These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Has ice always been in highsec?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#1 - 2012-10-30 02:46:48 UTC
My synapses have been twinkling and telling me that ice has not always been in highsec.

My memory (please don't fail me now) had ice in null only a few years back? It was put back. I went through 10 pages of Google and couldn't find any reference.

Anyone any the wiser on this?

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#2 - 2012-10-30 02:49:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Roll Sizzle Beef
Opposite. Ice used to be in even more highsec systems. all belts at and above I believe .7 were taken out years ago.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#3 - 2012-10-30 02:51:47 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Opposite. Ice used to be in even more highsec systems. all belts at and above I believe .7 were taken out years ago.

kk. Thx 4 that.

Maybe it was on a dev list and removed/shot down? It's bugging me now. Straight

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
Shederov Blood
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
#4 - 2012-10-30 02:52:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Shederov Blood
It still is in 0.7, it used to be in 0.8 as well.

If it was ever null only, then that's further back than I can remember.

Who put the goat in there?
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#5 - 2012-10-30 02:55:57 UTC
Found it
Patch Notes
Build 29969 to 30636 addresses Patch Notes for Revelations 1.4

  • Ice belts have been removed from all systems with 0.8+ security standing.

Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#6 - 2012-10-30 03:22:08 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Found it
Patch Notes
Build 29969 to 30636 addresses Patch Notes for Revelations 1.4

  • Ice belts have been removed from all systems with 0.8+ security standing.


You a genius bro Cool

Chased it up and saw change but can't find the reason for the shift? Was it to "promote" ganking or just limit supply?

NOTE: This is purely fact finding.


Have found when ice was introduced.

Build 1755 to 2942 addresses EVE Online: EXODUS
http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp?newpatchlogID=2701

And nothing in patches up to the one you found support my wandering synapses it seems Roll

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
#7 - 2012-10-30 03:31:33 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:


Chased it up and saw change but can't find the reason for the shift? Was it to "promote" ganking or just limit supply?




I remember ccp saying something about relieving stress on some systems. Jita had an ice belt for example. Same reason why lvl4 agents got shifted around in the past.
Touval Lysander
Zero Wine
#8 - 2012-10-30 07:16:17 UTC
Ludi Burek wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:


Chased it up and saw change but can't find the reason for the shift? Was it to "promote" ganking or just limit supply?




I remember ccp saying something about relieving stress on some systems. Jita had an ice belt for example. Same reason why lvl4 agents got shifted around in the past.

k. thx mate.

i'll book in for a lobotomy. should fix the synapses thingy.

>> [space for smartass comment] <<

"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
Ifly Uwalk
Perkone
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-10-30 07:55:42 UTC
Touval Lysander wrote:
Ludi Burek wrote:
Touval Lysander wrote:


Chased it up and saw change but can't find the reason for the shift? Was it to "promote" ganking or just limit supply?




I remember ccp saying something about relieving stress on some systems. Jita had an ice belt for example. Same reason why lvl4 agents got shifted around in the past.

k. thx mate.

i'll book in for a lobotomy. should fix the synapses thingy.

>> ofc to get a lobotomy i must first have a brain vOv <<

there you go