These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

Author
Ogi Talvanen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#41 - 2011-10-19 12:10:56 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
Basic question.

Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies...


Poetic is that you?
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2011-10-19 12:13:09 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time?

I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!!

Ogi Talvanen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#43 - 2011-10-19 12:16:42 UTC
:notsureiftrue:
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2011-10-19 12:23:46 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
The whole wardec system is so broken that it's hard to get excited about this change, tbh.

As soon as CCP have got the 0.0 rework well underway, then hi-sec needs to be next. CONCORD, bounty hunting, wardecs, sec status, all need reworking into some kind of a coherent system.

Except that there is no need for war decs in 0.0 as you don't get concorded... Kind of an issue in high sec, hence this change has removed the ability to pvp in high sec...


Bolded the part of my post you should have read.

That would be the 0.0 plan that was supposed to be over 5 years???

The Thrill
#45 - 2011-10-19 12:35:52 UTC
Simetraz wrote:
I could really care less if CCP gives EVE Uni complete immunity to War Dec's for free.





Great idea, after all they are just an extension of the Career stuff and NPC starter corps.

 Cruicible - oh noes, I like it!

Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2011-10-19 13:05:22 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time?


March rabbit wrote:

TLDR: you only need to gather some info and choose your style 0.0 alliance to get in there. Ask people who live in 0.0 about this place. 0.0 space is for people who play multiplayer game. High-sec is for those who like to play solo game. That's why concord. That's why wardecs. That's why missions and agents.


lookit that you answered your own question! Clever you!

post number 61
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
Cedar Locus
Fleet 2 die
#47 - 2011-10-19 13:33:59 UTC
it sucks. eve is gonna die
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2011-10-19 13:38:57 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time?

I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!!

and in FW you have no targets so you need to wardec carebears? Shocked

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#49 - 2011-10-19 13:46:15 UTC
Lot's of FW targets, but they're too good for him. It's easier to pick on poor innocent carebears. Sad


Disclaimer: I don't know what happens in FW. So I don't know what I'm talking about. Am currently thinking about putting a sock in my mouth.
Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#50 - 2011-10-19 13:52:14 UTC
How about either listing the changes or linking an official reference in the OP? X

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#51 - 2011-10-19 14:00:19 UTC
I'll say it again here just to put in my two ISK...

With the mechanic and policy allowing corps to avoid war decs... why even have war decs? I don't see the point. If they want to turn Empire into fairy fun-time sparkle pony land... than why pretend? Maybe we should be able to send out hugs and kisses decs to corps... or interbus cookies and milk delivery... should be pretty easy to change the war dec mechanic as it is now into something more useful like that...

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2011-10-19 14:51:11 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
what is wardec again? why do you need it to shoot people? You are scared to go to places where fighting is allowed all-the-time?

I'm in faction warfare, so umm, no!!!

and in FW you have no targets so you need to wardec carebears? Shocked

Who said this character is war deccing carebears???

non judgement wrote:
Lot's of FW targets, but they're too good for him. It's easier to pick on poor innocent carebears. Sad


Disclaimer: I don't know what happens in FW. So I don't know what I'm talking about. Am currently thinking about putting a sock in my mouth.

That might be a good idea... I am taking exception with the principle.

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2011-10-19 14:53:30 UTC
Wacktopia wrote:
How about either listing the changes or linking an official reference in the OP? X

It was linked on page 1, but it is kind of hard to miss - big sticky on top of general discussion explains it all...

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#54 - 2011-10-19 15:28:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Kengutsi Akira
Htrag wrote:
Its not that I dont like it, I just think its distasteful for something to be deemed no longer an exploit, presumably because enforcement is a pain in the nuts and whoever decides the game mechanics hasn't come up with a more elegant solution.


Yeah, like recycling ganking alts

that used to be an exploit every time.

Now, with the Goons' Ice Interdiction, Its on a case-by-case basis and there arent enough ppl to enforce it

Louis deGuerre wrote:

It should always be possible to attack someone anywhere without having to pay billions.


It is possible. You just need to not like your ship much if youre in high sec

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Jack bubu
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#55 - 2011-10-19 15:46:30 UTC
Its not like the old wardec policy was ever enforced anyway, so :shrug:
Poetic Stanzitroll
Doomheim
#56 - 2011-10-19 17:08:35 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
non judgement wrote:
Well, if this isn't Poetic Stanziel's alt. I'm going to be really confused.
In preparation for this thread, I created an alt before I even started playing EVE Online.


I'm 3.785 times as confusedArrow

-Check out my blog, it's the best!

Igualmentedos
Perkone
Caldari State
#57 - 2011-10-19 17:39:42 UTC
Har Harrison wrote:
Basic question.

Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies...


I'm starting a tear collection for all the butthurt "leet PvPers." Your contribution is greatly appreciated. Big smile
Skunk Gracklaw
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#58 - 2011-10-19 18:32:06 UTC
Kengutsi Akira wrote:
Yeah, like recycling ganking alts

that used to be an exploit every time.

Now, with the Goons' Ice Interdiction, Its on a case-by-case basis and there arent enough ppl to enforce it

Well look at you not having a clue
Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2011-10-20 02:39:37 UTC
Igualmentedos wrote:
Har Harrison wrote:
Basic question.

Who DOESN'T like the new wardec policy?

Sign/like/troll the thread to show your concerns about CCP taking the risk away from high sec because Eve Uni are a bunch of cry babies...


I'm starting a tear collection for all the butthurt "leet PvPers." Your contribution is greatly appreciated. Big smile

Glad you have read the thread and seen the bit where I said I am in FW. As such, you would have also checked my kb stats and seen pretty much all my kills have been in low sec... So yeah - I'm totally crying...

In other news I am collecting funds to allow people to learn to read and comprehend English so they can at least troll me with some form of understanding due to being able to read what has been posted PRIOR to them shooting off prematurely. Failing that, I think you can get a nasal spray to assist you there....

SHAMESHAME
Doomheim
#60 - 2011-10-20 02:44:45 UTC
Dear P*ssy, if you had any balls or self respect you'd go to nullsec or low sec. You're bullsh*t arguments would carry more weight if you weren't hiding behind Concord.