These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Carebears with bounties, welcome back to EVE

First post
Author
Frying Doom
#161 - 2012-12-08 04:58:19 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Ok, so it's not who I kill, it's why huh? And why is it again that certain players should be effectively immune to attack?

No one should be, but by the same token no one should pretend that their actions of ganking Hi-sec miners for no reason other than to make them selves feel better is anything other than cowardly.

You are not doing this game any kind of service, you are just making yourself feel better by making others feel worse.


Okay! We're getting somewhere! So, we've established that no one should be safe, so if nowhere should be safe then it falls on someone to make it that way, does it not? And if so, what does it matter why they really do it? You've assumed a lot about me and why I kill carebears, but in the end, what the hell does it matter? It has to be done. This is EVE.

Now what has to be done is the ridicule of cowards who can not fight against anything but defenseless targets.

You are not doing anyone a favour not even your self.

Your kind of bottom feeding scum will only cause the ability to gank those who are deserving to be removed in its entirety as the carebears will eventually have had enough.

Your kind of parasite has caused so many changes to this game, bugger all of them good. Yes the goons did ice interdictions and before that there was hulkagedon, year after year, all good all for a purpose. Bugger all was changed till the interdiction plus people like you jumping on the band wagon via the goons lo bounties

Subsequently miners have better barges and there are more and more restrictions on ganking, you pathetic bottom feeding brethren will be the cause of making Hi-sec totally safe.

So your need to feel better by making others feel worse will only end with the destruction of Hi-sec revenge for us all.

No you are not doing anyone a favour, become a real member of society, go to Null. Grow a pair.


Ok, so no one should be safe, but the people who make it that way are bottom-feeding griefer scum who are responsible for carebearizing the game. Lol, I knew if I gave you enough rope you'd hang yourself. ^_^

No no one should be safe if they are deserving via action or profitability, but all scum like you cause is a toughening of the game for people who are doing this for an industry, rather than those who are doing it because it is profitable(does not lose them isk)

You can believe all you will, it does not change the fact you are a coward, incapable of fighting others except the defenseless. You should not get the tag Wanted, people like you should get the tag, "Baby seal basher"

I would say grow a pair but that is hard when you are a eunuch.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#162 - 2012-12-08 05:04:38 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
No no one should be safe if they are deserving via action or profitability, but all scum like you cause is a toughening of the game for people who are doing this for an industry, rather than those who are doing it because it is profitable(does not lose them isk)

Maybe a toughening of the game is a good thing?

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#163 - 2012-12-08 05:04:40 UTC
Hmmm, baby seal basher... Has a ring to it...

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Frying Doom
#164 - 2012-12-08 05:07:31 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Hmmm, baby seal basher... Has a ring to it...

Yeah fits well too.

People like you will end up turning Hi-sec into a safe haven for idiots in 20 billion isk golems.

Then people like you will start crying about how it is unfair to your kind that you cant gank ships like that.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#165 - 2012-12-08 05:09:50 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
No no one should be safe if they are deserving via action or profitability, but all scum like you cause is a toughening of the game for people who are doing this for an industry, rather than those who are doing it because it is profitable(does not lose them isk)

Maybe a toughening of the game is a good thing?

Not in the direction that Hi-sec becomes completely safe. No one will ever leave hi-sec.

As I said I think they have the balance about right atm where idiots and people with huge bounties are struck down.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#166 - 2012-12-08 06:01:33 UTC
All these personal attacks and stuff make you seem kinda mad bro.

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Frying Doom
#167 - 2012-12-08 06:06:47 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
All these personal attacks and stuff make you seem kinda mad bro.

No I am not in any way shape or form mad, that would be emotionally projecting into a computer game, sorry not my style.

It is you who seem mad, having to attack the helpless to achieve a sense of self worth.

You can be a profitable member of society, as i have said go to Null and learn to PvP against those who can fight back. You will feel better in your self for having accomplished something, rather than just attacking the weak and helpless.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#168 - 2012-12-08 06:15:28 UTC
Jawas wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Ok, paint us the picture then, what would Highsec be like if everyone "moved to null to fight players who can fight back"? Are you really willing to advocate for a safe highsec?


I'm willing to advocate against griefing which is exactly what this allows. If you want PVP that much, move to lowsec or even nullsec where you can do it without Concord intervention. Or are you too scared to face someone who can actually fight back?


Concord gank people that can't fight back every day. What's your point?

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#169 - 2012-12-08 06:25:05 UTC
let me get this straight

if there weren't any gankers people could do all the ganking they wanted

but because there are gankers, no-one can do any ganking, so all the gankers should stop so that ganking may continue

how am i doing
Frying Doom
#170 - 2012-12-08 06:31:06 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Jawas wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Ok, paint us the picture then, what would Highsec be like if everyone "moved to null to fight players who can fight back"? Are you really willing to advocate for a safe highsec?


I'm willing to advocate against griefing which is exactly what this allows. If you want PVP that much, move to lowsec or even nullsec where you can do it without Concord intervention. Or are you too scared to face someone who can actually fight back?


Concord gank people that can't fight back every day. What's your point?

So do Goonswarm blobs. Whats your point?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#171 - 2012-12-08 06:31:57 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Jawas wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Ok, paint us the picture then, what would Highsec be like if everyone "moved to null to fight players who can fight back"? Are you really willing to advocate for a safe highsec?


I'm willing to advocate against griefing which is exactly what this allows. If you want PVP that much, move to lowsec or even nullsec where you can do it without Concord intervention. Or are you too scared to face someone who can actually fight back?


Concord gank people that can't fight back every day. What's your point?

So do Goonswarm blobs. Whats your point?


These blobs of ours shoot stuff that shoots back.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Frying Doom
#172 - 2012-12-08 06:32:00 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
let me get this straight

if there weren't any gankers people could do all the ganking they wanted

but because there are gankers, no-one can do any ganking, so all the gankers should stop so that ganking may continue

how am i doing

Painfully

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

robbyx
#173 - 2012-12-08 06:36:35 UTC
First let me say that i live in null and have no interest in hi-sec at all, CCP could paint the whole place pink and name it a "ladyboys only zone" for all i care (i would actually be more likely to visit more often in that case).....but it seems to me that EVE can and should be all things to everyone, everyone should have a place to play the game they want.

We all know that a game that cant pull new players soon stagnates, in my view if 100 new players join the game, some will stay in hi-sec forever, this doesnt affect me at all, but some of those players will make a lot of ISK and venture into low and null sec, which gives me fresh targets and stimulates the economy.

In my own experience as a brand new player it was very hard to get enough cash and ships together to venture into null, which was my plan...i cannot see how letting newer players make more ISK is a bad thing, sure this is a PVP centric game, and no one should ever forget that, but we should encourage new players to make ISK, not stifle them in their efforts.

There is no shortage of PVP in this game, absolutely none...if you are having trouble finding fights anywhere, you are doing it wrong...and no, ganking and greifing hi-sec players who cant fight back is not PVP, it is carebearing, plain and simple.
Let the hi-sec players make tons of cash and ship their freighters full of nice new shiny ships to low/null sec where i can shoot at them, and they can try again....if they want to stay in hi-sec, no skin of my nose at all...more subscriptions means more money for CCP, which is all good in my opinion.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#174 - 2012-12-08 06:37:22 UTC
Dude, you have spent what seems like hours trying to make us feel bad about ourselves out of game, I ask you, who here has the issues?

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#175 - 2012-12-08 06:46:00 UTC
robbyx wrote:
...this doesnt affect me at all...


O' the short-sightedness! T_T

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com

Frying Doom
#176 - 2012-12-08 06:50:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Galaxy Pig wrote:
Dude, you have spent what seems like hours trying to make us feel bad about ourselves out of game, I ask you, who here has the issues?

That would be you, sorry but true.

As the above pointed out attacking defenseless targets is not PvP. There is PvP to be had all over this game, if I am making you feel bad, Well frankly good.

I will not be sympathetic to someone who bullies the defenseless no matter what the reason.

Find somewhere nice and go PvP, syndicate is always nice this time of year.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Zak Fey
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2012-12-08 06:54:58 UTC
Every miner can defend themselves from the New Order and its ganks simply by buying a 10 million permit fee. Its truly the best counter to it and the best economical option too.
Frying Doom
#178 - 2012-12-08 06:57:00 UTC
Zak Fey wrote:
Every miner can defend themselves from the New Order and its ganks simply by buying a 10 million permit fee. Its truly the best counter to it and the best economical option too.

Would it not be money better spent to put the 10 mill down as a bounty?

Then some real PvPers can get involved Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

robbyx
#179 - 2012-12-08 07:03:48 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
robbyx wrote:
...this doesnt affect me at all...


O' the short-sightedness! T_T



Please do enlighten me....a snide remark with no explanation does not help to convince anyone.
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#180 - 2012-12-08 07:37:54 UTC
robbyx wrote:
Galaxy Pig wrote:
robbyx wrote:
...this doesnt affect me at all...


O' the short-sightedness! T_T



Please do enlighten me....a snide remark with no explanation does not help to convince anyone.


Don't know what to tell ya brother. Well actually, I probably do, but I lack the will to summon it right now. Ehh, think really hard about it?

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com