop wasn't making movies at the time of alien iirc and space marines are hardly the selling point of the film

trademarks are defended in courts, that's how it goes. let someone else use your trademark for long enough and you're letting go of it, it becomes theirs vOv

dust has no mention of 'space marines' in it so this has nothing to do with dust
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2013-02-10 09:45:15 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
Space Marine cannot be trademarked. Not because it is two different words, or even because it is a phrase using two different words, but because it is a generic phrase. I couldn't care less if Games Workshop wants to trademark it; I very much doubt anyone is going to let them do that.

they, uh, already have a registered trademark, i think

they're pursuing an unregistered trademark (ie in digital books) now from what i can tell?

and i don't think they're going after the concept of space marines (marines in space), that's undefendable, just the phrasing
Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
#17 - 2013-02-10 09:46:54 UTC
Trdina Rasputin wrote:
Who was first? Aliens 2 or workshop marines?




REFERENCE :D

They are BIG part of that movie.


Aliens 1 was first if i'm not mistaken, in 1986. Space marines has been used in literature since the 30s however, so Games workshop is being rather silly on this matter really.

BTW the person who GW made the trademark claim against, has had her e-book returned to the amazon.com collection.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-02-10 09:50:47 UTC
Silk daShocka wrote:
BTW the person who GW made the trademark claim against, has had her e-book returned to the amazon.com collection.

i agree with those who say companies like amazon and apple and google are too quick to comply with takedown requests and all that, it's not fair that just a polite email to some office can have someone's work ruined :(
Dheeradj Nurgle
Hoover Inc.
Snuffed Out
#19 - 2013-02-10 10:01:36 UTC
This thread is missing a lot of Boreale!
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#20 - 2013-02-10 10:01:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
Sentient Blade wrote:

However, this one really made me facepalm. BBC is reporting that Games Workshop is actively pursuing companies who have products about "Space Marines".

That's right... Space Marines. Marines, in space.

Like Dust 514.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21380003

Cotic wrote:
The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.



They are acting like typical 'Interlectual Property Trolls', pushing around little guys.

However the EFF just got in their face.
123Next page