These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Null is Broken, Hisec working as intended.

First post
Author
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#201 - 2012-12-28 05:33:40 UTC
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
You and most hi-seccers seem to think sov null is just Turn up, Plant flag, Collect free Technetium & Anomalies. . You're missing the titanic amount of ISK (amd effort) that's required to gain, control, upgrade and maintain space. And that's not even including what it costs to fight for it. Just to claim it costs many billions per region, and then more billions per month to keep it.


Oh no, there is dookey in your end of the sandbox! Shall you hold your nose and scoop it out, or just go and poop on the other side to make it match? Decisions, decisions. Oh wait, we're dealing with the vast web of insecurities & egomania of modern internet culture, so the answer is obvious: More poop for everyone.

"There is no such thing as justice. There is only the desire to see the pain spread around equally."
- Solomon Short



There is a lot of truth here, jealousy can get the better of people, so instead of doing something about improving their own circumstance, some just want every one to share their problems, that doesn't bode well for progress in Eve.

Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#202 - 2012-12-28 05:46:45 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Yeah, let's respond to sensible arguments with childishness and irrelevant quotes!


The quote was quite relevant, as it was a clear indication of the psychological dysfunction of the common whining nullbear. Childishness is simply my way of lowering the bar of conversation down to their own level of intellect for greater ease of comprehension. Did you enjoy it, or should I go back to being superciliously brusque?

Your little argument boiled down to "nullsec sucks, don't nerf highsec, just buff nullsec instead" which ignores how that's not actually possible without breaking the game completely.

Don't think we want to make highsec suck for industry as a means of balance in itself. Highsec needs to be nerfed, but it doesn't need to suck. Not only that, but if we were to nerf highsec without buffing anywhere else that would hurt nullsec alliances as well because currently highsec is where most of our ships and modules are built.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

DSpite Culhach
#203 - 2012-12-28 06:07:00 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
You see, there is a point where accusations of entitlement lose their bite. For me it's somewhere around the place where not liking a proposal which is designed to introduce bad gameplay for an area you don't like is "entitlement." You see a need for greater income disparity between sec statuses? Fine, really does make sense. Seriously. Want to turn an area of the game into a punishment? Not so much. Do you have an actual argument as to why it's a good thing or is that just an old fallback?

Why should you get the best stuff for free?

How would greater income disparity in trade be for free?

I'm referring to the fact that you can get 100% refining in highsec for nothing other than doing some missions and training a few skills, not to mention you have TONS more manufacturing slots.

It's only fair that you'd have to pay something to use such services.


If you make it harder for people in hisec, you wont get more people moving to low/null, you will just see people roam less in low/null because it takes them longer to make ships. If it was EASIER to make isk and stuff in hisec, I'd be roaming around looking for fights all the time, lose said ships, rinse and repeat.

I apparently have no idea what I'm doing.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#204 - 2012-12-28 06:07:56 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Yeah, let's respond to sensible arguments with childishness and irrelevant quotes!


The quote was quite relevant, as it was a clear indication of the psychological dysfunction of the common whining nullbear. Childishness is simply my way of lowering the bar of conversation down to their own level of intellect for greater ease of comprehension. Did you enjoy it, or should I go back to being superciliously brusque?

Your little argument boiled down to "nullsec sucks, don't nerf highsec, just buff nullsec instead" which ignores how that's not actually possible without breaking the game completely.

Don't think we want to make highsec suck for industry as a means of balance in itself. Highsec needs to be nerfed, but it doesn't need to suck. Not only that, but if we were to nerf highsec without buffing anywhere else that would hurt nullsec alliances as well because currently highsec is where most of our ships and modules are built.

You musn't take away even 1% of their refining in highsec.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#205 - 2012-12-28 06:08:58 UTC
It can't be better than perfect. Sorry. I don't know how many times I need to say it before you'll understand.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#206 - 2012-12-28 06:11:24 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
It can't be better than perfect. Sorry. I don't know how many times I need to say it before you'll understand.

This is general discussion, you'd need a lot more than just a few dozen,.. hundred of posts.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#207 - 2012-12-28 06:13:03 UTC
DSpite Culhach wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
You see, there is a point where accusations of entitlement lose their bite. For me it's somewhere around the place where not liking a proposal which is designed to introduce bad gameplay for an area you don't like is "entitlement." You see a need for greater income disparity between sec statuses? Fine, really does make sense. Seriously. Want to turn an area of the game into a punishment? Not so much. Do you have an actual argument as to why it's a good thing or is that just an old fallback?

Why should you get the best stuff for free?

How would greater income disparity in trade be for free?

I'm referring to the fact that you can get 100% refining in highsec for nothing other than doing some missions and training a few skills, not to mention you have TONS more manufacturing slots.

It's only fair that you'd have to pay something to use such services.


If you make it harder for people in hisec, you wont get more people moving to low/null, you will just see people roam less in low/null because it takes them longer to make ships. If it was EASIER to make isk and stuff in hisec, I'd be roaming around looking for fights all the time, lose said ships, rinse and repeat.



I agree with this, atm prices are stable, economy going along nicely, nerf hisec and even pirates will start thinking twice before they try to fight with a standard frigate that cost 40 million in jita.

Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#208 - 2012-12-28 06:15:48 UTC
EI Digin wrote:
RAGE QU1T wrote:
Confirming, no one likes EMO raging FC's spamming alliance crying for more Logi's, furthermore people are tired of CTA online

So don't join an alliance that demands you to play on their terms?

Actually I think we finally got our scimitar fleet participation giveaway system working. Someone has already been awarded the first payout.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#209 - 2012-12-28 06:17:00 UTC
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
You and most hi-seccers seem to think sov null is just Turn up, Plant flag, Collect free Technetium & Anomalies. . You're missing the titanic amount of ISK (amd effort) that's required to gain, control, upgrade and maintain space. And that's not even including what it costs to fight for it. Just to claim it costs many billions per region, and then more billions per month to keep it.


Oh no, there is dookey in your end of the sandbox! Shall you hold your nose and scoop it out, or just go and poop on the other side to make it match? Decisions, decisions. Oh wait, we're dealing with the vast web of insecurities & egomania of modern internet culture, so the answer is obvious: More poop for everyone.

"There is no such thing as justice. There is only the desire to see the pain spread around equally."
- Solomon Short


You like quotes? Here's a quote for you:

"Winter is coming"

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#210 - 2012-12-28 06:19:17 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
EI Digin wrote:
RAGE QU1T wrote:
Confirming, no one likes EMO raging FC's spamming alliance crying for more Logi's, furthermore people are tired of CTA online

So don't join an alliance that demands you to play on their terms?

Actually I think we finally got our scimitar fleet participation giveaway system working. Someone has already been awarded the first payout.

Scimitar fleet?
Is this a fleet where you just swarm everybody with light combat drones and RR the **** out of everybody?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#211 - 2012-12-28 06:19:31 UTC
DSpite Culhach wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
You see, there is a point where accusations of entitlement lose their bite. For me it's somewhere around the place where not liking a proposal which is designed to introduce bad gameplay for an area you don't like is "entitlement." You see a need for greater income disparity between sec statuses? Fine, really does make sense. Seriously. Want to turn an area of the game into a punishment? Not so much. Do you have an actual argument as to why it's a good thing or is that just an old fallback?

Why should you get the best stuff for free?

How would greater income disparity in trade be for free?

I'm referring to the fact that you can get 100% refining in highsec for nothing other than doing some missions and training a few skills, not to mention you have TONS more manufacturing slots.

It's only fair that you'd have to pay something to use such services.


If you make it harder for people in hisec, you wont get more people moving to low/null


Actually, yes we will. If hi-sec becomes less profitable for nullsec for industry, invention, missioning, or whatever, then the tens of thousands of null-sec owned alts that operate in hi-sec will repatriate to 0.0 as fast as you can say "ISK/hr".

Or maybe you think we will keep them there even though it makes no sense to? Why do you think we'll do that?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#212 - 2012-12-28 06:21:06 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Yeah, let's respond to sensible arguments with childishness and irrelevant quotes!


The quote was quite relevant, as it was a clear indication of the psychological dysfunction of the common whining nullbear. Childishness is simply my way of lowering the bar of conversation down to their own level of intellect for greater ease of comprehension. Did you enjoy it, or should I go back to being superciliously brusque?

Your little argument boiled down to "nullsec sucks, don't nerf highsec, just buff nullsec instead" which ignores how that's not actually possible without breaking the game completely.

Don't think we want to make highsec suck for industry as a means of balance in itself. Highsec needs to be nerfed, but it doesn't need to suck. Not only that, but if we were to nerf highsec without buffing anywhere else that would hurt nullsec alliances as well because currently highsec is where most of our ships and modules are built.

You musn't take away even 1% of their refining in highsec.


The answer is obviously to make nullsec refineries 111% efficient

And then increase all blueprint mineral requirements by 10%

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#213 - 2012-12-28 06:23:54 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Yeah, let's respond to sensible arguments with childishness and irrelevant quotes!


The quote was quite relevant, as it was a clear indication of the psychological dysfunction of the common whining nullbear. Childishness is simply my way of lowering the bar of conversation down to their own level of intellect for greater ease of comprehension. Did you enjoy it, or should I go back to being superciliously brusque?

Your little argument boiled down to "nullsec sucks, don't nerf highsec, just buff nullsec instead" which ignores how that's not actually possible without breaking the game completely.

Don't think we want to make highsec suck for industry as a means of balance in itself. Highsec needs to be nerfed, but it doesn't need to suck. Not only that, but if we were to nerf highsec without buffing anywhere else that would hurt nullsec alliances as well because currently highsec is where most of our ships and modules are built.

You musn't take away even 1% of their refining in highsec.


The answer is obviously to make nullsec refineries 111% efficient

And then increase all blueprint mineral requirements by 10%

Heh heh heh.

Another round of production speculation changes, eh. By the way, want to buy some T1 cruisers?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#214 - 2012-12-28 06:36:04 UTC
Yes please, 5 caracals & 5 moas to V-3 please.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#215 - 2012-12-28 06:59:49 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


Actually, yes we will. If hi-sec becomes less profitable for nullsec for industry, invention, missioning, or whatever, then the tens of thousands of null-sec owned alts that operate in hi-sec will repatriate to 0.0 as fast as you can say "ISK/hr".

Or maybe you think we will keep them there even though it makes no sense to? Why do you think we'll do that?




No theyll just unsub.



Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#216 - 2012-12-28 07:00:42 UTC
Peter Raptor wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


Actually, yes we will. If hi-sec becomes less profitable for nullsec for industry, invention, missioning, or whatever, then the tens of thousands of null-sec owned alts that operate in hi-sec will repatriate to 0.0 as fast as you can say "ISK/hr".

Or maybe you think we will keep them there even though it makes no sense to? Why do you think we'll do that?




No theyll just unsub.




Prove it.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#217 - 2012-12-28 07:04:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Peter Raptor
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Peter Raptor wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


Actually, yes we will. If hi-sec becomes less profitable for nullsec for industry, invention, missioning, or whatever, then the tens of thousands of null-sec owned alts that operate in hi-sec will repatriate to 0.0 as fast as you can say "ISK/hr".

Or maybe you think we will keep them there even though it makes no sense to? Why do you think we'll do that?




No theyll just unsub.




Prove it.


As shown in my opening post, Hulkaggeddon tried to get everybody into null in an indirect way, ccp was losing so many subs they Buffed Mining Barges, Unheard of in the History of this game, to Buff Mining Barges so quickly .

Oh and inflation was getting outta hand too, we had so many whining posts about that, all stable now, thx to hiseccers mostly, mess with them and pvp wont be happening much, cos even your shuttle will cost 20 mil

Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#218 - 2012-12-28 07:08:33 UTC
Peter Raptor wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Peter Raptor wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


Actually, yes we will. If hi-sec becomes less profitable for nullsec for industry, invention, missioning, or whatever, then the tens of thousands of null-sec owned alts that operate in hi-sec will repatriate to 0.0 as fast as you can say "ISK/hr".

Or maybe you think we will keep them there even though it makes no sense to? Why do you think we'll do that?




No theyll just unsub.




Prove it.


As shown in my opening post, Hulkaggeddon tried to get everybody into null in an indirect way, ccp was losing so many subs they Buffed Mining Barges, Unheard of in the History of this game, to Buff Mining Barges so quickly .
Oh and inflation was getting outta hand too, we had so many whining posts about that, all stable now, thx to hiseccers mostly, mess with them and pvp wont be happening much, cos even your shuttle will cost 20 mil

Um... what

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

DSpite Culhach
#219 - 2012-12-28 07:28:30 UTC
What confuses me sometimes is trying to figure out what people actually want.

* If you want people to roam low/null looking for stuff, you have to at least make the entry safer. Hunt them all you like after they are in there, but don't force players to enter the system in a way so predictable (name shows up, flashing gate) that basically yells out "shoot me, I'm RIGHT HERE".

* If you think hisec is too safe, well gee, that's the damn idea of any civilized society. We already pay taxes to the NPC corps, if you must, add a CONCORD subcharge and call it the cost of police protection. If you were to nerf hisec so bad as to make people unhappy, you'd just get alliances charging for even more services to undercut hisec. Test already charges billion isk monthly fees in rent for whole systems because they know players can make more then that easily by ratting and anoms.

* If you want more balanced ship pew pew, then I think you're out of luck, because given the choice, no player wants to be on the losing side, so hunting your lone ass down with 20 ships is not called overkill, its called efficiency.

What I am getting at, is that I keep reading "let's nerf this or boost that" but I never see any arguments other then "its too easy" or "it's too hard".

* If it's too easy, you should be doing it too, not complaining.

* If it's too hard, get help in a Corp, or read spoilers on how to do it, cause I guarantee you that if anything in EVE was actually REALLY BAD, you'd hear real screaming, not just see annoyed posts in the forums, you'd get Burn Jita and Monoclegate level events.

I apparently have no idea what I'm doing.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#220 - 2012-12-28 07:41:21 UTC
Peter Raptor wrote:
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
You and most hi-seccers seem to think sov null is just Turn up, Plant flag, Collect free Technetium & Anomalies. . You're missing the titanic amount of ISK (amd effort) that's required to gain, control, upgrade and maintain space. And that's not even including what it costs to fight for it. Just to claim it costs many billions per region, and then more billions per month to keep it.


Oh no, there is dookey in your end of the sandbox! Shall you hold your nose and scoop it out, or just go and poop on the other side to make it match? Decisions, decisions. Oh wait, we're dealing with the vast web of insecurities & egomania of modern internet culture, so the answer is obvious: More poop for everyone.

"There is no such thing as justice. There is only the desire to see the pain spread around equally."
- Solomon Short



There is a lot of truth here, jealousy can get the better of people, so instead of doing something about improving their own circumstance, some just want every one to share their problems, that doesn't bode well for progress in Eve.


Yeah we're asking to share the "problem" of viable industry

man how mean spirited and selfish can we get?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016