EVE General Discussion

Perhaps, but thats not going to happen so long as those who wish to destroy hi sec are spamming their idiocy and CCP seems to need the forums to find direction, my opinion is going to be expressed.

Not sure about any faucet but missions could use an update. I like what some had said....

Missions shouldn't be just a multiroom target shoot. Having fewer but tougher ships is good. Having missions be a kind of pvp practice is good as well. The enemy ships should be actual fitted ships controlled by AI. They should be vulnerable to to things like vamps and neuts. They should warp out, such that if you get them down to hull a timer starts (timer length depends on the ship, mission level, ect.) and if you don't kill them before they warp out, they leave, repair and return.

This means that points and scrams are needed. Some enemies can be locked by a point but others require a scram. Those that require a scram could have longer timers so even though you can't lock them down, you could maybe kill them before they warp out.


As for solo vs group. I think they should put a system in place that will adjust the difficulty depending on how many people make up the fleet. In turn, the rewards (mission reward, bonus, bounties, etc.) would have to be increased as well so that they are basically the same per person.

I am just glad I resisted the urge to pay for long term subscriptions on my accounts. I love the game and don't mind wars or having to defend myself if a muppet wants to try to gank me, but if hi sec gets nerfed to the degree that the more vocal egocentric people want then this game will be headed a direction I don't want forced upon me. My oldest character was created June 03 (though haven't been active the entire time) so have seen the game change alot and think nerfing hi sec to force people into low or to punish them is a step backwards. Rather than nerf hi sec try being more creative with fixing null to intice people there as punishing them for not going will backfire. That is what this all comes down to, nerf missions so there is no fun or income to be found in high forcing them into other areas.

All of this has already been explained, sourced, and referenced on multiple occasions.

You have everything that you need and are once again just ignoring what's been presented to you.

I'm on about how you keep jabbering on about something completely irrelevant to the business of bounties, for which the only explanation can be that you don't know how incursions are and what the rewards are like.

The many many remaining ISK faucets. Even in the best (worst?) case scenario where missions inject 600bn, the total elimination of that ISK injection would still leave a net influx of 400bn a day.

Currently (or as current as it gets), faucets inject 2 trillion ISK daily; sinks remove 1 trillion ISK. The flow could be cut down massively and still ensure growth. The sinks could be doubled or the faucets halved before the curve would start to point downwards.

I sometimes wonder how many of the lo-sec, null-sec, pixel hardmen run the missions they have so much disdain for.

The word, hypocrite, springs to mind.

It's strongly implied in how he says it.

Where and how old are the figures that say ISK 200bn/d? There can't possibly be that much "blue loot" (the only thing out of WH that creates ISK --all else just redistributes it, unless NPCs have also started buying those guaranteed and consistent(<---sarcasm) melted nanoribbon drops? It's been a while since I've been in w-space, granted.)



Again, it's implied strongly.

Even if literally everyone could have their own C5, then they couldn't do much of anything with it, except maybe PI, a lot of which would go to fuelling their POS'. High-end w-space PvE (C4+) content is not solo-able, fullstop/end-of, and w-space life in general is far from risk-free.



I have. This thread is about missions and income from same, which does need looking at, not some RMT-bloc sycophant injecting a NUFFWHOALNAOW!!111oneone! whinge into it. What next, another anti-cloaking whine for good measure?

For ****'s sake...

I don't see it. I see him mentioning the ISK faucet from w-space as a better target for adjustment than mission bounties.

Same place (and time) as everything else: Diagoras' tweets from January and February. And yes, there can indeed be that much blue loot. For instance, 7 trillion ISK in January alone means 225bn ISK daily on average.

And again, I don't see it. A “solo wormhole” is not the same thing as a “wormhole to solo”. One describes the state of the system; the other describes an activity.

Sweet, so not many people will complain about caps removal from anoms and it will still helps isk faucet a bit. It will also make anoms more challanging.

Playing since 2003 and still in the newbie area?

CCP Soundwave implies a lot of things and says a lot of other things. Let's not make me go look up the list of logical fallacies.