Market Discussions

..Ok awesome.

So here for the record. You have just said that any future production IPO will not be in the method that you outlined in your OP.

As the only contested point is the lack of locking down the BPOs for collateral. I, as well as many other investors, would fill such a bond without any other information.

Let me clear. No other point matters in an IPO like this.

So here for the record, will you, Saveritrader, agree that the next production IPO you release will be fully collateralized via locked down BPO's?

..Awesome. Hear it now, Saveritrader has stated any future production IPO's will be 100% secure. Thank you Sav.

That's bollocks, the API is still up to date and is set to non-expire. Ask shar'ra to forward you the mail and check for yourself.

* I also forwarded you the same mail. As you don't trust me, feel free to compare it with shar'ra and check the api for yourself.


You're bad at accusing people.

..I did get the mail that Sav posted about. It looks like I am wrong about the API in question. I still hold firm on all of my other speculations and statements.

So, it's that time of the year, when you resub, create the upteenth "Pepridge" alt and make MD look like CAOD or GD.

Before I deal with you like I have done with the Pepridges of the past years, I'd like to point out that:

1) I don't know nor particularly care about the OP, he's one of the 2-3 guys who daily contact me about investing in them, asking for audits and whatever.

2) I don't have the time neither to audit him nor to invest in him (and in anyone else) due to my known RL current stuff. The only point where I am not totally "neutral" is that I feel for him going in the slaugtherhouse and not to be scrutinized but to be trolled = useless = I hoped other guys would have posted. A Bad Bobby or similar other informed player would have done wonders. Because in my never ending pledge to help people improve themselves, those informed players can teach others a LOT. And no, I am not telling about teaching them to scam, but how to deal with situations and how to be "ready" to deal with all forms of inquires.

3) This is a special kind of "audit" I have put him in: the test of MD vs an IPO. If he does not get mad in the least secured kind of public investment (ISK request upfront, possibly share rewards after months) then he'll be at least prepared for the next round.

4) Your (nor a portion of Syd) posts are not useful, because the real MD "investigators" are guys like Estel Arador and MMe Pinkerton / Vera / I keep forgetting the names (:pulls hairs:). The former is possibly the guy who most posted against me at every possible opportunity, but he *researched* his stuff first, he made logic rebuttals, he did some detective work. I'd have given him a 80 / 100 quality. MMe is even better, because he really does an awesome data drilling job while posting better and more constructively than me, if there was an auditor to take my place I'd vote him for sure.

Syd seems still at the "early days", a bit more work on getting factual evidence (the nastiest one to slam in a pretend-investor face, believe me!) and s/he is set.
Pepridge instead, is good for "giggles" for those who like his humor but not *useful* to an investment. And as he seem to never change, evidently he does not want to "evolve" into either an investor or a value MD partecipant.

..Thanks for the advice Vaerah. I pretty much agree with your statements. I do like to season my posts with a healthy dash of instigation!

My goal is to find any skeletons in the closet via a swat team, rather then shinig a flashlight on them.

At any rate, your opinion has value to me.

As for pepperidge, if my memory serves me, any unsecured audit that Vaerah has performed as resulted in these select outcomes:

IPO issuer does/does not have the required skills/assets/experience/ track record to complete said IPO.

As far as I remember, the best summery from Vaerah for an unsecured loan has been - highly risky investment due to the nature of unsecured loans.

Not an ounce of selling out there.

- The POS is to profit of the 0.75% time multiplier assembly arrays offer. Logistically I will be able to manage it.

- I will be mostly producing T1, yet T2 is something I will be working towards

- I will also be providing the ships for my alliance. For the rest I will sell it on the market as it currently stands.

- I will most likely sell most in jita, while other trade hubs are a possibility as I do run a freighter around.

- In times of war the POS will be without any valuables and loaded with guns! If it goes down, the valuable stuff will be sitting in the station where I will resume production, just a bit slower.

You're wrong about mostly everything in this thread.
May I suggest you going to C&P and creating a post there will all your accusations towards me and explaining your role of MD detective and how you think things will turn out for everyone doing business with me.
I think opinions of people may turn out to be useful and they might even suggest you to fit Raven differently

EDIT: Oh and I'm out of here. I guess this thread served its purpose. Theory-crafting and stuff just ain't my thing.

This would be a T1 production IPO, yet I will be training my alt to do everything regarding production so I don't exclude T2 in the future. My alliance will be given slight discount, yet the consumption is little to disregardable in all fairness.

Regarding the POS; yes, getting it down would be a much better idea. But that depends wether I will have enough time on the day itself. The POS will however never contain any more than is being produced at any given moment, so there isn't anything to gain from a wardec.

..I'll own up to shar'ra matcevsovski's post.

I didn't want to out shar'ra for giving me Sav's API. So I took that API and ran it, and it said that it was not active.

Another poster stated it was active, so I'm assuming the fault and error is mine on the part of looki g up that API.

So that one is on me.

But even still, I stand by all of my speculation and statements. I'm also glad hat I got Sav to agree on a fully secured future production IPO.