These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

To CCP: If OGB is being removed Is there going to be a SP refund?

Author
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#221 - 2012-12-13 14:25:56 UTC
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:
Why do people think rorquals are in trouble? The dev blog said "warfare links" it did not mention "mining foreman links".

Given that the rorq only gets a bonus to mining foreman links, the code must be there to diffetentiate the various links. Couldn't this change truly impact only the warfare links, leaving mining foreman ones alone?

Or am I too optimistic.


Given CCP's track record of royally screwing things up unintentionally, you might be overly optimistic, but we can always hope, I suppose.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

thecunning mrfox
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#222 - 2012-12-13 14:36:27 UTC
hopefully this is finally being sorted out. I can't recall the number of L337 solo PvP videos I have watched, crowing about how their flying tactics are open to anyone, how easy "solo PvP" is etc, only to see Fleet (2+) and somehow the domi taking on 6 guys. spoils the whole thing. good riddance to bad mechanics. if you boost from a POS shame on you.
Ong
Lumberjack Commandos
#223 - 2012-12-13 14:41:43 UTC
Ekscalybur wrote:

5 against 30, and you are seriously suggesting their should be a means by which you don't get absolutely steamrolled. A means that isn't even anywhere near you?

6:1 odds (sorry, you and 4 others against thirty is a bit more than just 4:1 odds) should equal obliteration for the smaller group, pilot skill notwithstanding. You said it yourself,




And here is a prime example of what is wrong with allot of people that play eve these days. The blob is win in your eyes, if you don't blob you shouldn't win, is what your essentially saying.

For those of us that have moved on and grown past this fighting outnumbered is the only way to enjoy pvp in this game. There is only a certain amount or "anchor up, follow broadcasts, complain about tidi/lag then hope you still have enough logy left on the field to survive when your eventually primaried" you can take in this game.

Getting small gang pvp is so ridiculously hard in this game these days as it is, using OGB is the only way to keep that style of play alive. When was the last time you saw a Garmon video, or a DHB, or a Will adama or any of the dudes that inspired allot of us to get out there and pvp? Its been very long, you know why? Because its almost impossible as it is even with links.

Blobs have won eve as it is, fair enough, whatever, but for the love of god ccp don't remove the only mechanic that keeps small gang/solo pvp possible.

As SMT008 said link alts will just go back to being falcon alts, and yeah guess what that's even worse for small scale pvp then links.
Gangname Style
Doomheim
#224 - 2012-12-13 14:59:59 UTC
Ong wrote:
Ekscalybur wrote:

5 against 30, and you are seriously suggesting their should be a means by which you don't get absolutely steamrolled. A means that isn't even anywhere near you?

6:1 odds (sorry, you and 4 others against thirty is a bit more than just 4:1 odds) should equal obliteration for the smaller group, pilot skill notwithstanding. You said it yourself,




And here is a prime example of what is wrong with allot of people that play eve these days. The blob is win in your eyes, if you don't blob you shouldn't win, is what your essentially saying.

For those of us that have moved on and grown past this fighting outnumbered is the only way to enjoy pvp in this game. There is only a certain amount or "anchor up, follow broadcasts, complain about tidi/lag then hope you still have enough logy left on the field to survive when your eventually primaried" you can take in this game.

Getting small gang pvp is so ridiculously hard in this game these days as it is, using OGB is the only way to keep that style of play alive. When was the last time you saw a Garmon video, or a DHB, or a Will adama or any of the dudes that inspired allot of us to get out there and pvp? Its been very long, you know why? Because its almost impossible as it is even with links.

Blobs have won eve as it is, fair enough, whatever, but for the love of god ccp don't remove the only mechanic that keeps small gang/solo pvp possible.

As SMT008 said link alts will just go back to being falcon alts, and yeah guess what that's even worse for small scale pvp then links.


Hes got a point.
Doddy
Excidium.
#225 - 2012-12-13 15:14:26 UTC
In the end everything "because of falcon".
Shylari Avada
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#226 - 2012-12-13 15:28:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Shylari Avada
Ur235 wrote:

Have a read of this and maybe your 1 track blob pvp mind will see how it effects smaller gangs.

I mean I know you CFC guys despise small gangs and beleive that if you cant bring enough people to a fight then you shouldnt have turned up for a fight in the first place but there are other pvpers in the game that can and will fight outnumbered believe it or not


Pot, Kettle, Black

Grath Telkin wrote:

CCP has said that when the removal comes, the t3's will come with a rebalance to allow them to be on grid.

If thats not what you want...well tough **** really, you train a skill with the full knowledge that it can be completely changed at any time at the developers whim.

Basically you're not getting any skill points back, you should probably come to accept that fact or just move on to another game.

Hope I've been helpful.


Quoting for Truth (in the calmest Grath Telkin post ever).
Muestereate
Minions LLC
#227 - 2012-12-13 15:34:05 UTC
OGB is almost all about defense and all defense does is prolong fights. They should only last a few seconds.
Mathrin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#228 - 2012-12-13 15:49:59 UTC
Gangname Style wrote:
I train OGB on my alt so that I compete with other OGB fleets.

I'm happy it is being removed, but I also expect them to refund my SP for all my OGB skills.

This isn't the same situation as a nerf. The OGB removal will literally make my alt worthless.


Your alt is still able to boost the exact same amount now as when he will have to be on grid
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#229 - 2012-12-13 15:55:57 UTC
Mathrin wrote:

Your alt is still able to boost the exact same amount now as when he will have to be on grid


Boosting ships can't be flown along with most skirmish gangs.

The smaller the gang, the harder it is to have a boosting ship to go along with it.

When you roll with 3 dudes in Thoraxes for example. How do you think your Claymore will perform ? Very poorly. Sure, it can tank. It's also 2x slower than the Thoraxes you're with. You are also a dead weight because your ship can't do anything apart from giving bonuses.

Quote:
OGB is almost all about defense and all defense does is prolong fights. They should only last a few seconds.


The massive EHP buffs did that. Not OGB.
Mathrin
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#230 - 2012-12-13 15:57:19 UTC
Ong wrote:
Ekscalybur wrote:

5 against 30, and you are seriously suggesting their should be a means by which you don't get absolutely steamrolled. A means that isn't even anywhere near you?

6:1 odds (sorry, you and 4 others against thirty is a bit more than just 4:1 odds) should equal obliteration for the smaller group, pilot skill notwithstanding. You said it yourself,




And here is a prime example of what is wrong with allot of people that play eve these days. The blob is win in your eyes, if you don't blob you shouldn't win, is what your essentially saying.

For those of us that have moved on and grown past this fighting outnumbered is the only way to enjoy pvp in this game. There is only a certain amount or "anchor up, follow broadcasts, complain about tidi/lag then hope you still have enough logy left on the field to survive when your eventually primaried" you can take in this game.

Getting small gang pvp is so ridiculously hard in this game these days as it is, using OGB is the only way to keep that style of play alive. When was the last time you saw a Garmon video, or a DHB, or a Will adama or any of the dudes that inspired allot of us to get out there and pvp? Its been very long, you know why? Because its almost impossible as it is even with links.

Blobs have won eve as it is, fair enough, whatever, but for the love of god ccp don't remove the only mechanic that keeps small gang/solo pvp possible.

As SMT008 said link alts will just go back to being falcon alts, and yeah guess what that's even worse for small scale pvp then links.


what I think everyone in eve should understand is that in eve we are not the hero of the story, we don't get plot protection and we can't take on an invasion force by ourselves. When everyone has that equal status 2 IS between than one. Weather we like it or not.
Sarmea Moon
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#231 - 2012-12-13 16:06:22 UTC
fukier wrote:
no.

he is talking about off grid boosting...

he is upset that in the future you will have to risk your ship to provide game breaking bonus to fleet ships...




People with short memories.... (or aren't bittervets).

Fleets and gangs were the nerf to gang skills in the first place. It used to be that everyone could dogpile into a single gang, and the entire gang got everyone else's gang skills at whomever had the highest level- across the entire gang.

Then CCP decided gangs had to have a max number, and that was based on skills (huge nerf). Then they introduced command ships. Yep, I spent a couple years training everything on my main.

I don't care if FOTM alts/main builds get nerfed, but don't call this an overpowered/game breaking anything. This is the already nerfed state being nerfed further.

The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse [lady of commercial virtue]. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.- James Nicoll

Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#232 - 2012-12-13 16:10:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Inquisitor Kitchner
SMT008 wrote:

Anyone dual boxing any other combination of ships has more power than just a single ship with enhanced stats.



Don't be ridiculous.

The other day I was FCing a fleet that consisted of:

Me (cov ops)
Blackbird (which switched to have 3 gallente jammers)
2 dictors
2-3 HACS
2-3 Fast Tackle
3-4 T1 ships like cruisers, destroyer etc


We came up against:

6 Thoraxs (t1 cruisers)
1 OGB legion
1 OGB Loki


We outnumbered them about 2:1 and had a jamming ship with bonuses that was able to jam out half their ships at once. It still took ages to kill them and it was fairly touch and go. They still managed to kill both the dictors meaning that the outcome of the fight was that despite killing 4 of their cruisers (two got away) we only ended up about 40mil up.

OGB kill small gang and solo PvP because it sets a higher entry barrier. Unless you bring overwhelming numbers or your own OGB you can't compete with those who do, and therefore can't take part in it.

Plus you use the argument to say you'll just train your alt into a falcon and use that instead. What part of "solo" PvP do you not get? In every situation against a 100% genuine solo PvPer you're giving yourself a massive advantage by using 2 characters. So you're not after true solo PvP, you're after looking like you're so hard you can take on and kill a gang of guys on your own.

To be honest I expected better from a Goon.


EDIT:

Also looking at your killboard I struggle to see where you have killed someone "Solo" using off grid boosters or even outnumbered. In all the kills I could see on the first page you have dogpiled onto the enemy in true Goon style by outnumbering them.

Good thing you are keeping solo PvP alive o7o7o7 m8m8m8

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#233 - 2012-12-13 16:40:11 UTC
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:


We outnumbered them about 2:1 and had a jamming ship with bonuses that was able to jam out half their ships at once. It still took ages to kill them and it was fairly touch and go. They still managed to kill both the dictors meaning that the outcome of the fight was that despite killing 4 of their cruisers (two got away) we only ended up about 40mil up.


Of course they killed the dictors. Why would you even bring the dictors in that fight. They're paperthin and mostly useless.

Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
OGB kill small gang and solo PvP because it sets a higher entry barrier. Unless you bring overwhelming numbers or your own OGB you can't compete with those who do, and therefore can't take part in it.


In this case, it allowed 6 dudes to compete with 12. Without OGB, they wouldn't have been able to do half of what they did. Isn't that "promoting small gang" ?

Let me think for a second. You had 12 dudes. I'm pretty sure you could have taken on them easely with your blackbird, two Huginns and a couple Tier3 BCs (Like 3/4 Taloses). That's 7 dudes right there. You can throw in an additional huginn for more safety, or an additional Blackbird. Or just some more Taloses. Or a regular Command ship would have worked too.

Thorax, especially armor tanked ones, have pathetic range. Pin them down and the Taloses will make short work of them.

The only DPS you had were those 2-3 HACs (I don't know what kind of additional T1 ships you had, so can't comment on that). If those HACs were Vagabonds, no wonder you had troubles against armor tanked Thoraxes considering the low DPS a Vagabond does.

You had the wrong shiptypes and got spanked because of it.

Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
Plus you use the argument to say you'll just train your alt into a falcon and use that instead. What part of "solo" PvP do you not get? In every situation against a 100% genuine solo PvPer you're giving yourself a massive advantage by using 2 characters. So you're not after true solo PvP, you're after looking like you're so hard you can take on and kill a gang of guys on your own.


Depends on the definition of solo. To me, being solo means to have only one human managing the whole thing without stuff like ISboxer.

Dual-boxing means you usually can't properly manage two ships at the same time. Usually, You'll manage one while the other one is getting caught or that kind of stuff.

Considering it's quite a challenge to take on a gang while outnumbered, I consider this being solo PVP.

Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
To be honest I expected better from a Goon.


I don't care about your opinion on my alliance. A lot could be said about yours, but I'll refrain from such low-blows.


Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
EDIT:

Also looking at your killboard I struggle to see where you have killed someone "Solo" using off grid boosters or even outnumbered. In all the kills I could see on the first page you have dogpiled onto the enemy in true Goon style by outnumbering them.


Indeed, all the kills you could see on the first page were a Curse deployment lead by MisterVee. Does liking small gangs forbids me to take part of bigger fights ?

And, as you can guess, I have multiple characters.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#234 - 2012-12-13 16:57:59 UTC
SMT008 wrote:


Boosting ships can't be flown along with most skirmish gangs.



The megathron flys withliterally every gang so I think we can manage to get a command ship to workBlink
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#235 - 2012-12-13 17:06:32 UTC
Oh I've seen your Megathron, and I've gotta say, you own.

Is it a nano-shield Megathron ? Or just an untanked "No one will every shoot a Megathron anyway" Megathron ? Cool
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#236 - 2012-12-13 18:44:59 UTC
SMT008 wrote:

That whole "In order to fight X you have to bring an X yourself, so nerf X" is ridiculous tbh.

It's like "In order to catch a 100MN Tengu, you have to bring long range webs and something to keep it alive ! I want to kill those Tengus with my 3 Drakes and it doesn't work, nerfnerfnerf".

Yes, in order to fight special ships, you have to bring special ships yourself. How is that a problem ? When you fight a solo PVPer with an OGB, you have the number advantage. Use that to kill the OGBoosted solo PVPer. (In case you are also a solo PVPer yourself, don't worry. Now it's an OGB ship, it could have been a Falcon. What do you prefer ?).

Or bring a competent prober, and get a juicy T3 kill while the solo PVPer is too busy managing his main ship.

Now I'm all for nerfing Command T3s (Easier to find would be fine, switch the bonuses between command ships and T3s would be fine too, no boosting from within a POS is a good thing too), but the complete removal of OGB isn't something I would like to see happen.


The main problem with your argument is twofold, one, you have to bring Falcons and Arazus into the fight, on grid, so if thats what you shift their training to thats fine, they've been nerfed hard enough over the years that you'll need to get fairly close to have the desired effect. That brings your equalizer into the line of fire, thus putting the asset at risk. Small gang to small gang the OGB is rarely at risk because one small gang doesn't usually take the time in a fight to start looking for the other gangs OGB, there just isn't that kind of time.

The second problem is that the rest of your argument basically boils down to the same thing that was used at the end of the Nano Age. The kitchen sink fleets from around EVE weren't willing to bring the ships needed to counter the nano gangs and were wailing like mad that it was an unfair advantage. So the nerf hammer fell, and fell hard as hell, nano ships as they were known are long gone from EVE, its impossible to come anywhere close to the speeds that we used to travel in game, the need to bring those ships simply vanished.

The argument that the players should bring something they aren't was used when again when Titans were in danger of a nerf, dreads were all that was needed to stop the onslaught, and yet no player group in EVE (besides mine and maybe one or two others) had the balls to do what was needed to stop the madness, the players whinged and the game changed again.

You cannot force the players to do what you're asking, they simply have no desire to do what you want and no amount of posting on your part will bring them around to your way of thinking, even if it might be right, so the game will change again because without the players doing this simple thing the balance is skewed, the link bonuses are too strong, and the combat is getting out of whack.

Nothing you can say will change whats coming, your best actual bet is to start planning for the future.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#237 - 2012-12-13 18:54:57 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
SMT008 wrote:


Boosting ships can't be flown along with most skirmish gangs.



The megathron flys withliterally every gang so I think we can manage to get a command ship to workBlink

baltec1 bringing Mega back! Tried shield Hype? Just wish that rep bonus was something more useful though... Cry
Inquisitor Kitchner
The Executives
#238 - 2012-12-13 18:57:37 UTC
SMT008 wrote:

Of course they killed the dictors. Why would you even bring the dictors in that fight. They're paperthin and mostly useless.


To stop people from running when you find them I guess? Because in EVE unless they think they will win the enemy gang will leg it, How exactly would you stop a gang of 10 people running from a gang of 12 without dictors?



Quote:
In this case, it allowed 6 dudes to compete with 12. Without OGB, they wouldn't have been able to do half of what they did. Isn't that "promoting small gang" ?

Let me think for a second. You had 12 dudes. I'm pretty sure you could have taken on them easely with your blackbird, two Huginns and a couple Tier3 BCs (Like 3/4 Taloses). That's 7 dudes right there. You can throw in an additional huginn for more safety, or an additional Blackbird. Or just some more Taloses. Or a regular Command ship would have worked too.

Thorax, especially armor tanked ones, have pathetic range. Pin them down and the Taloses will make short work of them.

The only DPS you had were those 2-3 HACs (I don't know what kind of additional T1 ships you had, so can't comment on that). If those HACs were Vagabonds, no wonder you had troubles against armor tanked Thoraxes considering the low DPS a Vagabond does.

You had the wrong shiptypes and got spanked because of it.


You've missed the point and sailed way past it.

My gang was a gang of 12 guys who went "Hey, you know what? Let's go out and see if we can get a fight".

Their gang was a gang of 6 people who all outfitted themselves with a specific set up and made sure they were supported by OGB ships.

If my gang was 6 guys thinking "Hey, lets just go out and roam" I would have had to bring off grid boosters in order to compete with them, so therefore there is no point in my 6 man gang leaving unless it is actually an 8 man gang with off grid boosters with a dedicated theme OR I find another 6 people to bring with me.

As for bringing the wrong ships, you speak as if we had any say in who we were going, we bumped into these guys and got my blackbird pilot to switch out his 3 jammers for 3 gallente ones, thats all the preperation we had. If I had taken your fleet and game across an 8 man tornado gang it would have been useless.

You're view that OGB helps small gangs is actually saying that you need OGB and a "proper" fleet or double numbers otherwise you can't even compete with those who have them. It kills off fun spur of the moment small gang roaming.

Besides, you use the argument that OGB boost small gang PvP as it lets you take on people when you're outnumbered, what happens when 20-30 man gangs take OGBs every time too and then pummel you as they have the same advantage? Is that still a boon to small gang warfare?

Quote:
Depends on the definition of solo. To me, being solo means to have only one human managing the whole thing without stuff like ISboxer.

Dual-boxing means you usually can't properly manage two ships at the same time. Usually, You'll manage one while the other one is getting caught or that kind of stuff.

Considering it's quite a challenge to take on a gang while outnumbered, I consider this being solo PVP.


I'm sorry but you're wrong. Solo PvP means that it's Solo, as in on your own. Despite the fact your characters are being controlled by you, your character in space is not acting on their own. You are essentially flying the equivalent of some sort of massively buffed ship which the other side doesn't have access to (unless they are on their own OGB).


Quote:
I don't care about your opinion on my alliance. A lot could be said about yours, but I'll refrain from such low-blows.


"I think your alliance is crap, but I'm going to pretend to take the high ground by only alluding to it".

I have a lot of respect for Goonswarm for being full of people who can recognise when something isnt helping the game, even if they happen to be abusing it. I'm not bothered you use OGBs, as not using them would be stupid if you have the option, but even so your argument they are some how promoting the game is silly.


Quote:

Indeed, all the kills you could see on the first page were a Curse deployment lead by MisterVee. Does liking small gangs forbids me to take part of bigger fights ?

And, as you can guess, I have multiple characters.


Feel free to tell me who your elite pee vee pee character is and I'm happy to take it back if I see all your kills are actually you taking on gangs solo and definetly not a gang of 6-7 people ganking other equal or smaller sized gangs that dont have access to an OGB.

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli

SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#239 - 2012-12-13 19:03:12 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:

The main problem with your argument is twofold, one, you have to bring Falcons and Arazus into the fight, on grid, so if thats what you shift their training to thats fine, they've been nerfed hard enough over the years that you'll need to get fairly close to have the desired effect. That brings your equalizer into the line of fire, thus putting the asset at risk.


Depends what I'm fighting, of course. Against most small gangs, 2 Falcons should be enough to reliably jam most of the damage dealing ships. But I understand your point.

Grath Telkin wrote:
You cannot force the players to do what you're asking, they simply have no desire to do what you want and no amount of posting on your part will bring them around to your way of thinking, even if it might be right, so the game will change again because without the players doing this simple thing the balance is skewed, the link bonuses are too strong, and the combat is getting out of whack.


Too bad.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#240 - 2012-12-13 19:07:40 UTC
Quote:
Depends on the definition of solo. To me, being solo means to have only one human managing the whole thing without stuff like ISboxer.


Do I really need to point out that the only people that use that particular definition of what "Solo PVP" is are those that desperately want to say that they do well at hard core solo PVP... when in fact they do not.

You'd do a lot better sticking with your defense of small gang PVP, because statements like the above tend to make you look a bit silly and undermine your otherwise reasonable (if highly debatable) point of view.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.