These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Battlecruisers with battleship weapons? Evidence of a goon in charge of CSM.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sofia Bellard
Doomheim
#1 - 2011-10-22 03:44:55 UTC
Currently goons like to blow up innocent miners with NO risk and practically no ISK lost doing it. So in order to make their suicide ganking even MORE profitable, they convince CCP to make the new ships into battlecruisers with battleship weapons. This is an outrage. More changes to the game to cater to null sec blocks. Where will this blatant abuse of political power stop?

This winter expansion was going to be one of the best and you piece of **** goons had to go and ******* ruin it for everyone! Please leave this game and go find somewhere else to do your attention starved stunts!

Poor sad little pirates,  why you so mad?
SilentSkills
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2011-10-22 03:48:33 UTC
obvious goon alt
THERisingPHOENIX
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3 - 2011-10-22 03:48:56 UTC
lol
Tallianna Avenkarde
Pyre of Gods
#4 - 2011-10-22 03:50:38 UTC
Hey not only goons are looking forward to this....


everyone else that has ever ganked a hulk is excited as they are Big smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smile

And a sudden plunge in the sullen swell. Ten fathoms deep on the road to hell.
Jhagiti Tyran
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2011-10-22 03:52:27 UTC
Why should it make suicide ganking more profitable? I wouldn't be surprised if these new BCs have around the same build cost as a tier one BS.
Dessau
The Scope
#6 - 2011-10-22 03:53:07 UTC
I've heard what the miners do to those rocks. They're not so 'innocent'.
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Midgard Academy
#7 - 2011-10-22 03:53:51 UTC
warning jumping to conclusions on how this works will only lead to you looking very stupid in the end.

Why Can't I have a picture signature.

Also please support graphical immersion, bring back the art that brought people to EvE online originaly.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#8 - 2011-10-22 03:58:16 UTC
lol

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Vetruvius Valinor
Doomheim
#9 - 2011-10-22 04:03:22 UTC
Lulwut? Making Sub-Capitals more and more relevant is a bad thing now?
Endeavour Starfleet
#10 - 2011-10-22 04:04:35 UTC
CSM gives general ideas. CCP acts on them. The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#11 - 2011-10-22 04:09:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
CSM gives general ideas. CCP acts on them. The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.


i think mining ships shouldn't be insured either, it's like wanting your car insurance to pay you when your unlocked car got stolen in the darker parts of town

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Johan Krieger
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2011-10-22 04:11:41 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
CSM gives general ideas. CCP acts on them. The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.


Maybe you shouldn't be mining where people are dying.
Rocky Deadshot
In The Goo
EVE Trade Alliance
#13 - 2011-10-22 04:13:39 UTC
Andski wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
CSM gives general ideas. CCP acts on them. The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.


i think mining ships shouldn't be insured either, it's like wanting your car insurance to pay you when your unlocked car got stolen in the darker parts of town


And receiving insurance payouts on concord kills is like using your car in a drive by shoting, running from the cops, wrecking it, then filing for insurance replacement of it.
Largo Coronet
Perkone
Caldari State
#14 - 2011-10-22 04:16:21 UTC
This thread is evidence that there are people out there who have not yet been able to afford their tinfoil hats, so the Z-rays are burning out their minds.

Won't you think of the tiny minds? Send donations of isk and capital ships to Largo Coronet for our "TINFOILS FOR TWATS" campaign this Christmas. Some of the money will be used to provide rolls of Reynolds Wrap to needy personages like the OP, and the rest will be used to buy cheap liquor and cheaper women for our holiday party.

This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.

Someday, this signature may save my life.
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
#15 - 2011-10-22 04:18:58 UTC
@OP... Hello Kitten Online is that way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#16 - 2011-10-22 04:25:48 UTC
Rocky Deadshot wrote:
Andski wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
CSM gives general ideas. CCP acts on them. The issue with the tornado being a potential boon to hisec ganking is addressed by making changes such as no insurance for such activity and a large buff to CONCORD.


i think mining ships shouldn't be insured either, it's like wanting your car insurance to pay you when your unlocked car got stolen in the darker parts of town


And receiving insurance payouts on concord kills is like using your car in a drive by shoting, running from the cops, wrecking it, then filing for insurance replacement of it.

harden the **** up

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
DuKackBoon
Soban Heavy Industries
#17 - 2011-10-22 04:27:36 UTC
Sofia Bellard wrote:
Currently goons like to blow up innocent miners with NO risk and practically no ISK lost doing it. So in order to make their suicide ganking even MORE profitable, they convince CCP to make the new ships into battlecruisers with battleship weapons. This is an outrage. More changes to the game to cater to null sec blocks. Where will this blatant abuse of political power stop?

This winter expansion was going to be one of the best and you piece of **** goons had to go and ******* ruin it for everyone! Please leave this game and go find somewhere else to do your attention starved stunts!


The Tornado likely costs twice as much as a Brutix. Therefore that would reduce the profit.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#18 - 2011-10-22 04:31:14 UTC
Big guns + rather good tank + cheaper than a battle ship?

This won't exactly be Suicide Bombers.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.
Joan Avon
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2011-10-22 04:36:47 UTC
Largo Coronet wrote:
This thread is evidence that there are people out there who have not yet been able to afford their tinfoil hats, so the Z-rays are burning out their minds.

Won't you think of the tiny minds? Send donations of isk and capital ships to Largo Coronet for our "TINFOILS FOR TWATS" campaign this Christmas. Some of the money will be used to provide rolls of Reynolds Wrap to needy personages like the OP, and the rest will be used to buy cheap liquor and cheaper women for our holiday party.


I hope you raise alot of money because your going to need a river of liquor and spend a fortune the size of Warren Buffets to get any woman anywhere near your holiday party.

That being said the specific's of the Tornado and it's 3 other companions haven't been fully released and as such it's too soon to evaluate their ability to suicide and/or gank anything.

The same cannot be said for Largo's booze and cash requirements in order to attract/compensate a woman to be near him. they've been astronomical for years.

Let us begin....
Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-10-22 04:44:02 UTC
its time for players in hisec to stop letting the goon CSM screw them over https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24509

– postum faex est – 

never forget
123Next page