These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Whats the worst thing that could happen if everyone was blue to each other?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Kalle Demos
Ironic Corp Name
#1 - 2013-01-19 21:58:02 UTC
Read before whining.

I was thinking about it for a few mins and well is it really a bad thing? It makes sense in a way, just imagine it for a second, everyone friends, instead of talking about who you are going to kill next, you are instead laughing at pics and articles. PvP can be about attacking rats instead of players, RP will grow like this as you can easily compare it to real life.

I think EVE will get more popular and become a lot more entertaining if we all agreed to stop shooting each other either through actual NAPs or verbal agreements.

Its a shame this will never happen :'(

Now you may whine,..
Google Voices
Doomheim
#2 - 2013-01-19 22:01:07 UTC
IBTL and In before the flames of retardation burn this thread....Shocked




"Fozzie could not comment on when this issue would be resolved and stated that “one day Veritas will come up to me and say ‘hey I fixed off-grid boosting’”, but he had no idea on a potential timeframe for this sort of miracle."
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#3 - 2013-01-19 22:04:28 UTC
Kalle Demos wrote:
Read before whining.

I was thinking about it for a few mins and well is it really a bad thing? It makes sense in a way, just imagine it for a second, everyone friends, instead of talking about who you are going to kill next, you are instead laughing at pics and articles. PvP can be about attacking rats instead of players, RP will grow like this as you can easily compare it to real life.

I think EVE will get more popular and become a lot more entertaining if we all agreed to stop shooting each other either through actual NAPs or verbal agreements.

Its a shame this will never happen :'(

Now you may whine,..

Just wait a while, we need to finish blueing all of null and we can see how it goes.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Kalle Demos
Ironic Corp Name
#4 - 2013-01-19 22:04:30 UTC
Google Voices wrote:
IBTL and In before the flames of retardation burn this thread....Shocked






Its a perfectly valid question, im sorry you cant see that guy playing girl on alt
Romvex
TURN LEFT
#5 - 2013-01-19 22:17:35 UTC
Eve would not be dying, but dead.
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#6 - 2013-01-19 22:19:22 UTC
I'd be gone, and so would my subscriptions moneys.

Oh, and IB4L.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#7 - 2013-01-19 22:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Kalle Demos wrote:
I was thinking about it for a few mins and well is it really a bad thing?
1. No more massive ship losses, which leads to…
2. Complete collapse in demand for ships and modules, which leads to…
3. Complete collapse of industry, which leads to…
4. Complete collapse of the economy, which leads to…
5. No more reason to do anything in the game, which leads to…
6. Everyone leaves, which leads to…
7. The end.

Yes, it would be a bad thing.

The entire game revolves around a war economy where the broken window fallacy is not a fallacy but the core driving factor. Removing the war and the broken windows would not have even a single good consequence.
Mister S Burke
Doomheim
#8 - 2013-01-19 22:32:42 UTC
Romvex wrote:
Eve would not be dying, but dead.


Nah, the majority of people don't play games anymore to be jerkwads with anger issues. In the future people will talk to each other like normal in game or out as many do now. I think the die hard wannabe Machiavellians are a vocal minority. I see people acting like fruitcakes just because they are online and I think "people still live like that?"
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2013-01-19 22:39:32 UTC
Mister S Burke wrote:
Romvex wrote:
Eve would not be dying, but dead.


Nah, the majority of people don't play games anymore to be jerkwads with anger issues. In the future people will talk to each other like normal in game or out as many do now. I think the die hard wannabe Machiavellians are a vocal minority. I see people acting like fruitcakes just because they are online and I think "people still live like that?"

A life so far away from a natural form of living, we'll go extinct.

No thanks.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#10 - 2013-01-19 22:45:42 UTC
Kalle Demos wrote:
PvP can be about attacking rats instead of players


Uh... You don't seem to be familiar with what the term means.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#11 - 2013-01-19 22:48:26 UTC
Mister S Burke wrote:
Romvex wrote:
Eve would not be dying, but dead.


Nah, the majority of people don't play games anymore to be jerkwads with anger issues. In the future people will talk to each other like normal in game or out as many do now. I think the die hard wannabe Machiavellians are a vocal minority. I see people acting like fruitcakes just because they are online and I think "people still live like that?"


Fun fact:

Miners and mission runners are the most likely to fill local with endless rage, death threats and yo mamma insults.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2013-01-19 22:48:43 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Just wait a while, we need to finish blueing all of null and we can see how it goes.

You should probably not have reset us then, if that's your goal. Blink

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2013-01-19 22:49:53 UTC
Kalle Demos wrote:
Read before whining.

I was thinking about it for a few mins and well is it really a bad thing? It makes sense in a way, just imagine it for a second, everyone friends, instead of talking about who you are going to kill next, you are instead laughing at pics and articles. PvP can be about attacking rats instead of players, RP will grow like this as you can easily compare it to real life.

I think EVE will get more popular and become a lot more entertaining if we all agreed to stop shooting each other either through actual NAPs or verbal agreements.

Its a shame this will never happen :'(

Now you may whine,..


Are you stoned?

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP
Fanatic Row
Neo T.E.C.H.
#14 - 2013-01-19 22:52:29 UTC
Kalle Demos wrote:
Read before whining.
Sorry, no.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#15 - 2013-01-19 22:56:43 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Just wait a while, we need to finish blueing all of null and we can see how it goes.

You should probably not have reset us then, if that's your goal. Blink


I think they were concerned about you burning them if they held you too close.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Mister S Burke
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-01-19 22:56:51 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:

A life so far away from a natural form of living, we'll go extinct.

No thanks.


Yeah sure man, I'm sure you leave an expletive laced trail of death and destruction every time someone looks at you funny at the mall.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2013-01-19 23:01:14 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Just wait a while, we need to finish blueing all of null and we can see how it goes.

You should probably not have reset us then, if that's your goal. Blink


I think they were concerned about you burning them if they held you too close.

We started to and then they got a little scared and panicked.
But it's all good now.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#18 - 2013-01-19 23:12:05 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

I think they were concerned about you burning them if they held you too close.

We started to and then they got a little scared and panicked.
But it's all good now.


You missed it.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#19 - 2013-01-19 23:18:59 UTC
Kalle Demos wrote:
Read before whining.

I was thinking about it for a few mins and well is it really a bad thing? It makes sense in a way, just imagine it for a second, everyone friends, instead of talking about who you are going to kill next, you are instead laughing at pics and articles. PvP can be about attacking rats instead of players, RP will grow like this as you can easily compare it to real life.

I think EVE will get more popular and become a lot more entertaining if we all agreed to stop shooting each other either through actual NAPs or verbal agreements.

Its a shame this will never happen :'(

Now you may whine,..



I name this day AWOX DAY

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2013-01-19 23:31:03 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

I think they were concerned about you burning them if they held you too close.

We started to and then they got a little scared and panicked.
But it's all good now.


You missed it.

Yeah, that one was a little too subtle for me.
All the same I had a chuckle when you pointed it out.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
123Next pageLast page