These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mining conundrums.

Author
Tallis Lindisere
Farne Corp
#1 - 2013-02-02 22:07:52 UTC
I was doing a bit of mining today and before you say anything it was better than watching paint dry :-) But I did have my reasons. Watching some of the other folk out there, two connected, sort of, questions came up.....


1. Why would you solo mine in a Hulk. I was watching a character do it earlier, yes they were probably getting way more ore than me (I was in a barge) but it actually got painful watching them leaving the belt to unload every few seconds (exaggeration for effect) At one point I nearly shouted in Local buy a Mac and stop annoying me with your constant coming and going.

Ok so I am too lazy to to work it out, but is there that big a diff in yield between the Hulk and Mac to make it economical to run a hulk like that as opposed to jumping in a Mac ? Everything I have read since the expansion says you're better off soloing in a mac. Just in case anyone asks, the char had been in game 5 years.


2. Bit later I was watching a character and an alt (you could tell by the names, which is a whole other topic about not disguising your alts) Here's the thing, sort of leading on from the first question, they were using two macs to mine. Now is the difference in yield between the Mac and Hulk so low as to make it better to mine with a combo of Mac/Mac rather than Hulk/Mac. I would have thought, if you're going to mine with an alt, the second combo was better, the hulks better yield complimenting the Macs storage.

This is just curiosity as I have no desire to move up to Exhumers.
Azrin Stella Oerndotte
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-02-02 22:13:09 UTC
1. Less warp time more time in belt.

2. Gonna guess and say that using mac's unless you got an orca is gonna be better unless you get into high enough numbers, at which point should should have an orca and be using hulks, also no can.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#3 - 2013-02-02 22:18:06 UTC
1. The character will have had the Hulk already & may have felt that the difference in yield wasn't worth buying a mack for. They may have also timed their travel numbers and decided they actually made more isk in a Hulk. A Mack is just much simpler to manage than a hulk, you have to actually time your warps to know how much isk difference it really is. Since it will be different for every belt in a system.

2. Yes, a Hulk/Mack is better, but see above regarding simplicity. Hulk/Mack = more effort than Mack/Mack, and not much more reward.
Whitehound
#4 - 2013-02-02 22:18:55 UTC
After the change did the Hulks not disappear, but they are all docked up. So if you see someone mine in a Hulk then that is because he does not have a Mackinaw, does not want to buy one or lost one recently.

A Hulk is only useful when you have an Orca around or some other means to unload the ore and not having to dock. It is now a ship fully dedicated to fleet mining.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-02-02 22:20:12 UTC
old habits like "hulk #1" die hard I guess
Luna Moonraker
LUNA-CORP
#6 - 2013-02-02 22:34:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Luna Moonraker
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
old habits like "hulk #1" die hard I guess

This. Old habits die hard and some people never do read the blogs.

It could also be the only exhumer he has, used in mining ops normally but just running some solo time.

The Mackinaw is clearly the better solo choice now which is reflected in the numbers in use, especially for Ice harvesting but also for ore mining. Hulks are quite a rarity now as noted.

It also makes more sense safety wise, with the Hulk still solo gankable in a Catalyst if not tanked properly.

Lastly, if you have multiple alts, especially with a max Orca boost it gets pretty hectic to keep on top of the Hulk ore hold capacity limitation switching between them and any strip miners going off line or slow switchign to the next doid can soon outway the superior mining rate of the Hulk over a set of Macknaws. Not forgetting the time and attention to local/ dscan and safety.

In the end time spent travelling between belt and station is wasted time. if you have max Mining skills then you will fill a Hulk up fast and make 12-13 trips per hour emptying it to station (without Orca boost). Allow 2 minutes (optimistically) per round trip this adds up to over a third of your time not mining.

As to 2. you kind of argue against yourself. Why would you use a Hulk given the above? The Mackinaw may have a larger ore capacity but unless you jet can and the take ore from that to the Mackinaw ore hold you can't put it directly in from the Hulk. The Mack will fill up faster and require more trips = reduced time mining and having to move ore around just makes it less efficient.

The extra ore mined by the Hulk just doesn't make up for the lost time and hassle.

The Hulk remains supreme by some margin when it comes to Orca boosted mining fleet operations though. And with the use of EFC there are more options for static mining them haul.

Working it out is not so hard. All the figures were set out in the Mining Barges Update blog, so just remove the Orca bonus and you have your answer.
Dave Stark
#7 - 2013-02-02 22:57:15 UTC
they were both ********

situation 1 should have been using a mack.
situation 2 should have been using mack/hulk, atlhough generally mack/mack is fine if you're concerned about can flippers.
Dave Stark
#8 - 2013-02-02 23:02:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
Luna Moonraker wrote:
The Hulk remains supreme by some margin when it comes to Orca boosted mining fleet operations though.


~15% or so.

when you consider a flight of mining drones is roughly a ~11.5% increase in yield for a max skilled/boosted hulk bonus...

not really reigning supreme. a large group of mining ships will attract attention, i'd rather have the extra tank of the mack for such a small yield bonus especially when it has the added bonus of letting me be a lazy bastard.

edit: woopsy was calculating without like for like implants.
on second thoughts, slightly bigger difference than i thought, but meh laziness and ehp still tips it in favour of the mackinaw for doing everything.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-02-02 23:03:25 UTC
I think the numbers are...

2 Macks beat one hulk and a orca

To be most efficient you need 3 hulks and one orca.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

MadMuppet
Critical Mass Inc
#10 - 2013-02-02 23:10:54 UTC
I still use a Hulk because, as other have mentioned, I had one before the change over. When mining in high-sec I often am stuck with pebbles that only take a partial cycle to pick up. I am very much 'at the keyboard' when I am doing this, and the Hulk is actually very effective at this. If I was going large asteroid mining where I could walk away for six to nine minutes knowing things would be fine I would use a 'smaller' barge.

Then again, I really only mine for ammo,while watching crap on Netflix, or I'm too drunk to fish in WoW.

As for using two mining ships, unless the math has changed dramatically, until you get three players, it is still better to use two mining ships to haul to a station than one hauler and one mining ship (even with the bonus from an Orca).

This message brought to you by Experience(tm). When common sense fails you, experience will come to the rescue. Experience(tm) from the makers of CONCORD.

"If you are part of the problem, you will be nerfed." -MadMuppet

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#11 - 2013-02-03 00:39:34 UTC
Don't mine illegally! Buy a permit!

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-02-03 01:11:30 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Don't mine illegally! Buy a permit!


lol ........



almost amusing, but only almost.
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
#13 - 2013-02-03 02:14:11 UTC
I trained for a Hulk, I'm mining in a Hulk. I didn't train for a Mack, I trained for a Hulk, I didn't train for a Skiff, I trained for a Hulk.

It isn't my fault that Mama CCP is letting the whiny miners hide behind her skirt. She raised me right, gave me the tools I needed to take care of myself, I'm not going to run home to mama for help cause she said I could, I'm going to prove to her that she raised me right.

Hulk > All other Barges/Exhumers

Though I will state this, the Venture is one fast ass, fun little ship to tool around in.
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-02-03 04:01:50 UTC
My mining fleet does a lot of this sort of thing. Corroborating the above:

a single hulk ferrying every time upon maxxing cargo is really stupid as far as limiting yield.

The old format still holds true as far as I know: two hulks and an Orca with a maxxed pilot is better than 3 hulks. Same is true if using Macks. But Hulks NEED the Orca because their cargo hold will fill in like one cycle...
androch
LitlCorp
#15 - 2013-02-03 12:05:26 UTC
MadMuppet wrote:


Then again, I really only mine for ammo,while watching crap on Netflix, or I'm too drunk to fish in WoW.

.

this made me laugh