These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP allow miners to defend against bumpers ?

Author
Phoenix Bibbs
Fweddit
Free Range Chikuns
#381 - 2012-10-26 14:33:39 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Andski wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
It doesn't help. Why would more expensive losses equate to more meaningful to everyone? It just means people would be MORE risk averse you twit. You raise the barrier of entry, they dont want to risk loosing the ship, they end up not playing OR paying, subscriptions go down, and gg Eve. GG free expansions, GG more content, expanding company, more gameplay, more fixed, more ANYTHING.


because an erebus hull, which represents ~40,000 max-yield hulk hours of veldspar mining for the trit requirements alone, being so easily replaced, is somehow good for the game?


Would you remember what I said about barrier of entry? I don't care about your NAP alliances. I care about the new people coming in and trying to build up. You build whatever the hell you want, I just don't want to see Jonny Newbie play three weeks, find it impossible to afford a damn cruiser, and then quit.


Maybe the noobs should stay in frigs longer? If new players (myself included at the time) got over this bigger is better mentality then they'd actually be able to skill up their core skills instead of training for a Titan after being in the game for 2 hours.

Give me a choice of any ship in the game to fly and I'll take a Navy Issue Caracal or an Interceptor over some massive DPS battleship any day. So as a player who has capital skills who prefers a cruiser I don't think it'll hurt little Johnny to sit in a frig for a few extra weeks.

So in reality, if prices go up the noobs will stay in smaller ships for longer which in turn will force them to skill up their core navigation/weaponry skills and in the end they'll end up better pilots. HUZZAH, the New Order has found another way to continue to improve the game. We are now providing important learning opportunities for new players across New Eden.

ALL HAIL THE NEW ORDER, ALL HAIL THE CODE, ALL HAIL JAMES 315 THE SAVIOR AND PROTECTOR OF HIGH SEC.
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#382 - 2012-10-26 14:35:59 UTC
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:
crap


You clearly have no idea how this game works. Also not everyone wants to be in small ships. Not everyone is you.

Also also James is not a "savior" of highsec. He is an undesirable, much like you.
Raziel Walker
NPC Tax Evasion Corp
#383 - 2012-10-26 14:37:44 UTC
I only started (afk) mining after being pointed at minerbumping.

James does not like people afk mining and decided to take action against them.
If you are a miner and don't like being bumped YOU can take action against him and his agents. You can pay some minor blackmail fee. Or you can move to another system. Or you can suicide gank bumpers. Or you can find other ways to mine. Or you can try to reduce mining cycles lost by more active piloting.

James adds content to the game. I applaud his initiative.
I admit I don't know how I would respond if I was targeted but I would probably just take the loss in mining yield for granted and not pay the fee even though it would be the smart thing to do from an economical point of view.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#384 - 2012-10-26 14:42:35 UTC
CCP has been asked in the past to make mining more of a mini-game, but it appears the community has taken care of the issue for them.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Luc Chastot
#385 - 2012-10-26 15:00:28 UTC
Zkaor wrote:
Luc Chastot wrote:
With all the isk you make from afk mining, you could easily fund a mercenary corp that will wardec and hunt the bumpers. James 514 and his minions are silly, but I think you people deserve what they do. Use your brain.



You accuse me of somthing I did not do ... AFK mining.


You accuse me of something I did not do ... accusing only you of afk mining. "You" can also be plural.

If you want to fight them, then why have you not wardec-ed them? Why must CCP treat you different/better? We're all paying this game (in one way or another).

HTFU or STFU.

Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#386 - 2012-10-26 15:17:43 UTC
Luc Chastot wrote:
Zkaor wrote:
Luc Chastot wrote:
With all the isk you make from afk mining, you could easily fund a mercenary corp that will wardec and hunt the bumpers. James 514 and his minions are silly, but I think you people deserve what they do. Use your brain.



You accuse me of somthing I did not do ... AFK mining.


You accuse me of something I did not do ... accusing only you of afk mining. "You" can also be plural.

If you want to fight them, then why have you not wardec-ed them? Why must CCP treat you different/better? We're all paying this game (in one way or another).

HTFU or STFU.


Because they're spread out between a handful of corps and a the rest NPC corps. It is not financially feasible to simply "htfu" and dec them, as 315 has spread his 'forces' out to ensure their safety.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#387 - 2012-10-26 15:22:24 UTC
NPC alt posters are all belligerent undesirables.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#388 - 2012-10-26 15:25:08 UTC
Abdiel Kavash wrote:
You can defend against anyone in roughly 80% of the universe. It is your fault for staying in the part that does not allow you to do so.


Screw the like button, ccp we need a "this guy wins eve" button.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#389 - 2012-10-26 16:03:45 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:
crap


You clearly have no idea how this game works. Also not everyone wants to be in small ships. Not everyone is you.

Also also James is not a "savior" of highsec. He is an undesirable, much like you.


James is playing the game the way it was meant to be played, unlike afk miners and botters. In fact, emergent gameplay pioneers are the epitome of desirable, as they help demonstrate the possibilities in EVE online. Things like hulkageddon and burn jita are what make EVE famous, not undesirables such as yourself, who do nothing but f1 space rocks 23/7
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#390 - 2012-10-26 16:06:51 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:
crap


You clearly have no idea how this game works. Also not everyone wants to be in small ships. Not everyone is you.

Also also James is not a "savior" of highsec. He is an undesirable, much like you.


James is playing the game the way it was meant to be played, unlike afk miners and botters. In fact, emergent gameplay pioneers are the epitome of desirable, as they help demonstrate the possibilities in EVE online. Things like hulkageddon and burn jita are what make EVE famous, not undesirables such as yourself, who do nothing but f1 space rocks 23/7


I'd agree if he only targeted bots. No one likes bots. I've seen him target actively non-bot, non-afk players. That's where I take my issues. Also his grandiose claims of being elected Protector of etc etc when he...really isn't protecting anything.

You and other undesirable belligerents are interrupting EULA sanctioned and legitimate game play for active miners.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#391 - 2012-10-26 16:12:00 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:
crap


You clearly have no idea how this game works. Also not everyone wants to be in small ships. Not everyone is you.

Also also James is not a "savior" of highsec. He is an undesirable, much like you.


James is playing the game the way it was meant to be played, unlike afk miners and botters. In fact, emergent gameplay pioneers are the epitome of desirable, as they help demonstrate the possibilities in EVE online. Things like hulkageddon and burn jita are what make EVE famous, not undesirables such as yourself, who do nothing but f1 space rocks 23/7


I'd agree if he only targeted bots. No one likes bots. I've seen him target actively non-bot, non-afk players. That's where I take my issues. Also his grandiose claims of being elected Protector of etc etc when he...really isn't protecting anything.

You and other undesirable belligerents are interrupting EULA sanctioned and legitimate game play for active miners.


I do not see an issue with James and his New Order extending their actions to bot/afk sympathisers and other undesirables.

While you are certainly allowed to mine your rocks and even defend your fellow undesirables under the EULA/TOS/whatever, James and the New Order are equally allowed to disrupt it. That is the sandbox. That is EVE.

In this thread we have even discussed the tactics and mechanics available to you to deal with James and the New Order, but you seem to refuse to attempt any of them, citing the "difficulty" or "cost" of pursuing such avenues of defense or retaliation. It is a shame that you let your own vices (greed, laziness) further disrupt your actions.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#392 - 2012-10-26 16:13:22 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
You and other undesirable belligerents are interrupting EULA sanctioned and legitimate game play for active miners.


Yea... they wish. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#393 - 2012-10-26 16:13:50 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
You and other undesirable belligerents are interrupting EULA sanctioned and legitimate game play for active miners.
…which is itself EULA-sanctioned and legitimate game play.
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#394 - 2012-10-26 16:16:05 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
I do not see an issue with James and his New Order extending their actions to bot/afk sympathisers and other undesirables.

Your definition of sympathizer is anyone who mines actively as a legitimate career.

Quote:
While you are certainly allowed to mine your rocks and even defend your fellow desirables under the EULA/TOS/whatever, James and the New Order are equally allowed to disrupt it. That is the sandbox. That is EVE.

except when there's no in game mechanic to defend against it, such as a space anchor. If that existed, we wouldn't even be talking.

Quote:
In this thread we have even discussed the tactics and mechanics available to you to deal with James and the New Order, but you seem to refuse to attempt any of them, citing the "difficulty" or "cost" of pursuing such avenues of defense or retaliation.

Please show how war deccing 12 different corps is feasible for a few small time miners with a tiny budget for anything.

Quote:
It is a shame that you let your own vices (greed, laziness) further disrupt your actions.

It is a shame that you let your own vices (wrath, trolling) further disrupt your logic.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#395 - 2012-10-26 16:24:24 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
except when there's no in game mechanic to defend against it, such as a space anchor.
Sure there is. You can try to dodge him, or you can just blow him up.
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#396 - 2012-10-26 16:28:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Tali Ambraelle
Tippia wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
except when there's no in game mechanic to defend against it, such as a space anchor.
Sure there is. You can try to dodge him, or you can just blow him up.


Dodge: There's 5-15 of them on the field at a time. Can you tell me how any mining barge is going to dodge that many ships MWDing at them? (Not being snarky here: I'm dead serious, how do you stop something like that?)

Blow Up: True, they could, if they were all in one corp. As it stands, millions of isk would need to be paid to war dec each person involved as they are all in different corps or NPC corps. If they were in a single entity, I'd agree with you and tell the miners to htfu and hire a merc contract to wipe them off the face of New Eden.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#397 - 2012-10-26 16:31:21 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Dodge: There's 5-15 of them on the field at a time.
…and they're not all going to come at you at once since that would mean that 4–14 of them would miss, and that would be a waste of their energy.

Quote:
Blow Up: True, they could, if they were all in one corp.
So organise yourself. Take a corp each. Or just blow them up anyway.

Regardless, claiming that there are no mechanics to defend against it is blatantly dishonest.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#398 - 2012-10-26 16:31:35 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Tali Ambraelle wrote:
except when there's no in game mechanic to defend against it, such as a space anchor.
Sure there is. You can try to dodge him, or you can just blow him up.


Dodge: There's 5-15 of them on the field at a time. Can you tell me how any mining barge is going to dodge that many ships MWDing at them? (Not being snarky here: I'm dead serious, how do you stop something like that?)


I manage it in a megathron vs 100+...
Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#399 - 2012-10-26 16:34:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Tali Ambraelle
Tippia wrote:
…and they're not all going to come at you at once since that would mean that 4–14 of them would miss, and that would be a waste of their energy.

They do come all at once actually.

Quote:
So organize yourself. Take a corp each. Or just blow them up anyway. Regardless, claiming that there are no mechanics to defend against it is blatantly dishonest.


I'll concede at the war dec point. I just don't have enough isk to dec them all.

Also who mines in a megathron?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#400 - 2012-10-26 16:37:42 UTC
Tali Ambraelle wrote:


Also who mines in a megathron?


Miners arnt the only people that get bumped.