These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Video blog: In Development: New destroyers and ship balancing

First post First post
Author
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#61 - 2012-10-26 08:50:58 UTC
Honestly, I'm a bit underwhelmed by the new Dessies. While I can understand the "lets use the 'other' weapon system" that's a bit too simplistic imo. They add nothing and do nothing compared to the current ones. They still **** frigs, they still suck against cruisers and they're still very very niche.

The Amarr one especially sucks, first of all the looks are... wrong, it looks like a giant bug from the top and is amazingly similar to the Coercer (while the other races have a very different look compared to the current ones) and looks like a lazy design by someone who doesn't understand Amarr design language. Then we get to the bonuses, range to nos/neut sounds cool but it doesn't do anything on a ship like this, it'll pwn frigs regardless of it and it'll die to cruisers regardless of it, especially with the low amount of midslots. It also forces it into scram range (not like it's fast&agile enough to avoid it). Then the split weapon systems, really... REALLY? Unbonused and useless.

Gallente one makes sense and is close to being OP, Caldari one makes sense ofcourse, the Minmatar does not make sense (if anything the Minnie one should be mixed weapon systems) and all 3 of those look awesome in their own way. The Amarr one adds nothing other than "look it's not laser based", it's bonuses are just weird and it's a terrible eye sore.
Terrorfrodo
Interbus Universal
#62 - 2012-10-26 09:02:58 UTC
Love the video, CCP and Guard are almost back to the "Permaband - HTFU"-level now :)

.

Claire Raynor
NovaGear
#63 - 2012-10-26 10:48:46 UTC
I actually really like the look of the Amarr Destroyer that was shown. It looks like a bug like has been said. I was thinking the Amarr stuff is starting to look more and more insect inspired. If the Amarr Destroyer landed on a planet - and about a dozen legs came out on each side - that would rock!!!

Mega happy about my new Minmatar Destroyer. It looks nice :)
Manes Avatarr
Superfast
#64 - 2012-10-26 10:50:42 UTC
CCP Guard wrote:
The latest episode in the In Development series reveals even more of the Retribution Expansion coming on December 4. It also reveals some other things but you'll find that out for yourselves by going right here.Enjoy!

Please put some images along with video link, ppl have not access to YT video playback (at work for ie) and would like to look at news.

FRONTIER ADVENTURERS Corp. | To explore, build & fight! | recruitment topic

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#65 - 2012-10-26 11:25:01 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
CCP Guard wrote:
Ager Agemo wrote:
not all t1 cruisers, faction ones arent being looked at, and the navy caracal right now is a sorry excuse of a cruiser.


We'll get to them all! :)


When?


Aren't you the troll with the thread telling CCP to slow down and take their time?

They'll get it done when they get it done, and I'm sure they'll coordinate with you personally on an appropriate schedule.

Roll


I am indeed the voice of reason suggesting they slow down multiple changes simultaneously.
And this is yet another example of a half-baked implementation, where you will end up with some generic T1 ships being superior to their faction, Navy, and possibly T2 counterparts.

The entire revamp, if necessary at all, should have been ALL frigate hulls, then once that was working properly, ALL the cruiser hulls, then ALL the BS hulls.

Not some shotgun approach.


You're right, what were they thinking? No other plan of rollout could possibly make more sense than yours, considering your extensive experience with MMORPG balancing changes and feature rollouts.

After-all, one man with one closed mind must know better than an organization with multiple teams all working on many projects at once. Your method is the epitome of efficiency, and will certainly not cause an increase in backlogs while several teams wait for their chance to go through the Dinsdale turn-style of approval.

I eagerly await the day when they realize your brilliance and announce the hiring of CCP Tunnafish and it turns out to be you.

(The incorrect double-n will be a dead giveaway though)

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Echo Mande
#66 - 2012-10-26 12:02:42 UTC
Overall a good video devblog. I look forward to seeing the ships and changed ships.

Guard has IMO been stashed in a place he belongs (though IMO he belongs in a straightjacket) and his predicament sets the stage for a DUST devblog centered around some dustbunnies breaking him out . . .
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#67 - 2012-10-26 12:20:19 UTC
honestly i thought that the Amarr dessie looked alot more like the torpedo frigate from homeworld 2
Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#68 - 2012-10-26 13:09:30 UTC
Callic Veratar wrote:
Unfortunate that the final amarr destroyer model ended up looking like a fat Coercer. Many of the concept images looked really good and, more importantly, different than the final design.


Yeah some of the other amarr designed looked ALLOT better then the current, abaddon/coercer baby.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

Haifisch Zahne
Hraka Manufacture GmbH
#69 - 2012-10-26 13:30:26 UTC
There is also the idea, Kitten, to use what is said to be CCP's official new policy: Iterative Roll-outs. We could see the Dessies come out, and then shortly (and I mean less than a month), some of the cruisers. CCP loves to dump a load, and see who mucks their way to the top.


War Kitten wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
War Kitten wrote:


Aren't you the troll with the thread telling CCP to slow down and take their time?

They'll get it done when they get it done, and I'm sure they'll coordinate with you personally on an appropriate schedule.

Roll


I am indeed the voice of reason suggesting they slow down multiple changes simultaneously.
And this is yet another example of a half-baked implementation, where you will end up with some generic T1 ships being superior to their faction, Navy, and possibly T2 counterparts.

The entire revamp, if necessary at all, should have been ALL frigate hulls, then once that was working properly, ALL the cruiser hulls, then ALL the BS hulls.

Not some shotgun approach.


You're right, what were they thinking? No other plan of rollout could possibly make more sense than yours, considering your extensive experience with MMORPG balancing changes and feature rollouts.

After-all, one man with one closed mind must know better than an organization with multiple teams all working on many projects at once. Your method is the epitome of efficiency, and will certainly not cause an increase in backlogs while several teams wait for their chance to go through the Dinsdale turn-style of approval.

I eagerly await the day when they realize your brilliance and announce the hiring of CCP Tunnafish and it turns out to be you.

(The incorrect double-n will be a dead giveaway though)
ISquishWorms
#70 - 2012-10-26 14:17:51 UTC
Free CCP Guard!!!

Really informative and funny video loved it. Big smile

‘No, this isn't it at all. Make it more... psssshhhh’.

Karl Planck
Perkone
Caldari State
#71 - 2012-10-26 14:19:05 UTC
lol love these vids. Good stuffz the design of the new dessies

I has all the eve inactivity

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#72 - 2012-10-26 14:20:29 UTC
Why would they do that if they feel the ships will be ready for the major release?

If you go look at the threads in Features & Ideas, there's plenty of iteration and plenty of refinement over a fairly long period of time. And Duality is open for testing right now.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Iq Cadaen
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#73 - 2012-10-26 14:56:24 UTC
Have to say the Amarr design is a big disappointment. All the sketched designs shown in the video were miles above the final product. Amarr ships are supposed to be sleek and shiny not ribbed and unwieldy.
Bantara
Dolmite Cornerstone
#74 - 2012-10-26 15:42:42 UTC
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
(unrealistic whine/rant/request snipped...)

Dinsdale, you have been in Eve so long, apparently, that you have forgotten that the game is not built upon T2 ships. The root of ship design are the T1s, which is why they must be looked at first. Then T2, and somewhere along the line (I think they said after T2) the navy ships.

This is not shotgun nor haphazard. It is very logical. Also, since more problems would have been introduced had they started with the trimming(T2) instead of the foundation(T1), many problems have been avoided ahd they done it your way.

They have done a much larger amount of work than I for one would have ever anticipated for a single release, and I am very satisfied with the CCP we have seen post-Incarna.
Komen
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#75 - 2012-10-26 15:55:49 UTC
I love that little gallente bit. Drone boat, is it? Mmmm-hmmm.

I gotta say that overall, this expansion is looking more like a Crucible and less like an Inferno (I can make my way around in the new inventory, but something in it got borked when it comes to using it inside a POS with CHA and SMA).

Now completely redesign the looks of the dominix to make it look cool, and I'll be a happy little hedonistic democrat.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#76 - 2012-10-26 16:56:50 UTC
Haifisch Zahne wrote:
I got it: the Amarr destroyer looks like the Eagle Transporter from the old TV series Space 1999! (I liked that show.)

It does at that, but frankly it more closely resembles a Purifier with a couple of protrusions on the sides.

I'm not really seeing why people compare it to the Coercer... the only resemblence there is the side protrusions (but it has two, not one) and it's basically sort of a tube shape (like many other ships in EVE).

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Aeril Malkyre
Knights of the Ouroboros
#77 - 2012-10-26 16:57:33 UTC
I take back all the grumbles I had about the new Minmatar hull. The original renders made it look horrific, but seeing it fly through that gate... want. I even like the pillbox hat cockpit. And anything that continues the tradition of "who would put solar panels here? Oh, right, we're Minmatar, that's just extra flair armor" is alright in my book. I'm not one for missiles, but this looks like an awesome little ship.

As to the 'funny' bits: CCP Guard in prison was amusing. His 'rescuer' and all that... how about we spend more time with the concept art, or in space renders, or anything but these mini-plays? Please?

Otherwise, keep up the great work. Winter is coming.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#78 - 2012-10-26 17:16:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Ranger 1 wrote:
Haifisch Zahne wrote:
I got it: the Amarr destroyer looks like the Eagle Transporter from the old TV series Space 1999! (I liked that show.)

It does at that, but frankly it more closely resembles a Purifier with a couple of protrusions on the sides.

I'm not really seeing why people compare it to the Coercer... the only resemblence there is the side protrusions (but it has two, not one) and it's basically sort of a tube shape (like many other ships in EVE).

To illustrate the point to those that are thinking of the old Purifier.
New Purifier

Oh, by the way, Prisoner 1337 indeed! Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Haifisch Zahne
Hraka Manufacture GmbH
#79 - 2012-10-26 20:26:22 UTC
Yes, I can see why you are disappointed with the new Destroyers: adds a new kind of weapon system to a class of ships that are ALL turret based, can't take on cruisers (too bad they rule over frigates, kick ass in wolfpacks, and very simply aren't designed to take on a ship like that without numbers) , they're still just frigates (with twice as many guns of any I know), the Amarr one looks ike a bug... just like most Amarr ships do, the CCP devs don't understand the look and feel of they're own product (shame, shame on them), the Amarr one is mixed weapon system (go figure it's Amarr and sucks, and incidentally is similar to a few Amarr ships whose names I don't care to look up), the Amarr one doesn't have lasers (I think they said it did, no?), the Minmatar one is not mixed weapon systems like the Tempest (but unlike, obviously, the existing destroyer, but also, by and large, the Hurricane, Tornado, Tempest, Maelstrom, and if you will permit me, the Machariel and who only knows which frigates).

Yes, I think you are quite correct. Many good and well thought out points.



Vilnius Zar wrote:
Honestly, I'm a bit underwhelmed by the new Dessies. While I can understand the "lets use the 'other' weapon system" that's a bit too simplistic imo. They add nothing and do nothing compared to the current ones. They still **** frigs, they still suck against cruisers and they're still very very niche.

The Amarr one especially sucks, first of all the looks are... wrong, it looks like a giant bug from the top and is amazingly similar to the Coercer (while the other races have a very different look compared to the current ones) and looks like a lazy design by someone who doesn't understand Amarr design language. Then we get to the bonuses, range to nos/neut sounds cool but it doesn't do anything on a ship like this, it'll pwn frigs regardless of it and it'll die to cruisers regardless of it, especially with the low amount of midslots. It also forces it into scram range (not like it's fast&agile enough to avoid it). Then the split weapon systems, really... REALLY? Unbonused and useless.

Gallente one makes sense and is close to being OP, Caldari one makes sense ofcourse, the Minmatar does not make sense (if anything the Minnie one should be mixed weapon systems) and all 3 of those look awesome in their own way. The Amarr one adds nothing other than "look it's not laser based", it's bonuses are just weird and it's a terrible eye sore.

Haifisch Zahne
Hraka Manufacture GmbH
#80 - 2012-10-26 20:31:34 UTC
I rather like the look of the Minmatar frigate. Very fond of its snow plow (for ice belts, I presume). The pill box is a little too reminiscent for me of the Monitor, a superb little ship that held its own against the Merrimac, which also held its own.